In the quest to understand how structure and dynamics are connected in glasses, a number of machine learning based methods have been developed that predict dynamics in supercooled liquids. These methods include both increasingly complex machine learning techniques and increasingly sophisticated descriptors used to describe the environment around particles. In many cases, both the chosen machine learning technique and choice of structural descriptors are varied simultaneously, making it hard to quantitatively compare the performance of different machine learning approaches. Here, we use three different machine learning algorithms—linear regression, neural networks, and graph neural networks—to predict the dynamic propensity of a glassy binary hard-sphere mixture using as structural input a recursive set of order parameters recently introduced by Boattini et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 088007 (2021)]. As we show, when these advanced descriptors are used, all three methods predict the dynamics with nearly equal accuracy. However, the linear regression is orders of magnitude faster to train, making it by far the method of choice.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
Article navigation
28 May 2022
Research Article|
May 24 2022
Comparing machine learning techniques for predicting glassy dynamics Available to Purchase
Rinske M. Alkemade;
Rinske M. Alkemade
1
Soft Condensed Matter, Debye Institute of Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University
, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
Emanuele Boattini;
Emanuele Boattini
1
Soft Condensed Matter, Debye Institute of Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University
, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
Laura Filion
;
Laura Filion
1
Soft Condensed Matter, Debye Institute of Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University
, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
Frank Smallenburg
Frank Smallenburg
a)
2
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique des Solides
, 91405 Orsay, France
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Rinske M. Alkemade
1
Emanuele Boattini
1
Laura Filion
1
Frank Smallenburg
2,a)
1
Soft Condensed Matter, Debye Institute of Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University
, Utrecht, The Netherlands
2
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique des Solides
, 91405 Orsay, France
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
J. Chem. Phys. 156, 204503 (2022)
Article history
Received:
February 18 2022
Accepted:
May 08 2022
Citation
Rinske M. Alkemade, Emanuele Boattini, Laura Filion, Frank Smallenburg; Comparing machine learning techniques for predicting glassy dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 28 May 2022; 156 (20): 204503. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0088581
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
CREST—A program for the exploration of low-energy molecular chemical space
Philipp Pracht, Stefan Grimme, et al.
DeePMD-kit v2: A software package for deep potential models
Jinzhe Zeng, Duo Zhang, et al.
Related Content
Improving the prediction of glassy dynamics by pinpointing the local cage
J. Chem. Phys. (April 2023)
Dimensionality reduction of local structure in glassy binary mixtures
J. Chem. Phys. (November 2022)
A geometry-enhanced graph neural network for learning the smoothness of glassy dynamics from static structure
J. Chem. Phys. (October 2023)
Selecting relevant structural features for glassy dynamics by information imbalance
J. Chem. Phys. (November 2024)
Monodisperse patchy particle glass former
J. Chem. Phys. (May 2021)