Artificial intelligence (AI)-based approaches have had indubitable impact across the sciences through the ability to extract relevant information from raw data. Recently, AI has also found use in enhancing the efficiency of molecular simulations, wherein AI derived slow modes are used to accelerate the simulation in targeted ways. However, while typical fields where AI is used are characterized by a plethora of data, molecular simulations, per construction, suffer from limited sampling and thus limited data. As such, the use of AI in molecular simulations can suffer from a dangerous situation where the AI-optimization could get stuck in spurious regimes, leading to incorrect characterization of the reaction coordinate (RC) for the problem at hand. When such an incorrect RC is then used to perform additional simulations, one could start to deviate progressively from the ground truth. To deal with this problem of spurious AI-solutions, here, we report a novel and automated algorithm using ideas from statistical mechanics. It is based on the notion that a more reliable AI-solution will be one that maximizes the timescale separation between slow and fast processes. To learn this timescale separation even from limited data, we use a maximum caliber-based framework. We show the applicability of this automatic protocol for three classic benchmark problems, namely, the conformational dynamics of a model peptide, ligand-unbinding from a protein, and folding/unfolding energy landscape of the C-terminal domain of protein G. We believe that our work will lead to increased and robust use of trustworthy AI in molecular simulations of complex systems.
REFERENCES
1.
R. C.
Bernardi
, M. C. R.
Melo
, and K.
Schulten
, “Enhanced sampling techniques in molecular dynamics simulations of biological systems
,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1850
, 872
–877
(2015
).2.
M.
Karplus
and G. A.
Petsko
, “Molecular dynamics simulations in biology
,” Nature
347
, 631
–639
(1990
).3.
M. A.
Rohrdanz
, W.
Zheng
, and C.
Clementi
, “Discovering mountain passes via torchlight: Methods for the definition of reaction coordinates and pathways in complex macromolecular reactions
,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.
64
, 295
–316
(2013
).4.
C.
Abrams
and G.
Bussi
, “Enhanced sampling in molecular dynamics using metadynamics, replica-exchange, and temperature-acceleration
,” Entropy
16
, 163
–199
(2014
).5.
B.
Hashemian
, D.
Millán
, and M.
Arroyo
, “Modeling and enhanced sampling of molecular systems with smooth and nonlinear data-driven collective variables
,” J. Chem. Phys.
139
, 214101
(2013
).6.
J. N.
Onuchic
and P. G.
Wolynes
, “Theory of protein folding
,” Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
14
, 70
–75
(2004
).7.
K. A.
Dill
, S. B.
Ozkan
, M. S.
Shell
, and T. R.
Weikl
, “The protein folding problem
,” Annu. Rev. Biophys.
37
, 289
–316
(2008
).8.
P.
Tiwary
, V.
Limongelli
, M.
Salvalaglio
, and M.
Parrinello
, “Kinetics of protein–ligand unbinding: Predicting pathways, rates, and rate-limiting steps
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
112
, E386
–E391
(2015
).9.
P.
Tiwary
, J.
Mondal
, and B. J.
Berne
, “How and when does an anticancer drug leave its binding site?
,” Sci. Adv.
3
, e1700014
(2017
).10.
M.
Moradi
and E.
Tajkhorshid
, “Mechanistic picture for conformational transition of a membrane transporter at atomic resolution
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
110
, 18916
–18921
(2013
).11.
M.
Moradi
and E.
Tajkhorshid
, “Computational recipe for efficient description of large-scale conformational changes in biomolecular systems
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
10
, 2866
–2880
(2014
).12.
M.
Moradi
, G.
Enkavi
, and E.
Tajkhorshid
, “Atomic-level characterization of transport cycle thermodynamics in the glycerol-3-phosphate:phosphate transporter
,” Nat. Commun.
6
, 8393
(2015
).13.
S.
Pant
and E.
Tajkhorshid
, “Microscopic characterization of GRP1 PH domain interaction with anionic membranes
,” J. Comput. Chem.
41
, 489
–499
(2019
).14.
S. P.
Brooks
and B. J.
