Photoinduced electron transfer dynamics between fluorescer (acceptor, A) and quencher (donor, D) was investigated by measuring the fluorescence quenching using femtosecond up-conversion spectroscopy. The measurements were made in a quencher concentration range of 0.15 M–1 M and also in a neat quencher solvent. Fluorescence decay at times longer than 5 ps can be explained by combining the diffusion equation with the Marcus equation of electron transfer. At higher quencher concentrations (>0.3 M), an additional component with a time constant of ∼250 fs appears. At these concentrations, the fluorescers (9-cyanoanthracene, CA and 9,10-dicyanoanthracene) and the quenchers (N,N-dimethylaniline, DMA) were found to form “weak” CT complexes. Fluorescence from the S1 state of the CA-DMA complex was detected by steady state spectroscopy. The excitation spectrum observed at the maximum intensity of this fluorescence indicates the existence of an excited S2 state of the CT complex near the energy of D⋅A* (the locally excited state of the pair). Excitation of CA at 400 nm leads to simultaneous excitation of the CT complex to the S2 state. It was concluded that the fast component is the fluorescence from the S2 state of the complex. This was confirmed by the concurrent rise of the S1 fluorescence of the CA-DMA complex. The fast decay of ∼250 fs is caused by the competition between the radiative transition S2→S0 and the nonradiative internal conversion S2→S1. The fast S2→S1 nonradiative transition can be regarded as a charge separation process.

1.
S.
Murata
and
M.
Tachiya
,
Chem. Phys. Lett.
194
,
347
(
1992
).
2.
S.
Murata
,
M.
Nishimura
,
S.
Matsuzaki
, and
M.
Tachiya
,
Chem. Phys. Lett.
219
,
200
(
1994
).
3.
S.
Murata
,
S.
Matsuzaki
, and
M.
Tachiya
,
J. Phys. Chem.
99
,
5354
(
1995
).
4.
S.
Murata
and
M.
Tachiya
,
J. Phys. Chem.
100
,
4064
(
1996
).
5.
S. F.
Swallen
,
K.
Weidemaier
,
H. L.
Tavernier
, and
M. D.
Fayer
,
J. Phys. Chem.
100
,
8106
(
1996
).
6.
K.
Yoshihara
,
K.
Tominaga
, and
Y.
Nagasawa
,
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
68
,
696
(
1995
), and references therein.
7.
(a)
H.
Miyasaka
,
S.
Ojima
, and
N.
Mataga
,
J. Phys. Chem.
93
,
3380
(
1989
);
(b)
S.
Ojima
,
H.
Miyasaka
, and
N.
Mataga
,
J. Phys. Chem.
94
,
4147
(
1990
);
(c)
S.
Ojima
,
H.
Miyasaka
, and
N.
Mataga
,
J. Phys. Chem.
94
,
5834
(
1990
);
(d)
S.
Ojima
,
H.
Miyasaka
, and
N.
Mataga
,
J. Phys. Chem.
94
,
7534
(
1990
).
8.
(a)
T.
Asahi
and
N.
Mataga
,
J. Phys. Chem.
93
,
6575
(
1989
);
(b)
T.
Asahi
and
N.
Mataga
,
J. Phys. Chem.
95
,
1956
(
1991
);
(c)
T.
Asahi
,
N.
Mataga
,
Y.
Takahashi
, and
T.
Miyashi
,
Chem. Phys. Lett.
171
,
309
(
1990
).
9.
T.
Asahi
and
N.
Mataga
,
J. Phys. Chem.
95
,
1956
(
1991
).
10.
T.
Asahi
,
M.
Ohkohchi
, and
N.
Mataga
,
J. Phys. Chem.
97
,
13132
(
1993
).
11.
H.
Miyasaka
,
S.
Kotani
, and
A.
Itaya
,
J. Phys. Chem.
99
,
5757
(
1995
).
12.
N. Mataga and T. Kubota, Molecular Interactions and Electronic Spectra (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1970).
