As a threat to meeting the global demand for food created by the continued growth of population, different methods are being applied to enhance seed germination and plant growth. This study investigates the effect of hydrogen-rich water (HRW) and different plasma-activated waters (PAW) and their combinations including HRW, PAW1, PAW2, HPAW1, and HPAW2 on the seed germination of lentils. Different arc discharge reactors are generated under atmospheric pressure in the air. Optical emission spectroscopy was used to detect the radiative species formed in the plasma zone. Raman spectra and physicochemical properties of different waters were investigated. The results demonstrated significant differences in the properties of different activated waters compared to control water. On day 3 after treatment, the fraction and length of germinated seeds were evaluated. During germination, treated water significantly increased germination parameters such as final germination percentage, mean germination time, germination index, and coefficient of germination velocity. HPAW2 exhibited the highest germination index (GI), which combines germination percentage and speed. The plasma systems also effectively reduced the pH of PAW1 and PAW2, with a greater decrease observed in HPAW1 and HPAW1. Analysis of nitrite and nitrate levels revealed that HPAW2 had the highest concentrations, indicating more reactive processes in the presence of hydrogen. Based on our results, it can be concluded that lentil seed germination can be increased using PAW and hydrogenated PAW combined.

A threat to meeting the global demand for food has been created by the continued growth of population worldwide. Global food demand is expected to increase by 60% by 2050 to feed an estimated population of 9.7 × 109 people.1–4 However, these methods also have several associated problems, including adverse impacts on crop health, pollution following treatments, and the introduction of toxins that can cause various diseases in animals and humans, which, in turn, can lead to significant economic challenges.2,5–8

Plasma-activated water (PAW) has been discovered, as a result of the efforts to find new methods for the promotion of sustainability and viability useful solutions that enhance seed germination and plant growth. PAW is created by transferring various reactive oxygen-nitrogen species (RONS) from the plasma phase to water.9 This process results in the formation of a range of primary species such as atomic oxygen, single oxygen, superoxide, ozone, hydroxyl radicals, and atomic nitrogen, which are then followed by secondary species such as hydrogen peroxide, peroxy-nitrite, nitric oxide, nitrates, and nitrite ions. These secondary species react with water to form PAW, potentially promoting healthy plant growth.10,11 Dissolution of plasma species in water causes the formation of short-lived species including oxygen atoms (O), hydroxyl radicals (OH), peroxynitrous acid (ONOO), nitric oxide (ON), etc., and long-lived species including nitrate (NO3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), dissolved ozone (O3), etc.12 The existence of these reactive radicals and species in PAW makes it a promising product that can be employed in countless applications, including eliminating or reducing the spread of pathogens;13 improving soil fertility,14 seed germination, and plant growth;11,15,16 resistance inducer against bacterial leaf spot,17 etc.

PAW and plasma treatments have been shown to affect seed germination and plant growth, with prior reports from various researchers.11,18–22 Rathore et al.18 have shown that water activated with a pencil plasma jet (PPJ) improves the germination rate, viability index, and mean germination time of peas (Pisum sativum L.). Sivachandiran et al.11 have reported the positive effect of air plasma and PAW with a DBD reactor on the germination rate and plant growth in three different seed species, including radish (Raphanus sativus), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), and sweet pepper (Capsicum annum). Terebun et al.19 describe the significant improvement of PAW produced in an atmospheric pressure gliding arc reactor for the germination of beetroot (Beta vulgaris) and carrot (Daucus carota) seeds.

Additionally, a series of events in the growth and development of plants have been attributed to H2.23,24 Some researchers, such as Huang et al., investigated the role and basic mechanisms of H2 in promoting seed germination.25 In recent years, H2 is an entirely new antioxidant in animals and plants. As a new beneficial gaseous molecule, H2 can respond to physiological processes.26–28 In addition, H2 responds to certain abiotic stress factors, such as salinity,29 osmotic stresses,30 heavy metals,31 high light stress,32 and temperatures.33 For instance, an increase in the antioxidant system that counteracts the overproduction of ROS and lipid peroxidation has led to increased salt tolerance of Arabidopsis through hydrogen-rich water (HRW).29 

Furthermore, cultivating food legumes, which provide more than 1 × 109 people with a critical source of digestible carbohydrate polymers, could offer opportunities to use in new plant protein-based foods and animal feeding stuff. Seeds of grain legumes are very popular as a source of digestible carbohydrates, compared to animal-based protein, which is environmentally costly.34,35 The value of food, handling characteristics, and gustatory qualities can be provided by carbohydrate polymers.36 Lentil seeds offer a significant source of dietary fiber, complex carbohydrates, iron, zinc, and vitamin B complex. These nutritional components are essential for maintaining a healthy diet and providing the body with nutrients for optimal performance.37 They also contain specific phenolic compounds, giving them a higher antioxidant activity than other legume species.38 

