Modern semiempirical electronic structure methods have considerable promise in drug discovery as universal “force fields” that can reliably model biological and drug-like molecules, including alternative tautomers and protonation states. Herein, we compare the performance of several neglect of diatomic differential overlap-based semiempirical (MNDO/d, AM1, PM6, PM6-D3H4X, PM7, and ODM2), density-functional tight-binding based (DFTB3, DFTB/ChIMES, GFN1-xTB, and GFN2-xTB) models with pure machine learning potentials (ANI-1x and ANI-2x) and hybrid quantum mechanical/machine learning potentials (AIQM1 and QDπ) for a wide range of data computed at a consistent ωB97X/6-31G* level of theory (as in the ANI-1x database). This data includes conformational energies, intermolecular interactions, tautomers, and protonation states. Additional comparisons are made to a set of natural and synthetic nucleic acids from the artificially expanded genetic information system that has important implications for the design of new biotechnology and therapeutics. Finally, we examine the acid/base chemistry relevant for RNA cleavage reactions catalyzed by small nucleolytic ribozymes, DNAzymes, and ribonucleases. Overall, the hybrid quantum mechanical/machine learning potentials appear to be the most robust for these datasets, and the recently developed QDπ model performs exceptionally well, having especially high accuracy for tautomers and protonation states relevant to drug discovery.
REFERENCES
1.
T.-S.
Lee
, B. K.
Allen
, T. J.
Giese
, Z.
Guo
, P.
Li
, C.
Lin
, T. D.
McGee
, Jr., D. A.
Pearlman
, B. K.
Radak
, Y.
Tao
, H.-C.
Tsai
, H.
Xu
, W.
Sherman
, and D. M.
York
, “Alchemical binding free energy calculations in AMBER20: Advances and best practices for drug discovery
,” J. Chem. Inf. Model.
60
, 5595
–5623
(2020
).2.
W. L.
Jorgensen
, “Efficient drug lead discovery and optimization
,” Acc. Chem. Res.
42
, 724
–733
(2009
).3.
D. J.
Cole
, J. T.
Horton
, L.
Nelson
, and V.
Kurdekar
, “The future of force fields in computer-aided drug design
,” Future Med. Chem.
11
, 2359
–2363
(2019
).4.
A. D.
MacKerell
, Jr., “Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: Overview and issues
,” J. Comput. Chem.
25
, 1584
–1604
(2004
).5.
K.
Lindorff-Larsen
, P.
Maragakis
, S.
Piana
, M. P.
Eastwood
, R. O.
Dror
, and D. E.
Shaw
, “Systematic validation of protein force fields against experimental data
,” PLoS One
7
, e32131
(2012
).6.
S.
Piana
, J. L.
Klepeis
, and D. E.
Shaw
, “Assessing the accuracy of physical models used in protein-folding simulations: Quantitative evidence from long molecular dynamics simulations
,” Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
24
, 98
–105
(2014
).7.
W. L.
Jorgensen
, J.
Chandrasekhar
, J. D.
Madura
, R. W.
Impey
, and M. L.
Klein
, “Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water
,” J. Chem. Phys.
79
, 926
–935
(1983
).8.
H. W.
Horn
, W. C.
Swope
, J. W.
Pitera
, J. D.
Madura
, T. J.
Dick
, G. L.
Hura
, and T.
Head-Gordon
, “Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew
,” J. Chem. Phys.
120
, 9665
–9678
(2004
).9.
Y.
Wu
, H. L.
Tepper
, and G. A.
Voth
, “Flexible simple point-charge water model with improved liquid-state properties
,” J. Chem. Phys.
124
, 024503
(2006
).10.
S.
Izadi
, R.
Anandakrishnan
, and A. V.
Onufriev
, “Building water models: A different approach
,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
5
, 3863
–3871
(2014
).11.
S.
Izadi
and A. V.
Onufriev
, “Accuracy limit of rigid 3-point water models
,” J. Chem. Phys.
145
, 074501
–074510
(2016
).12.
I. S.
Joung
and T. E.
Cheatham
III, “Molecular dynamics simulations of the dynamic and energetic properties of alkali and halide ions using water-model-specific ion parameters
,” J. Phys. Chem. B
113
, 13279
–13290
(2009
).13.
P.
Li
, B. P.
Roberts
, D. K.
Chakravorty
, and K. M.
Merz
, Jr., “Rational design of particle mesh Ewald compatible Lennard-Jones parameters for +2 metal cations in explicit solvent
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
9
, 2733
–2748
(2013
).14.
P.
Li
and K. M.
Merz
, Jr., “Taking into account the ion-induced dipole interaction in the nonbonded model of ions
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
10
, 289
–297
(2014
).15.
P.
Li
and K. M.
Merz
, “Metal ion modeling using classical mechanics
,” Chem. Rev.
117
, 1564
–1686
(2017
).16.
P. E. M.
Lopes
, O.
Guvench
, and A. D.
MacKerell
, Jr., “Current status of protein force fields for molecular dynamics simulations
,” Methods Mol. Biol.
1215
, 47
–71
(2015
).17.
C.
Tian
, K.
Kasavajhala
, K. A. A.
Belfon
, L.
Raguette
, H.
Huang
, A. N.
Migues
, J.
