In benchmark-quality studies of non-covalent interactions, it is common to estimate interaction energies at the complete basis set (CBS) coupled-cluster through perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] level of theory by adding to CBS second-order perturbation theory (MP2) a “coupled-cluster correction,” , evaluated in a modest basis set. This work illustrates that commonly used basis sets such as 6-31G*(0.25) can yield large, even wrongly signed, errors for that vary significantly by binding motif. Double-ζ basis sets show more reliable results when used with explicitly correlated methods to form a correction, yielding a mean absolute deviation of 0.11 kcal mol−1 for the S22 test set. Examining the coupled-cluster correction for basis sets up to sextuple-ζ in quality reveals that converges monotonically only beyond a turning point at triple-ζ or quadruple-ζ quality. In consequence, CBS extrapolation of corrections before the turning point, generally CBS (aug-cc-pVDZ,aug-cc-pVTZ), are found to be unreliable and often inferior to aug-cc-pVTZ alone, especially for hydrogen-bonding systems. Using the findings of this paper, we revise some recent benchmarks for non-covalent interactions, namely the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG test sets. The maximum differences in the revised benchmarks are 0.080, 0.060, 0.257, and 0.102 kcal mol−1, respectively.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
21 November 2011
Research Article|
November 15 2011
Basis set convergence of the coupled-cluster correction, : Best practices for benchmarking non-covalent interactions and the attendant revision of the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG databases Available to Purchase
Michael S. Marshall;
Michael S. Marshall
Center for Computational Molecular Science and Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Lori A. Burns;
Lori A. Burns
Center for Computational Molecular Science and Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
C. David Sherrill
C. David Sherrill
a)
Center for Computational Molecular Science and Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael S. Marshall
Center for Computational Molecular Science and Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400, USA
Lori A. Burns
Center for Computational Molecular Science and Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400, USA
C. David Sherrill
a)
Center for Computational Molecular Science and Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400, USA
a)
Electronic mail: [email protected].
J. Chem. Phys. 135, 194102 (2011)
Article history
Received:
August 19 2011
Accepted:
October 19 2011
Citation
Michael S. Marshall, Lori A. Burns, C. David Sherrill; Basis set convergence of the coupled-cluster correction, : Best practices for benchmarking non-covalent interactions and the attendant revision of the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG databases. J. Chem. Phys. 21 November 2011; 135 (19): 194102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3659142
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
CREST—A program for the exploration of low-energy molecular chemical space
Philipp Pracht, Stefan Grimme, et al.
DeePMD-kit v2: A software package for deep potential models
Jinzhe Zeng, Duo Zhang, et al.
Related Content
Density-functional approaches to noncovalent interactions: A comparison of dispersion corrections (DFT-D), exchange-hole dipole moment (XDM) theory, and specialized functionals
J. Chem. Phys. (February 2011)
Levels of symmetry adapted perturbation theory (SAPT). I. Efficiency and performance for interaction energies
J. Chem. Phys. (March 2014)
Appointing silver and bronze standards for noncovalent interactions: A comparison of spin-component-scaled (SCS), explicitly correlated (F12), and specialized wavefunction approaches
J. Chem. Phys. (December 2014)
Mapping the genome of meta-generalized gradient approximation density functionals: The search for B97M-V
J. Chem. Phys. (February 2015)
Communication: Density functional theory overcomes the failure of predicting intermolecular interaction energies
J. Chem. Phys. (April 2012)