The global challenge of meeting increasing food demand persists and PAW shows potential in promoting plant growth. Various research has revealed the impact of PAW on seed germination and plant growth, as well as the beneficial effects of hydrogen (H2) in supporting seed germination and acting as an antioxidant in plants. However, in prior research, there was a lack of combination in the study of the impact of both PAW and HRW on seed germination and plant growth. This current experiment focuses on optimizing the germination process to enhance the efficiency and quality of sprout production, particularly considering the substantial nutritional benefits of lentils. Our study aims to elucidate the influence of PAW, HRW, and their combination on these processes.

In prior research, a finite element simulation was used to study the two-dimensional dielectric barrier discharge and arc discharge in a bubble within water.39 The present study uses an HRW generator and two different atmospheric pressure air plasma generators to produce PAW. Species were evaluated in plasma columns by optical emission spectroscopy, and Raman spectra of water were investigated. Multifarious produced glasses of water were exposed to green lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) seeds to study the various phenotypic growth parameters.

Figure 1 gives an overview of the water activator setups. The reactor was powered by an RMS (root-mean-square) voltage of 10.61 kV (15 kV peak voltage), a current of 20 mA, and a frequency of 50 Hz, with a power of 130 W. In this research, electric arc discharge plasma has been used for PAW production systems. The first layout can be seen in Fig. 1(a). Setup 1 comprises a glass tube, an air pump, a rubber tube, and two cylindrical electrodes with a diameter of up to 1 mm. The plasma arc is formed between two electrodes connected to the HV source inside the glass tube. The length of the glass tube is 20 cm, and the distance between the electrodes is 7 cm. The active species produced by the plasma are injected into water utilizing a pump.

FIG. 1.

Schematic of the water-activating setups; (a) PAW1 (injection of electrically arc discharged air into water); (b) PAW2 (arc discharge on the water surface); and (c) HRW generator.

FIG. 1.

Schematic of the water-activating setups; (a) PAW1 (injection of electrically arc discharged air into water); (b) PAW2 (arc discharge on the water surface); and (c) HRW generator.

Close modal

The other configuration consists of a cylindrical electrode with a diameter of 0.7 mm placed at a height of approximately 3.5 cm from the water surface and a flat electrode placed in water. In this system, the plasma arc is formed between the cylindrical electrode and water [Fig. 1(b)].

The HRW generator is an electrolyzer (electrolysis cell) [Fig. 1(c)]. It consists of two electrodes, an anode, and a cathode, separated by a solid porous ceramic membrane that is surrounded by water. The anode and the cathode are made of titanium mesh. The electrode is connected to a 12 V DC power source with an electrical power of 13 W. When an electric current passes through the electrolysis cell, the following reactions occur at the anode and the cathode: At the anode, oxidation of water molecules occurs, leading to the release of oxygen gas. Formed hydrogen ions migrate through the electrolyte to the cathode. At the cathode, the reduction of protons occurs, leading to the production of hydrogen gas (H2). A plastic tube is designed to remove oxygen from the chamber.

50 ml of distilled water (control) was taken in a 100 ml glass beaker. This water was exposed to plasma with two different PAW generators, namely, injection of electrically arc discharged air into water (PAW1) and arc discharge on the water surface (PAW2) with a 3 min exposure time. 50 ml of distilled water was taken in the HRW generator and enriched for 3 min. Then, it was activated by PAW generators for 3 min. Based on prior experimentation and optimization studies for achieving the desired effects of water activation, the minimum time required to observe changes in germination parameters was determined to be 3 min. Figure 2 shows the schematic of the production of various waters utilized in this study.

FIG. 2.

Schematic of the production of various waters utilized in this study.

FIG. 2.

Schematic of the production of various waters utilized in this study.

Close modal

For this experiment, green dried lentil seeds (L. culinaris) were purchased from the local market. The experiment involved a total of 750 seeds, which were divided into six groups, each consisting of five sets of 25 seeds. Each group was given a unique label, including Control, PAW1, PAW2, HPAW1, HPAW2, and HRW. To begin the experiment, each set of 25 seeds was soaked in 7 ml of one of the water samples, including Control, PAW1, PAW2, HPAW1, HPAW2, and HRW. The soaking process lasted 72 h since the necessary time for lentil germination is typically 2–3 days40 and was carried out at 24 °C and a relative humidity of 26%.

