Yttrium iron garnet (YIG) magnonics has garnered significant research interest because of the unique properties of magnons (quasiparticles of collective spin excitation) for signal processing. In particular, hybrid systems based on YIG magnonics show great promise for quantum information science due to their broad frequency tunability and strong compatibility with other platforms. However, their broad applications have been severely constrained by substantial microwave loss in the gadolinium gallium garnet (GGG) substrate at cryogenic temperatures. In this study, we demonstrate that YIG thin films can be spalled from YIG/GGG samples. Our approach is validated by measuring hybrid devices comprising superconducting resonators and spalled YIG films, which exhibit anti-crossing features that indicate strong coupling between magnons and microwave photons. Such new capability of separating YIG thin films from GGG substrates via spalling and the integrated superconductor-YIG devices represent a significant advancement for integrated magnonic devices, paving the way for advanced magnon-based coherent information processing.

The field of YIG magnonics1 is a rapidly evolving research area focusing on the study of collective spin excitations (magnons) in YIG (yttrium iron garnet) crystals. In recent years, magnonics has shown great potential for hybrid information processing.2–5 As a ferrimagnetic insulator, YIG has been considered as one of the most attractive magnetic materials for developing hybrid magnonic devices, thanks to its low magnetic damping, high spin density, and excellent compatibility with various physical systems such as microwave, optics, and acoustics. These unique properties enable the extensive exploration in recent years on YIG-based hybrid magnonic devices such as electromagnonics,6–16 optomagnonics,17–19 and magnomechanics20–23 for different applications ranging from quantum information science24–28 to dark matter detection.29,30 With the recent growing interests in developing large-scale integrated magnonic circuits, thin-film YIG devices are now highly sought after, marking a shift from the bulk YIG spheres widely used in earlier research.

However, the development of thin film YIG devices at cryogenic temperatures has faced significant limitations, primarily due to the undesirable properties of the substrate used for YIG thin film growth. The optimal method for producing high-quality crystalline YIG films is epitaxial growth on gadolinium gallium garnet (GGG) substrates, which have a lattice constant closely matched to that of YIG, resulting in room-temperature magnon linewidths similar to those of single-crystal YIG spheres. Unfortunately, at cryogenic temperatures, YIG films exhibit substantial microwave losses because the GGG substrate undergoes a phase transition into a geometrically frustrated spin-liquid state below 5 K.31 In this state, the short-range ordered spins in the GGG substrate strongly absorb external energy, a characteristic that has been exploited in commercial adiabatic demagnetization cooling applications. Consequently, in YIG/GGG structures, the presence of the spin-liquid state in GGG reduces the lifetime of spin excitations in the YIG layer, as evidenced by a larger ferromagnetic resonance (FMR)32 linewidth compared to pure YIG spheres. This presents a significant obstacle to the integration of YIG thin films in cryogenic devices. For instance, recent demonstrations of electromagnonic systems,6–16,33–34 which involve strongly coupled microwave photons and magnons and hold great promise for integration with superconducting qubits,24–28 have been largely restricted to YIG spheres, while the application of YIG thin films has been limited due to their high losses at cryogenic temperatures.

One promising solution to this significant challenge is to utilize YIG thin films without the GGG substrate, which can be implemented through several different technical approaches. The first method involves growing YIG thin films on alternative substrates, such as silicon.35–38 This approach is straightforward and could greatly facilitate device integration if successfully developed; however, the quality of the YIG thin films produced in this manner is often low due to the lattice mismatch between YIG and the new substrate. The second method entails detaching epitaxially grown single-crystalline YIG from the GGG substrate.39–42 While this approach yields high-quality YIG thin films, the separation processes are typically challenging and difficult to control due to the similar physical and chemical properties of YIG and GGG, which hinders broader applications. Another approach involves growing YIG structures on the GGG substrate with finite contact points, followed by a transfer process. Although high-quality YIG devices can be obtained using this method, it is challenging to produce large-area YIG thin films.40 In this work, we present our investigation of a novel method designed to simplify the YIG detaching process, offering a new direction for the development of integrated YIG devices [Fig. 1(a)].

FIG. 1.

(a) A schematic of an integrated hybrid quantum device using the spalled YIG thin film. (b) Schematics of the YIG film spalling process: (I) (Optional) helium ion implantation process with implantation depth around 7  μm in the YIG/GGG substrate. (II) A stack of films comprising 10 nm of chromium, 70 nm of gold, and 7  μm of nickel deposited on a 200 nm YIG/500  μm GGG substrate. (III) The separation point occurs at approximately 2  μm beneath the YIG/GGG substrate’s top surface, where stress accumulates, achieved by using a thermal release tape. (IV) Materials remaining on the tape, from bottom to top: 7  μm of nickel, 70 nm of gold, 10 nm of chromium, 200 nm of YIG, and 2  μm of GGG. (V) Subsequent removal of metal layers is accomplished using nickel, gold, and chromium etchants in sequence. (c) Optical image of the spalled sample after step II. Right side: Spalled film adhered to the thermal release tape. Left side: The remaining GGG substrate after the spalling process. (d) Confocal microscope measurement image of the surface of the remaining GGG substrate. The outline of the spalled area is marked by the yellow dashed line.