Bickel
, Y.
Wang
, J.
Pincay
, Q.
Wu
, and C.
Simmerling
, “ff19SB: Amino-acid-specific protein backbone parameters trained against quantum mechanics energy surfaces in solution
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
16
, 528
–552
(2020
).18.
Y. C.
Martin
, “Experimental and pKa prediction aspects of tautomerism of drug-like molecules
,” Drug Discovery Today: Technol.
27
, 59
–64
(2018
).19.
F.
Milletti
and A.
Vulpetti
, “Tautomer preference in PDB complexes and its impact on structure-based drug discovery
,” J. Chem. Inf. Model.
50
, 1062
–1074
(2010
).20.
J. I.
Wells
, Pharmaceutical Preformulation: The Physicochemical Properties of Drug Substances
(E. Horwood
, Chichester, UK
, 1988
).21.
C. D.
Navo
and G.
Jiménez-Osés
, “Computer prediction of pKa values in small molecules and proteins
,” ACS Med. Chem. Lett.
12
, 1624
–1628
(2021
).22.
W.
Thiel
, “Semiempirical quantum–chemical methods
,” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci.
4
, 145
–157
(2014
).23.
K.
Kříž
and J.
Řezáč
, “Benchmarking of semiempirical quantum-mechanical methods on systems relevant to computer-aided drug design
,” J. Chem. Inf. Model.
60
, 1453
–1460
(2020
).24.
V.
Khanna
and S.
Ranganathan
, “Physicochemical property space distribution among human metabolites, drugs and toxins
,” BMC Bioinf.
10
, S10
(2009
).25.
T.
Darden
, D.
York
, and L.
Pedersen
, “Particle mesh Ewald: An N log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems
,” J. Chem. Phys.
98
, 10089
–10092
(1993
).26.
K.
Nam
, J.
Gao
, and D. M.
York
, “An efficient linear-scaling Ewald method for long-range electrostatic interactions in combined QM/MM calculations
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
1
, 2
–13
(2005
).27.
T. J.
Giese
, M. T.
Panteva
, H.
Chen
, and D. M.
York
, “Multipolar Ewald methods, 2: Applications using a quantum mechanical force field
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
11
, 451
–461
(2015
).28.
T. J.
Giese
and D. M.
York
, “Ambient-potential composite Ewald method for ab initio quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical molecular dynamics simulation
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
12
, 2611
–2632
(2016
).29.
J. T.
Margraf
, M.
Hennemann
, and T.
Clark
, “EMPIRE: A highly parallel semiempirical molecular orbital program: 3: Born-Oppenheimer molecular dynamics
,” J. Mol. Model.
26
, 43
(2020
).30.
B.
Hourahine
, B.
Aradi
, V.
Blum
, F.
Bonafé
, A.
Buccheri
, C.
Camacho
, C.
Cevallos
, M. Y.
Deshaye
, T.
Dumitrică
, A.
Dominguez
, S.
Ehlert
, M.
Elstner
, T.
van der Heide
, J.
Hermann
, S.
Irle
, J. J.
Kranz
, C.
Köhler
, T.
Kowalczyk
, T.
Kubař
, I. S.
Lee
, V.
Lutsker
, R. J.
Maurer
, S. K.
Min
, I.
Mitchell
, C.
Negre
, T. A.
Niehaus
, A. M. N.
Niklasson
, A. J.
Page
, A.
Pecchia
, G.
Penazzi
, M. P.
Persson
, J.
Řezáč
, C. G.
Sánchez
, M.
Sternberg
, M.
Stöhr
, F.
Stuckenberg
, A.
Tkatchenko
, V. W.-z.
Yu
, and T.
Frauenheim
, “DFTB+, a software package for efficient approximate density functional theory based atomistic simulations
,” J. Chem. Phys.
152
, 124101
(2020
).31.
T. J.
Giese
and D. M.
York
, “Development of a robust indirect approach for MM → QM free energy calculations that combines force-matched reference potential and Bennett’s acceptance ratio methods
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
15
, 5543
–5562
(2019
).32.
F. L.
Kearns
, P. S.
Hudson
, H. L.
Woodcock
, and S.
Boresch
, “Computing converged free energy differences between levels of theory via nonequilibrium work methods: Challenges and opportunities
,” J. Comput. Chem.
38
, 1376
–1388
(2017
).33.
S.
Boresch
and H. L.
Woodcock
, “Convergence of single-step free energy perturbation
,” Mol. Phys.
115
, 1200
–1213
(2017
).34.
P. S.
Hudson
, F.
Aviat
, R.
Meana-Pañeda
, L.
Warrensford
, B. C.
Pollard
, S.
Prasad
, M. R.
Jones
, H. L.
Woodcock
, and B. R.
Brooks
, “Obtaining QM/MM binding free energies in the SAMPL8 drugs of abuse challenge: Indirect approaches
,” J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des.
36
, 263
–277
(2022
).35.
A.
Schöller
, F.
Kearns
, H. L.
Woodcock
, and S.
Boresch
, “Optimizing the calculation of free energy differences in nonequilibrium work SQM/MM switching simulations
,” J. Phys. Chem. B
126
, 2798
–2811
(2022
).36.
G.