Seed germination progress in different groups of lentils based on water was monitored daily for the first 3 days. Comparative analysis of germination data across groups was performed utilizing the following parameters: final germination percentage (FGP), mean germination time (MGT), germination index (GI), coefficient of velocity of germination (CVG), and germination rate index (GRI). The methodology of calculations of the mentioned parameters is as follows:41 

  1. MGT:

    MGT refers to the average time required for seeds to germinate, considering the timing of most germination events,
    where n = number of seeds germinated on each day is different from N = total number of seeds germinated at the termination of the experiment.
  2. CVG

    CVG solely measures the speed of germination based on the quantity of seeds and time without emphasizing the final percentage,41 
    where N is the number of seeds germinated every day and T is the number of days from seeding corresponding to N.
  3. GI:

In the GI, seeds germinated on the first day are given more weight than those germinated later.

GI = ( 3 × N 1 ) + ( 2 × N 2 ) + ( 1 × N 3 ), where N1, N2, and N3 are the number of germinated seeds on the first, second, and third day, and the multipliers (e.g., 1, 2, and 3) are weights given to the days of germination.

ANOVA (analysis of variance) was utilized to statistically compare the results obtained from different experimental groups. ANOVA is a widely employed statistical technique that facilitates the comparison of means across three or more groups to ascertain if there are any statistically significant differences among them. This method is particularly valuable when dealing with multiple treatment groups or factors, as it offers a comprehensive analysis of variance and aids in determining whether observed differences are a result of actual treatment effects or random variability.42 Through the use of ANOVA, we were able to thoroughly evaluate the significance of any observed differences and ensure the validity and reliability of our experimental findings.

Following the water production process, a 50 ml sample of water was tested to assess its physicochemical parameters. The testing device is capable of measuring pH with an accuracy of 0.01, total dissolved salts with an accuracy of 1 ppm, and electric current with an accuracy of 2 μs/cm.

Five minutes after the water was produced, it underwent examination. The Raman spectra of the water samples were analyzed using a Technooran (Microspectrophotometer, Ram-532-004) within the range of 134–4325 cm−1, with an exposure time of 500 ms and three accumulations. The amount of water tested in this analyzer was 20 ml.

Nitrate and nitrite concentrations in the water samples were measured using an ion chromatograph with a precision of 0.5 mg/l. Analysis was conducted at three time points: immediately after water production and at 24 and 72 h thereafter.

Figure 3 illustrates the optical emission spectra of plasmas formed by (a) arc discharge in the air (setup1) and (b) electrical discharge on the water surface (setup2) at wavelengths ranging from 150 to 500 nm. An optical emission spectrometer, Technooran (Noora200) with a spectral resolution of 1 nm, was used to identify the reactive species present in the generated discharge. The x-axis represents the wavelength (nm), and the y-axis represents the emission intensity (a.u.).

FIG. 3.

Spectrum of plasmas formed, (a) arc discharge in the air (setup1) and (b) electrical discharge on the water surface (setup 2).

FIG. 3.

Spectrum of plasmas formed, (a) arc discharge in the air (setup1) and (b) electrical discharge on the water surface (setup 2).

Close modal

At wavelengths ranging from 200 to 270 nm, low-intensity excited nitric oxide (NOγ-band) dominates the spectra.43 Existence of the hydroxyl radical (OH) is indicated by the signal at 309 nm. At wavelengths ranging from 315 to 380 nm, several high and low-intensity nitrogen molecules (N2—the second positive system) were also discovered.44 In the spectrum of arc on the water surface, the intensity of excited nitric oxide species and hydroxyl radicals is the highest due to the presence of water molecules. Low intensity (N2—the initial negative system) is also observed at wavelengths ranging from 390 to 430 nm.45 Oxygen (O2) is also present in the discharge, as shown by the emission spectrum's peak at 356 nm.46 All of these reactive species are short-lived (primary species) and produce long-lived reactive species (secondary species).10,44,47,48

Activated water's pH, electrical conductivity, and total dissolved solids were measured to determine its physicochemical properties. The pH measures the concentration of hydrogen ions in the solution. Table I shows a decrease in pH levels in PAWs, but injecting hydrogen gas leads to a slight increase in pH. The pH changes in PAW acidification are consistent with other articles.11,14,18,19 Hopkins' paper indicates that pH levels should rise in HRW.49 Both PAW1 and PAW2 exhibit a decrease in pH. However, when HRW is plasma-activated, hydrogen molecules (H2) participate in the reactions, resulting in the production of more compounds in water. Consequently, the pH of HPAW1 and HPAW2 shows a more significant decrease.

TABLE I.

Physicochemical properties of activated waters. EC, electrical conductivity; TDS, total dissolved solid.