FIG. 1.

(a) A schematic of an integrated hybrid quantum device using the spalled YIG thin film. (b) Schematics of the YIG film spalling process: (I) (Optional) helium ion implantation process with implantation depth around 7  μm in the YIG/GGG substrate. (II) A stack of films comprising 10 nm of chromium, 70 nm of gold, and 7  μm of nickel deposited on a 200 nm YIG/500  μm GGG substrate. (III) The separation point occurs at approximately 2  μm beneath the YIG/GGG substrate’s top surface, where stress accumulates, achieved by using a thermal release tape. (IV) Materials remaining on the tape, from bottom to top: 7  μm of nickel, 70 nm of gold, 10 nm of chromium, 200 nm of YIG, and 2  μm of GGG. (V) Subsequent removal of metal layers is accomplished using nickel, gold, and chromium etchants in sequence. (c) Optical image of the spalled sample after step II. Right side: Spalled film adhered to the thermal release tape. Left side: The remaining GGG substrate after the spalling process. (d) Confocal microscope measurement image of the surface of the remaining GGG substrate. The outline of the spalled area is marked by the yellow dashed line.

Close modal

Our approach is based on controlled mechanical spalling,43 as illustrated by the procedures in Fig. 1(b). The substrate used is a commercially available single-crystal YIG film [200 nm thick, (111)-oriented], grown on a 500  μm-thick GGG substrate via liquid phase epitaxy (LPE). After cleaning the sample, a 10-nm-thick layer of chromium (Cr) followed by a 70-nm-thick layer of gold (Au) is deposited on the YIG surface through magnetron sputtering. Using the sputtered gold film as a seed layer, a thick film of nickel (Ni) is electroplated to a final thickness of 7  μm, utilizing the electroplating conditions outlined in Refs. 44 and 45, which yields an intrinsic tensile stress of 700 MPa. This tensile stress, along with the thickness of the Ni layer, defines an equilibrium depth within the YIG/GGG substrate where steady-state crack propagation can occur.46 

Using a thermal release tape, the top layer stack (Ni/Au/Cr/YIG/GGG) is carefully spalled, resulting in a continuous film, as shown in Fig. 1(c), with most of the GGG substrate remaining on the bottom tape. Given that this depth exceeds the thickness of the YIG layer, the spalled YIG remains attached to a thin layer of GGG. However, by selecting YIG wafers with larger thickness (e.g., 10  μm) and optimizing the thickness and tensile stress of the Ni layer, it is possible to spall a layer of pure YIG without any residual GGG. The final metal-free device is achieved by removing all the metal layers using appropriate wet chemical etching.

We observed that under our current conditions, ion implantation into the substrate plays a crucial role in spalling. For intrinsic YIG/GGG samples, the resulting spalling depth is typically 5–10  μm. However, when the YIG/GGG sample is treated with helium ion implantation (following the conditions outlined in Refs. 39 and 47), thinner spalling depths are achieved along with smoother surfaces. This is demonstrated by surface profile scans of the remaining GGG substrate post-spalling [Fig. 1(d)] using a 3D laser scanning confocal microscope (Keyence VK-X1000), which reveal a spalling depth of approximately 2–3  μm. This observation can be attributed to damage within the GGG layer at the ion implantation depth (7  μm) caused by high-energy helium ions during the implantation process, making it more prone to fracture under the elastic stress from the Ni layer and resulting in a shallower spalling depth.

To characterize the microwave performance of the spalled YIG thin film at room temperature, it is flip-bonded to a rectangular split ring resonator (RSRR) made of copper16 for ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) measurement, as shown schematically in Fig. 2(a). The reflection spectrum of the RSRR is obtained using a vector network analyzer, and the FMR frequency of the spalled YIG is fine-tuned by adjusting the magnitude of a magnetic field applied along the out-of-plane direction. When the magnon modes approach the resonance frequency of the microwave resonator, they should become visible in the reflection spectrum.

FIG. 2.

(a) Schematics of a spalled YIG thin film bonded onto a room-temperature RSRR chip. (b) Optical image of a piece of spalled YIG (approximately 500 × 300 μ m 2 affixed to a Kapton tape. (c) Measured reflection spectra for the RSRR device with the YIG/GGG chip attached (prior to annealing). (d) Measured reflection spectra for the RSRR device with the spalled YIG (after annealing).

FIG. 2.

(a) Schematics of a spalled YIG thin film bonded onto a room-temperature RSRR chip. (b) Optical image of a piece of spalled YIG (approximately 500 × 300 μ m 2 affixed to a Kapton tape. (c) Measured reflection spectra for the RSRR device with the YIG/GGG chip attached (prior to annealing). (d) Measured reflection spectra for the RSRR device with the spalled YIG (after annealing).