Arya
, “Models for recovering the energy landscape of conformational transitions from single-molecule pulling experiments
,” Mol. Simul.
42
, 1102
–1115
(2016
).37.
A. N.
Naganathan
, U.
Doshi
, and V.
Muñoz
, “Protein folding kinetics: Barrier effects in chemical and thermal denaturation experiments
,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.
129
, 5673
–5682
(2007
).38.
J.
Basran
, S.
Patel
, M. J.
Sutcliffe
, and N. S.
Scrutton
, “Importance of barrier shape in enzyme-catalyzed reactions
,” J. Biol. Chem.
276
, 6234
–6242
(2001
).39.
J.
Behler
, “Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations
,” J. Chem. Phys.
145
, 170901
(2016
).40.
K. T.
Butler
, D. W.
Davies
, H.
Cartwright
, O.
Isayev
, and A.
Walsh
, “Machine learning for molecular and materials science
,” Nature
559
, 547
–555
(2018
).41.
F.
Noé
, A.
Tkatchenko
, K.-R.
Müller
, and C.
Clementi
, “Machine learning for molecular simulation
,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.
71
, 361
–390
(2020
).42.
M.
Pinheiro
, Jr., F.
Ge
, N.
Ferré
, P. O.
Dral
, and M.
Barbatti
, “Choosing the right molecular machine learning potential
,” Chem. Sci.
12
, 14396
–14413
(2021
).43.
S.
Manzhos
and T.
Carrington
, Jr., “Neural network potential energy surfaces for small molecules and reactions
,” Chem. Rev.
121
, 10187
–10217
(2021
).44.
J.
Zeng
, L.
Cao
, and T.
Zhu
, “Neural network potentials
,” in Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Machine Learning
, edited by P. O.
Dral
(Elsevier
, 2022
) Chap. 12, pp. 279
–294
.45.
X.
Pan
, J.
Yang
, R.
Van
, E.
Epifanovsky
, J.
Ho
, J.
Huang
, J.
Pu
, Y.
Mei
, K.
Nam
, and Y.
Shao
, “Machine-learning-assisted free energy simulation of solution-phase and enzyme reactions
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
17
, 5745
–5758
(2021
).46.
P.
Zheng
, R.
Zubatyuk
, W.
Wu
, O.
Isayev
, and P. O.
Dral
, “Artificial intelligence-enhanced quantum chemical method with broad applicability
,” Nat. Commun.
12
, 7022
(2021
).47.
J.
Zeng
, T. J.
Giese
, Ş.
Ekesan
, and D. M.
York
, “Development of range-corrected deep learning potentials for fast, accurate quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical simulations of chemical reactions in solution
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
17
, 6993
–7009
(2021
).48.
T. J.
Giese
, J.
Zeng
, Ş.
Ekesan
, and D. M.
York
, “Combined QM/MM, machine learning path integral approach to compute free energy profiles and kinetic isotope effects in RNA cleavage reactions
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
18
, 4304
–4317
(2022
).49.
C. L.
Gómez-Flores
, D.
Maag
, M.
Kansari
, V.-Q.
Vuong
, S.
Irle
, F.
Gräter
, T.
Kubař
, and M.
Elstner
, “Accurate free energies for complex condensed-phase reactions using an artificial neural network corrected DFTB/MM methodology
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
18
, 1213
–1226
(2022
).50.
J.
Böser
, T.
Kubař
, M.
Elstner
, and D.
Maag
, “Reduction pathway of glutaredoxin 1 investigated with QM/MM molecular dynamics using a neural network correction
,” J. Chem. Phys.
157
, 154104
(2022
).51.
P. O.
Dral
, T.
Zubatiuk
, and B.-X.
Xue
, “Learning from multiple quantum chemical methods: Δ-learning, transfer learning, co-kriging, and beyond
,” in Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Machine Learning
, edited by P. O.
Dral
(Elsevier
, 2022
) Chap. 21, pp. 491
–507
.52.
J.
Behler
and M.
Parrinello
, “Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
98
, 146401
–146404
(2007
).53.
A. P.
Bartók
, M. C.
Payne
, R.
Kondor
, and G.
Csányi
, “Gaussian approximation potentials: The accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
104
, 136403
(2010
).54.
J.
Behler
, “Atom-centered symmetry functions for constructing high-dimensional neural network potentials
,” J. Chem. Phys.
134
, 074106
(2011
).55.
M.
Gastegger
, L.
Schwiedrzik
, M.
Bittermann
, F.
Berzsenyi
, and P.
Marquetand
, “wACSF—Weighted atom-centered symmetry functions as descriptors in machine learning potentials
,” J. Chem. Phys.
148
, 241709
(2018
).56.
S.
Chmiela
, A.
Tkatchenko
, H. E.
Sauceda
, I.
Poltavsky
, K. T.
Schütt
, and K.-R.
Müller
, “Machine learning of accurate energy-conserving molecular force fields
,” Sci. Adv.
3
, 1603015
(2017
).57.
K. T.
Schütt
, F.
Arbabzadah
, S.
Chmiela
, K. R.
Müller
, and A.
Tkatchenko
, “Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks
,” Nat. Commun.
8
, 13890
(2017
).58.
K. T.
Schütt
, H. E.
Sauceda
, P.-J.