ControlHRWPAW1PAW2HPAW1HPAW2
pH 5.5 ± 0.01 5.73 ± 0.2 4.71 ± 0.015 3.96 ± 0.24 4.56 ± 0.09 3.39 ± 0.31 
EC (μSiemens/cm) 2 ± 1 14 ± 3.5 48 ± 2 194 ± 2 55 ± 1 470 ± 15.35 
TDS (ppm) 1 ± 1 7 ± 1 24 ± 1 97 ± 1 27 ± 1 240 ± 7.7 
ControlHRWPAW1PAW2HPAW1HPAW2
pH 5.5 ± 0.01 5.73 ± 0.2 4.71 ± 0.015 3.96 ± 0.24 4.56 ± 0.09 3.39 ± 0.31 
EC (μSiemens/cm) 2 ± 1 14 ± 3.5 48 ± 2 194 ± 2 55 ± 1 470 ± 15.35 
TDS (ppm) 1 ± 1 7 ± 1 24 ± 1 97 ± 1 27 ± 1 240 ± 7.7 

Activated water's Raman spectrum is illustrated in Fig. 4. Using the reference data available in the literature, the Raman spectrum of water can be seen in Fig. 4 lines (A) and (B), with vibration bands near 3400 and 3250 cm−1.50 The Raman Q branch of hydrogen dissolved in water is observed at wavelengths ranging from 3900 to 4170 cm−1.51 In Fig. 4, line (c) represents a peak of the Q-branch.

FIG. 4.

The Raman spectra of activated waters.

FIG. 4.

The Raman spectra of activated waters.

Close modal

The graph depicted in Fig. 5 illustrates a comparison of nitrate and nitrite levels in various activated waters. PAW2 and HPAW2 show the highest nitrate concentration, while HPAW2 consistently exhibits the highest nitrite concentration among the activated waters. Conversely, PAW1 displays the lowest levels of nitrate and nitrite due to the plasma column's lack of direct interaction with water and the absence of additional hydrogen molecules, as seen in HPAW1, which would facilitate further reactions. In HPAW1, more complex nitrate species, similar to those in PAW1, were not produced, but there was an increase in nitrite concentration. As indicated by the experiment's short duration, no specific changes were observed in the concentration of nitrate and nitrite.

FIG. 5.

Nitrate and nitrite concentration diagrams of different activated waters.

FIG. 5.

Nitrate and nitrite concentration diagrams of different activated waters.

Close modal

The measurement results of 125 lentil bean sprouts in each group were taken for length and germination parameters in five replicates on the third day. Figure 6 shows a picture of cultivation containers.

FIG. 6.

Lentil seeds treatment using PAW, HRW, and control on the third day.

FIG. 6.

Lentil seeds treatment using PAW, HRW, and control on the third day.

Close modal

A one-way ANOVA was performed to compare the effect of six different waters on germination parameters. The ANOVA revealed a statistically significant difference in mean germination parameters between at least two groups, as shown in Table II.

TABLE II.

ANOVA.

Sum of squaresdfMean squareFSig.
Average sprout length Between groups 328.498 65.700 36.137 0.000 
Within groups 43.633 24 1.818   
Total 372.131 29    
FGP Between groups 1284.267 256.853 14.594 0.000 
Within groups 422.400 24 17.600   
Total 1706.667 29    
MGT Between groups 0.349 0.070 25.451 0.000 
Within groups 0.066 24 0.003   
Total 0.415 29    
CVG Between groups 301.738 60.348 54.131 0.000 
Within groups 26.756 24 1.115   
Total 328.494 29    
GI Between groups 3836.667 767.333 180.549 0.000 
Within groups 102.000 24 4.250   
Total 3938.667 29    
Sum of squaresdfMean squareFSig.
Average sprout length Between groups 328.498 65.700 36.137 0.000 
Within groups 43.633 24 1.818   
Total 372.131 29    
FGP Between groups 1284.267 256.853 14.594 0.000 
Within groups 422.400 24 17.600   
Total 1706.667 29    
MGT Between groups 0.349 0.070 25.451 0.000 
Within groups 0.066 24 0.003   
Total 0.415 29    
CVG Between groups 301.738 60.348 54.131 0.000 
Within groups 26.756 24 1.115   
Total 328.494 29    
GI Between groups 3836.667 767.333 180.549 0.000 
Within groups 102.000 24 4.250   
Total 3938.667 29    

Fisher's LSD test for multiple comparisons indicated that there was no significant difference in the average stem length between HPAW2 and PAW2 (p = 0.407). However, their difference with other waters was found to be significant. In the comparison between HRW and PAW1, there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.149); similarly, no significant difference was found between HRW and HPAW1 (p = 0.551). Additionally, it is worth noting that HRW showed no detectable nitrate and nitrite concentrations (Table III).