Close modal

However, when a 500 × 300 × 2 μm 3 piece of the spalled YIG film (treated with helium ion implantation) is bonded to the RSRR, no magnon modes are observed in the reflection spectra. This absence can be attributed to significant magnon losses induced by ion implantation, which may exceed the coupling strength between the microwave resonance and the magnon mode due to the small volume of the YIG piece. To confirm this hypothesis, we tested a larger piece (approximately 5 × 5 mm 2) of unspalled YIG treated with the same ion implantation process, using the same RSRR reflection measurement. With this increased YIG volume, the magnon mode is successfully detected; however, the measured data [Fig. 2(c)] show a significantly broader linewidth (full width at half maximum, FWHM) of Δ ω / 2 π = 78.2 MHz at 11.6 GHz, corresponding to a magnon dissipation rate κ m / 2 π = 39.1 MHz, which is an order of magnitude higher than previously reported values for LPE YIG thin films.32,48–50

The broader linewidth can be attributed to two primary dissipation sources: (1) Structural damage from high-energy ion penetration into the YIG layer and (2) the accumulation of helium ions within the YIG layer. Both effects can be mitigated through an annealing process, which can restore the damaged lattice structure and expel accumulated helium ions from the YIG. We performed annealing on multiple spalled-free YIG films in ambient air, with the temperature gradually increased from room temperature to a maximum of 850 °C over 6 h, held for 3 h, and then slowly cooled over 14 h, allowing ample time for lattice healing and recrystallization of the YIG. Following this annealing process, the magnon mode is successfully observed in the spalled YIG device, as shown in Fig. 2(d). Numerical fitting reveals a linewidth of Δ ω / 2 π = 4.16 MHz at 10.5 GHz (corresponding to Δ H = 1.5 Oe), comparable to those of high-quality LPE YIG thin films reported in previous studies.32,48–50

We further characterize the spalled YIG device at millikelvin (mK) temperatures to explore its potential in cryogenic quantum applications. A small piece of spalled YIG (around 300 × 200 × 2 μ m 3) is coupled to a superconducting microwave resonator, fabricated using a 100-nm-thick niobium layer via photolithography and dry etching. To enhance magnon–photon coupling, a lumped-element resonator with interdigital capacitors is used, inductively coupled to a bus transmission line, as shown in the layout in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b). The YIG flake is flip-bonded with GE varnish to cover the central inductor wire where the microwave magnetic field is strongest,34 further increasing the coupling strength between the magnon and photon modes. An optical image of the assembled device is shown in Fig. 3(c), with the red dashed line indicating the shape and location of the spalled YIG film, which appears with low contrast against the yellowish GE varnish under the optical microscope.

FIG. 3.

(a) Layout depicting the superconducting resonator coupled to a bus transmission line. (b) Zoomed-in view of the lumped element resonator design, showing the interdigital capacitors on the sides and the inductor wire in the middle. (c) Optical image displaying a superconducting resonator loaded with the spalled YIG thin film (measuring approximately 300 × 200 μ m 2). The irregular shaded area is the GE varnish for chip bonding. (d) The measured spectrum of the chip bonded with the spalled YIG at 200 mK, revealing two microwave resonances at 5.05 and 9.34 GHz, respectively. (e) The measured transmission spectrum of another superconducting resonator device at 200 mK with (red curve) and without (black curve) the unspalled YIG/GGG substrate.

FIG. 3.

(a) Layout depicting the superconducting resonator coupled to a bus transmission line. (b) Zoomed-in view of the lumped element resonator design, showing the interdigital capacitors on the sides and the inductor wire in the middle. (c) Optical image displaying a superconducting resonator loaded with the spalled YIG thin film (measuring approximately 300 × 200 μ m 2). The irregular shaded area is the GE varnish for chip bonding. (d) The measured spectrum of the chip bonded with the spalled YIG at 200 mK, revealing two microwave resonances at 5.05 and 9.34 GHz, respectively. (e) The measured transmission spectrum of another superconducting resonator device at 200 mK with (red curve) and without (black curve) the unspalled YIG/GGG substrate.

Close modal

Figure 3(d) shows the microwave transmission of the device measured at 200 mK in an adiabatic demagnetization refrigerator (ADR). Two resonance modes appear as sharp dips in the transmission spectrum, similar to observations in Ref. 34. The inset highlights the fundamental mode at 5.05 GHz, which has a lower damping rate and smaller extinction ratio. While the mode at 9.34 GHz exhibits a higher extinction ratio, it has greater dissipation and couples weakly with the YIG magnon mode, and therefore is not discussed hereafter. Importantly, the clear observation of two high-quality resonances in the YIG-loaded superconducting resonator suggests that losses from the GGG substrate have been significantly suppressed. For comparison, we measured another superconducting resonator device loaded with an unspalled YIG/GGG chip at the same temperature. Figure 3(e) clearly shows that the GGG substrate loss directly affects the superconducting microwave resonator. Prior to the YIG/GGG bonding, two resonances at 7.4 and 8.5 GHz are distinctly visible [black curve in Fig. 3(e)]. However, with the addition of the 500  μm thick GGG substrate, no clear microwave resonances are observed (red curve).

