A set of 148 molecules having well-established enthalpies of formation at 298 K is presented. This set, referred to as the G2 neutral test set, includes the 55 molecules whose atomization energies were used to test Gaussian-2 (G2) theory [J. Chem. Phys. 94, 7221 (1991)] and 93 new molecules. The G2 test set includes 29 radicals, 35 nonhydrogen systems, 22 hydrocarbons, 47 substituted hydrocarbons, and 15 inorganic hydrides. It is hoped that this new test set will provide a means for assessing and improving new theoretical models. From an assessment of G2 and density functional theories (DFT) on this test set it is found that G2 theory is the most reliable method both in terms of average absolute deviation (1.58 kcal/mol) and maximum deviation (8.2 kcal/mol). The largest deviations between experiment and G2 theory occur for molecules having multiple halogens. Inclusion of spin–orbit effects reduces the average absolute deviation to 1.47 kcal/mol and significantly improves the results for the chlorine substituted molecules, but little overall improvement is seen for the fluorine substituted molecules. Of the two modified versions of G2 theory examined in this study, G2(MP2,SVP) theory (average absolute deviation=1.93 kcal/mol) performs better than G2(MP2) theory (2.04 kcal/mol). The G2(MP2,SVP) theory is found to perform very well for hydrocarbons, radicals, and inorganic hydrides. Of the seven DFT methods investigated, the B3LYP method has the smallest average absolute deviation (3.11 kcal/mol). It also has a significantly larger distribution of error than the G2 methods with a maximum deviation of 20.1 kcal/mol.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
15 January 1997
Research Article|
January 15 1997
Assessment of Gaussian-2 and density functional theories for the computation of enthalpies of formation Available to Purchase
Larry A. Curtiss;
Larry A. Curtiss
Chemical Technology/Materials Science Divisions, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
Search for other works by this author on:
Krishnan Raghavachari;
Krishnan Raghavachari
Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul C. Redfern;
Paul C. Redfern
Chemical Technology/Materials Science Divisions, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
Search for other works by this author on:
John A. Pople
John A. Pople
Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
Search for other works by this author on:
Larry A. Curtiss
Chemical Technology/Materials Science Divisions, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
Krishnan Raghavachari
Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
Paul C. Redfern
Chemical Technology/Materials Science Divisions, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
John A. Pople
Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
J. Chem. Phys. 106, 1063–1079 (1997)
Article history
Received:
September 04 1996
Accepted:
October 04 1996
Citation
Larry A. Curtiss, Krishnan Raghavachari, Paul C. Redfern, John A. Pople; Assessment of Gaussian-2 and density functional theories for the computation of enthalpies of formation. J. Chem. Phys. 15 January 1997; 106 (3): 1063–1079. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.473182
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
CREST—A program for the exploration of low-energy molecular chemical space
Philipp Pracht, Stefan Grimme, et al.
DeePMD-kit v2: A software package for deep potential models
Jinzhe Zeng, Duo Zhang, et al.
Related Content
Assessment of W1 and W2 theories for the computation of electron affinities, ionization potentials, heats of formation, and proton affinities
J. Chem. Phys. (April 2001)
Assessment of Gaussian-2 and density functional theories for the computation of ionization potentials and electron affinities
J. Chem. Phys. (July 1998)
Assessment of complete basis set methods for calculation of enthalpies of formation
J. Chem. Phys. (January 1998)