TABLE III.

Multiple comparisons for average sprout length.

Dependent variableCategory (I)Category (J)Mean difference (I–J)Std. errorSig.95% Confidence
Lower boundUpper bound
Average sprout length LSD Control HRW −4.90400a 0.85277 0.000 −6.6640 −3.1440 
PAW1 −3.63400a 0.85277 0.000 −5.3940 −1.8740 
PAW2 −9.75800a 0.85277 0.000 −11.5180 −7.9980 
HPAW1 −4.38800a 0.85277 0.000 −6.1480 −2.6280 
HPAW2 −9.03800a 0.85277 0.000 −10.7980 −7.2780 
HRW Control 4.90400a 0.85277 0.000 3.1440 6.6640 
PAW1 1.27000 0.85277 0.149 −0.4900 3.0300 
PAW2 −4.85400a 0.85277 0.000 −6.6140 −3.0940 
HPAW1 0.51600 0.85277 0.551 −1.2440 2.2760 
HPAW2 −4.13400a 0.85277 0.000 −5.8940 −2.3740 
PAW1 Control 3.63400a 0.85277 0.000 1.8740 5.3940 
HRW −1.27000 0.85277 0.149 −3.0300 0.4900 
PAW2 −6.12400a 0.85277 0.000 −7.8840 −4.3640 
HPAW1 −0.75400 0.85277 0.385 −2.5140 1.0060 
HPAW2 −5.40400a 0.85277 0.000 −7.1640 −3.6440 
PAW2 Control 9.75800a 0.85277 0.000 7.9980 11.5180 
HRW 4.85400a 0.85277 0.000 3.0940 6.6140 
PAW1 6.12400a 0.85277 0.000 4.3640 7.8840 
HPAW1 5.37000a 0.85277 0.000 3.6100 7.1300 
HPAW2 0.72000 0.85277 0.407 −1.0400 2.4800 
HPAW1 Control 4.38800a 0.85277 0.000 2.6280 6.1480 
HRW −0.51600 0.85277 0.551 −2.2760 1.2440 
PAW1 0.75400 0.85277 0.385 −1.0060 2.5140 
PAW2 −5.37000a 0.85277 0.000 −7.1300 −3.6100 
HPAW2 −4.65000a 0.85277 0.000 −6.4100 −2.8900 
HPAW2 Control 9.03800a 0.85277 0.000 7.2780 10.7980 
HRW 4.13400a 0.85277 0.000 2.3740 5.8940 
PAW1 5.40400a 0.85277 0.000 3.6440 7.1640 
PAW2 −0.72000 0.85277 0.407 −2.4800 1.0400 
HPAW1 4.65000a 0.85277 0.000 2.8900 6.4100 
Dependent variableCategory (I)Category (J)Mean difference (I–J)Std. errorSig.95% Confidence
Lower boundUpper bound
Average sprout length LSD Control HRW −4.90400a 0.85277 0.000 −6.6640 −3.1440 
PAW1 −3.63400a 0.85277 0.000 −5.3940 −1.8740 
PAW2 −9.75800a 0.85277 0.000 −11.5180 −7.9980 
HPAW1 −4.38800a 0.85277 0.000 −6.1480 −2.6280 
HPAW2 −9.03800a 0.85277 0.000 −10.7980 −7.2780 
HRW Control 4.90400a 0.85277 0.000 3.1440 6.6640 
PAW1 1.27000 0.85277 0.149 −0.4900 3.0300 
PAW2 −4.85400a 0.85277 0.000 −6.6140 −3.0940 
HPAW1 0.51600 0.85277 0.551 −1.2440 2.2760 
HPAW2 −4.13400a 0.85277 0.000 −5.8940 −2.3740 
PAW1 Control 3.63400a 0.85277 0.000 1.8740 5.3940 
HRW −1.27000 0.85277 0.149 −3.0300 0.4900 
PAW2 −6.12400a 0.85277 0.000 −7.8840 −4.3640 
HPAW1 −0.75400 0.85277 0.385 −2.5140 1.0060 
HPAW2 −5.40400a 0.85277 0.000 −7.1640 −3.6440 
PAW2 Control 9.75800a 0.85277 0.000 7.9980 11.5180 
HRW 4.85400a 0.85277 0.000 3.0940 6.6140 
PAW1 6.12400a 0.85277 0.000 4.3640 7.8840 
HPAW1 5.37000a 0.85277 0.000 3.6100 7.1300 
HPAW2 0.72000 0.85277 0.407 −1.0400 2.4800 
HPAW1 Control 4.38800a 0.85277 0.000 2.6280 6.1480 
HRW −0.51600 0.85277 0.551 −2.2760 1.2440 
PAW1 0.75400 0.85277 0.385 −1.0060 2.5140 
PAW2 −5.37000a 0.85277 0.000 −7.1300 −3.6100 
HPAW2 −4.65000a 0.85277 0.000 −6.4100 −2.8900 
HPAW2 Control 9.03800a 0.85277 0.000 7.2780 10.7980 
HRW 4.13400a 0.85277 0.000 2.3740 5.8940 
PAW1 5.40400a 0.85277 0.000 3.6440 7.1640 
PAW2 −0.72000 0.85277 0.407 −2.4800 1.0400 
HPAW1 4.65000a 0.85277 0.000 2.8900 6.4100 
a