Morgan
, “Optimization using simulated annealing
,” J. R. Stat. Soc.: D
44
, 241
–257
(1995
).15.
U. H.
Hansmann
, “Parallel tempering algorithm for conformational studies of biological molecules
,” Chem. Phys. Lett.
281
, 140
–150
(1997
).16.
Y.
Sugita
and Y.
Okamoto
, “Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding
,” Chem. Phys. Lett.
314
, 141
–151
(1999
).17.
Y.
Sugita
, A.
Kitao
, and Y.
Okamoto
, “Multidimensional replica-exchange method for free-energy calculations
,” J. Chem. Phys.
113
, 6042
–6051
(2000
).18.
A.
Mitsutake
, Y.
Sugita
, and Y.
Okamoto
, “Generalized-ensemble algorithms for molecular simulations of biopolymers
,” Biopolymers
60
, 96
–123
(2001
).19.
H.
Fukunishi
, O.
Watanabe
, and S.
Takada
, “On the Hamiltonian replica exchange method for efficient sampling of biomolecular systems: Application to protein structure prediction
,” J. Chem. Phys.
116
, 9058
–9067
(2002
).20.
L.
Maragliano
and E.
Vanden-Eijnden
, “A temperature accelerated method for sampling free energy and determining reaction pathways in rare events simulations
,” Chem. Phys. Lett.
426
, 168
–175
(2006
).21.
Y.
Miao
, V. A.
Feher
, and J. A.
McCammon
, “Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics: Unconstrained enhanced sampling and free energy calculation
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
11
, 3584
–3595
(2015
).22.
A.
Laio
and M.
Parrinello
, “Escaping free-energy minima
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
99
, 12562
–12566
(2002
).23.
A.
Laio
and F. L.
Gervasio
, “Metadynamics: A method to simulate rare events and reconstruct the free energy in biophysics, chemistry and material science
,” Rep. Progr. Phys.
71
, 126601
(2008
).24.
A.
Barducci
, G.
Bussi
, and M.
Parrinello
, “Well-tempered metadynamics: A smoothly converging and tunable free-energy method
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
100
, 020603
(2008
).25.
G. M.
Torrie
and J. P.
Valleau
, “Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Umbrella sampling
,” J. Chem. Phys.
23
, 187
–199
(1977
).26.
T.
Lelièvre
, M.
Rousset
, and G.
Stoltz
, “Computation of free energy profiles with parallel adaptive dynamics
,” J. Chem. Phys.
126
, 134111
(2007
).27.
E.
Darve
, D.
Rodríguez-Gómez
, and A.
Pohorille
, “Adaptive biasing force method for scalar and vector free energy calculations
,” J. Chem. Phys.
128
, 144120
(2008
).28.
J.
Comer
, J. C.
Gumbart
, J.
Hénin
, T.
Lelièvre
, A.
Pohorille
, and C.
Chipot
, “The adaptive biasing force method: Everything you always wanted to know but were afraid to ask
,” J. Phys. Chem. B
119
, 1129
–1151
(2015
).29.
H.
Fu
, X.
Shao
, C.
Chipot
, and W.
Cai
, “Extended adaptive biasing force algorithm. An on-the-fly implementation for accurate free-energy calculations
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
12
, 3506
–3513
(2016
).30.
A.
Lesage
, T.
Lelièvre
, G.
Stoltz
, and J.
Hénin
, “Smoothed biasing forces yield unbiased free energies with the extended-system adaptive biasing force method
,” J. Phys. Chem. B
121
, 3676
–3685
(2017
).31.
J. B.
Abrams
and M. E.
Tuckerman
, “Efficient and direct generation of multidimensional free energy surfaces via adiabatic dynamics without coordinate transformations
,” J. Phys. Chem. B
112
, 15742
–15757
(2008
).32.
J. G.
Kirkwood
, “Statistical mechanics of fluid mixtures
,” J. Chem. Phys.
3
, 300
–313
(1935
).33.
W. K.
den Otter
and W. J.
