A pair of chemically powered self-propelled nanodimers can exist in a variety of bound and unbound states after undergoing a collision. In addition to independently moving unbound dimers, bound Brownian dimer pairs, whose center-of-mass exhibits diffusive motion, self-propelled moving dimer pairs with directed motion, and bound rotating dimer pairs, were observed. The bound pairs arise from a solvent depletion interaction, which depends on the nonequilibrium concentration field in the vicinity of dimers. The phase diagram reported in the paper shows regions in monomer interaction energy–diameter plane where these bound and unbound states are found. Particle-based simulations and analytical calculations are used to provide insight into the nature of interaction between dimers that gives rise to the observed bound states.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
E. M.
Purcell
, Am. J. Phys.
45
, 3
(1977
).3.
R. D.
Vale
and R. A.
Milligan
, Science
288
, 88
(2000
).4.
J. E.
Molloy
and C.
Veigel
, Science
300
, 2045
(2003
).5.
A.
Yildiz
, Science
311
, 792
(2006
).6.
U.
Börner
, A.
Deutsch
, H.
Reichenbach
, and M.
Bär
, Phys. Rev. Lett.
89
, 078101
(2002
).7.
O. A.
Igoshin
, A.
Goldbeter
, D.
Kaiser
, and G.
Oster
, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
101
, 15760
(2004
).8.
U.
Börner
, A.
Deutsch
, and M.
Bär
, Phys. Biol.
3
, 138
(2006
).9.
V.
Narayan
, N.
Menon
, and S.
Ramaswamy
, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.
P01005
(2006
).10.
J. M.
Ottino
, Chem. Eng. Sci.
61
, 4165
(2006
).11.
D.
Marenduzzo
, E.
Orlandini
, M. E.
Cates
, and J. M.
Yeomans
, Phys. Rev. E
76
, 031921
(2007
).12.
S. A.
Edwards
and J. M.
Yeomans
, Europhys. Lett.
85
, 18008
(2009
).13.
W. A.
Thompson
, I.
Vertinsky
, and J. R.
Krebs
, J. Anim. Ecol.
43
, 785
(1974
).14.
T. J.
Pitcher
, B. L.
Partridge
, and C. S.
Wardle
, Science
194
, 963
(1976
).15.
S. P.
Fletcher
, F.
Dumur
, M. M.
Pollard
, and B. L.
Feringa
, Science
310
, 80
(2005
).16.
E. R.
Kay
, D. A.
Leigh
, and F.
Zerbetto
, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
46
, 72
(2007
).17.
M.
Alvarez-P (c)rez
, S. M.
Goldup
, D. A.
Leigh
, and A. M. Z.
Slawin
, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
130
, 1836
(2008
).18.
S.
Sundararajan
, P. E.
Lammert
, A. W.
Zudans
, V. H.
Crespi
, and A.
Sen
, Nano Lett.
8
, 1271
(2008
).19.
R.
Dreyfus
, J.
Baudry
, M. L.
Ropar
, M.
Fermigier
, H. A.
Stone
, and J.
Bibetter
, Nature
437
, 862
(2005
).20.
W. F.
Paxton
, K. C.
Kistler
, C. C.
Olmeda
, A.
Sen
, S. K. St.
Angelo
, Y.
Cao
, T. E.
Mallouk
, P. E.
Lammert
, and V. H.
Crespi
, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
126
, 13424
(2004
).21.
S.
Fournier-Bidoz
, A. C.
Arsenault
, I.
Manners
, and G. A.
Ozin
, Chem. Commun.
441
(2005
).22.
G. A.
Ozin
, I.
Manners
, S.
Fournier-Bidoz
, and A.
Arsenault
, Adv. Mater.
17
, 3011
(2005
).23.
N.
Mano
and A.
Heller
, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
127
, 11574
(2005
).24.
W. F.
Paxton
, S.
Sundararajan
, T. E.
Mallouk
, and A.
Sen
, Angew. Chem.
45
, 5420
(2006
).25.
L. F.
Valadares
, Y.-G.
Tao
, N. S.
Zacharia
, V.
Kitaev
, F.
Galembeck
, R.
Kapral
, and G. A.
Ozin
, Small
6
, 565
(2010
).26.