The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

The shoot length for PAW2 and HPAW2 increased by 40% compared to the control. Figure 7’s graph illustrates that the sprout length increase compared to the control for other waters is 20%. Despite HRW having zero nitrate and nitrite concentrations, it is important to note that HRW can activate the sugar production mechanism, thereby allowing seeds to extract nutrients for growth independently.23 

FIG. 7.

Charts of average sprout length and MGT of lentil seeds.

FIG. 7.

Charts of average sprout length and MGT of lentil seeds.

Close modal

There was no statistically significant difference in MGT between HRW and PAW1 (p = 0.197) or HRW and HPAW1 (p = 0.288), although there are statistically significant differences between PAW2 and HPAW2 (p < 0.050) (Table IV). The lowest MGT value belonged to PAW2 and HPAW2, with a reduction of around 12.8% compared to the reference sample [Fig. 7(b)]. The control had the highest MGT, followed by HRW, PAW1, and HPAW1 with a 12% decrease. The lower the MGT, the faster the population of seeds germinated.52 

TABLE IV.

Multiple comparisons for MGT.

Dependent variableCategory (I)Category (J)Mean difference (I–J)Std. errorSig.95% Confidence
Lower boundUpper bound
MGT LSD Control HRW 0.21000a 0.03313 0.000 0.1416 0.2784 
PAW1 0.25400a 0.03313 0.000 0.1856 0.3224 
PAW2 0.31600a 0.03313 0.000 0.2476 0.3844 
HPAW1 0.24600a 0.03313 0.000 0.1776 0.3144 
HPAW2 0.32200a 0.03313 0.000 0.2536 0.3904 
HRW Control −0.21000a 0.03313 0.000 −0.2784 −0.1416 
PAW1 0.04400 0.03313 0.197 −0.0244 0.1124 
PAW2 0.10600a 0.03313 0.004 0.0376 0.1744 
HPAW1 0.03600 0.03313 0.288 −0.0324 0.1044 
HPAW2 0.11200a 0.03313 0.002 0.0436 0.1804 
PAW1 Control −0.25400a 0.03313 0.000 −0.3224 −0.1856 
HRW −0.04400 0.03313 0.197 −0.1124 0.0244 
PAW2 0.06200 0.03313 0.073 −0.0064 0.1304 
HPAW1 −0.00800 0.03313 0.811 −0.0764 0.0604 
HPAW2 0.06800 0.03313 0.051 −0.0004 0.1364 
PAW2 Control −0.31600a 0.03313 0.000 −0.3844 −0.2476 
HRW −0.10600a 0.03313 0.004 −0.1744 −0.0376 
PAW1 −0.06200 0.03313 0.073 −0.1304 0.0064 
HPAW1 −0.07000a 0.03313 0.045 −0.1384 −0.0016 
HPAW2 0.00600 0.03313 0.858 −0.0624 0.0744 
HPAW1 Control −0.24600a 0.03313 0.000 −0.3144 −0.1776 
HRW −0.03600 0.03313 0.288 −0.1044 0.0324 
PAW1 0.00800 0.03313 0.811 −0.0604 0.0764 
PAW2 0.07000a 0.03313 0.045 0.0016 0.1384 
HPAW2 0.07600a 0.03313 0.031 0.0076 0.1444 
HPAW2 Control −0.32200a 0.03313 0.000 −0.3904 −0.2536 
HRW −0.11200a 0.03313 0.002 −0.1804 −0.0436 
PAW1 −0.06800 0.03313 0.051 −0.1364 0.0004 
PAW2 −0.00600 0.03313 0.858 −0.0744 0.0624 
HPAW1 −0.07600a 0.03313 0.031 −0.1444 −0.0076 
Dependent variableCategory (I)Category (J)Mean difference (I–J)Std. errorSig.95% Confidence
Lower boundUpper bound
MGT LSD Control HRW 0.21000a 0.03313 0.000 0.1416 0.2784 
PAW1 0.25400a 0.03313 0.000 0.1856 0.3224 
PAW2 0.31600a 0.03313 0.000 0.2476 0.3844 
HPAW1 0.24600a 0.03313 0.000 0.1776 0.3144 
HPAW2 0.32200a 0.03313 0.000 0.2536 0.3904 
HRW Control −0.21000a 0.03313 0.000 −0.2784 −0.1416 
PAW1 0.04400 0.03313 0.197 −0.0244 0.1124 
PAW2 0.10600a 0.03313 0.004 0.0376 0.1744 
HPAW1 0.03600 0.03313 0.288 −0.0324 0.1044 
HPAW2 0.11200a 0.03313 0.002 0.0436 0.1804 
PAW1 Control −0.25400a 0.03313 0.000 −0.3224 −0.1856 
HRW −0.04400 0.03313 0.197 −0.1124 0.0244 
PAW2 0.06200 0.03313 0.073 −0.0064 0.1304 
HPAW1 −0.00800 0.03313 0.811 −0.0764 0.0604 
HPAW2 0.06800 0.03313 0.051 −0.0004 0.1364 
PAW2 Control −0.31600a 0.03313 0.000 −0.3844 −0.2476 
HRW −0.10600a 0.03313 0.004 −0.1744 −0.0376 
PAW1 −0.06200 0.03313 0.073 −0.1304 0.0064 
HPAW1 −0.07000a 0.03313 0.045 −0.1384 −0.0016 
HPAW2 0.00600 0.03313 0.858 −0.0624 0.0744 
HPAW1 Control −0.24600a 0.03313 0.000 −0.3144 −0.1776 
HRW −0.03600 0.03313 0.288 −0.1044 0.0324 
PAW1 0.00800 0.03313 0.811 −0.0604 0.0764 
PAW2 0.07000a 0.03313 0.045 0.0016 0.1384 
HPAW2 0.07600a 0.03313 0.031 0.0076 0.1444 
HPAW2 Control −0.32200a 0.03313 0.000 −0.3904 −0.2536 
HRW −0.11200a 0.03313 0.002 −0.1804 −0.0436 
PAW1 −0.06800 0.03313 0.051 −0.1364 0.0004 
PAW2 −0.00600 0.03313 0.858 −0.0744 0.0624 
HPAW1 −0.07600a 0.03313 0.031 −0.1444 −0.0076 
a