Briels
, “The calculation of free-energy differences by constrained molecular-dynamics simulations
,” J. Chem. Phys.
109
, 4139
–4146
(1998
).34.
A.
Hazel
, C.
Chipot
, and J. C.
Gumbart
, “Thermodynamics of deca-alanine folding in water
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
10
, 2836
–2844
(2014
).35.
P.
Liu
, B.
Kim
, R. A.
Friesner
, and B.
Berne
, “Replica exchange with solute tempering: A method for sampling biological systems in explicit water
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
102
, 13749
–13754
(2005
).36.
X.
Huang
, M.
Hagen
, B.
Kim
, R. A.
Friesner
, R.
Zhou
, and B. J.
Berne
, “Replica exchange with solute tempering: Efficiency in large scale systems
,” J. Phys. Chem. B
111
, 5405
–5410
(2007
).37.
Y.
Wang
, J. M. L.
Ribeiro
, and P.
Tiwary
, “Machine learning approaches for analyzing and enhancing molecular dynamics simulations
,” Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
61
, 139
–145
(2020
).38.
F.
Noé
, G.
De Fabritiis
, and C.
Clementi
, “Machine learning for protein folding and dynamics
,” Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
60
, 77
–84
(2020
).39.
F.
Noé
, S.
Olsson
, J.
Köhler
, and H.
Wu
, “Boltzmann generators: Sampling equilibrium states of many-body systems with deep learning
,” Science
365
, eaaw1147
(2019
).40.
Y.
Wang
, J. M. L.
Ribeiro
, and P.
Tiwary
, “Past–future information bottleneck for sampling molecular reaction coordinate simultaneously with thermodynamics and kinetics
,” Nat. Commun.
10
, 3573
(2019
).41.
W.
Chen
, A. R.
Tan
, and A. L.
Ferguson
, “Collective variable discovery and enhanced sampling using autoencoders: Innovations in network architecture and error function design
,” J. Comput. Chem.
149
, 072312
(2018
).42.
M. E.
Tuckerman
, “Machine learning transforms how microstates are sampled
,” Science
365
, 982
–983
(2019
).43.
S.-L. J.
Lahey
and C. N.
Rowley
, “Simulating protein–ligand binding with neural network potentials
,” Chem. Sci.
11
, 2362
–2368
(2020
).44.
G.
Rotskoff
and E.
Vanden-Eijnden
, “Parameters as interacting particles: Long time convergence and asymptotic error scaling of neural networks
,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
(Curran Associates
, 2018
), pp. 7146
–7155
.45.
G.
Cybenko
, “Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function
,” Math. Control, Signals, Syst.
5
, 455
(1992
).46.
A. R.
Barron
, “Universal approximation bounds for superpositions of a sigmoidal function
,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory
39
, 930
–945
(1993
).47.
F.
Bach
, “Breaking the curse of dimensionality with convex neural networks
,” J. Mach. Learn. Res.
18
, 629
–681
(2017
).48.
I.
Evtimov
, K.
Eykholt
, E.
Fernandes
, T.
Kohno
, B.
Li
, A.
Prakash
, A.
Rahmati
, and D.
Song
, “Robust physical-world attacks on deep learning models
,” arXiv:1707.08945 (2017
).49.
F.
Noé
, I.
Horenko
, C.
Schütte
, and J. C.
Smith
, “Hierarchical analysis of conformational dynamics in biomolecules: Transition networks of metastable states
,” J. Chem. Phys.
126
, 155102
(2007
).50.
M. A.
Rohrdanz
, W.
Zheng
, M.
Maggioni
, and C.
Clementi
, “Determination of reaction coordinates via locally scaled diffusion map
,” J. Chem. Phys.
134
, 124116
(2011
).51.
F.
Noé
and F.
Nüske
, “A variational approach to modeling slow processes in stochastic dynamical systems
,” Multiscale Model. Simul.
11
, 635
–655
(2013
).52.
G.
Pérez-Hernández
, F.
Paul
, T.
Giorgino
, G.
De Fabritiis
, and F.
Noé
, “Identification of slow molecular order parameters for Markov model construction
,” J. Chem. Phys.
