Within the harmonic approximation to transition state theory, the biggest challenge involved in finding the mechanism or rate of transitions is the location of the relevant saddle points on the multidimensional potential energy surface. The saddle point search is particularly challenging when the final state of the transition is not specified. In this article we report on a comparison of several methods for locating saddle points under these conditions and compare, in particular, the well-established rational function optimization (RFO) methods using either exact or approximate Hessians with the more recently proposed minimum mode following methods where only the minimum eigenvalue mode is found, either by the dimer or the Lanczos method. A test problem involving transitions in a seven-atom Pt island on a Pt(111) surface using a simple Morse pairwise potential function is used and the number of degrees of freedom varied by varying the number of movable atoms. In the full system, 175 atoms can move so 525 degrees of freedom need to be optimized to find the saddle points. For testing purposes, we have also restricted the number of movable atoms to 7 and 1. Our results indicate that if attempting to make a map of all relevant saddle points for a large system (as would be necessary when simulating the long time scale evolution of a thermal system) the minimum mode following methods are preferred. The minimum mode following methods are also more efficient when searching for the lowest saddle points in a large system, and if the force can be obtained cheaply. However, if only the lowest saddle points are sought and the calculation of the force is expensive but a good approximation for the Hessian at the starting position of the search can be obtained at low cost, then the RFO approaches employing an approximate Hessian represent the preferred choice. For small and medium sized systems where the force is expensive to calculate, the RFO approaches employing an approximate Hessian is also the more efficient, but when the force and Hessian can be obtained cheaply and only the lowest saddle points are sought the RFO approach using an exact Hessian is the better choice. These conclusions have been reached based on a comparison of the total computational effort needed to find the saddle points and the number of saddle points found for each of the methods. The RFO methods do not perform very well with respect to the latter aspect, but starting the searches further away from the initial minimum or using the hybrid RFO version presented here improves this behavior considerably in most cases.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
22 November 2004
Research Article|
November 22 2004
Comparison of methods for finding saddle points without knowledge of the final states Available to Purchase
R. A. Olsen;
R. A. Olsen
Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Gorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
G. J. Kroes;
G. J. Kroes
Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Gorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
G. Henkelman;
G. Henkelman
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A5300, Austin, Texas 78712-0165
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Arnaldsson;
A. Arnaldsson
Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, P.O. Box 351700, Seattle, Washington 98195-1700
Search for other works by this author on:
H. Jónsson
H. Jónsson
Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, P.O. Box 351700, Seattle, Washington 98195-1700
Faculty of Science, VR-II, University of Iceland, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland
Search for other works by this author on:
R. A. Olsen
Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Gorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
G. J. Kroes
Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Gorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
G. Henkelman
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A5300, Austin, Texas 78712-0165
A. Arnaldsson
Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, P.O. Box 351700, Seattle, Washington 98195-1700
H. Jónsson
Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, P.O. Box 351700, Seattle, Washington 98195-1700
Faculty of Science, VR-II, University of Iceland, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland
J. Chem. Phys. 121, 9776–9792 (2004)
Article history
Received:
July 14 2004
Accepted:
September 03 2004
Citation
R. A. Olsen, G. J. Kroes, G. Henkelman, A. Arnaldsson, H. Jónsson; Comparison of methods for finding saddle points without knowledge of the final states. J. Chem. Phys. 22 November 2004; 121 (20): 9776–9792. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1809574
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
CREST—A program for the exploration of low-energy molecular chemical space
Philipp Pracht, Stefan Grimme, et al.
DeePMD-kit v2: A software package for deep potential models
Jinzhe Zeng, Duo Zhang, et al.
Related Content
Exploring potential energy surfaces to reach saddle points above convex regions
J. Chem. Phys. (June 2024)
Acceleration of saddle-point searches with machine learning
J. Chem. Phys. (August 2016)
Basin constrained κ-dimer method for saddle point finding
J. Chem. Phys. (October 2014)
Biased gradient squared descent saddle point finding method
J. Chem. Phys. (May 2014)
Methods to locate saddle points in complex landscapes
J. Chem. Phys. (November 2017)