The Marcus and Pekar partitions are common, alternative models to describe the non-equilibrium dielectric polarization response that accompanies instantaneous perturbation of a solute embedded in a dielectric continuum. Examples of such a perturbation include vertical electronic excitation and vertical ionization of a solution-phase molecule. Here, we provide a general derivation of the accompanying polarization response, for a quantum-mechanical solute described within the framework of a polarizable continuum model (PCM) of electrostatic solvation. Although the non-equilibrium free energy is formally equivalent within the two partitions, albeit partitioned differently into “fast” versus “slow” polarization contributions, discretization of the PCM integral equations fails to preserve certain symmetries contained in these equations (except in the case of the conductor-like models or when the solute cavity is spherical), leading to alternative, non-equivalent matrix equations. Unlike the total equilibrium solvation energy, however, which can differ dramatically between different formulations, we demonstrate that the equivalence of the Marcus and Pekar partitions for the non-equilibrium solvation correction is preserved to high accuracy. Differences in vertical excitation and ionization energies are <0.2 eV (and often <0.01 eV), even for systems specifically selected to afford a large polarization response. Numerical results therefore support the interchangeability of the Marcus and Pekar partitions, but also caution against relying too much on the fast PCM charges for interpretive value, as these charges differ greatly between the two partitions, especially in polar solvents.
Skip Nav Destination
CHORUS
Article navigation
28 November 2015
Research Article|
November 24 2015
Comparison of the Marcus and Pekar partitions in the context of non-equilibrium, polarizable-continuum solvation models
Zhi-Qiang You;
Zhi-Qiang You
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
The Ohio State University
, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Jan-Michael Mewes;
Jan-Michael Mewes
2Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing,
Ruprechts-Karls University
, Im Neuenheimer Feld 368, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Andreas Dreuw;
Andreas Dreuw
2Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing,
Ruprechts-Karls University
, Im Neuenheimer Feld 368, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
John M. Herbert
John M. Herbert
a)
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
The Ohio State University
, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Chem. Phys. 143, 204104 (2015)
Article history
Received:
September 04 2015
Accepted:
November 11 2015
Citation
Zhi-Qiang You, Jan-Michael Mewes, Andreas Dreuw, John M. Herbert; Comparison of the Marcus and Pekar partitions in the context of non-equilibrium, polarizable-continuum solvation models. J. Chem. Phys. 28 November 2015; 143 (20): 204104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4936357
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
DeePMD-kit v2: A software package for deep potential models
Jinzhe Zeng, Duo Zhang, et al.
CREST—A program for the exploration of low-energy molecular chemical space
Philipp Pracht, Stefan Grimme, et al.
Dielectric profile at the Pt(111)/water interface
Jia-Xin Zhu, Jun Cheng, et al.
Related Content
Free energy functionals for polarization fluctuations: Pekar factor revisited
J. Chem. Phys. (February 2017)
Pekar Mechanism of Electron‐Phonon Interaction in Nanostructures
AIP Conference Proceedings (June 2005)
Nonequilibrium solvation for vertical photoemission and photoabsorption processes using the symmetry-adapted cluster–configuration interaction method in the polarizable continuum model
J. Chem. Phys. (March 2011)
State-specific solvation for restricted active space spin–flip (RAS-SF) wave functions based on the polarizable continuum formalism
J. Chem. Phys. (May 2022)
Optimal diabatic states based on solvation parameters
J. Chem. Phys. (November 2012)