The complexity of electrochemical interfaces has led to the development of several approximate density functional theory (DFT)-based schemes to study reaction thermodynamics and kinetics as a function of electrode potential. While fixed electrode potential conditions can be simulated with grand canonical ensemble DFT (GCE-DFT), various electrostatic corrections on canonical, constant charge DFT are often applied instead. In this work, we present a systematic derivation and analysis of the different electrostatic corrections on canonical DFT to understand their physical validity, implicit assumptions, and scope of applicability. Our work highlights the need to carefully address the suitability of a given model for the problem under study, especially if physical or chemical insight in addition to reaction energetics is sought. In particular, we analytically show that the different corrections cannot differentiate between electrostatic interactions and covalent or charge-transfer interactions. By numerically testing different models for CO2 adsorption on a single-atom catalyst as a function of the electrode potential, we further show that computed capacitances, dipole moments, and the obtained physical insight depend sensitively on the chosen approximation. These features limit the scope, generality, and physical insight of these corrective schemes despite their proven practicality for specific systems and energetics. Finally, we suggest guidelines for choosing different electrostatic corrections and propose the use of conceptual DFT to develop more general approximations for electrochemical interfaces and reactions using canonical DFT.
REFERENCES
1.
Atomic-Scale Modelling of Electrochemical Systems
, edited by M. M.
Melander
, T. T. L.
Laurila
, and K.
Laasonen
(John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
, Chichester
, 2022
).2.
A. Y.
Lozovoi
, A.
Alavi
, J.
Kohanoff
, and R. M.
Lynden-Bell
, “Ab initio simulation of charged slabs at constant chemical potential
,” J. Chem. Phys.
115
, 1661
–1669
(2001
).3.
N. D.
Mermin
, “Thermal properties of the inhomogeneous electron gas
,” Phys. Rev.
137
, A1441
–A1443
(1965
).4.
R.
Sundararaman
, W. A.
Goddard
, and T. A.
Arias
, “Grand canonical electronic density-functional theory: Algorithms and applications to electrochemistry
,” J. Chem. Phys.
146
, 114104
(2017
).5.
M. M.
Melander
, M. J.
Kuisma
, T. E. K.
Christensen
, and K.
Honkala
, “Grand-canonical approach to density functional theory of electrocatalytic systems: Thermodynamics of solid-liquid interfaces at constant ion and electrode potentials
,” J. Chem. Phys.
150
, 041706
(2019
).6.
M. M.
Melander
, “Grand canonical rate theory for electrochemical and electrocatalytic systems I: General formulation and proton-coupled electron transfer reactions
,” J. Electrochem. Soc.
167
, 116518
(2020
).7.
N.
Bonnet
, T.
Morishita
, O.
Sugino
, and M.
Otani
, “First-principles molecular dynamics at a constant electrode potential
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
109
, 266101
(2012
).8.
W.
Schmickler
and E.
Santos
, “Desorption of hydrogen from graphene induced by charge injection
,” ChemElectroChem
9
, e202200511
(2022
).9.
M. M.
Melander
, “Grand canonical ensemble approach to electrochemical thermodynamics, kinetics, and model Hamiltonians
,” Curr. Opin. Electrochem.
29
, 100749
(2021
).10.
N.
Abidi
and S. N.
Steinmann
, “How are transition states modeled in heterogeneous electrocatalysis?,
” Curr. Opin. Electrochem.
33
, 100940
(2022
).11.
S.
Vijay
, W.
Ju
, S.
Brückner
, S.-C.
Tsang
, P.
Strasser
, and K.
Chan
, “Unified mechanistic understanding of CO2 reduction to CO on transition metal and single atom catalysts
,” Nat. Catal.
4
, 1024
–1031
(2021
).12.
S.
Vijay
, G.
Kastlunger
, J. A.
Gauthier
, A.
Patel
, and K.
Chan
, “Force-based method to determine the potential dependence in electrochemical barriers
,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
13
, 5719
–5725
(2022
).13.
A. M.
Patel
, S.
