Allosteric signaling within multidomain proteins is a driver of communication between spatially distant functional sites. Understanding the mechanism of allosteric coupling in large multidomain proteins is the most promising route to achieving spatial and temporal control of the system. The recent explosion of CRISPR-Cas9 applications in molecular biology and medicine has created a need to understand how the atomic level protein dynamics of Cas9, which are the driving force of its allosteric crosstalk, influence its biophysical characteristics. In this study, we used a synergistic approach of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and computation to pinpoint an allosteric hotspot in the HNH domain of the thermostable GeoCas9. We show that mutation of K597 to alanine disrupts a salt-bridge network, which in turn alters the structure, the timescale of allosteric motions, and the thermostability of the GeoHNH domain. This homologous lysine-to-alanine mutation in the extensively studied mesophilic S. pyogenes Cas9 similarly alters the dynamics of the SpHNH domain. We have previously demonstrated that the alteration of allostery via mutations is a source for the specificity enhancement of SpCas9 (eSpCas9). Hence, this may also be true in GeoCas9.
REFERENCES
1.
J. A.
Doudna
, “The promise and challenge of therapeutic genome editing
,” Nature
578
, 229
–236
(2020
).2.
A.
Mir
, A.
Edraki
, J.
Lee
, and E. J.
Sontheimer
, “Type II-C CRISPR-Cas9 biology, mechanism, and application
,” ACS Chem. Biol.
13
, 357
–365
(2018
).3.
F.
Jiang
and J. A.
Doudna
, “The structural biology of CRISPR-Cas systems
,” Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
30
, 100
–111
(2015
).4.
L. B.
Harrington
et al, “A thermostable Cas9 with increased lifetime in human plasma
,” Nat. Commun.
8
, 1424
(2017
).5.
S. H.
Sternberg
, B.
LaFrance
, M.
Kaplan
, and J. A.
Doudna
, “Conformational control of DNA target cleavage by CRISPR–Cas9
,” Nature
527
, 110
–113
(2015
).6.
J. S.
Chen
et al, “Enhanced proofreading governs CRISPR–Cas9 targeting accuracy
,” Nature
550
, 407
–410
(2017
).7.
K. W.
East
et al, “Allosteric motions of the CRISPR-Cas9 HNH nuclease probed by NMR and molecular dynamics
,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.
142
, 1348
(2020
).8.
L.
Nierzwicki
et al, “Enhanced specificity mutations perturb allosteric signaling in CRISPR-Cas9
,” Elife
10
, e73601
(2021
).9.
Ł.
Nierzwicki
, P. R.
Arantes
, A.
Saha
, and G.
Palermo
, “Establishing the allosteric mechanism in CRISPR-Cas9
,” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci.
11
, e1503
(2021
).10.
H. B.
Belato
et al, “Structural and dynamic insights into the HNH nuclease of divergent Cas9 species
,” J. Struct. Biol.
214
, 107814
(2022
).11.
I. M.
Slaymaker
et al, “Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity
,” Science
351
, 84
–88
(2016
).12.
C. N.
Pace
and J. M.
Scholtz
, “A helix propensity scale based on experimental studies of peptides and proteins
,” Biophys. J.
75
, 422
–427
(1998
).13.
M.
Jinek
et al, “Structures of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation
,” Science
343
, 1247997
(2014
).14.
G.
Palermo
, Y.
Miao
, R. C.
Walker
, M.
Jinek
, and J. A.
McCammon
, “Striking plasticity of CRISPR-Cas9 and key role of non-target DNA, as revealed by molecular simulations
,” ACS Cent. Sci.
2
, 756
–763
(2016
).15.
C.
Huai
et al, “Structural insights into DNA cleavage activation of CRISPR-Cas9 system
,” Nat. Commun.
8
, 1375
(2017
).16.
G.
Palermo
et al, “Protospacer adjacent motif-induced allostery activates CRISPR-Cas9
,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.
139
, 16028
–16031
(2017
).17.
G.
Palermo
et al, “Key role of the REC lobe during CRISPR-Cas9 activation by ‘sensing,’ ‘regulating,’ and ‘locking’ the catalytic HNH domain
,” Q. Rev. Biophys.
51
, e91
(2018
).18.
V.
Nguyen
et al, “Evolutionary drivers of thermoadaptation in enzyme catalysis
,” Science
355
, 289
–294
(2017
).19.
H. N.
Motlagh
, J. O.
Wrabl
, J.
Li
, and V. J.
Hilser
, “The ensemble nature of allostery
,” Nature
508
, 331
–339
(2014
).20.
C. M.
Petit
, J.
Zhang
, P. J.
Sapienza
, E. J.
Fuentes
, and A. L.
Lee
, “Hidden dynamic allostery in a PDZ domain
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
106
, 18249
–18254
(2009
).21.
A. J.
Wand
, “The dark energy of proteins comes to light: Conformational entropy and its role in protein function revealed by NMR relaxation
,” Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
23
, 75
–81
(2013
).22.
S.-R.
Tzeng
and C. G.
Kalodimos
, “Protein activity regulation by conformational entropy
,” Nature
488
, 236
–240
(2012
).23.
F.
Delaglio
et al, “NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes
,” J. Biomol. NMR
6
, 277
–293
(1995
).24.
W.
Lee
, M.
Tonelli
, and J. L.
Markley
, “NMRFAM-SPARKY: Enhanced software for biomolecular NMR spectroscopy
,” Bioinformatics
31
, 1325
–1327
(2015
).25.
J. P.
Loria
, M.
Rance
, and A. G.
Palmer
, “A relaxation-compensated Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill sequence for characterizing chemical exchange by NMR spectroscopy
,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.
121
, 2331
–2332
(1999
).26.
M.
Bieri
, E. J.
d’Auvergne
, and P. R.
Gooley
, “relaxGUI: A new software for fast and simple NMR relaxation data analysis and calculation of ps-ns and μs motion of proteins
,” J. Biomol. NMR
50
, 147
–155
(2011
).27.
Ł.
Nierzwicki
et al, “Principles of target DNA cleavage and the role of Mg2+ in the catalysis of CRISPR–Cas9
,” Nat. Catal.
5
, 912
–922
(2022
).28.
W.
Kabsch
, “XDS
,” Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr.
66
, 125
–132
(2010
).29.
M. D.
Winn
et al, “Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments
,” Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr.
67
, 235
–242
(2011
).30.
D.
Liebschner
et al, “Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: Recent developments in Phenix
,” Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr.
75
, 861
–877
(2019
).31.
P.
Emsley
, B.
Lohkamp
, W. G.
Scott
, and K.
Cowtan
, “Features and development of Coot
,” Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr.
66
, 486
–501
(2010
).32.
J. A.
Maier
et al, “ff14SB: Improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
11
, 3696
–3713
(2015
).33.
W. L.
Jorgensen
, J.
Chandrasekhar
, J. D.
Madura
, R. W.
Impey
, and M. L.
Klein
, “Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water
,” J. Chem. Phys.
79
, 926
–935
(1983
).34.
B.
Hess
, H.
Bekker
, H. J. C.
Berendsen
, and J. G. E. M.
Fraaije
, “LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations
,” J. Comput. Chem.
18
, 1463
–1472
(1997
).35.
al, C. D. e
, AMBER 20, University of California
, San Francisco
, 2020
.© 2022 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.
2022
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.