To characterize the device shown in Fig. 3(c), we measured its microwave transmission while varying the strength of an applied magnetic field to tune the magnon frequency. The magnetic field is applied along the in-plane direction of the superconducting resonator chip, aligned with the orientation of the inductor wire. A clear avoided-crossing feature appears in the measured spectra, as shown in Fig. 4(a), indicating that the device has entered the strong coupling regime, where the magnon–photon coupling strength surpasses the dissipation rate of each individual mode.

FIG. 4.

(a) A heatmap of the measured transmission spectrum for the superconducting resonator device shown in Fig. 3(c), showing the avoid-crossing feature. The overlaid red circles represent the calculated frequencies of magnon–photon modes. (b) A heatmap of the calculated transmission spectrum using Eq. (1) with the fitted magnon linewidth. (c) Transmission data at 1300 G where the magnon mode is far detuned. The photon linewidth is extracted as 2 κ c / 2 π = 3.9 MHz. (d) Transmission data at 1000 G where the magnon and the photon modes are on resonance and fully hybridized. The hybrid linewidth is fitted to be 2 κ h / 2 π = 15 MHz.

FIG. 4.

(a) A heatmap of the measured transmission spectrum for the superconducting resonator device shown in Fig. 3(c), showing the avoid-crossing feature. The overlaid red circles represent the calculated frequencies of magnon–photon modes. (b) A heatmap of the calculated transmission spectrum using Eq. (1) with the fitted magnon linewidth. (c) Transmission data at 1300 G where the magnon mode is far detuned. The photon linewidth is extracted as 2 κ c / 2 π = 3.9 MHz. (d) Transmission data at 1000 G where the magnon and the photon modes are on resonance and fully hybridized. The hybrid linewidth is fitted to be 2 κ h / 2 π = 15 MHz.

Close modal

Using numerical fitting based on the rotating-wave approximation (RWA),51 the magnon–photon coupling strength g is determined to be 2 π × 62 MHz, with detailed procedures described in Sec. I in the supplementary material. The calculated frequencies of the magnon and photon modes, shown as red dots in Fig. 4(a), align well with the measured spectrum. At a magnetic field of 1300 G, where the magnon mode is far detuned from the microwave resonance, the dissipation rate of the microwave mode is extracted as κ c = Δ ω / 2 = 2 π × 1.95 MHz, leading to a quality factor of Q = 1295. Since the spalled YIG film is positioned sufficiently far from the bus transmission line, its direct coupling to the line is negligible. Therefore, the magnon mode is only observed when it is close to or on resonance with the microwave mode.

The magnon dissipation rate can be estimated using the relation κ h = ( κ m + κ c ) / 2 when the modes are maximally hybridized, i.e., when the magnon and photon modes are on resonance. Here, κ h is the on-resonance dissipation rate of the hybrid mode, fitted from the linewidth as κ h = Δ ω h / 2 = 2 π × 7.50 MHz, as shown in Fig. 4(d). Consequently, the dissipation rate of the magnon mode is determined as κ m = 2 κ h κ c = 2 π × 13 MHz, corresponding to an FWHM of Δ H = 9.3 Oe. Compared with the devices in Fig. 3(e), which consist of 200-nm-thick YIG on 500- μm-thick GGG, the magnon losses have been significantly reduced at cryogenic temperatures. Although it remains higher than the dissipation rate measured on bulk YIG samples, this may be due to the residual GGG layer attached to the YIG thin film or the rough spalled surface, which could potentially be removed through further optimization.

The extracted parameters for dissipation and coupling are consistent with the numerical fitting results (see supplementary material for details) from the measured spectrum based on the input–output theory,52–54 as described by the equation
(1)
where g is the magnon–photon coupling strength, κ ex is the external coupling rate between the microwave resonator and the bus feeding line, κ c ( κ m) represents the total dissipation rate of the resonator (magnon) mode, and Δ c = ω c ω and Δ m = ω m ω are the cavity and magnon detunings, respectively. The calculated spectra using Eq. (1) are shown in Fig. 4(b), matching well with the measured result in Fig. 4(a).

