The basis for the conjecture that water’s may be 165±5 K [Velikov, Borick, and Angell, Science 294, 2335 (2001)] has been examined. It is shown that (i) differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) scans provided by Hallbrucker and Mayer [J. Phys. Chem. 91, 503 (1987)], and used as a basis for the conjecture, do not represent the heat capacity of the assumed, slow-cooled glassy water or of hyperquenched glassy water, and (ii) there is no fundamental requirement that the excess heat capacity show a peak at —instead the peak may appear at at or at On heating, the enthalpy of glasses produced by hyperquenching or rapid cooling begins to decrease at a much lower T than that of the glasses obtained by slow cooling. Annealing increases this temperature toward and the enthalpy decrease continues at T above In the enthalpy relaxation region, the diffusion coefficient of the hyperquenched glassy state is higher than that of a slow-cooled glassy state at a given T, and a local minimum in the DSC scan does not appear at in several glasses. These findings remove the basis for the conjecture that water’s may be ∼165 K. Several analyses confirm that the known sigmoid-shape endotherm of glassy water represents the glass-softening range with onset temperature of 136 K. The DSC scans of a glassy state similar to that of water have been simulated by using a nonlinear, nonexponential enthalpy relaxation formalism. These show that a peak in the difference scan of the simulated glass appears above its of 136 K.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
8 May 2002
Research Article|
May 08 2002
Does water need a new Available to Purchase
J. Chem. Phys. 116, 8067–8073 (2002)
Article history
Received:
January 03 2002
Accepted:
February 07 2002
Citation
G. P. Johari; Does water need a new . J. Chem. Phys. 8 May 2002; 116 (18): 8067–8073. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1466469
Download citation file:
