We have performed simulations of the model of infinitely thin rigid rods undergoing rotational and translational diffusion, subject to the restriction that no two rods can cross one another, for various concentrations well into the semidilute regime. We used a modification of the algorithm of Doi et al [J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.53, 3000 (1984)] https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.53.3000 that simulates diffusive dynamics using a Monte Carlo method and a nonzero time step. In the limit of zero time step, this algorithm is an exact description of diffusive dynamics subject to the noncrossing restriction. For a wide range of concentrations in the semidilute regime, we report values of the long time rotational diffusion constant of the rods, extrapolated to the limit of zero time step, for various sets of values of the infinite dilution (bare) diffusion constants. These results are compared with the results of a previous simulation of the model by Doi et al. and of previous simulations of rods with finite aspect ratio by Fixman and by Cobb and Butler that had been extrapolated to the limit of infinitely thin rods. The predictions of the Doi-Edwards (DE) scaling law do not hold for this model for the concentrations studied. The simulation data for the model display two deviations from the predictions of the DE theory that have been observed in experimental systems in the semidilute regime, namely, the very slow approach toward DE scaling behavior as the concentration is increased and the large value of the prefactor in the DE scaling law. We present a modified scaling principle for this model that is consistent with the simulation results for a broad range of concentrations in the semidilute regime. The modified scaling principle takes into account two physical effects, which we call “leakage” and “drift,” that were found to be important for the transport properties of a simpler model of nonrotating rods on a lattice [Y.-L. S. Tse and H. C. Andersen, J. Chem. Phys.136, 024904 (2012)] https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3673791.

2.
M.
Doi
and
S. F.
Edwards
,
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2
74
,
560
(
1978
).
3.
M.
Doi
and
S. F.
Edwards
,
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2
74
,
918
(
1978
).
4.
M.
Doi
,
J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed.
19
,
229
(
1981
).
5.
M.
Doi
,
I.
Yamamoto
, and
F.
Kano
,
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
53
,
3000
(
1984
).
6.
R.
Pecora
,
J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Symp.
73
,
83
(
1985
).
7.
The physical assumptions Doi and Edwards made about the mechanism of rotational diffusion and the logic of their derivation actually lead directly to Eq. (1) as written, which contains the bare parallel translational diffusion coefficient. See Eqs. (4) and (6) of Ref. 1, or Eqs. (9.7) and (9.8) of Ref. 24. When standard hydrodynamic theory is then used to relate both D‖0 and Dr0 to the solvent viscosity and hence to each other, the result Dr0D‖0/L2 is obtained. This and Eq. (1) give the more familiar expression for Dr, Eq. (2), which contains Dr0.
8.
J. F.
Maguire
,
J. P.
McTague
, and
F.
Rondelez
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
45
,
1891
(
1980
).
9.
J. F.
Maguire
,
J. P.
McTague
, and
F.
Rondelez
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
47
,
148
(
1981
).
10.
S.
Highsmith
,
C.
Wang
,
K.
Zero
,
R.
Pecora
, and
O.
Jardetzky
,
Biochemistry
21
,
1192
(
1982
).
11.
K. M.
Zero
and
R.
Pecora
,
Macromolecules
15
,
87
(
1982
).
12.
K.
Kubota
and
B.
Chu
,
Biopolymers
22
,
1461
(
1983
).
13.
J. A.
Odell
,
E. D. T.
Atkins
, and
A.
Keller
,
J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Lett. Ed.
21
,
289
(
1983
).
14.
Y.
Mori
,
N.
Ookubo
,
R.
Hayakawa
, and
Y.
Wada
,
J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed.
20
,
2111
(
1982
).
17.
It should be noted that Fixman's rod model was not identical to that of Doi. In particular, in Doi's model D⊥0/D‖0 = 0.5, whereas in Fixman's model D⊥0/D‖0 = 1.0. (For both models L2Dr0/D‖0 = 6.)
18.
I.
Bitsanis
,
H. T.
Davis
, and
M.
Tirrell
,
Macromolecules
21
,
2824
(
1988
).
19.
I.
Bitsanis
,
H. T.
Davis
, and
M.
Tirrell
,
Macromolecules
23
,
1157
(
1990
).
20.
P. D.
Cobb
and
J. E.
Butler
,
J. Chem. Phys.
123
,
054908
(
2005
).
21.
V.
Pryamitsyn
and
V.
Ganesan
,
J. Chem. Phys.
128
,
134901
(
2008
).
22.
Y.-L. S.
Tse
and
H. C.
Andersen
,
J. Chem. Phys.
136
,
024904
(
2012
).
23.
For this model, the equilibrium distribution of states is one in which all allowed states are equally likely.
24.
M.
Doi
and
S. F.
Edwards
,
The Theory of Polymer Dynamics
(
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford
,
1986
).
25.
Note that the first reflection causes the rod to move back toward its original position and then further if necessary. A subsequent reflection, if any, will then cause the rod to move back toward its original position. Thus, the “reflection” in this algorithm is not specular reflection. Also note that along such a path the moving rod can encounter at most two blockers (although it can encounter each of them several times, it crosses neither of them).
26.
H.
Risken
,
The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications
, 2nd ed. (
Springer
,
Germany
,
1989
).
27.
The procedure was done in Origin 8.6 and information about the error analysis is given at http://www.originlab.com/www/helponline/origin/en/UserGuide/The_Fit_Results.html#Parameter_Standard_Errors.
28.
See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4816001 for data tables and additional details left out in the main text.
29.
Note that the mathematical assumptions of the modified scaling principle do not imply that, as dimensionless concentration goes to infinity for fixed bare diffusion constants, the unscaled (νL3)2L2Dr/D‖0 approaches its limiting value monotonically.
30.
The specification of the units of time and length for the various models has no effect on the presentation of the data since the dependent and independent variables in the graph are dimensionless.

Supplementary Material

You do not currently have access to this content.