In conclusion, we have demonstrated a new approach for spalling YIG thin films from GGG substrates and validated it by measuring strong magnon–photon coupling in a hybrid device. Direct comparisons with conventional YIG/GGG devices confirm the effectiveness of our approach. This work represents the first application of spalling technology to magnetic garnets, which are known for their strength and processing challenges. Compared to other methods, our spalling-based approach offers distinct advantages, including reduced material contamination and flexible thickness control. Although the linewidth of our measured device at cryogenic temperatures is still higher than that of bulk YIG, further improvement is achievable by fully removing the GGG substrate. With optimization—such as adjusting the thickness of the initial YIG film and the stress and thickness of the Ni layer—our method is promising for wafer-scale production of magnonic devices for quantum applications and beyond. For example, the spalled YIG films can be integrated (via bonding or pattern transfer) with on-chip microwave antennas or resonators to provide large frequency tunability even at millikelvin temperature. In addition, when combined with other novel functionalities6–30 in YIG magnonic devices, our spalled YIG thin films could enable unique properties for coupling magnons with a wide range of degrees of freedom, including optics, acoustics, and magnetics.

Further resonator simulation results and system modeling details can be found in the supplementary material.

The authors thank R. Divan, L. Stan, C. Miller, and D. Czaplewski for support in the device fabrication. X.Z. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) (No. 2337713) and ONR Young Investigator Program (No. N00014-23-1-2144). Contributions by C.H. and S.G. were supported by the Vannevar Bush Fellowship received by S.G. under the program sponsored by the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and in part by the Office of Naval Research as the Executive Manager for the grant. Work performed at the Center for Nanoscale Materials, a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility, was supported by the U.S. DOE Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Jing Xu and Connor Horn contributed equally to this work.