H.
Ke
, S.
Ye
, R. L.
Carroll
, and K.
Showalter
, J. Phys. Chem. A
114
, 5462
(2010
).27.
F.
Jülicher
, A.
Ajdari
, and J.
Prost
, Rev. Mod. Phys.
69
, 1269
(1997
).28.
A.
Najafi
and R.
Golestanian
, Phys. Rev. E
69
, 062901
(2004
).29.
R.
Golestanian
, T. B.
Liverpool
, and A.
Ajdari
, Phys. Rev. Lett.
94
, 220801
(2005
).30.
R.
Golestanian
, T. B.
Liverpool
, and A.
Ajdari
, New J. Phys.
9
, 126
(2007
).31.
J. R.
Howse
, R. A. L.
Jones
, A. J.
Ryan
, T.
Gough
, R.
Vafabakhsh
, and R.
Golestanian
, Phys. Rev. Lett.
99
, 048102
(2007
).32.
D. C.
Rapaport
, Phys. Rev. Lett.
99
, 238101
(2007
).33.
G.
Rückner
and R.
Kapral
, Phys. Rev. Lett.
98
, 150603
(2007
).34.
Y.-G.
Tao
, and R.
Kapral
, J. Chem. Phys.
128
, 164518
(2008
).35.
G. P.
Alexander
, and J. M.
Yeomans
, Europhys. Lett.
83
, 34006
(2008
).36.
C. M.
Pooley
, G. P.
Alexander
, and J. M.
Yeomans
, Phys. Rev. Lett.
99
, 228103
(2007
).37.
Y.
Wang
, S.
Fei
, Y.
Byun
, P. E.
Lammert
, V. H.
Crespi
, A.
Sen
, and T. E.
Mallouk
, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
131
, 9926
(2009
).38.
Y.-G.
Tao
and R.
Kapral
, J. Chem. Phys.
131
, 024113
(2009
).39.
K.
Tucci
and R.
Kapral
, J. Chem. Phys.
120
, 8262
(2004
).40.
The asymmetry can arise in different ways for the nanomotor and it is not necessary that the asymmetry be associated with the noncatalytic sphere. Asymmetry could occur as a result of interactions with the catalytic dimer, or the catalytic and noncatalytic portions of Janus particles or other motor configurations.
41.
A.
Malevanets
and R.
Kapral
, J. Chem. Phys.
110
, 8605
(1999
).42.
A.
Malevanets
and R.
Kapral
, J. Chem. Phys.
112
, 72609
(2000
).43.
44.
45.
46.
T.
Ihle
and D. M.
Kroll
, Phys. Rev. E
63
, 020201
(2001
).47.
T.
Ihle
and D. M.
Kroll
, Phys. Rev. E
67
, 066705
(2003
).48.
Similar considerations apply when reversible reactions take place at the catalytic spheres. In this case propulsion will cease when chemical equilibrium is established.
49.
D.
Frenkel
and B.
Smit
, Understanding Molecular Simulation—From Algorithms to Applications
(Academic Press
, San Diego
, 1996
).50.
H. C.
Andersen
, J. Comput. Phys.
52
, 24
(1983
).51.
One may also attempt to estimate the friction coefficient by accounting for Oseen interactions among the monomers in the bound dimer pair. However, in view of the fact that the configuration involves short bonds between the overlapping monomers, this approximation is likely to be poor.
52.
S. H.
Lee
and R.
Kapral
, J. Chem. Phys.
121
, 11163
(2004
).53.
M.
Ripoll
, K.
Mussawisade
, R. G.
Winkler
, and G.
Gompper
, Phys. Rev. E
72
, 016701
(2005
).54.
N.
Kikuchi
, C. M.
Pooley
, J. F.
Ryder
, and J. M.
Yeomans
, J. Chem. Phys.
119
, 6388
(2003
).55.
R.
Kapral
and R. C.
Desai
, J. Chem. Phys.
67
, 5645
(1977
).56.
J. T.
Hynes
, R.
Kapral
, and M.
Weinberg
, J. Chem. Phys.
69
, 2725
(1978
).57.
D.
Frenkel
, Physica A
313
, 1
(2002
).© 2010 American Institute of Physics.
2010
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.
