The hydration free energy (HFE) is a critical property for predicting and understanding chemical and biological processes in aqueous solution. There are a number of computational methods to derive HFE, generally classified into the equilibrium or non-equilibrium methods, based on the type of calculations used. In the present study, we compute the hydration free energies of 34 small, neutral, organic molecules with experimental HFE between +2 and −16 kcal/mol. The one-sided non-equilibrium methods Jarzynski Forward (JF) and Backward (JB), the two-sided non-equilibrium methods Jarzynski mean based on the average of JF and JB, Crooks Gaussian Intersection (CGI), and the Bennett Acceptance Ratio (BAR) are compared to the estimates from the two-sided equilibrium method Multistate Bennett Acceptance Ratio (MBAR), which is considered as the reference method for HFE calculations, and experimental data from the literature. Our results show that the estimated hydration free energies from all the methods are consistent with MBAR results, and all methods provide a mean absolute error of ∼0.8 kcal/mol and root mean square error of ∼1 kcal for the 34 organic molecules studied. In addition, the results show that one-sided methods JF and JB result in systematic deviations that cannot be corrected entirely. The statistical efficiency ε of the different methods can be expressed as the one over the simulation time times the average variance in the HFE. From such an analysis, we conclude that ε(MBAR) > ε(BAR) ≈ ε(CGI) > ε(JX), where JX is any of the Jarzynski methods. In other words, the non-equilibrium methods tested here for the prediction of HFE have lower computational efficiency than the MBAR method.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
14 October 2018
Research Article|
October 11 2018
Statistical efficiency of methods for computing free energy of hydration
Ahmet Yildirim
;
Ahmet Yildirim
1
Department of Physics, Siirt University
, Siirt 56100, Turkey
Search for other works by this author on:
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar
;
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar
2
Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute and Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen
, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
David van der Spoel
David van der Spoel
a)
3
Uppsala Centre for Computational Chemistry, Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University
, Husargatan 3, Box 596, SE-75124 Uppsala, Sweden
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected].
Search for other works by this author on:
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected].
J. Chem. Phys. 149, 144111 (2018)
Article history
Received:
May 27 2018
Accepted:
September 27 2018
Connected Content
A related article has been published:
Comment on “Statistical efficiency of methods for computing free energy of hydration” [J. Chem. Phys. 149, 144111 (2018)]
Citation
Ahmet Yildirim, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, David van der Spoel; Statistical efficiency of methods for computing free energy of hydration. J. Chem. Phys. 14 October 2018; 149 (14): 144111. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5041835
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
DeePMD-kit v2: A software package for deep potential models
Jinzhe Zeng, Duo Zhang, et al.
CREST—A program for the exploration of low-energy molecular chemical space
Philipp Pracht, Stefan Grimme, et al.
Related Content
Automatic parametrization of non-polar implicit solvent models for the blind prediction of solvation free energies
J. Chem. Phys. (September 2016)
A fast and high-quality charge model for the next generation general AMBER force field
J. Chem. Phys. (September 2020)