The Hückel Hamiltonian is an incredibly simple tight-binding model known for its ability to capture qualitative physics phenomena arising from electron interactions in molecules and materials. Part of its simplicity arises from using only two types of empirically fit physics-motivated parameters: the first describes the orbital energies on each atom and the second describes electronic interactions and bonding between atoms. By replacing these empirical parameters with machine-learned dynamic values, we vastly increase the accuracy of the extended Hückel model. The dynamic values are generated with a deep neural network, which is trained to reproduce orbital energies and densities derived from density functional theory. The resulting model retains interpretability, while the deep neural network parameterization is smooth and accurate and reproduces insightful features of the original empirical parameterization. Overall, this work shows the promise of utilizing machine learning to formulate simple, accurate, and dynamically parameterized physics models.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
CHORUS
Article navigation
28 June 2021
Research Article|
June 25 2021
Machine learned Hückel theory: Interfacing physics and deep neural networks
Special Collection:
Computational Materials Discovery
Tetiana Zubatiuk
;
Tetiana Zubatiuk
1
Department of Chemistry, Mellon College of Science, Carnegie Mellon University
, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Benjamin Nebgen
;
Benjamin Nebgen
2
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544, USA
4
Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Nicholas Lubbers;
Nicholas Lubbers
3
Center for Nonlinear Studies, Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
5
Computer, Computational, and Statistical Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Justin S. Smith;
Justin S. Smith
2
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544, USA
3
Center for Nonlinear Studies, Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Roman Zubatyuk;
Roman Zubatyuk
1
Department of Chemistry, Mellon College of Science, Carnegie Mellon University
, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Guoqing Zhou
;
Guoqing Zhou
6
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southern California
, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Christopher Koh;
Christopher Koh
2
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Kipton Barros
;
Kipton Barros
2
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Olexandr Isayev
;
Olexandr Isayev
a)
1
Department of Chemistry, Mellon College of Science, Carnegie Mellon University
, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Sergei Tretiak
Sergei Tretiak
2
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544, USA
3
Center for Nonlinear Studies, Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
4
Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Tetiana Zubatiuk
1
Benjamin Nebgen
2,4
Nicholas Lubbers
3,5
Justin S. Smith
2,3
Roman Zubatyuk
1
Guoqing Zhou
6
Christopher Koh
2
Kipton Barros
2
Olexandr Isayev
1,a)
Sergei Tretiak
2,3,4
1
Department of Chemistry, Mellon College of Science, Carnegie Mellon University
, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
2
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544, USA
4
Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
3
Center for Nonlinear Studies, Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
5
Computer, Computational, and Statistical Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544, USA
6
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southern California
, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Note: This paper is part of the JCP Special Topic on Computational Materials Discovery.
J. Chem. Phys. 154, 244108 (2021)
Article history
Received:
April 01 2021
Accepted:
June 10 2021
Citation
Tetiana Zubatiuk, Benjamin Nebgen, Nicholas Lubbers, Justin S. Smith, Roman Zubatyuk, Guoqing Zhou, Christopher Koh, Kipton Barros, Olexandr Isayev, Sergei Tretiak; Machine learned Hückel theory: Interfacing physics and deep neural networks. J. Chem. Phys. 28 June 2021; 154 (24): 244108. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0052857
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
DeePMD-kit v2: A software package for deep potential models
Jinzhe Zeng, Duo Zhang, et al.
CREST—A program for the exploration of low-energy molecular chemical space
Philipp Pracht, Stefan Grimme, et al.
Related Content
Quantum computing of Hückel molecular orbitals of π-electron systems
J. Chem. Phys. (May 2022)
Extended Hückel theory for band structure, chemistry, and transport. II. Silicon
J. Appl. Phys. (August 2006)
Mapping of Hückel zigzag carbon nanotubes onto independent polyene chains: Application to periodic nanotubes
J. Chem. Phys. (September 2023)
A Hückel source-sink-potential theory of Pauli spin blockade in molecular electronic devices
J. Chem. Phys. (November 2016)