Vijay
, G.
Kastlunger
, J. K.
Nørskov
, and K.
Chan
, “Generalizable trends in electrochemical protonation barriers
,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
12
, 5193
–5200
(2021
).14.
S.
Vijay
, J. A.
Gauthier
, H. H.
Heenen
, V. J.
Bukas
, H. H.
Kristoffersen
, and K.
Chan
, “Dipole-field interactions determine the CO2 reduction activity of 2D Fe–N–C single-atom catalysts
,” ACS Catal.
10
, 7826
–7835
(2020
).15.
S. R.
Kelly
, C.
Kirk
, K.
Chan
, and J. K.
Nørskov
, “Electric field effects in oxygen reduction kinetics: Rationalizing pH dependence at the Pt(111), Au(111), and Au(100) electrodes
,” J. Phys. Chem. C
124
, 14581
–14591
(2020
).16.
S.
Ringe
, C. G.
Morales-Guio
, L. D.
Chen
, M.
Fields
, T. F.
Jaramillo
, C.
Hahn
, and K.
Chan
, “Double layer charging driven carbon dioxide adsorption limits the rate of electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction on gold
,” Nat. Commun.
11
, 33
(2020
).17.
J. A.
Gauthier
, C. F.
Dickens
, H. H.
Heenen
, S.
Vijay
, S.
Ringe
, and K.
Chan
, “Unified approach to implicit and explicit solvent simulations of electrochemical reaction energetics
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
15
, 6895
–6906
(2019
).18.
S.
Ringe
, E. L.
Clark
, J.
Resasco
, A.
Walton
, B.
Seger
, A. T.
Bell
, and K.
Chan
, “Understanding cation effects in electrochemical CO2 reduction
,” Energy Environ. Sci.
12
, 3001
–3014
(2019
).19.
L. D.
Chen
, M.
Urushihara
, K.
Chan
, and J. K.
Nørskov
, “Electric field effects in electrochemical CO2 reduction
,” ACS Catal.
6
, 7133
–7139
(2016
).20.
K.
Chan
and J. K.
Nørskov
, “Potential dependence of electrochemical barriers from ab initio calculations
,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
7
, 1686
–1690
(2016
).21.
K.
Chan
and J. K.
Nørskov
, “Electrochemical barriers made simple
,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
6
, 2663
–2668
(2015
).22.
J. A.
Gauthier
, C. F.
Dickens
, S.
Ringe
, and K.
Chan
, “Practical considerations for continuum models applied to surface electrochemistry
,” ChemPhysChem
20
, 3074
–3080
(2019
).23.
S.
Ringe
, “The importance of a charge transfer descriptor for the screening of electrocatalysts at the example of CO2 reduction,
” ChemRxiv:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-hvf9g (2022
).24.
S. D.
Beinlich
, N. G.
Hörmann
, and K.
Reuter
, “Field effects at protruding defect sites in electrocatalysis at metal electrodes?,
” ACS Catal.
12
, 6143
–6148
(2022
).25.
N. G.
Hörmann
, N.
Marzari
, and K.
Reuter
, “Electrosorption at metal surfaces from first principles
,” Comput. Mater.
6
, 136
(2020
).26.
G. A.
Tsirlina
, O. A.
Petrii
, R. R.
Nazmutdinov
, and D. V.
Glukhov
, “Frumkin correction: Microscopic view
,” Russ. J. Electrochem.
38
, 132
–140
(2002
).27.
S.
Trasatti
, “The “absolute” electrode potential—The end of the story
,” Electrochim. Acta
35
, 269
–271
(1990
).28.
P.
Geerlings
, F.
De Proft
, and W.
Langenaeker
, “Conceptual density functional theory
,” Chem. Rev.
103
, 1793
–1874
(2003
).29.
M.
Franco-Pérez
, P. W.
Ayers
, J. L.
Gázquez
, and A.
Vela
, “Thermodynamic responses of electronic systems
,” J. Chem. Phys.
147
, 094105
(2017
).30.
