Inelastic scattering of H and D atoms from the (111) surfaces of six fcc transition metals (Au, Pt, Ag, Pd, Cu, and Ni) was investigated, and in each case, excitation of electron-hole pairs dominates the inelasticity. The results are very similar for all six metals. Differences in the average kinetic energy losses between metals can mainly be attributed to different efficiencies in the coupling to phonons due to the different masses of the metal atoms. The experimental observations can be reproduced by molecular dynamics simulations based on full-dimensional potential energy surfaces and including electronic excitations by using electronic friction in the local density friction approximation. The determining factors for the energy loss are the electron density at the surface, which is similar for all six metals, and the mass ratio between the impinging atoms and the surface atoms. Details of the electronic structure of the metal do not play a significant role. The experimentally validated simulations are used to explore sticking over a wide range of incidence conditions. We find that the sticking probability increases for H and D collisions near normal incidence—consistent with a previously reported penetration-resurfacing mechanism. The sticking probability for H or D on any of these metals may be represented as a simple function of the incidence energy, Ein, metal atom mass, M, and incidence angle, 𝜗in. S=(S0+aEin+bM)*(1h(𝜗inc)(1cos(𝜗inc)dh(Eine)(Eine))), where h is the Heaviside step function and for H, S0 = 1.081, a = −0.125 eV−1, b=8.40104 u−1, c = 28.88°, d = 1.166 eV−1, and e = 0.442 eV; whereas for D, S0 = 1.120, a = −0.124 eV−1, b=1.20103 u−1, c = 28.62°, d = 1.196 eV−1, and e = 0.474 eV.

1.
M.
Pavanello
 et al., “
Adiabatic energy loss in hyperthermal H atom collisions with Cu and Au: A basis for testing the importance of nonadiabatic energy loss
,”
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
4
(
21
),
3735
3740
(
2013
).
2.
S. M.
Janke
 et al., “
Toward detection of electron-hole pair excitation in H-atom collisions with Au(111): Adiabatic molecular dynamics with a semi-empirical full-dimensional potential energy surface
,”
Z. Phys. Chem.
227
(
9-11
),
1467
1490
(
2013
).
3.
M.
Blanco-Rey
 et al., “
Electronic friction dominates hydrogen hot-atom relaxation on Pd(100)
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
112
(
10
),
103203
(
2014
).
4.
G. J.
Kroes
 et al., “
Ab initio molecular dynamics calculations on scattering of hyperthermal H atoms from Cu(111) and Au(111)
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
141
(
5
),
054705
(
2014
).
5.
O.
Buenermann
 et al., “
Electron-hole pair excitation determines the mechanism of hydrogen atom adsorption
,”
Science
350
(
6266
),
1346
1349
(
2015
).
6.
S. M.
Janke
 et al., “
An accurate full-dimensional potential energy surface for H-Au(111): Importance of nonadiabatic electronic excitation in energy transfer and adsorption
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
143
,
124708
(
2015
).
7.
K. W.
Jacobsen
,
P.
Stoltze
, and
J. K.
Norskov
, “
A semi-empirical effective medium theory for metals and alloys
,”
Surf. Sci.
366
(
2
),
394
402
(
1996
).
8.
Y.
Li
and
G.
Wahnström
, “
Molecular-dynamics simulation of hydrogen diffusion in palladium
,”
Phys. Rev. B
46
(
22
),
14528
14542
(
1992
).
9.
A.
Kandratsenka
 et al., “
A unified description of H-atom-induced chemicurrents and inelastic scattering
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
(in press).
10.
L.
Schnieder
 et al., “
Hydrogen-exchange reaction H + D2 in crossed beams
,”
Faraday Discuss.
91
,
259
269
(
1991
).
11.
M.
Kammler
 et al., “
Genetic algorithm approach to global optimization of the full-dimensional potential energy surface for hydrogen atom at fcc-metal surfaces
,”
Chem. Phys. Lett.
683
,
286
290
(
2017
).
12.