139
, 015102
(2013
).53.
Q.
Li
, F.
Dietrich
, E. M.
Bollt
, and I. G.
Kevrekidis
, “Extended dynamic mode decomposition with dictionary learning: A data-driven adaptive spectral decomposition of the Koopman operator
,” Chaos
27
, 103111
(2017
).54.
P.
Tiwary
and B.
Berne
, “Spectral gap optimization of order parameters for sampling complex molecular systems
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
113
, 2839
–2844
(2016
).55.
K.
Ghosh
, P. D.
Dixit
, L.
Agozzino
, and K. A.
Dill
, “The maximum caliber variational principle for nonequilibria
,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.
71
, 213
–238
(2020
).56.
J. M. L.
Ribeiro
, P.
Bravo
, Y.
Wang
, and P.
Tiwary
, “Reweighted autoencoded variational Bayes for enhanced sampling (RAVE)
,” J. Chem. Phys.
149
, 072301
(2018
).57.
P.
Ravindra
, Z.
Smith
, and P.
Tiwary
, “Automatic mutual information noise omission (AMINO): Generating order parameters for molecular systems
,” Mol. Syst. Des. Eng.
5
, 339
(2020
).58.
N.
Tishby
, F. C.
Pereira
, and W.
Bialek
, “The information bottleneck method
,” arXiv:physics/0004057 (2000
).59.
S. E.
Palmer
, O.
Marre
, M. J.
Berry
, and W.
Bialek
, “Predictive information in a sensory population
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
112
, 6908
–6913
(2015
).60.
G. J.
Berman
, W.
Bialek
, and J. W.
Shaevitz
, “Predictability and hierarchy in Drosophila behavior
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
113
, 11943
–11948
(2016
).61.
A. A.
Alemi
, I.
Fischer
, J. V.
Dillon
, and K.
Murphy
, “Deep variational information bottleneck
,” arXiv:1612.00410 (2016
).62.
S.
Still
, “Information bottleneck approach to predictive inference
,” Entropy
16
, 968
–989
(2014
).63.
S. V.
Krivov
, “On reaction coordinate optimality
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
9
, 135
–146
(2013
).64.
Z.
Smith
, P.
Ravindra
, Y.
Wang
, R.
Cooley
, and P.
Tiwary
, “Discovering loop conformational flexibility in T4 lysozyme mutants through Artificial Intelligence aided Molecular Dynamics
,” J. Phys. Chem. B
124
, 8221
–8229
(2020
).65.
O.
Valsson
, P.
Tiwary
, and M.
Parrinello
, “Enhancing important fluctuations: Rare events and metadynamics from a conceptual viewpoint
,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.
67
, 159
–184
(2016
).66.
T. M.
Cover
and J. A.
Thomas
, Elements of Information Theory
(John Wiley & Sons
, 2012
).67.
I.
Goodfellow
, Y.
Bengio
, and A.
Courville
, Deep Learning
(MIT Press
, 2016
), http://www.deeplearningbook.org.68.
Y.
Wang
and P.
Tiwary
, “Understanding the role of predictive time delay and biased propagator in RAVE
,” J. Chem. Phys.
152
, 144102
(2020
).69.
I. N.
Levine
, D. H.
Busch
, and H.
Shull
, Quantum Chemistry
(Pearson Prentice Hall Upper
, Saddle River, NJ
, 2009
), Vol. 6.70.
D. L.
Nelson
, A. L.
Lehninger
, and M. M.
Cox
, Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry
(Macmillan
, 2008
).71.
D. G.
Truhlar
and B. C.
Garrett
, “Variational transition state theory
,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.
35
, 159
–189
(1984
).72.
P. D.
Dixit
and K. A.
Dill
, “Caliber corrected Markov modeling (C2M2): Correcting equilibrium Markov models
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
14
, 1111
–1119
(2018
).73.
Z.
Smith
, D.
Pramanik
, S.-T.
Tsai
, and P.