Kindermans
, A.
Tkatchenko
, and K.-R.
Müller
, “SchNet – A deep learning architecture for molecules and materials
,” J. Chem. Phys.
148
, 241722
(2018
).59.
X.
Chen
, M. S.
Jørgensen
, J.
Li
, and B.
Hammer
, “Atomic energies from a convolutional neural network
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
14
, 3933
–3942
(2018
).60.
L.
Zhang
, J.
Han
, H.
Wang
, R.
Car
, and W.
E
, “Deep potential molecular dynamics: A scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanics
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
120
, 143001
(2018
).61.
L.
Zhang
, J.
Han
, H.
Wang
, W.
Saidi
, R.
Car
, and W.
E
, “End-to-end symmetry preserving inter-atomic potential energy model for finite and extended systems
,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31
, edited by S.
Bengio
, H.
Wallach
, H.
Larochelle
, K.
Grauman
, N.
Cesa-Bianchi
, and R.
Garnett
(Curran Associates, Inc.
, 2018
), pp. 4436
–4446
.62.
Y.
Zhang
, C.
Hu
, and B.
Jiang
, “Embedded atom neural network potentials: Efficient and accurate machine learning with a physically inspired representation
,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
10
, 4962
–4967
(2019
).63.
J. S.
Smith
, O.
Isayev
, and A. E.
Roitberg
, “ANI-1: An extensible neural network potential with DFT accuracy at force field computational cost
,” Chem. Sci.
8
, 3192
–3203
(2017
).64.
O.
Unke
and M.
Meuwly
, “PhysNet: A neural network for predicting energies, forces, dipole moments, and partial charges
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
15
, 3678
–3693
(2019
).65.
Z. L.
Glick
, D. P.
Metcalf
, A.
Koutsoukas
, S. A.
Spronk
, D. L.
Cheney
, and C. D.
Sherrill
, “AP-Net: An atomic-pairwise neural network for smooth and transferable interaction potentials
,” J. Chem. Phys.
153
, 044112
(2020
).66.
T.
Zubatiuk
and O.
Isayev
, “Development of multimodal machine learning potentials: Toward a physics-aware artificial intelligence
,” Acc. Chem. Res.
54
, 1575
–1585
(2021
).67.
E. R.
Khajehpasha
, J. A.
Finkler
, T. D.
Kühne
, and S. A.
Ghasemi
, “CENT2: Improved charge equilibration via neural network technique
,” Phys. Rev. B
105
, 144106
(2022
).68.
Y.
Hirano
, N.
Okimoto
, S.
Fujita
, and M.
Taiji
, “Molecular dynamics study of conformational changes of tankyrase 2 binding subsites upon ligand binding
,” ACS Omega
6
, 17609
–17620
(2021
).69.
P. W.
Kenny
, “Hydrogen-bond donors in drug design
,” J. Med. Chem.
65
, 14261
–14275
(2022
).70.
H.
Yuki
, Y.
Tanaka
, M.
Hata
, H.
Ishikawa
, S.
Neya
, and T.
Hoshino
, “Implementation of π–π interactions in molecular dynamics simulation
,” J. Comput. Chem.
28
, 1091
–1099
(2007
).71.
T.
Chen
, M.
Li
, and J.
Liu
, “π–π Stacking interaction: A nondestructive and facile means in material engineering for bioapplications
,” Cryst. Growth Des.
18
, 2765
–2783
(2018
).72.
M.
Mohebifar
, E. R.
Johnson
, and C. N.
Rowley
, “Evaluating force-field London dispersion coefficients using the exchange-hole dipole moment model
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
13
, 6146
–6157
(2017
).73.
L. I.
Vazquez-Salazar
, E. D.
Boittier
, O. T.
Unke
, and M.
Meuwly
, “Impact of the characteristics of quantum chemical databases on machine learning prediction of tautomerization energies
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
17
, 4769
–4785
(2021
).74.
J. S.
Smith
, B.
Nebgen
, N.
Lubbers
, O.
Isayev
, and A. E.
Roitberg
, “Less is more: Sampling chemical space with active learning
,” J. Chem. Phys.
148
, 241733
–241743
(2018
).75.
J.
Smith
, B.
Nebgen
, R.
Zubatyuk
, N.
Lubbers
, C.
Devereux
, K.
Barros
, S.
Tretiak
, O.
Isayev
, and A.
Roitberg
, “Approaching coupled cluster accuracy with a general-purpose neural network potential through transfer learning
,” Nat. Commun.
10
, 2903
(2019
).76.
C.
Devereux
, J. S.
Smith
, K. K.
Huddleston
, K.
Barros
, R.
Zubatyuk
, O.
Isayev
, and A. E.
Roitberg
, “Extending the applicability of the ANI deep learning molecular potential to sulfur and halogens
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
16
, 4192
–4202
(2020
).77.
J. Z.
amd Yujun Tao
, T. J.
Giese
, and D. M.
York
, “QDπ: A quantum deep potential interaction model for drug discovery
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
19
, 1261
–1275
(2023
).78.
P. O.
Dral
, X.
Wu
, and W.
Thiel
, “Semiempirical quantum-chemical methods with orthogonalization and dispersion corrections
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
15
, 1743
–1760
(2019
).79.
