The S22 test set of interaction energies for small model complexes [Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 1985 (2006)] has been very valuable for benchmarking new and existing methods for noncovalent interactions. However, the basis sets utilized to compute the CCSD(T) interaction energies for some of the dimers are insufficient to obtain converged results. Here we consistently extrapolate all CCSD(T)/complete basis set (CBS) interaction energies using larger basis sets for the CCSD(T) component of the computation. The revised values, which we designate S22A, represent the most accurate results to date for this set of dimers. The new values appear to be within a few hundredths of of the true CCSD(T)/CBS limit at the given geometries, but the former S22 values are off by as much as compared to the revised values. Because some of the most promising methods for noncovalent interactions are already achieving this level of agreement (or better) compared to the S22 data, more accurate benchmark values would clearly be helpful. The MP2, SCS-MP2, SCS-CCSD, SCS(MI)-MP2, and B2PLYP-D methods have been tested against the more accurate benchmark set. The B2PLYP-D method outperforms all other methods tested here, with a mean average deviation of only . However, the consistent, slight underestimation of the interaction energies computed by the SCS-CCSD method (an overall mean absolute deviation and mean deviation of 0.24 and , respectively) suggests that the SCS-CCSD method has the potential to become even more accurate with a reoptimization of its parameters for noncovalent interactions.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
,
Article navigation
14 April 2010
Research Article|
April 08 2010
Basis set consistent revision of the S22 test set of noncovalent interaction energies Available to Purchase
Tait Takatani;
Tait Takatani
1Center for Computational Molecular Science and Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Edward G. Hohenstein;
Edward G. Hohenstein
1Center for Computational Molecular Science and Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Massimo Malagoli;
Massimo Malagoli
1Center for Computational Molecular Science and Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael S. Marshall;
Michael S. Marshall
1Center for Computational Molecular Science and Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
C. David Sherrill
C. David Sherrill
a)
1Center for Computational Molecular Science and Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400, USA
2College of Computing,
Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0280, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Tait Takatani
1
Edward G. Hohenstein
1
Massimo Malagoli
1
Michael S. Marshall
1
C. David Sherrill
1,2,a)
1Center for Computational Molecular Science and Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400, USA
2College of Computing,
Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0280, USA
a)
Electronic mail: [email protected].
J. Chem. Phys. 132, 144104 (2010)
Article history
Received:
November 20 2009
Accepted:
March 12 2010
Citation
Tait Takatani, Edward G. Hohenstein, Massimo Malagoli, Michael S. Marshall, C. David Sherrill; Basis set consistent revision of the S22 test set of noncovalent interaction energies. J. Chem. Phys. 14 April 2010; 132 (14): 144104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3378024
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
CREST—A program for the exploration of low-energy molecular chemical space
Philipp Pracht, Stefan Grimme, et al.
DeePMD-kit v2: A software package for deep potential models
Jinzhe Zeng, Duo Zhang, et al.
Related Content
A comparison of geometric parameters from PBE-based doubly hybrid density functionals PBE0-DH, PBE0-2, and xDH-PBE0
J. Chem. Phys. (November 2013)
Characterization of Si nanostructures using a noncontact mode scanning near-field optical Raman microscope, with 100 nm spatial resolution and 5 nm depth resolution, using ultraviolet resonant Raman scattering
Appl. Phys. Lett. (September 2007)
Spin projection with double hybrid density functional theory
J. Chem. Phys. (July 2014)