T.
Binninger
, “Piecewise nonlinearity and capacitance in the joint density functional theory of extended interfaces
,” Phys. Rev. B
103
, L161403
(2021
).31.
M.
Melander
, T.
Wu
, and K.
Honkala
, “Constant inner potential DFT for modelling electrochemical systems under constant potential and bias
,” ChemRxiv:10.26434/chemrxiv-2021-r621x-v3 (2023
).32.
C. G.
Van de Walle
and R. M.
Martin
, “Theoretical calculations of heterojunction discontinuities in the Si/Ge system
,” Phys. Rev. B
34
, 5621
–5634
(1986
).33.
J. K.
Nørskov
, J.
Rossmeisl
, A.
Logadottir
, L.
Lindqvist
, J. R.
Kitchin
, T.
Bligaard
, and H.
Jónsson
, “Origin of the overpotential for Oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode
,” J. Phys. Chem. B
108
, 17886
–17892
(2004
).34.
D.
Bruch
, C.
Balzer
, and Z.-G.
Wang
, “Thermodynamics of electrolyte solutions near charged surfaces: Constant surface charge vs constant surface potential
,” J. Chem. Phys.
156
, 174704
(2022
).35.
D.
Gunceler
, K.
Letchworth-Weaver
, R.
Sundararaman
, K. A.
Schwarz
, and T. A.
Arias
, “The importance of nonlinear fluid response in joint density-functional theory studies of battery systems
,” Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng.
21
, 074005
(2013
).36.
J.
Wu
, “Understanding the electric double-layer structure, capacitance, and charging dynamics
,” Chem. Rev.
122
, 10821
–10859
(2022
).37.
J.
Huang
, “Surface charging behaviors of electrocatalytic interfaces with partially charged chemisorbates
,” Curr. Opin. Electrochem.
33
, 100938
(2022
).38.
P.
Hutchison
, R. E.
Warburton
, A. V.
Soudackov
, and S.
Hammes-Schiffer
, “Multicapacitor approach to interfacial proton-coupled electron transfer thermodynamics at constant potential
,” J. Phys. Chem. C
125
, 21891
–21901
(2021
).39.
O.
Gharbi
, M. T. T.
Tran
, B.
Tribollet
, M.
Turmine
, and V.
Vivier
, “Revisiting cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy analysis for capacitance measurements
,” Electrochim. Acta
343
, 136109
(2020
).40.
J.
Kang
, J.
Wen
, S. H.
Jayaram
, A.
Yu
, and X.
Wang
, “Development of an equivalent circuit model for electrochemical double layer capacitors (EDLCs) with distinct electrolytes
,” Electrochim. Acta
115
, 587
–598
(2014
).41.
J.
Huang
and C.-K.
Li
, “Impedance response of electrochemical interfaces: Part II-chemisorption
,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
33
, 164003
(2021
).42.
N.
Karmodak
, S.
Vijay
, G.
Kastlunger
, and K.
Chan
, “Computational screening of single and di-atom catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction
,” ACS Catal.
12
, 4818
–4824
(2022
).43.
A.
Stone
, The Theory of Intermolecular Forces
(Oxford University Press
, 2013
).44.
W.
Schmickler
, “The surface dipole moment of species adsorbed from a solution
,” J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem.
249
, 25
–33
(1988
).45.
Under electrochemical conditions or in GCE-DFT this practice would be inapplicable because the work function does not change because it is fixed by the electrode potential.
46.
D.
Luan
and J.
Xiao
, “Adaptive electric fields embedded electrochemical barrier calculations
,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
14
, 685
–693
(2023
).47.
L.
Komorowski
, J.
Lipiński
, and P.
Szarek
, “Polarization justified Fukui functions
,” J. Chem. Phys.
131
, 124120
(2009
).48.
T.
Clarys
, T.
Stuyver
, F.
De Proft
, and P.
Geerlings
, “Extending conceptual DFT to include additional variables: Oriented external electric field
,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
23
, 990
–1005
(2021
).49.