13.
(a)
T.
Kobayashi
,
K.
Yosihara
, and
S.
Nagakura
,
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
44
,
2603
(
1971
);
(b)
K.
Egawa
,
N.
Nakashima
,
N.
Mataga
, and
C.
Yamanaka
,
Chem. Phys. Lett.
8
,
108
(
1971
);
(c)
K.
Egawa
,
N.
Nakashima
,
N.
Mataga
, and
C.
Yamanaka
,
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
44
,
3287
(
1971
).
14.
I. V.
Rubtsov
and
K.
Yoshihara
,
J. Phys. Chem. A
101
,
6138
(
1997
).
15.
M.
Tachiya
and
A.
Mozumder
,
Chem. Phys. Lett.
28
,
87
(
1974
).
16.
M.
Tachiya
,
Radiat. Phys. Chem.
21
,
167
(
1983
).
17.
H.
Sano
and
M.
Tachiya
,
J. Chem. Phys.
71
,
1276
(
1979
).
18.
R. A.
Marcus
,
J. Chem. Phys.
24
,
966
(
1956
).
19.
We observed a rise-up of 150–200 fs in the longer wavelength side of DCA fluorescence in AN without quencher. This is considered to originate from the dynamic Stokes shift due to solvation. The rise time is consistent with the longitudinal relaxation time of AN estimated previously (Ref. 20).
20.
M. A.
Kahlow
,
W.
Jarzeba
,
T. J.
King
, and
P. F.
Barbara
,
J. Chem. Phys.
90
,
151
(
1989
).
21.
T.
Yabe
,
H.
Chosrowjan
,
K.
Yamada
, and
T.
Okada
,
J. Photochem. Photobiol., A
109
,
15
(
1997
).
22.
In principle, we should incorporate the mean force potential into account in the diffusion equation [Eq. (2)] to guarantee an equilibrium oscillatory structure of the radial distribution function. However, as shown in Fig. 4, diffusion gives small influences on the decay curve in the time region <2 ps. Therefore, we believe that the term due to the mean force potential can be neglected in these discussions.
23.
J. K.
Percus
and
G. J.
Yevic
,
Phys. Rev.
110
,
1
(
1958
).
24.
M. S.
Wertheim
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
10
,
321
(
1963
).
25.
E. J.
Thiele
,
Chem. Phys.
39
,
474
(
1963
).
26.
The one-component PY equation is applicable to a pure liquid, i.e., there should be only one kind of molecule in the liquid. In the present paper, the existence of the fluorescer molecules was assumed to have a negligible effect on the radial distribution function (rdf) of the quencher molecules. This assumption is reasonable since the fluorescer concentration is low (7×10−3M). On the other hand, the existence of AN molecules cannot be neglected at concentrations of 0.15–1 M. However, the existence of AN molecules may make the rdf of DMA smoother, and make the effective contact distance larger. This is because there exists AN molecules between DCA and DMA or between DMA and DMA. If the rdf of pure DMA is used instead of that of DMA in AN in the calculation of the decay curve, the decay rate at shorter times will be overestimated. The “true” decay curve due to ET quenching for DCA and DMA in ACN is considered to lie between the solid and broken curves in Figs. 2 and 3(b).
27.
There is a possible explanation for the decay in Fig. 2 including the 250 fs decay. We have assumed above that the electron transfer rate is expressed by Eq. (3) at any distance. If we assume that the electron transfer rate at short D-A* distances is larger than that predicted by Eq. (3), both the faster and slower decays in Fig. 2 can be reproduced pretty well. Stronger interaction than the prediction between the D⋅A pairs at short distances may possibly occur. However, as described in the next section of this paper, we confirmed the formation of the CT complex between the fluorescer and the quencher at high quencher concentrations by stationary absorption and fluorescence spectra. We therefore believe that the 250 fs decay component in Fig. 2 is due to the fluorescence from S2 state of the CT complex (see Sec. III B).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.