We study four citrate synthase homodimeric proteins within a structure-based coarse-grained model. Two of these proteins come from thermophilic bacteria, one from a cryophilic bacterium and one from a mesophilic organism; three are in the closed and two in the open conformations. Even though the proteins belong to the same fold, the model distinguishes the properties of these proteins in a way which is consistent with experiments. For instance, the thermophilic proteins are more stable thermodynamically than their mesophilic and cryophilic homologues, which we observe both in the magnitude of thermal fluctuations near the native state and in the kinetics of thermal unfolding. The level of stability correlates with the average coordination number for amino acid contacts and with the degree of structural compactness. The pattern of positional fluctuations along the sequence in the closed conformation is different than in the open conformation, including within the active site. The modes of correlated and anticorrelated movements of pairs of amino acids forming the active site are very different in the open and closed conformations. Taken together, our results show that the precise location of amino acid contacts in the native structure appears to be a critical element in explaining the similarities and differences in the thermodynamic properties, local flexibility, and collective motions of the different forms of the enzyme.
REFERENCES
1.
N.
Lane
, Life Ascending: The Ten Great Inventions of Evolution
(W.W. Norton and Co.
, New York
, 2009
).2.
H. A.
Krebs
and P. D. J.
Weitzman
, Krebs’ Citric Acid Cycle: Half a Century and Still Turning
(Biochemical Society
, London
, 1987
).3.
D. L.
Nelson
and M. M.
Cox
, Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry
, 4th ed. (W.H. Freeman and Co.
, 2005
).4.
Y.
Ueda
, H.
Taketomi
, and N.
Go
, “Studies on protein folding, unfolding and fluctuations by computer simulation: A three-dimensional lattice model of lysozyme
,” Biopolymers
17
, 1531
–1548
(1978
).5.
H.
Abe
and N.
Go
, “Noninteracting local-structure model of folding and unfolding transition in globular proteins. II. Application to two-dimensional lattice proteins
,” Biopolymers
20
, 1013
–1031
(1981
).6.
N.
Go
, “Theoretical studies of protein folding
,” Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng.
12
, 183
–210
(1983
).7.
T. X.
Hoang
and M.
Cieplak
, “Molecular dynamics of folding of secondary structures in Go-like models of proteins
,” J. Chem. Phys.
112
, 6851
–6862
(2000
).8.
C.
Clementi
, H.
Nymeyer
, and J. N.
Onuchic
, “Topological and energetic factors: What determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and en-route intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins
,” J. Mol. Biol.
298
, 937
–953
(2000
).9.
J.
Karanicolas
and Ch. L.
Brooks
III, “The origins of the asymmetry in the folding transition states of protein L and protein G
,” Prot. Sci.
11
, 2351
–2361
(2002
).10.
Y.
Levy
, P. G.
Wolynes
, and J.
Onuchic
, “Protein topology determines binding mechanism
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
101
, 511
–516
(2004
).11.
J. I.
Sułkowska
and M.
Cieplak
, “Selection of optimal variants of Go-like models of proteins through studies of stretching
,” Biophys. J.
95
, 3174
–3191
(2008
).12.
J. K.
Noel
and J. N.
Onuchic
, “The many faces of structure-based potentials: From protein folding landscapes to structural characterization of complex biomolecules
,” in Computational Modeling of Biological Systems: From Molecules to Pathways
, edited by N.
Dokholyan
(Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
, 2012
).13.
J. I.
Sułkowska
and M.
Cieplak
, “Mechanical stretching of proteins – A theoretical survey of the Protein Data Bank
,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
19
, 283201
(2007
).14.
M.
Sikora
, J. I.
Sułkowska
, and M.
Cieplak
, “Mechanical strength of 17134 model proteins and cysteine slipknots
,” PLoS Comput. Biol.
5
, e1000547
(2009
).15.
B.
Różycki
, Ł.
Mioduszewski
, and M.
Cieplak
, “Unbinding and unfolding of adhesion protein complexes through stretching: Interplay between shear and tensile mechanical clamps
,” Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf.
82
, 3144
–3153
(2014
).16.
A.
Galera-Prat
, A.
Gomez-Sicilia
, A. F.
Oberhauser
, M.
Cieplak
, and M.
Carrion-Vazquez
, “Understanding biology by stretching proteins: Recent progress
,” Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
20
, 63
–69
(2010
).17.
P. G.
Wolynes
, “Symmetry and the energy landscapes of biomolecules
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
93
, 14249
(1996
).18.
J. N.
Onuchic
, Z.
Luthey-Schulten
, and P. G.
Wolynes
, “Theory of protein folding: The energy landscape perspective
,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.
48
, 545
–600
(1997
).19.
E.
Alm
and D.
Baker
, “Prediction of protein-folding mechanisms from free energy landscapes derived from the native structures
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
96
, 11305
–11310
(1999
).20.
S.
Takada
, “Going for the prediction of protein folding mechanism
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
96
, 11698
–11700
(1999
).21.
C.
Micheletti
, J. R.
Banavar
, A.
Maritan
, and F.
Seno
, “Protein structures and optimal folding from a geometrical variational principle
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
82
, 3372
(1999
).22.
D.
Baker
, “A surprising simplicity to protein folding
,” Nature (London)
405
, 39
–42
(2000
).23.
R. B.
Best
, Y. G.
Chen
, and G.
Hummer
, “Slow protein conformational dynamics from multiple experimental structures: The helix/sheet transition of arc repressor
,” Structure
13
, 1755
–1763
(2005
).24.
Y. G.
Chen
and G.
Hummer
, “Slow conformational dynamics and unfolding of the calmodulin C-terminal domain
,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.
129
, 2414
–2415
(2007
).25.
F. Q.
Zhu
and G.
Hummer
, “Gating transition of pentameric ligand-gated ion channels
,” Biophys. J.
97
, 2456
–2463
(2009
).26.
I.
Bahar
, A. R.
Atilgan
, and B.
Erman
, “Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential
,” Folding Des.
2
, 173
–181
(1997
).27.
R. M.
Daniel
and D. A.
Cowan
, “Biomolecular stability and life at high temperatures
,” CMLS Cell. Mol. Life Sci.
57
, 250
–264
(2000
).28.
G.
Feller
, “Protein stability and enzyme activity at extreme biological temperatures
,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
22
, 323101
(2010
).29.
T.
Collins
, C.
Gerday
, and G.
Feller
, “Xylanases, xylanase families and extremophilic xylanases
,” FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
29
, 3
–23
(2005
).30.
P.
Argos
, M. G.
Rossmann
, U. M.
Grau
, H.
Zuber
, G.
Frank
, and J. D.
Tratschin
, “Thermal stability and protein structure
,” Biochemistry
18
, 5698
–5703
(1979
).31.
R.
Jaenicke
and G.
Boehm
, “The stability of proteins in extreme environments
,” Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
8
, 738
–748
(1998
).32.
A.
Szilagyi
and P.
Zavodszky
, “Structural differences between mesoscopic, moderately thermophilic and extremely thermophilic protein subunits: Results of a comprehensive survey
,” Structure
8
, 493
–504
(2000
).33.
C.
Cambillau
and J.-M.
Claverie
, “Structural and genomic correlates of hyperthermostability
,” J. Biol. Chem.
275
, 32383
–32386
(2000
).34.
G.
Feller
and C.
Gerday
, “Psychrophilic enzymes: Hot topics in cold adaptation
,” Nat. Rev. Microbiol.
1
, 200
–208
(2003
).35.
D. C.
Demirjian
, F.
Moris-Varas
, and C. S.
Cassidy
, “Enzymes from extremophiles
,” Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
5
, 144
–151
(2001
).36.
S.
Bjelic
, B. O.
Brandsdal
, and J.
Aqvist
, “Cold adaptation of enzyme reaction rates
,” Biochemistry
47
, 10049
–10057
(2008
).37.
P. De
Maayer
, D.
Anderson
, C.
Cary
, and D. A.
Cowan
, “Some like it cold: Understanding the survival strategies of psychrophiles
,” EMBO Rep.
15
, 508
–517
(2014
).38.
R. J.
Russell
, J. M.
Ferguson
, D. W.
Hough
, M. J.
Danson
, and G. L.
Taylor
, “The crystal structure of citrate synthase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus at 1.9 A resolution
,” Biochemistry
36
, 9983
–9994
(1997
).39.
S.
Remington
, G.
Wiegand
, and R.
Huber
, “Crystallographic refinement and atomic models of two different forms of citrate synthase at 2.7 and 1.7 A resolution
,” J. Mol. Biol.
158
, 111
–152
(1982
).40.
R. J.
Russell
, U.
Gerike
, M. J.
Danson
, D. W.
Hough
, and G. L.
Taylor
, “Structural adaptations of the cold-active citrate synthase from an Antarctic bacterium
,” Structure
6
, 351
–361
(1998
).41.
D. R.
Boutz
, D.
Cascio
, J.
Whitelegge
, L. J.
Perry
, and T. O.
Yeates
, “Discovery of a thermophilic protein complex stabilized by topologically interlinked chains
,” J. Mol. Biol.
368
, 1332
–1344
(2007
).42.
M.
Cieplak
and T. X.
Hoang
, “Folding of proteins in Go models with angular interactions
,” Physica A
330
, 195
–205
(2003
).43.
J.
Tsai
, R.
Taylor
, C.
Chothia
, and M.
Gerstein
, “The packing density in proteins: Standard radii and volumes
,” J. Mol. Biol.
290
, 253
–266
(1999
).44.
O.
Szklarczyk
, K.
Staron
, and M.
Cieplak
, “Native state dynamics and mechanical properties of human topoisomerase I within a structure-based coarse-grained model
,” Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf.
77
, 420
–431
(2009
).45.
W.
Kabsch
, “A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors
,” Acta Crystallogr.
34
, 827
–828
(1978
).46.
M.
Cieplak
and M. O.
Robbins
, “Nanoindentation of 35 virus capsids in a molecular model: Relating mechanical properties to structure
,” PLoS ONE
8
, e63640
(2013
).47.
M.
Cieplak
and T. X.
Hoang
, “Universality classes in folding times of proteins
,” Biophys. J.
84
, 475
–488
(2003
).48.
G. S.
Bell
, R. J. M.
Russell
, H.
Connaris
, D. W.
Hough
, M. J.
Danson
, and G. L.
Taylor
, “Stepwise adaptations of citrate synthase to survival at life's extremes
,” Eur. J. Biochem.
269
, 6250
–6260
(2002
).49.
M.
Karpusas
, B.
Branchaud
, and S. J.
Remington
, “Proposed mechanism for the condensation reaction of citrate synthase: 1.9-A structure of the ternary complex with oxaloacetate and carboxymethyl coenzyme A
,” Biochemistry
29
, 2213
–2219
(1990
).50.
M.
Cieplak
and J. I.
Sułkowska
, “Thermal unfolding of proteins
,” J. Chem. Phys.
123
, 194908
(2005
).51.
D. A.
Beard
, K. C.
Vinnakota
, and F.
Wu
, “Detailed enzyme kinetics in terms of biochemical species: Study of citrate synthase
,” PLoS ONE
3
, e1825
(2008
).52.
C.
Pfleger
and H.
Gohlke
, “Efficient and robust analysis of biomacromolecular flexibility using ensembles of network topologies based on fuzzy noncovalent constraints
,” Structure
21
, 1725
–1734
(2013
).53.
See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4903747 for Table S1, Figs. S1 and S2.
© 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.
2014
AIP Publishing LLC
You do not currently have access to this content.