Previously we have provided a quantitative theory that explains the apparent field dependence observed for chemical shifts in high resolution solids state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (where magic angle spinning is combined with high‐power 1H decoupling). We have expanded that theoretical treatment so as to include the effect of homonuclear dipole–dipole couplings among the abundant nuclear spin species, and to the impact of off‐resonance rf fields. These differing contributions to the residual linewidths are assessed in a unified theoretical treatment using the Floquet theory for time‐dependent Hamiltonians. Some comments are provided as to the circumstances in which the various contributing terms dominate.
REFERENCES
1.
M. P.
Augustine
, K. W.
Zilm
, and D. B.
Zax
, J. Chem. Phys.
98
, 9432
(1993
).2.
3.
4.
A. N.
Garroway
, D. L.
VanderHart
, and W. L.
Earl
, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A
299
, 609
(1981
);5.
6.
7.
A. E.
Bennett
, C. M.
Rienstra
, M.
Auger
, K. V.
Lakshmi
, and R. G.
Griffin
, J. Chem. Phys.
103
, 6951
(1995
).8.
A. Abragam, Principles of Nuclear Magnetism (Oxford University Press, New York, 1961).
9.
See, for example, Standard Mathematical Tables and Formulae, edited by D. Zwillinger, 30th ed. (CRC, Boca Raton, 1996).
10.
11.
R. C.
Hewitt
, S.
Meiboom
, and L. C.
Snyder
, J. Chem. Phys.
58
, 5089
(1973
).12.
A.
Pines
, D. J.
Ruben
, S.
Vega
, and M.
Mehring
, Phys. Rev. Lett.
36
, 110
(1976
);13.
A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1961), Vol. II.
14.
15.
A. Pines, “Lectures on Pulsed NMR,” in Proceedings of the 100th School of Physics “Enrico Fermi” (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988).
16.
C. P. Slichter, Principles of Magnetic Resonance (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990), Appendix D.
17.
M. Mehring, Principles of High Resolution NMR in Solids (Springer, Berlin, 1983).
18.
19.
20.
21.
S.
Vega
, E. T.
Olejniczak
, and R. G.
Griffin
, J. Chem. Phys.
80
, 4832
(1984
).22.
23.
24.
25.
U. Haeberlen, High Resolution NMR in Solids: Selective Averaging (Academic, New York, 1976), Adv. Magn. Reson. Suppl. 1.
26.
27.
In evaluating these cross correlations we have discovered that Eq. (2) of Ref. 1 incorrectly provides a simple analytic form for sin β. No such simple form appears to exist.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1996 American Institute of Physics.
1996
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.