E. K.
Grimmelmann
,
J. C.
Tully
, and
M. J.
Cardillo
, “
Hard-cube model analysis of gas-surface energy accommodation
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
72
(
2
),
1039
1043
(
1980
).
13.
J.
Harris
, in
Dynamics of Gas-Surface Interactions: Advances in Gas-Phase Photochemistry and Kinetics
, edited by
C. T.
Rettner
and
M. N. R.
Ashfold
(
Royal Society of Chemistry
,
1991
).
14.
A. C.
Luntz
, “
The dynamics of making and breaking bonds at surfaces
,” in
Chemical Boding at Surfaces and Interfaces
, edited by
A.
Nilsson
,
L. G. M.
Peterson
, and
J.
Norskov
(
Elsevier Science & Technology
,
2008
), pp.
143
254
.
15.
M.
Grotemeyer
and
E.
Phelke
, “
Non-adiabatic effects at surfaces simulated with TDDFT molecular dynamics,”
in
Dynamics of Gas-Surface Interactions: Atomic-Level Understanding of Scattering Processes at Surfaces
, edited by
R. D.
Muino
and
H. F.
Busnengo
(
Springer
,
2013
), pp.
299
321
.
16.
B. C.
Krueger
 et al., “
Vibrational inelasticity of highly vibrationally excited no on Ag(111)
,”
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
7
(
3
),
441
446
(
2016
).
17.
S. D.
Kevan
and
R. H.
Gaylord
, “
High-resolution photoemission-study of the electronic-structure of the noble-metal (111)
Surfaces
,”
Phys. Rev. B
36
(
11
),
5809
5818
(
1987
).
18.
P.
Roos
,
E.
Bertel
, and
K. D.
Rendulic
, “
Observation of an sp-derived surface resonance on Pt(111) indicating the crucial role of surface-states in physisorption
,”
Chem. Phys. Lett.
232
(
5-6
),
537
541
(
1995
).
19.
H.
Nienhaus
 et al., “
Electron-hole pair creation at Ag and Cu surfaces by adsorption of atomic hydrogen and deuterium
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
82
(
2
),
446
449
(
1999
).
20.
H.
Nienhaus
 et al., “
Direct detection of electron-hole pairs generated by chemical reactions on metal surfaces
,”
Surf. Sci.
445
(
2-3
),
335
342
(
2000
).
21.
Y. H.
Huang
 et al., “
Vibrational promotion of electron transfer
,”
Science
290
(
5489
),
111
114
(
2000
).
22.
B.
Mildner
,
E.
Hasselbrink
, and
D.
Diesing
, “
Electronic excitations induced by surface reactions of H and D on gold
,”
Chem. Phys. Lett.
432
(
1-3
),
133
138
(
2006
).
23.
B.
Schindler
,
D.
Diesing
, and
E.
Hasselbrink
, “
Electronic excitations in the course of the reaction of H with coinage and noble metal surfaces: A comparison
,”
Z. Phys. Chem.
227
(
9-11
),
1381
1395
(
2013
).
24.
N.
Shenvi
,
S.
Roy
, and
J. C.
Tully
, “
Dynamical steering and electronic excitation in no scattering from a gold surface
,”
Science
326
(
5954
),
829
832
(
2009
).
25.
N.
Bartels
 et al., “
Observation of orientation-dependent electron transfer in molecule-surface collisions
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
110
(
44
),
17738
17743
(
2013
).
26.
N.
Bartels
 et al., “
Controlling an electron-transfer reaction at a metal surface by manipulating reactant motion and orientation
,”
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
53
(
50
),
13690
(
2014
).
27.
B. C.
Krueger
 et al., “
NO vibrational energy transfer on a metal surface: Still a challenge to first-principles theory
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
119
(
6
),
3268
3272
(
2015
).
28.
K.
Golibrzuch
 et al., “
The dynamics of molecular interactions and chemical reactions at metal surfaces: Testing the foundations of theory
,”
Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.
66
,
399
(
2015
).
You do not currently have access to this content.