Y.
Chen
, Y.
Ou
, P.
Zheng
, Y.
Huang
, F.
Ge
, and P. O.
Dral
, “Benchmark of general-purpose machine learning-based quantum mechanical method AIQM1 on reaction barrier heights
,” J. Chem. Phys.
158
, 074103
(2023
).80.
Y.
Yang
, H.
Yu
, D. M.
York
, Q.
Cui
, and M.
Elstner
, “Extension of the self-consistent-charge density-functional tight-binding method: Third-order expansion of the density functional theory total energy and introduction of a modified effective coulomb interaction
,” J. Phys. Chem. A
111
, 10861
–10873
(2007
).81.
M.
Gaus
, X.
Lu
, M.
Elstner
, and Q.
Cui
, “Parameterization of DFTB3/3OB for sulfur and phosphorus for chemical and biological applications
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
10
, 1518
–1537
(2014
).82.
H.
Wang
, L.
Zhang
, J.
Han
, and W.
E
, “DeePMD-kit: A deep learning package for many-body potential energy representation and molecular dynamics
,” Comput. Phys. Commun.
228
, 178
–184
(2018
).83.
W.
Liang
, J.
Zeng
, D. M.
York
, L.
Zhang
, and H.
Wang
, “Learning DeePMD-kit: A guide to building deep potential models
,” in A Practical Guide to Recent Advances in Multiscale Modeling and Simulation of Biomolecules
, edited by Y.
Wang
and R.
Zhou
(AIP Publishing
, 2023
), Chap. 6, pp. 6–1
–6–20
.84.
Z.
Yang
, D.
Hutter
, P.
Sheng
, A. M.
Sismour
, and S. A.
Benner
, “Artificially expanded genetic information system: A new base pair with an alternative hydrogen bonding pattern
,” Nucleic Acids Res.
34
, 6095
–6101
(2006
).85.
L.
Eberlein
, F. R.
Beierlein
, N. J. R.
van Eikema Hommes
, A.
Radadiya
, J.
Heil
, S. A.
Benner
, T.
Clark
, S. M.
Kast
, and N. G. J.
Richards
, “Tautomeric equilibria of nucleobases in the hachimoji expanded genetic alphabet
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
16
, 2766
–2777
(2020
).86.
E.
Biondi
and S. A.
Benner
, “Artificially expanded genetic information systems for new aptamer technologies
,” Biomedicines
6
, 53
(2018
).87.
B.
Behera
, P.
Das
, and N. R.
Jena
, “Accurate base pair energies of artificially expanded genetic information systems (AEGIS): Clues for their mutagenic characteristics
,” J. Phys. Chem. B
123
, 6728
–6739
(2019
).88.
C. A.
Jerome
, S.
Hoshika
, K. M.
Bradley
, S. A.
Benner
, and E.
Biondi
, “In vitro evolution of ribonucleases from expanded genetic alphabets
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
119
, e2208261119
(2022
).89.
M. J. S.
Dewar
and W.
Thiel
, “A semiempirical model for the two-Center repulsion integrals in the NDDO approximation
,” Theor. Chim. Acta
46
, 89
–104
(1977
).90.
M. J. S.
Dewar
, E.
Zoebisch
, E. F.
Healy
, and J. J. P.
Stewart
, “Development and use of quantum mechanical molecular models. 76. AM1: A new general purpose quantum mechanical molecular model
.” J. Am. Chem. Soc.
107
, 3902
–3909
(1985
).91.
J. J. P.
Stewart
, “Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods V: Modification of NDDO approximations and application to 70 elements
,” J. Mol. Model.
13
, 1173
–1213
(2007
).92.
J.
R̆ezác̆
and P.
Hobza
, “Advanced corrections of hydrogen bonding and dispersion for semiempirical quantum mechanical methods
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
8
, 141
–151
(2012
).93.
J.
Řezáč
and P.
Hobza
, “A halogen-bonding correction for the semiempirical PM6 method
,” Chem. Phys. Lett.
506
, 286
–289
(2011
).94.
J. J. P.
Stewart
, “Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods VI: More modifications to the NDDO approximations and re-optimization of parameters
,” J. Mol. Model.
19
, 1
–32
(2013
).95.
M.
Gaus
, Q.
Cui
, and M.
Elstner
, “DFTB3: Extension of the self-consistent-charge density-functional tight-binding method (SCC-DFTB)
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
7
, 931
–948
(2011
).96.
S.
Grimme
, C.
Bannwarth
, and P.
Shushkov
, “A robust and accurate tight-binding quantum chemical method for structures, vibrational frequencies, and noncovalent interactions of large molecular systems parametrized for all spd-block elements (Z = 1–86)
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
13
, 1989
–2009
(2017
).97.
C.
Bannwarth
, S.
Ehlert
, and S.
Grimme
, “GFN2-xTB—An accurate and broadly parametrized self-consistent tight-binding quantum chemical method with multipole electrostatics and density-dependent dispersion contributions
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
15
, 1652
–1671
(2019
).98.
N.
Goldman
, K. E.
Kweon
, B.
Sadigh
, T. W.
Heo
, R. K.
Lindsey
, C. H.
Pham
, L. E.
Fried
, B.