Jing Xu: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (lead); Writing – original draft (lead). Connor Horn: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Validation (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Yu Jiang: Investigation (equal). Amin Pishehvar: Software (lead); Visualization (equal). Xinhao Li: Investigation (equal). Daniel Rosenmann: Investigation (equal); Resources (equal). Xu Han: Investigation (equal); Resources (equal). Miguel Levy: Methodology (equal); Resources (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Supratik Guha: Conceptualization (equal); Funding acquisition (equal); Project administration (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Xufeng Zhang: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Funding acquisition (equal); Methodology (equal); Project administration (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
A. A.
Serga
,
A. V.
Chumak
, and
B.
Hillebrands
, “
YIG magnonics
,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
43
,
264002
(
2010
).
2.
D. D.
Awschalom
,
C. R.
Du
,
R.
He
,
F. J.
Heremans
,
A.
Hoffmann
,
J.
Hou
,
H.
Kurebayashi
,
Y.
Li
,
L.
Liu
,
V.
Novosad
et al., “
Quantum engineering with hybrid magnonic systems and materials
,”
IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng.
2
,
1
36
(
2021
).
3.
Y.
Li
,
W.
Zhang
,
V.
Tyberkevych
,
W.-K.
Kwok
,
A.
Hoffmann
, and
V.
Novosad
, “
Hybrid magnonics: Physics, circuits, and applications for coherent information processing
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
130902
(
2020
).
4.
X.
Zhang
, “
A review of common materials for hybrid quantum magnonics
,”
Mater. Today Electron.
5
,
100044
(
2023
).
5.
D.
Lachance-Quirion
,
Y.
Tabuchi
,
A.
Gloppe
,
K.
Usami
, and
Y.
Nakamura
, “
Hybrid quantum systems based on magnonics
,”
Appl. Phys. Express
12
,
070101
(
2019
).
6.
X.
Zhang
,
C.-L.
Zou
,
L.
Jiang
, and
H. X.
Tang
, “
Strongly coupled magnons and cavity microwave photons
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
113
,
156401
(
2014
).
7.
Y.
Tabuchi
,
S.
Ishino
,
T.
Ishikawa
,
R.
Yamazaki
,
K.
Usami
, and
Y.
Nakamura
, “
Hybridizing ferromagnetic magnons and microwave photons in the quantum limit
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
113
,
083603
(
2014
).
8.
L.
Bai
,
M.
Harder
,
Y. P.
Chen
,
X.
Fan
,
J. Q.
Xiao
, and
C.-M.
Hu
, “
Spin pumping in electrodynamically coupled magnon-photon systems
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
114
,
227201
(
2015
).
9.
M.
Goryachev
,
W. G.
Farr
,
D. L.
Creedon
,
Y.
Fan
,
M.
Kostylev
, and
M. E.
Tobar
, “
High-cooperativity cavity QED with magnons at microwave frequencies
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
2
,
054002
(
2014
).
10.
H.
Huebl
,
C. W.
Zollitsch
,
J.
Lotze
,
F.
Hocke
,
M.
Greifenstein
,
A.
Marx
,
R.
Gross
, and
S. T. B.
Goennenwein
, “
High cooperativity in coupled microwave resonator ferrimagnetic insulator hybrids
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
111
,
127003
(
2013
).
11.
M.
Harder
and
C.-M.
Hu
, “
Cavity spintronics: An early review of recent progress in the study of magnon–photon level repulsion
,”
Solid State Phys.
69
,
47
121
(
2018
).
12.
B.
Bhoi
and
S.-K.
Kim
, “Roadmap for photon-magnon coupling and its applications,” in Solid State Physics (Elsevier, 2020), Vol. 71, pp. 39–71.
13.
C.-M.
Hu
, “The 2020 roadmap for spin cavitronics,” in Solid State Physics (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, 2020), Vol. 71, pp. 117–121.
14.
B. Z.
Rameshti
,
S. V.
Kusminskiy
,
J. A.
Haigh
,
K.
Usami
,
D.
Lachance-Quirion
,
Y.
Nakamura
,
C.-M.
Hu
,
H. X.
Tang
,
G. E.
Bauer
, and
Y. M.
Blanter
, “
Cavity magnonics
,”
Phys. Rep.
979
,
1
61
(
2022
).
15.
J. W.
Rao
,
S.
Kaur
,
B. M.
Yao
,
E. R. J.
Edwards
,
Y. T.
Zhao
,
X.
Fan
,
D.
Xue
,
T. J.
Silva
,
Y. S.
Gui
, and
C.-M.
Hu
, “
Analogue of dynamic Hall effect in cavity magnon polariton system and coherently controlled logic device
,”
Nat. Commun.
10
,
1
7
(
2019
).
16.
J.
Xu
,
C.
Zhong
,
X.
Han
,
D.
Jin
,
L.
Jiang
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Coherent gate operations in hybrid magnonics
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
126
,
207202
(
2021
).
17.
X.
Zhang
,
N.
Zhu
,
C.-L.
Zou
, and
H. X.
Tang
, “
Optomagnonic whispering gallery microresonators
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
117
,
123605
(
2016
).
18.
L.
Bi
,
J.
Hu
,
P.
Jiang
,
D. H.
Kim
,
G. F.
Dionne
,
L. C.
Kimerling
, and
C. A.
Ross
, “