Tiwary
, “Multi-dimensional spectral gap optimization of order parameters (SGOOP) through conditional probability factorization
,” J. Chem. Phys.
149
, 234105
(2018
).74.
D.
Meral
, D.
Provasi
, and M.
Filizola
, “An efficient strategy to estimate thermodynamics and kinetics of G protein-coupled receptor activation using metadynamics and maximum caliber
,” J. Chem. Phys.
149
, 224101
(2018
).75.
P.
Tiwary
and A.
van de Walle
, Multiscale Materials Modeling for Nanomechanics
(Springer
, 2016
), pp. 195
–221
.76.
J.
Debnath
and M.
Parrinello
, “Gaussian mixture based enhanced sampling for statics and dynamics
,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
11
, 5076
(2020
).77.
M. J.
Abraham
, T.
Murtola
, R.
Schulz
, S.
Páll
, J. C.
Smith
, B.
Hess
, and E.
Lindahl
, “GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers
,” SoftwareX
1-2
, 19
–25
(2015
).78.
G. A.
Tribello
, M.
Bonomi
, D.
Branduardi
, C.
Camilloni
, and G.
Bussi
, “PLUMED 2: New feathers for an old bird
,” Comput. Phys. Commun.
185
, 604
–613
(2014
).79.
M.
Bonomi
, G.
Bussi
, C.
Camilloni
, G. A.
Tribello
, P.
Banáš
, A.
Barducci
, M.
Bernetti
, P. G.
Bolhuis
, S.
Bottaro
, D.
Branduardi
et al, “Promoting transparency and reproducibility in enhanced molecular simulations
,” Nat. Methods
16
, 670
–673
(2019
).80.
Y.
Mu
, P. H.
Nguyen
, and G.
Stock
, “Energy landscape of a small peptide revealed by dihedral angle principal component analysis
,” Proteins
58
, 45
–52
(2005
).81.
A.
Altis
, P. H.
Nguyen
, R.
Hegger
, and G.
Stock
, “Dihedral angle principal component analysis of molecular dynamics simulations
,” J. Chem. Phys.
126
, 244111
(2007
).82.
M.
Salvalaglio
, P.
Tiwary
, and M.
Parrinello
, “Assessing the reliability of the dynamics reconstructed from metadynamics
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
10
, 1420
–1425
(2014
).83.
V.
Hornak
, R.
Abel
, A.
Okur
, B.
Strockbine
, A.
Roitberg
, and C.
Simmerling
, “Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters
,” Proteins
65
, 712
–725
(2006
).84.
R. B.
Best
and G.
Hummer
, “Optimized molecular dynamics force fields applied to the helix- coil transition of polypeptides
,” J. Phys. Chem. B
113
, 9004
–9015
(2009
).85.
K.
Lindorff-Larsen
, S.
Piana
, K.
Palmo
, P.
Maragakis
, J. L.
Klepeis
, R. O.
Dror
, and D. E.
Shaw
, “Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field
,” Proteins
78
, 1950
–1958
(2010
).86.
J. C.
Gumbart
, B.
Roux
, and C.
Chipot
, “Standard binding free energies from computer simulations: What is the best strategy?
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
9
, 794
–802
(2013
).87.
P.
Burkhard
, P.
Taylor
, and M. D.
Walkinshaw
, “X-ray structures of small ligand-FKBP complexes provide an estimate for hydrophobic interaction energies
,” J. Mol. Biol.
295
, 953
–962
(2000
).88.
D.
Pramanik
, Z.
Smith
, A.
Kells
, and P.
Tiwary
, “Can one trust kinetic and thermodynamic observables from biased metadynamics simulations?: Detailed quantitative benchmarks on millimolar drug fragment dissociation
,” J. Phys. Chem. B
123
, 3672
–3678
(2019
).89.
A. C.
Pan
, H.
Xu
, T.
Palpant
, and D. E.
Shaw
, “Quantitative characterization of the binding and unbinding of millimolar drug fragments with molecular dynamics simulations
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
13
, 3372
–3377
(2017
).90.
N.
Ahalawat
and J.