W. R.
Fawcett
, “Fifty years of studies of double layer effects in electrode kinetics—A personal view
,” J. Solid State Electrochem.
15
, 1347
(2011
).50.
D.-Q.
Liu
, M.
Kang
, D.
Perry
, C.-H.
Chen
, G.
West
, X.
Xia
, S.
Chaudhuri
, Z. P. L.
Laker
, N. R.
Wilson
, G. N.
Meloni
, M. M.
Melander
, R. J.
Maurer
, and P. R.
Unwin
, “Adiabatic versus non-adiabatic electron transfer at 2D electrode materials
,” Nat. Commun.
12
, 7110
(2021
).51.
W.
Schmickler
, “A theory of adiabatic electron-transfer reactions
,” J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem.
204
, 31
–43
(1986
).52.
J.
Huang
, P.
Li
, and S.
Chen
, “Quantitative understanding of the sluggish kinetics of hydrogen reactions in alkaline media based on a microscopic Hamiltonian model for the Volmer step
,” J. Phys. Chem. C
123
, 17325
–17334
(2019
).53.
C. G.
Vayenas
and S.
Brosda
, “Electron donation–backdonation and the rules of catalytic promotion
,” Top. Catal.
57
, 1287
–1301
(2014
).54.
R. A.
Miranda-Quintana
, P. W.
Ayers
, and F.
Heidar-Zadeh
, “Reactivity and charge transfer beyond the parabolic model: The “|Δμ| big is good” principle
,” ChemistrySelect
6
, 96
–100
(2021
).55.
R. A.
Miranda-Quintana
and J.
Smiatek
, “Theoretical insights into specific ion effects and strong-weak acid-base rules for ions in solution: Deriving the law of matching solvent affinities from first principles
,” ChemPhysChem
21
, 2605
–2617
(2020
).56.
R. A.
Miranda-Quintana
, M.
Martínez González
, and P. W.
Ayers
, “Electronegativity and redox reactions
,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
18
, 22235
–22243
(2016
).57.
The potential-of-zero-charge effects are implicitly included in the reference state chosen for Eq. (37).
58.
T.
Clark
, “Polarization, donor–acceptor interactions, and covalent contributions in weak interactions: A clarification
,” J. Mol. Model.
23
, 297
(2017
).59.
J.
Chen
, C.
Li
, and G.
Shi
, “Graphene materials for electrochemical capacitors
,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
4
, 1244
–1253
(2013
).60.
F.
Dominguez-Flores
, E.
Santos
, W.
Schmickler
, and F.
Juarez
, “Interaction between chloride ions mediated by carbon nanotubes: A chemical attraction
,” J. Solid State Electrochem.
24
, 3207
(2020
).61.
While some approximations, such as dielectric continuum solvent/electrolyte models, need to be used currently in practical GCE-DFT calculations, it should be noted that canonical DFT inherits all limitations of current GCE-DFT methods but many more are introduced when using canonical DFT and electrostatic corrections.
62.
E.
Skúlason
, V.
Tripkovic
, M. E.
Björketun
, S.
Gudmundsdóttir
, G.
Karlberg
, J.
Rossmeisl
, T.
Bligaard
, H.
Jónsson
, and J. K.
Nørskov
, “Modeling the electrochemical hydrogen oxidation and evolution reactions on the basis of density functional theory calculations
,” J. Phys. Chem. C
114
, 18182
–18197
(2010
).63.
J.
Rossmeisl
, E.
Skúlason
, M. E.
Björketun
, V.
Tripkovic
, and J. K.
Nørskov
, “Modeling the electrified solid–liquid interface
,” Chem. Phys. Lett.
466
, 68
–71
(2008
).64.
M. D.
Hossain
, Y.
Huang
, T. H.
Yu
, W. A.
Goddard
III, and Z.
Luo
, “Reaction mechanism and kinetics for CO2 reduction on nickel single atom catalysts from quantum mechanics
,” Nat. Commun.
11
, 2256
(2020
).65.
P.