On-chip optical isolation in monolithically integrated non-reciprocal optical resonators
,”
Nat. Photonics
5
,
758
762
(
2011
).
19.
N.
Zhu
,
X.
Zhang
,
X.
Zhang
,
X.
Han
,
X.
Han
,
C.-L.
Zou
,
C.-L.
Zou
,
C.
Zhong
,
C.
Zhong
,
C.-H.
Wang
,
C.-H.
Wang
,
L.
Jiang
,
L.
Jiang
, and
H. X.
Tang
, “
Waveguide cavity optomagnonics for microwave-to-optics conversion
,”
Optica
7
,
1291
1297
(
2020
).
20.
Y.-J.
Seo
,
K.
Harii
,
R.
Takahashi
,
H.
Chudo
,
K.
Oyanagi
,
Z.
Qiu
,
T.
Ono
,
Y.
Shiomi
, and
E.
Saitoh
, “
Fabrication and magnetic control of Y 3Fe 5O 12 cantilevers
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
110
,
132409
(
2017
).
21.
K.
An
,
A. N.
Litvinenko
,
R.
Kohno
,
A. A.
Fuad
,
V. V.
Naletov
,
L.
Vila
,
U.
Ebels
,
G.
de Loubens
,
H.
Hurdequint
,
N.
Beaulieu
,
J.
Ben Youssef
,
N.
Vukadinovic
,
G. E. W.
Bauer
,
A. N.
Slavin
,
V. S.
Tiberkevich
, and
O.
Klein
, “
Coherent long-range transfer of angular momentum between magnon Kittel modes by phonons
,”
Phys. Rev. B
101
,
060407
(
2020
).
22.
X.
Zhang
,
C.-L.
Zou
,
L.
Jiang
, and
H. X.
Tang
, “
Cavity magnomechanics
,”
Sci. Adv.
2
,
e1501286
(
2016
).
23.
J.
Xu
,
C.
Zhong
,
X.
Zhou
,
X.
Han
,
D.
Jin
,
S. K.
Gray
,
L.
Jiang
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Coherent pulse echo in hybrid magnonics with multimode phonons
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
16
,
024009
(
2021
).
24.
Y.
Tabuchi
,
S.
Ishino
,
A.
Noguchi
,
T.
Ishikawa
,
R.
Yamazaki
,
K.
Usami
, and
Y.
Nakamura
, “
Coherent coupling between a ferromagnetic magnon and a superconducting qubit
,”
Science
349
,
405
408
(
2015
).
25.
D.
Lachance-Quirion
,
S. P.
Wolski
,
Y.
Tabuchi
,
S.
Kono
,
K.
Usami
, and
Y.
Nakamura
, “
Entanglement-based single-shot detection of a single magnon with a superconducting qubit
,”
Science
367
,
425
428
(
2020
).
26.
D.
Lachance-Quirion
,
Y.
Tabuchi
,
S.
Ishino
,
A.
Noguchi
,
T.
Ishikawa
,
R.
Yamazaki
, and
Y.
Nakamura
, “
Resolving quanta of collective spin excitations in a millimeter-sized ferromagnet
,”
Sci. Adv.
3
,
e1603150
(
2017
).
27.
S. P.
Wolski
,
D.
Lachance-Quirion
,
Y.
Tabuchi
,
S.
Kono
,
A.
Noguchi
,
K.
Usami
, and
Y.
Nakamura
, “
Dissipation-based quantum sensing of magnons with a superconducting qubit
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
125
,
117701
(
2020
).
28.
D.
Xu
,
X.-K.
Gu
,
H.-K.
Li
,
Y.-C.
Weng
,
Y.-P.
Wang
,
J.
Li
,
H.
Wang
,
S.-Y.
Zhu
, and
J. Q.
You
, “
Quantum control of a single magnon in a macroscopic spin system
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
130
,
193603
(
2023
).
29.
N.
Crescini
,
D.
Alesini
,
C.
Braggio
,
G.
Carugno
,
D.
D’Agostino
,
D.
Di Gioacchino
,
P.
Falferi
,
U.
Gambardella
,
C.
Gatti
,
G.
Iannone
,
C.
Ligi
,
A.
Lombardi
,
A.
Ortolan
,
R.
Pengo
,
G.
Ruoso
,
L.
Taffarello
, and
QUAX Collaboration
, “
Axion search with a quantum-limited ferromagnetic haloscope
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
124
,
171801
(
2020
).
30.
G.
Flower
,
J.
Bourhill
,
M.
Goryachev
, and
M. E.
Tobar
, “
Broadening frequency range of a ferromagnetic axion haloscope with strongly coupled cavity–magnon polaritons
,”
Phys. Dark Universe.
25
,
100306
(
2019
).
31.
O. A.
Petrenko
,
C.
Ritter
,
M.
Yethiraj
, and
D. M.
Paul
, “
Spin-liquid behavior of the gadolinium gallium garnet
,”
Physica B
241–243
,
727
729
(
1997
).
32.
S.
Knauer
,
K.
Davídková
,
D.
Schmoll
,
R. O.
Serha
,
A.
Voronov
,
Q.
Wang
,
R.
Verba
,
O. V.
Dobrovolskiy
,
M.
Lindner
,
T.
Reimann
,
C.
Dubs
,
M.
Urbánek
, and
A. V.
Chumak
, “
Propagating spin-wave spectroscopy in a liquid-phase epitaxial nanometer-thick YIG film at millikelvin temperatures
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
133
,
143905
(
2023
).
33.
Y.
Li
,
T.
Polakovic
,
Y.-L.
Wang
,
J.
Xu
,
S.
Lendinez
,
Z.
Zhang
,
J.
Ding
,
T.
Khaire
,
H.
Saglam
,
R.
Divan
,
J.
Pearson
,
W.-K.
Kwok
,
Z.
Xiao
,
V.
Novosad
,
A.
Hoffmann
, and
W.
Zhang
, “
Strong coupling between magnons and microwave photons in on-chip ferromagnet-superconductor thin-film devices
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
123
,
107701
(
2019
).
34.
J. T.
Hou
and
L.
Liu
, “
Strong coupling between microwave photons and nanomagnet magnons
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
123
,
107702
(
2019
).
35.
L.
Bi
,
J.
Hu
,
P.
Jiang
,
H. S.
Kim
,
D. H.
Kim
,
M. C.
Onbasli
,
G. F.
Dionne
, and
C. A.
Ross
, “
Magneto-optical thin films for on-chip monolithic integration of non-reciprocal photonic devices
,”
Materials
6
,
5094
5117
(
2013
).
36.
M. C.
Onbasli
,
T.
Goto
,
X.
Sun
,
N.
Huynh
, and
C. A.
Ross
, “
