We explore whether the topology of energy landscapes in chemical systems obeys any rules and what these rules are. To answer this and related questions we use several tools: (i) Reduced energy surface and its density of states, (ii) descriptor of structure called fingerprint function, which can be represented as a one-dimensional function or a vector in abstract multidimensional space, (iii) definition of a “distance” between two structures enabling quantification of energy landscapes, (iv) definition of a degree of order of a structure, and (v) definitions of the quasi-entropy quantifying structural diversity. Our approach can be used for rationalizing large databases of crystal structures and for tuning computational algorithms for structure prediction. It enables quantitative and intuitive representations of energy landscapes and reappraisal of some of the traditional chemical notions and rules. Our analysis confirms the expectations that low-energy minima are clustered in compact regions of configuration space (“funnels”) and that chemical systems tend to have very few funnels, sometimes only one. This analysis can be applied to the physical properties of solids, opening new ways of discovering structure-property relations. We quantitatively demonstrate that crystals tend to adopt one of the few simplest structures consistent with their chemistry, providing a thermodynamic justification of Pauling’s fifth rule.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
14 March 2009
Research Article|
March 10 2009
How to quantify energy landscapes of solids
Artem R. Oganov;
Artem R. Oganov
a)
1Department of Materials, Laboratory of Crystallography,
ETH Zurich
, HCI G 515, Wolfgang-Pauli-Str. 10, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
2Geology Department,
Moscow State University
, 119992 Moscow, Russia
Search for other works by this author on:
Mario Valle
Mario Valle
3Data Analysis and Visualization Group,
Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS)
, via Cantonale, Galleria 2, 6928 Manno, Switzerland
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Present address: Department of Geosciences, Department of Physics and Astronomy, and New York Center for Computational Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2100, USA. Electronic mail: artem.oganov@sunysb.edu.
J. Chem. Phys. 130, 104504 (2009)
Article history
Received:
August 27 2008
Accepted:
January 16 2009
Citation
Artem R. Oganov, Mario Valle; How to quantify energy landscapes of solids. J. Chem. Phys. 14 March 2009; 130 (10): 104504. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3079326
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Citing articles via
DeePMD-kit v2: A software package for deep potential models
Jinzhe Zeng, Duo Zhang, et al.
Related Content
Energy landscapes for diffusion: Analysis of cage-breaking processes
J. Chem. Phys. (October 2008)
Determining landscape-based criteria for freezing of liquids
J. Chem. Phys. (June 2007)
Entropy, diffusivity and the energy landscape of a waterlike fluid
J. Chem. Phys. (June 2010)
Diffusivity, excess entropy, and the potential-energy landscape of monatomic liquids
J. Chem. Phys. (January 2006)
Potential energy landscape of TIP4P/2005 water
J. Chem. Phys. (April 2018)