A new approximate ``absolute'' scale of electronegativity, or electroaffinity, is set up. The absolute electroaffinity on this scale is equal to the average of ionization potential and electron affinity. These quantities must, however, in general, be calculated not in the ordinary way, but for suitable ``valence states'' of the positive and negative ion. Also, the electroaffinity of an atom has different values for different values of its valence; in general the electroaffinity as here calculated (in agreement with chemical facts) is larger for higher valences. Electroaffinity values have been calculated here for H, Li, B, C, N, O, F, Cl, Br, I. They show good agreement in known cases with Pauling's electronegativity scale based on thermal data, and with the dipole moment scale. The present electronegativity scale (like the others) is rather largely empirical, especially as to its quantitative validity; and it remains to be seen whether or not the latter will be more than very rough when tested for a wider range of cases. Nevertheless the new scale has a degree of theoretical background and foundation which throws some new light on the physical meaning of the concept of electronegativity (or electro‐affinity). The basis of the present scale, it should be mentioned, is simpler and more certain for univalent than for polyvalent atoms.—The nature of valence states of atoms is briefly discussed. It is hoped that the tabulations of atomic valence state energies and valence state ionization potentials and electron affinities given at the end of this paper may be useful in problems of molecular structure.

1.
Cf.
J. C.
Slater
,
Phys. Rev.
35
,
514
5
(
1930
) for the case of H2.
Also
S.
Weinbaum
,
J. Chem. Phys.
1
,
593
(
1933
).
2.
Cf.
L.
Pauling
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
54
,
3570
(
1932
).
3.
F.
Hund
,
Zeits. f. Physik
73
,
1
(
1931
);
cf. especially pp. 18–19.
4.
J. C.
Slater
,
Phys. Rev.
34
,
1293
(
1929
).
J. H.
Van Vleck
,
Phys. Rev.
45
,
405
(
1934
) has recently given a simpler method of getting the energy formulas.
(a) At this point a question which might be raised will be answered. Why cannot we make use of excited triplet states of H, e.g., 1s2s, S3, in combination with P3 of Cl+, since S1+P'1 is capable of giving Σ+1 of HCl? The energy of 1s2s, S3 and other triplet states should be only about 0.7 volt higher than that of 1s2, S1 if we assume zero electron affinity for nx, n>1, in H, and the total energy of S1+P'1 would be considerably lower than that of (1s2,1S) plus (3p4, D1 or S1). It is true that such terms should contribute to Σ+1 of HCl, but these contributions would probably be small compared with the others, for the reason that Cl+ (3P) would give rise to an electron configuration 3pπ33pσ or 3pπ23pσ2, instead of the required 3pπ4. The question just raised and answered for H has its analogue for Cl and the others, although because of the much larger electron affinity for formation of unexcited Cl, etc., the (unstable) excited states are relatively much higher in energy than for H, and so need much less to be considered.
5.
H. M.
Smallwood
,
Zeits. f. Physik. Chemie
B19
,
242
(
1932
).
J. G.
Malone
,
J. Chem. Phys.
1
,
197
(
1933
);
M. G.
Malone
and
A. L.
Ferguson
,
J. Chem. Phys.
2
,
99
(
1934
).
6.
J. H.
Van Vleck
,
J. Chem. Phys.
2
,
22
(
1934
). (Van Vleck considers a range of valence states of carbon from q4, V4 (complete s−p hybridization, μ = 14) to sp3, V4 (no hybridization, μ = 1 in Van Vleck’s Eq. (7).)
(a)Slater, Condon, and Shortley, in part, and recently Van Vleck (Reference 4, Eqs. 22, 38).
Cf. Slater, Reference 4, p. 1133.
7.
Cf.
J. C.
Slater
,
Phys. Rev.
38
,
1109
(
1931
), discussion of several electrons with only spin degeneracy. The results given there can of course be used even if two or more electrons are on the same atom.
8.
G.
Glockler
,
Phys. Rev.
46
,
111
(
1934
).
9.
W. W.
Lozier
,
Phys. Rev.
46
,
268
(
1934
).
10.
J. E.
Mayer
and
Maltbie
,
Zeits. f. Physik
75
,
748
(
1932
).
11.
J. E.
Mayer
and
L.
Helmholtz
,
Zeits. f. Physik
75
,
19
(
1932
).
12.
H. von Wartenberg, G. Sprenger, and J. Taylor, Bodenstein‐Festband, p. 61.
(Ergänzungsband of the Zeits. f. Physik. Chemie, Leipzig, 1931.)
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.