Integration of bulk-quality thin film magneto-optical cerium-doped yttrium iron garnet on silicon nitride photonic substrates
,”
Opt. Express
22
,
25183
25192
(
2014
).
37.
S.
Guo
,
B.
McCullian
,
P.
Chris Hammel
, and
F.
Yang
, “
Low damping at few-K temperatures in Y 3Fe 5O 12 epitaxial films isolated from Gd 3Ga 5O 12 substrate using a diamagnetic Y 3Sc 2.5Al 2.5O 12 spacer
,”
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
562
,
169795
(
2022
).
38.
S.
Guo
,
D.
Russell
,
J.
Lanier
,
H.
Da
,
P. C.
Hammel
, and
F.
Yang
, “
Strong on-chip microwave photon–magnon coupling using ultralow-damping epitaxial Y 3Fe 5O 12 films at 2 K
,”
Nano Lett.
23
,
5055
5060
(
2023
).
39.
M.
Levy
,
R. M.
Osgood
,
A.
Kumar
, and
H.
Bakhru
, “
Crystal ion slicing of single-crystal magnetic garnet films
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
83
,
6759
6761
(
1998
).
40.
F.
Heyroth
,
C.
Hauser
,
P.
Trempler
,
P.
Geyer
,
F.
Syrowatka
,
R.
Dreyer
,
S. G.
Ebbinghaus
,
G.
Woltersdorf
, and
G.
Schmidt
, “
Monocrystalline freestanding three-dimensional yttrium-iron-garnet magnon nanoresonators
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
12
,
054031
(
2019
).
41.
J. A.
Haigh
,
R. A.
Chakalov
, and
A. J.
Ramsay
, “
Subpicoliter magnetoptical cavities
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
14
,
044005
(
2020
).
42.
P. G.
Baity
,
D. A.
Bozhko
,
R.
Macêdo
,
W.
Smith
,
R. C.
Holland
,
S.
Danilin
,
V.
Seferai
,
J.
Barbosa
,
R. R.
Peroor
,
S.
Goldman
,
U.
Nasti
,
J.
Paul
,
R. H.
Hadfield
,
S.
McVitie
, and
M.
Weides
, “
Strong magnon–photon coupling with chip-integrated YIG in the zero-temperature limit
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
119
,
033502
(
2021
).
43.
S. W.
Bedell
,
D.
Shahrjerdi
,
B.
Hekmatshoar
,
K.
Fogel
,
P. A.
Lauro
,
J. A.
Ott
,
N.
Sosa
, and
D.
Sadana
, “
Kerf-less removal of Si, Ge, and III–V layers by controlled spalling to enable low-cost PV technologies
,”
IEEE J. Photovoltaics
2
,
141
147
(
2012
).
44.
S. W.
Bedell
,
P.
Lauro
,
J. A.
Ott
,
K.
Fogel
, and
D. K.
Sadana
, “
Layer transfer of bulk gallium nitride by controlled spalling
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
122
,
025103
(
2017
).
45.
C. P.
Horn
,
C.
Wicker
,
A.
Wellisz
,
C.
Zeledon
,
P. V. K.
Nittala
,
F. J.
Heremans
,
D. D.
Awschalom
, and
S.
Guha
, “
Controlled spalling of 4H silicon carbide with investigated spin coherence for quantum engineering integration
,”
ACS Nano
18
,
31381
31389
(
2024
).
46.
Z.
Suo
and
J. W.
Hutchinson
, “
Steady-state cracking in brittle substrates beneath adherent films
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
25
,
1337
1353
(
1989
).
47.
M.
Levy
,
R. M.
Osgood
,
R.
Liu
,
L. E.
Cross
,
G. S.
Cargill
,
A.
Kumar
, and
H.
Bakhru
, “
Fabrication of single-crystal lithium niobate films by crystal ion slicing
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
73
,
2293
2295
(
1998
).
48.
C.
Dubs
,
O.
Surzhenko
,
R.
Linke
,
A.
Danilewsky
,
U.
Brückner
, and
J.
Dellith
, “
Sub-micrometer yttrium iron garnet LPE films with low ferromagnetic resonance losses
,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
50
,
204005
(
2017
).
49.
C.
Dubs
,
O.
Surzhenko
,
R.
Thomas
,
J.
Osten
,
T.
Schneider
,
K.
Lenz
,
J.
Grenzer
,
R.
Hübner
, and
E.
Wendler
, “
Low damping and microstructural perfection of sub-40nm-thin yttrium iron garnet films grown by liquid phase epitaxy
,”
Phys. Rev. Mater.
4
,
024416
(
2020
).
50.
P.
Pirro
,
T.
Brächer
,
A. V.
Chumak
,
B.
Lägel
,
C.
Dubs
,
O.
Surzhenko
,
P.
Görnert
,
B.
Leven
, and
B.
Hillebrands
, “
Spin-wave excitation and propagation in microstructured waveguides of yttrium iron garnet/Pt bilayers
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
104
,
012402
(
2014
).
51.
R. W.
Boyd
,
Nonlinear Optics
(
Academic Press, Elsevier
,
2008
).
52.
D. I.
Schuster
,
A. P.
Sears
,
E.
Ginossar
,
L.
DiCarlo
,
L.
Frunzio
,
J. J. L.
Morton
,
H.
Wu
,
G. A. D.
Briggs
,
B. B.
Buckley
,
D. D.
Awschalom
, and
R. J.
Schoelkopf
, “
High-cooperativity coupling of electron-spin ensembles to superconducting cavities
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
105
,
140501
(
2010
).
53.
D.
Walls
and
G. J.
Milburn
,
Quantum Optics
(
Springer
,
Berlin
,
2008
).
54.
Q.-M.
Chen
,
M.
Pfeiffer
,
M.
Partanen
,
F.
Fesquet
,
K. E.
Honasoge
,
F.
Kronowetter
,
Y.
Nojiri
,
M.
Renger
,
K. G.
Fedorov
,
A.
Marx
,
F.
Deppe
, and
R.
Gross
, “
Scattering coefficients of superconducting microwave resonators. I. Transfer matrix approach
,”
Phys. Rev. B
106
,
214505
(
2022
).