When dealing with approximate wave functions, molecular properties can be computed either as expectation values or as derivatives of the energy with respect to a corresponding perturbation. In this work, the intermediate state representation (ISR) formalism for the computation of expectation values is compared to the Lagrange formalism following a derivative ansatz, which are two alternative approaches of which neither one can be considered superior in general. Within the ISR formalism, terms are included up to a given order of perturbation theory only, while in the Lagrange formalism, all terms are accounted for arising through the differentiation. Similarities and differences of the Lagrange and ISR formalism are illustrated using explicit working equations for selected methods and analyzing numerical results for a range of coupled-cluster as well as algebraic-diagrammatic construction (ADC) methods for excited states. The analysis explains why the ADC(3/2) method is able to yield a large amount of the orbital-relaxation effects for p-h states in contrast to ADC(2) although the same second-order ISR is used to represent the corresponding operator.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
28 April 2019
Research Article|
April 30 2019
Similarities and differences of the Lagrange formalism and the intermediate state representation in the treatment of molecular properties
Manuel Hodecker
;
Manuel Hodecker
1
Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing (IWR), Ruprecht–Karls University Heidelberg
, Im Neuenheimer Feld 205, D–69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Dirk R. Rehn
;
Dirk R. Rehn
1
Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing (IWR), Ruprecht–Karls University Heidelberg
, Im Neuenheimer Feld 205, D–69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Andreas Dreuw
;
1
Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing (IWR), Ruprecht–Karls University Heidelberg
, Im Neuenheimer Feld 205, D–69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Sebastian Höfener
2
Institute of Physical Chemistry, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
, P.O. Box 6980, D–76049 Karlsruhe, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Chem. Phys. 150, 164125 (2019)
Article history
Received:
December 02 2018
Accepted:
April 10 2019
Citation
Manuel Hodecker, Dirk R. Rehn, Andreas Dreuw, Sebastian Höfener; Similarities and differences of the Lagrange formalism and the intermediate state representation in the treatment of molecular properties. J. Chem. Phys. 28 April 2019; 150 (16): 164125. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5093606
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A theory of pitch for the hydrodynamic properties of molecules, helices, and achiral swimmers at low Reynolds number
Anderson D. S. Duraes, J. Daniel Gezelter
DeePMD-kit v2: A software package for deep potential models
Jinzhe Zeng, Duo Zhang, et al.
Related Content
A Lagrange multiplier approach for excited state properties through intermediate Hamiltonian formulation of Fock space multireference coupled-cluster theory
J. Chem. Phys. (August 2013)
Static polarizabilities for excited states within the spin-conserving and spin-flipping equation-of-motion coupled-cluster singles and doubles formalism: Theory, implementation, and benchmarks
J. Chem. Phys. (November 2016)
Efficient elimination of response parameters in molecular property calculations for variational and nonvariational energies
J. Chem. Phys. (December 2008)
First-order properties from internally contracted multireference coupled-cluster theory with particular focus on hyperfine coupling tensors
J. Chem. Phys. (August 2018)
Accuracy of Lagrange-sinc functions as a basis set for electronic structure calculations of atoms and molecules
J. Chem. Phys. (March 2015)