In the context of high-accuracy computational thermochemistry, the valence coupled cluster with all singles and doubles (CCSD) correlation component of molecular atomization energies presents the most severe basis set convergence problem, followed by the (T) component. In the present paper, we make a detailed comparison, for an expanded version of the W4-11 thermochemistry benchmark, between, on the one hand, orbital-based CCSD/AV{5,6}Z + d and CCSD/ACV{5,6}Z extrapolation, and on the other hand CCSD-F12b calculations with cc-pVQZ-F12 and cc-pV5Z-F12 basis sets. This latter basis set, now available for H–He, B–Ne, and Al–Ar, is shown to be very close to the basis set limit. Apparent differences (which can reach 0.35 kcal/mol for systems like CCl4) between orbital-based and CCSD-F12b basis set limits disappear if basis sets with additional radial flexibility, such as ACV{5,6}Z, are used for the orbital calculation. Counterpoise calculations reveal that, while total atomization energies with V5Z-F12 basis sets are nearly free of BSSE, orbital calculations have significant BSSE even with AV(6 + d)Z basis sets, leading to non-negligible differences between raw and counterpoise-corrected extrapolated limits. This latter problem is greatly reduced by switching to ACV{5,6}Z core-valence basis sets, or simply adding an additional zeta to just the valence orbitals. Previous reports that all-electron approaches like HEAT (high-accuracy extrapolated ab-initio thermochemistry) lead to different CCSD(T) limits than “valence limit + CV correction” approaches like Feller-Peterson-Dixon and Weizmann-4 (W4) theory can be rationalized in terms of the greater radial flexibility of core-valence basis sets. For (T) corrections, conventional CCSD(T)/AV{Q,5}Z + d calculations are found to be superior to scaled or extrapolated CCSD(T)-F12b calculations of similar cost. For a W4-F12 protocol, we recommend obtaining the Hartree-Fock and valence CCSD components from CCSD-F12b/cc-pV{Q,5}Z-F12 calculations, but the (T) component from conventional CCSD(T)/aug’-cc-pV{Q,5}Z + d calculations using Schwenke’s extrapolation; post-CCSD(T), core-valence, and relativistic corrections are to be obtained as in the original W4 theory. W4-F12 is found to agree slightly better than W4 with ATcT (active thermochemical tables) data, at a substantial saving in computation time and especially I/O overhead. A W4-F12 calculation on benzene is presented as a proof of concept.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
Article navigation
7 June 2016
Research Article|
June 01 2016
Toward a W4-F12 approach: Can explicitly correlated and orbital-based ab initio CCSD(T) limits be reconciled? Available to Purchase
Nitai Sylvetsky;
Nitai Sylvetsky
a)
1Department of Organic Chemistry,
Weizmann Institute of Science
, 76100 Reḥovot, Israel
Search for other works by this author on:
Kirk A. Peterson
;
Kirk A. Peterson
b)
2Department of Chemistry,
Washington State University
, Pullman, Washington 99164-4630, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Amir Karton
;
Amir Karton
c)
3School of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
The University of Western Australia
, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Jan M. L. Martin
Jan M. L. Martin
a)
1Department of Organic Chemistry,
Weizmann Institute of Science
, 76100 Reḥovot, Israel
Search for other works by this author on:
Nitai Sylvetsky
1,a)
Kirk A. Peterson
2,b)
Amir Karton
3,c)
Jan M. L. Martin
1,a)
1Department of Organic Chemistry,
Weizmann Institute of Science
, 76100 Reḥovot, Israel
2Department of Chemistry,
Washington State University
, Pullman, Washington 99164-4630, USA
3School of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
The University of Western Australia
, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
a)
Email: [email protected]. FAX: +972 8 934 3029.
b)
Email: [email protected]. FAX: +1 509 335 8867.
c)
Email: [email protected]
J. Chem. Phys. 144, 214101 (2016)
Article history
Received:
March 23 2016
Accepted:
May 11 2016
Citation
Nitai Sylvetsky, Kirk A. Peterson, Amir Karton, Jan M. L. Martin; Toward a W4-F12 approach: Can explicitly correlated and orbital-based ab initio CCSD(T) limits be reconciled?. J. Chem. Phys. 7 June 2016; 144 (21): 214101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4952410
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
CREST—A program for the exploration of low-energy molecular chemical space
Philipp Pracht, Stefan Grimme, et al.
DeePMD-kit v2: A software package for deep potential models
Jinzhe Zeng, Duo Zhang, et al.
Related Content
Basis set convergence of post-CCSD contributions to molecular atomization energies
J. Chem. Phys. (August 2007)
Do CCSD and approximate CCSD-F12 variants converge to the same basis set limits? The case of atomization energies
J. Chem. Phys. (October 2018)
On the effectiveness of CCSD(T) complete basis set extrapolations for atomization energies
J. Chem. Phys. (July 2011)