We introduce Langevin sampling algorithms to field-theoretic simulations (FTSs) of polymers that, for the same accuracy, are ∼10× more efficient than a previously used Brownian dynamics algorithm that used predictor corrector for such simulations, over 10× more efficient than the smart Monte Carlo (SMC) algorithm, and typically over 1000× more efficient than a simple Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. These algorithms are known as the Leimkuhler–Matthews (the BAOAB-limited) method and the BAOAB method. Furthermore, the FTS allows for an improved MC algorithm based on the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process (OU MC), which is 2× more efficient than SMC. The system-size dependence of the efficiency for the sampling algorithms is presented, and it is shown that the aforementioned MC algorithms do not scale well with system sizes. Hence, for larger sizes, the efficiency difference between the Langevin and MC algorithms is even greater, although, for SMC and OU MC, the scaling is less unfavorable than for the simple MC.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
21 March 2023
Research Article|
March 20 2023
Efficient Langevin and Monte Carlo sampling algorithms: The case of field-theoretic simulations
Bart Vorselaars
Bart Vorselaars
a)
(Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing)
School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Lincoln
, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS, United Kingdom
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: bvorselaars@lincoln.ac.uk
Search for other works by this author on:
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: bvorselaars@lincoln.ac.uk
J. Chem. Phys. 158, 114117 (2023)
Article history
Received:
October 18 2022
Accepted:
February 21 2023
Citation
Bart Vorselaars; Efficient Langevin and Monte Carlo sampling algorithms: The case of field-theoretic simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 21 March 2023; 158 (11): 114117. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0131183
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionPay-Per-View Access
$40.00