Aradi
, K.
Holliday
, J. R.
Jeffries
, and B. C.
Wood
, “Semi-automated creation of density functional tight binding models through leveraging Chebyshev polynomial-based force fields
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
17
, 4435
–4448
(2021
).99.
J.-D.
Chai
and M.
Head-Gordon
, “Systematic optimization of long-range corrected hybrid density functionals
,” J. Chem. Phys.
128
, 084106
(2008
).100.
P. C.
Bevilacqua
, M. E.
Harris
, J. A.
Piccirilli
, C.
Gaines
, A.
Ganguly
, K.
Kostenbader
, Ş.
Ekesan
, and D. M.
York
, “An ontology for facilitating discussion of catalytic strategies of RNA-cleaving enzymes
,” ACS Chem. Biol.
14
, 1068
–1076
(2019
).101.
M. J.
Frisch
, G. W.
Trucks
, H. B.
Schlegel
, G. E.
Scuseria
, M. A.
Robb
, J. R.
Cheeseman
, G.
Scalmani
, V.
Barone
, G. A.
Petersson
, H.
Nakatsuji
, X.
Li
, M.
Caricato
, A. V.
Marenich
, J.
Bloino
, B. G.
Janesko
, R.
Gomperts
, B.
Mennucci
, H. P.
Hratchian
, J. V.
Ortiz
, A. F.
Izmaylov
, J. L.
Sonnenberg
, D.
Williams-Young
, F.
Ding
, F.
Lipparini
, F.
Egidi
, J.
Goings
, B.
Peng
, A.
Petrone
, T.
Henderson
, D.
Ranasinghe
, V. G.
Zakrzewski
, J.
Gao
, N.
Rega
, G.
Zheng
, W.
Liang
, M.
Hada
, M.
Ehara
, K.
Toyota
, R.
Fukuda
, J.
Hasegawa
, M.
Ishida
, T.
Nakajima
, Y.
Honda
, O.
Kitao
, H.
Nakai
, T.
Vreven
, K.
Throssell
, J. A.
Montgomery
, Jr., J. E.
Peralta
, F.
Ogliaro
, M. J.
Bearpark
, J. J.
Heyd
, E. N.
Brothers
, K. N.
Kudin
, V. N.
Staroverov
, T. A.
Keith
, R.
Kobayashi
, J.
Normand
, K.
Raghavachari
, A. P.
Rendell
, J. C.
Burant
, S. S.
Iyengar
, J.
Tomasi
, M.
Cossi
, J. M.
Millam
, M.
Klene
, C.
Adamo
, R.
Cammi
, J. W.
Ochterski
, R. L.
Martin
, K.
Morokuma
, O.
Farkas
, J. B.
Foresman
, and D. J.
Fox
, Gaussian 16 Revision A.03, Gaussian, Inc.
, Wallingford CT
, 2016
.102.
D. L.
Beveridge
, Approximate Molecular Orbital Theory of Nuclear and Electron Magnetic Resonance Parameters
(Springer
, Boston
, 1977
).103.
T.
Tuttle
and W.
Thiel
, “OMx-D: Semiempirical methods with orthogonalization and dispersion corrections. Implementation and biochemical application
,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
10
, 2159
–2166
(2008
).104.
D.
Tuna
, Y.
Lu
, A.
Koslowski
, and W.
Thiel
, “Semiempirical quantum-chemical orthogonalization-corrected methods: Benchmarks of electronically excited states
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
12
, 4400
–4422
(2016
).105.
P. O.
Dral
, X.
Wu
, L.
Spörkel
, A.
Koslowski
, W.
Weber
, R.
Steiger
, M.
Scholten
, and W.
Thiel
, “Semiempirical quantum-chemical orthogonalization-corrected methods: Theory, implementation, and parameters
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
12
, 1082
–1096
(2016
).106.
P. O.
Dral
, X.
Wu
, L.
Spörkel
, A.
Koslowski
, and W.
Thiel
, “Semiempirical quantum-chemical orthogonalization-corrected methods: Benchmarks for ground-state properties
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
12
, 1097
–1120
(2016
).107.
D. A.
Case
, K.
Belfon
, I. Y.
Ben-Shalom
, S. R.
Brozell
, D. S.
Cerutti
, T. E.
Cheatham
III, V. W. D.
Cruzeiro
, T. A.
Darden
, R. E.
Duke
, G.
Giambasu
, , M. K.
Gilson
, H.
Gohlke
, A. W.
Goetz
, R.
Harris
, S.
Izadi
, S. A.
Izmailov
, K.
Kasavajhala
, K.
Kovalenko
, R.
Krasny
, T.
Kurtzman
, T.
Lee
, S.
Le-Grand
, P.
Li
, C.
Lin
, J.
Liu
, T.
Luchko
, R.
Luo
, V.
Man
, K.
Merz
, Y.
Miao
, O.
Mikhailovskii
, G.
Monard
, , H.
Nguyen
, A.
Onufriev
, F.
Pan
, S.
Pantano
, R.
Qi
, D. R.
Roe
, A.
Roitberg
, C.
Sagui
, S.
Schott-Verdugo
, J.
Shen
, C. L.
Simmerling
, N.
Skrynnikov
, J.
Smith
, J.