Mondal
, “Assessment and optimization of collective variables for protein conformational landscape: GB1 β-hairpin as a case study
,” J. Chem. Phys.
149
, 094101
(2018
).91.
V.
Muñoz
, P. A.
Thompson
, J.
Hofrichter
, and W. A.
Eaton
, “Folding dynamics and mechanism of β-hairpin formation
,” Nature
390
, 196
–199
(1997
).92.
R. M.
Fesinmeyer
, F. M.
Hudson
, and N. H.
Andersen
, “Enhanced hairpin stability through loop design: The case of the protein G B1 domain hairpin
,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.
126
, 7238
–7243
(2004
).93.
A. J.
Hazel
, E. T.
Walters
, C. N.
Rowley
, and J. C.
Gumbart
, “Folding free energy landscapes of β-sheets with non-polarizable and polarizable CHARMM force fields
,” J. Chem. Phys.
149
, 072317
(2018
).94.
R. B.
Best
and J.
Mittal
, “Free-energy landscape of the GB1 hairpin in all-atom explicit solvent simulations with different force fields: Similarities and differences
,” Proteins
79
, 1318
–1328
(2011
).95.
A.
Ardevol
, G. A.
Tribello
, M.
Ceriotti
, and M.
Parrinello
, “Probing the unfolded configurations of a β-hairpin using sketch-map
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
11
, 1086
–1093
(2015
).96.
F.
Nüske
, B. G.
Keller
, G.
Pérez-Hernández
, A. S.
Mey
, and F.
Noé
, “Variational approach to molecular kinetics
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
10
, 1739
–1752
(2014
).97.
R. T.
McGibbon
and V. S.
Pande
, “Variational cross-validation of slow dynamical modes in molecular kinetics
,” J. Chem. Phys.
142
, 124105
(2015
).98.
J. M.
Lamim Ribeiro
and P.
Tiwary
, “Toward achieving efficient and accurate Ligand–Protein unbinding with deep learning and molecular dynamics through RAVE
,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.
15
, 708
–719
(2018
).99.
M.
Bonomi
, D.
Branduardi
, F. L.
Gervasio
, and M.
Parrinello
, “The unfolded ensemble and folding mechanism of the C-terminal GB1 β-hairpin
,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.
130
, 13938
–13944
(2008
).100.
G.
Bussi
, F. L.
Gervasio
, A.
Laio
, and M.
Parrinello
, “Free-energy landscape for β hairpin folding from combined parallel tempering and metadynamics
,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.
128
, 13435
–13441
(2006
).101.
G.
Saladino
, S.
Pieraccini
, S.
Rendine
, T.
Recca
, P.
Francescato
, G.
Speranza
, and M.
Sironi
, “Metadynamics study of a β-hairpin stability in mixed solvents
,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.
133
, 2897
–2903
(2011
).102.
S.
Pressé
, K.
Ghosh
, J.
Lee
, and K. A.
Dill
, “Principles of maximum entropy and maximum caliber in statistical physics
,” Rev. Mod. Phys.
85
, 1115
(2013
).103.
W.
Chen
, H.
Sidky
, and A. L.
Ferguson
, “Nonlinear discovery of slow molecular modes using state-free reversible VAMPnets
,” J. Chem. Phys.
150
, 214114
(2019
).104.
G.
Bussi
, D.
Donadio
, and M.
Parrinello
, “Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling
,” J. Chem. Phys.
126
, 014101
(2007
).105.
J.
Wang
, R. M.
Wolf
, J. W.
Caldwell
, P. A.
Kollman
, and D. A.
Case
, “Development and testing of a general amber force field
,” J. Comput. Chem.
25
, 1157
–1174
(2004
).106.
G. J.
Martyna
, D. J.
Tobias
, and M. L.
Klein
, “Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms
,” J. Chem. Phys.
101
, 4177
–4189
(1994
).107.
P.
Tiwary
and M.
Parrinello
, “A time-independent free energy estimator for metadynamics
,” J. Phys. Chem. B
119
, 736
–742
(2015
).© 2020 Author(s).
2020
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.