The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

CVG prioritizes the time taken to achieve the result and does not consider specific time details, only general averages.53 The LSD test for multiple comparisons revealed a significant difference in CVG between HRW and other activated waters. There was no statistically significant difference between PAW1 and HPAW1 (p = 0.722) or between PAW2 and HPAW2 (p = 0.479) (Table V). The CVG ratios for PAW2/HPAW2 and PAW1/HPAW1 samples were nearly identical. Compared to the control sample, similar CVG ratios were reported for samples 1.2 and 3.4, with increases of 18.4% and 14.7%, respectively [Fig. 8(a)]. Additionally, PAW's RONS have the potential to enhance germination rates by activating abscisic acid/gibberellic acid pathways and interrupting seed dormancy.

FIG. 8.

Charts of CVG and GI of lentil seeds.

FIG. 8.

Charts of CVG and GI of lentil seeds.

Close modal
TABLE V.

Multiple comparisons for CVG.

Dependent variableCategory (I)Category (J)Mean difference (I–J)Std. errorSig.95% Confidence
Lower boundUpper bound
CVG LSD Control HRW −5.94000a 0.66778 0.000 −7.3182 −4.5618 
PAW1 −7.68000a 0.66778 0.000 −9.0582 −6.3018 
PAW2 −9.04000a 0.66778 0.000 −10.4182 −7.6618 
HPAW1 −7.44000a 0.66778 0.000 −8.8182 −6.0618 
HPAW2 −9.52000a 0.66778 0.000 −10.8982 −8.1418 
HRW Control 5.94000a 0.66778 0.000 4.5618 7.3182 
PAW1 −1.74000a 0.66778 0.016 −3.1182 −0.3618 
PAW2 −3.10000a 0.66778 0.000 −4.4782 −1.7218 
HPAW1 −1.50000a 0.66778 0.034 −2.8782 −0.1218 
HPAW2 −3.58000a 0.66778 0.000 −4.9582 −2.2018 
PAW1 Control 7.68000a 0.66778 0.000 6.3018 9.0582 
HRW 1.74000a 0.66778 0.016 0.3618 3.1182 
PAW2 −1.36000 0.66778 0.053 −2.7382 0.0182 
HPAW1 0.24000 0.66778 0.722 −1.1382 1.6182 
HPAW2 −1.84000a 0.66778 0.011 −3.2182 −0.4618 
PAW2 Control 9.04000a 0.66778 0.000 7.6618 10.4182 
HRW 3.10000a 0.66778 0.000 1.7218 4.4782 
PAW1 1.36000 0.66778 0.053 −0.0182 2.7382 
HPAW1 1.60000a 0.66778 0.025 0.2218 2.9782 
HPAW2 −0.48000 0.66778 0.479 −1.8582 0.8982 
HPAW1 Control 7.44000a 0.66778 0.000 6.0618 8.8182 
HRW 1.50000a 0.66778 0.034 0.1218 2.8782 
PAW1 −0.24000 0.66778 0.722 −1.6182 1.1382 
PAW2 −1.60000a 0.66778 0.025 −2.9782 −0.2218 
HPAW2 −2.08000a 0.66778 0.005 −3.4582 −0.7018 