Swails
, R. C.
Walker
, J.
Wang
, R. M.
Wilson
, R. M.
Wolf
, X.
Wu
, Y.
Xiong
, Y.
Xue
, D. M.
York
, and P. A.
Kollman
, AMBER 20, University of California
, San Francisco, CA
, 2020
.108.
R. C.
Walker
, M. F.
Crowley
, and D. A.
Case
, “The implementation of a fast and accurate QM/MM potential method in Amber
,” J. Comput. Chem.
29
, 1019
–1031
(2008
).109.
M.
Thiel
, MNDO, Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Mülheim an der Ruhr, 2022
.110.
J. J. P.
Stewart
, “MOPAC: A semiempirical molecular orbital program
,” J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des.
4
, 1
–105
(1990
).111.
J.
Hostaš
, J.
Řezáč
, and P.
Hobza
, “On the performance of the semiempirical quantum mechanical PM6 and PM7 methods for noncovalent interactions
,” Chem. Phys. Lett.
568
, 161
–166
(2013
).112.
A. V.
Sulimov
, D. C.
Kutov
, E. V.
Katkova
, I. S.
Ilin
, and V. B.
Sulimov
, “New generation of docking programs: Supercomputer validation of force fields and quantum-chemical methods for docking
,” J. Mol. Graphics Modell.
78
, 139
–147
(2017
).113.
T. J.
Giese
and D. M.
York
, “Density-functional expansion methods: Grand challenges
,” Theor. Chem. Acc.
131
, 1145
(2012
).114.
M.
Gaus
, A.
Goez
, and M.
Elstner
, “Parametrization and benchmark of DFTB3 for organic molecules
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
9
, 338
–354
(2013
).115.
G.
Seabra
, R. C.
Walker
, M.
Elstner
, D. A.
Case
, and A. E.
Roitberg
, “Implementation of the SCC-DFTB method for hybrid QM/MM simulations within the amber molecular dynamics package
,” J. Phys. Chem. A
111
, 5655
–5664
(2007
).116.
C. H.
Pham
, R. K.
Lindsey
, L. E.
Fried
, and N.
Goldman
, “High-accuracy semiempirical quantum models based on a minimal training set
,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
13
, 2934
–2942
(2022
).117.
R. K.
Lindsey
, L. E.
Fried
, and N.
Goldman
, “ChIMES: A force matched potential with explicit three-body interactions for molten carbon
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
13
, 6222
–6229
(2017
).118.
H.
Li
, C.
Collins
, M.
Tanha
, G. J.
Gordon
, and D. J.
Yaron
, “A density functional tight binding layer for deep learning of chemical Hamiltonians
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
14
, 5764
–5776
(2018
).119.
J.
Zhu
, V. Q.
Vuong
, B. G.
Sumpter
, and S.
Irle
, “Artificial neural network correction for density-functional tight-binding molecular dynamics simulations
,” MRS Commun.
9
, 867
–873
(2019
).120.
M.
Stöhr
, L.
Medrano Sandonas
, and A.
Tkatchenko
, “Accurate many-body repulsive potentials for density-functional tight binding from deep tensor neural networks
,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
11
, 6835
–6843
(2020
).121.
C.
Panosetti
, A.
Engelmann
, L.
Nemec
, K.
Reuter
, and J. T.
Margraf
, “Learning to use the force: Fitting repulsive potentials in density-functional tight-binding with Gaussian process regression
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
16
, 2181
–2191
(2020
).122.
J. J.
Kranz
, M.
Kubillus
, R.
Ramakrishnan
, O. A.
von Lilienfeld
, and M.
Elstner
, “Generalized density-functional tight-binding repulsive potentials from unsupervised machine learning
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
14
, 2341
–2352
(2018
).123.
X.
Gao
, F.
Ramezanghorbani
, O.
Isayev
, J. S.
Smith
, and A. E.
Roitberg
, “TorchANI: A free and open source PyTorch-based deep learning implementation of the ANI neural network potentials
,” J. Chem. Inf. Model.
60
, 3408
–3415
(2020
).124.
E.
Caldeweyher
, C.
Bannwarth
, and S.
Grimme
, “Extension of the D3 dispersion coefficient model
,” J. Chem. Phys.
147
, 034112
(2017
).125.
D. C.
Liu
and J.
Nocedal
, “On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization
,” Math. Program.
45
, 503
–528
(1989
).126.
A.
Hjorth Larsen
, J.
Jørgen Mortensen
, J.
Blomqvist
, I. E.
Castelli
, R.
Christensen
, M.
Dułak
, J.
Friis
, M. N.
Groves
, B.
Hammer
, C.
Hargus
, E. D.
Hermes
, P. C.
Jennings
, P.
Bjerre Jensen
, J.
Kermode
, J. R.
Kitchin
, E.
Leonhard Kolsbjerg
, J.
Kubal
, K.
Kaasbjerg
, S.
Lysgaard
, J.
Bergmann Maronsson
, T.
Maxson
, T.
Olsen
, L.
Pastewka
, A.
Peterson
, C.
Rostgaard
, J.
Schiøtz
, O.
Schütt
, M.
Strange
, K. S.
Thygesen
, T.
Vegge
, L.
Vilhelmsen
, M.
Walter
, Z.