Besalú-Sala
, M.
Solà
, J. M.
Luis
, and M.
Torrent-Sucarrat
, “Fast and simple evaluation of the catalysis and selectivity induced by external electric fields
,” ACS Catal.
11
, 14467
–14479
(2021
).66.
N. M.
Hoffmann
, X.
Wang
, and T. C.
Berkelbach
, “Linear free energy relationships in electrostatic catalysis
,” ACS Catal.
12
, 8237
–8241
(2022
).67.
J.-S.
Filhol
and M.-L.
Doublet
, “Conceptual surface electrochemistry and new redox descriptors
,” J. Phys. Chem. C
118
, 19023
–19031
(2014
).68.
T.
Wu
, M. M.
Melander
, and K.
Honkala
, “Coadsorption of NRR and HER intermediates determines the performance of Ru-N4 toward electrocatalytic N2 reduction
,” ACS Catal.
12
, 2505
–2512
(2022
).69.
G.
Kastlunger
, P.
Lindgren
, and A. A.
Peterson
, “Controlled-potential simulation of elementary electrochemical reactions: Proton discharge on metal surfaces
,” J. Phys. Chem. C
122
, 12771
–12781
(2018
).70.
J.
Enkovaara
, C.
Rostgaard
, J. J.
Mortensen
, J.
Chen
, M.
Dułak
, L.
Ferrighi
, J.
Gavnholt
, C.
Glinsvad
, V.
Haikola
, H. A.
Hansen
, H. H.
Kristoffersen
, M.
Kuisma
, A. H.
Larsen
, L.
Lehtovaara
, M.
Ljungberg
, O.
Lopez-Acevedo
, P. G.
Moses
, J.
Ojanen
, T.
Olsen
, V.
Petzold
, N. A.
Romero
, J.
Stausholm-Møller
, M.
Strange
, G. A.
Tritsaris
, M.
Vanin
, M.
Walter
, B.
Hammer
, H.
Häkkinen
, G. K. H.
Madsen
, R. M.
Nieminen
, J. K.
Nørskov
, M.
Puska
, T. T.
Rantala
, J.
Schiøtz
, K. S.
Thygesen
, and K. W.
Jacobsen
, “Electronic structure calculations with GPAW: A real-space implementation of the projector augmented-wave method
,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
22
, 253202
(2010
).71.
A.
Held
and M.
Walter
, “Simplified continuum solvent model with a smooth cavity based on volumetric data
,” J. Chem. Phys.
141
, 174108
(2014
).72.
J.
Wellendorff
, K. T.
Lundgaard
, A.
Møgelhøj
, V.
Petzold
, D. D.
Landis
, J. K.
Nørskov
, T.
Bligaard
, and K. W.
Jacobsen
, “Density functionals for surface science: Exchange-correlation model development with Bayesian error estimation
,” Phys. Rev. B
85
, 235149
(2012
).73.
M.
Valiev
, E. J.
Bylaska
, N.
Govind
, K.
Kowalski
, T. P.
Straatsma
, H. J. J.
Van Dam
, D.
Wang
, J.
Nieplocha
, E.
Apra
, T. L.
Windus
, and W. A.
de Jong
, “NWChem: A comprehensive and scalable open-source solution for large scale molecular simulations
,” Comput. Phys. Commun.
181
, 1477
–1489
(2010
).74.
S.
Grimme
, J.
Antony
, S.
Ehrlich
, and H.
Krieg
, “A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu
,” J. Chem. Phys.
132
, 154104
(2010
).75.
R. A.
Kendall
, T. H.
Dunning
, and R. J.
Harrison
, “Electron affinities of the first-row atoms revisited. systematic basis sets and wave functions
,” J. Chem. Phys.
96
, 6796
–6806
(1992
).76.
J. C.
Zapata
and L. K.
McKemmish
, “Computation of dipole moments: A recommendation on the choice of the basis set and the level of theory
,” J. Phys. Chem. A
124
, 7538
–7548
(2020
).© 2023 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.
2023
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.