Zeng
, and K. W.
Jacobsen
, “The atomic simulation environment—A Python library for working with atoms
,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
29
, 273002
(2017
).127.
J. S.
Smith
, R.
Zubatyuk
, B.
Nebgen
, N.
Lubbers
, K.
Barros
, A. E.
Roitberg
, O.
Isayev
, and S.
Tretiak
, “The ANI-1ccx and ANI-1x data sets, coupled-cluster and density functional theory properties for molecules
,” Sci. Data
7
, 134
(2020
).128.
T.
Fink
, H.
Bruggesser
, and J.-L.
Reymond
, “Virtual exploration of the small-molecule chemical universe below 160 daltons
,” Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
44
, 1504
–1508
(2005
).129.
L. C.
Blum
and J.-L.
Reymond
, “970 million druglike small molecules for virtual screening in the chemical universe database GDB-13
,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.
131
, 8732
–8733
(2009
).130.
V.
Law
, C.
Knox
, Y.
Djoumbou
, T.
Jewison
, A. C.
Guo
, Y.
Liu
, A.
Maciejewski
, D.
Arndt
, M.
Wilson
, V.
Neveu
, A.
Tang
, G.
Gabriel
, C.
Ly
, S.
Adamjee
, Z. T.
Dame
, B.
Han
, Y.
Zhou
, and D. S.
Wishart
, “DrugBank 4.0: Shedding new light on drug metabolism
,” Nucleic Acids Res.
42
, 1091
–1097
(2014
).131.
L.
Goerigk
, H.
Kruse
, and S.
Grimme
, “Benchmarking density functional methods against the S66 and S66x8 datasets for non-covalent interactions
,” ChemPhysChem.
12
, 3421
–3433
(2011
).132.
B.
Brauer
, M. K.
Kesharwani
, S.
Kozuch
, and J. M. L.
Martin
, “The S66x8 benchmark for noncovalent interactions revisited: Explicitly correlated ab initio methods and density functional theory
,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
18
, 20905
–20925
(2016
).133.
J.
Řezáč
, “Non-covalent interactions atlas benchmark data sets: Hydrogen bonding
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
16
, 2355
–2368
(2020
).134.
O.
Wahl
and T.
Sander
, “Tautobase: An open tautomer database
,” J. Chem. Inf. Model.
60
, 1085
–1089
(2020
).135.
M.
Wieder
, J.
Fass
, and J. D.
Chodera
, “Fitting quantum machine learning potentials to experimental free energy data: Predicting tautomer ratios in solution
,” Chem. Sci.
12
, 11364
–11381
(2021
).136.
A.
Moser
, K.
Range
, and D. M.
York
, “Accurate proton affinity and gas-phase basicity values for molecules important in biocatalysis
,” J. Phys. Chem. B
114
, 13911
–13921
(2010
).137.
L.
Goerigk
, A.
Hansen
, C.
Bauer
, S.
Ehrlich
, A.
Najibi
, and S.
Grimme
, “A look at the density functional theory zoo with the advanced GMTKN55 database for general main group thermochemistry, kinetics and noncovalent interactions
,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
19
, 32184
–32215
(2017
).138.
N.
Ree
, A. H.
Göller
, and J. H.
Jensen
, “RegioSQM20: Improved prediction of the regioselectivity of electrophilic aromatic substitutions
,” J. Cheminf.
13
, 10
(2021
).139.
N. B.
Leontis
and E.
Westhof
, “Geometric nomenclature and classification of RNA base pairs
,” RNA
7
, 499
–512
(2001
).140.
N. B.
Leontis
, J.
Stombaugh
, and E.
Westhof
, “The non-Watson–Crick base pairs and their associated isostericity matrices
,” Nucleic Acids Res.
30
, 3497
–3531
(2002
).141.
N. B.
Leontis
and E.
Westhof
, “Analysis of RNA motifs
,” Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
13
, 300
–308
(2003
).142.
I.
Singh
, M.-J.
Kim
, R. W.
Molt
, S.
Hoshika
, S. A.
Benner
, and M. M.
Georgiadis
, “Structure and biophysics for a six letter DNA alphabet that includes imidazo[1,2-a]-1,3,5-triazine-2(8H)-4(3H)-dione (X) and 2,4-diaminopyrimidine (K)
,” ACS Synth. Biol.
6
, 2118
–2129
(2017
).143.
R. T.
Raines
, “Ribonuclease A
,” Chem. Rev.
98
, 1045
–1066
(1998
).144.
H.
Gu
, S.
Zhang
, K.-Y.
Wong
, B. K.
Radak
, T.
Dissanayake
, D. L.
Kellerman
, Q.
Dai
, M.
Miyagi
, V. E.
Anderson
, D. M.
York
, J. A.
Piccirilli
, and M. E.
Harris
, “Experimental and computational analysis of the transition state for ribonuclease A-catalyzed RNA 2′-O-transphosphorylation
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
110
, 13002
–13007
(2013
).145.
M. E.
Harris
, J. A.
Piccirilli
, and D. M.
York
, “Integration of kinetic isotope effect analyses to elucidate ribonuclease mechanism
,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Proteins Proteomics
1854
, 1801
–1808
(2015
).© 2023 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.
2023
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.