HPAW2 Control 9.52000a 0.66778 0.000 8.1418 10.8982 
HRW 3.58000a 0.66778 0.000 2.2018 4.9582 
PAW1 1.84000a 0.66778 0.011 0.4618 3.2182 
PAW2 0.48000 0.66778 0.479 −0.8982 1.8582 
HPAW1 2.08000a 0.66778 0.005 0.7018 3.4582 
Dependent variableCategory (I)Category (J)Mean difference (I–J)Std. errorSig.95% Confidence
Lower boundUpper bound
CVG LSD Control HRW −5.94000a 0.66778 0.000 −7.3182 −4.5618 
PAW1 −7.68000a 0.66778 0.000 −9.0582 −6.3018 
PAW2 −9.04000a 0.66778 0.000 −10.4182 −7.6618 
HPAW1 −7.44000a 0.66778 0.000 −8.8182 −6.0618 
HPAW2 −9.52000a 0.66778 0.000 −10.8982 −8.1418 
HRW Control 5.94000a 0.66778 0.000 4.5618 7.3182 
PAW1 −1.74000a 0.66778 0.016 −3.1182 −0.3618 
PAW2 −3.10000a 0.66778 0.000 −4.4782 −1.7218 
HPAW1 −1.50000a 0.66778 0.034 −2.8782 −0.1218 
HPAW2 −3.58000a 0.66778 0.000 −4.9582 −2.2018 
PAW1 Control 7.68000a 0.66778 0.000 6.3018 9.0582 
HRW 1.74000a 0.66778 0.016 0.3618 3.1182 
PAW2 −1.36000 0.66778 0.053 −2.7382 0.0182 
HPAW1 0.24000 0.66778 0.722 −1.1382 1.6182 
HPAW2 −1.84000a 0.66778 0.011 −3.2182 −0.4618 
PAW2 Control 9.04000a 0.66778 0.000 7.6618 10.4182 
HRW 3.10000a 0.66778 0.000 1.7218 4.4782 
PAW1 1.36000 0.66778 0.053 −0.0182 2.7382 
HPAW1 1.60000a 0.66778 0.025 0.2218 2.9782 
HPAW2 −0.48000 0.66778 0.479 −1.8582 0.8982 
HPAW1 Control 7.44000a 0.66778 0.000 6.0618 8.8182 
HRW 1.50000a 0.66778 0.034 0.1218 2.8782 
PAW1 −0.24000 0.66778 0.722 −1.6182 1.1382 
PAW2 −1.60000a 0.66778 0.025 −2.9782 −0.2218 
HPAW2 −2.08000a 0.66778 0.005 −3.4582 −0.7018 
HPAW2 Control 9.52000a 0.66778 0.000 8.1418 10.8982 
HRW 3.58000a 0.66778 0.000 2.2018 4.9582 
PAW1 1.84000a 0.66778 0.011 0.4618 3.2182 
PAW2 0.48000 0.66778 0.479 −0.8982 1.8582 
HPAW1 2.08000a 0.66778 0.005 0.7018 3.4582 
a

The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

The GI measures both the percentage and speed of germination, with a higher value indicating a higher percentage and rate.54 According to the LSD test for multiple comparisons, germination index (GI) was found to be significantly different between HPAW2 and HRW when compared to other activated waters. However, there was no statistically significant difference between PAW1 and HPAW1 (p = 0.138) or between PAW1 and PAW2 (p = 0.138) (Table VI). The highest recorded value for GI is related to HPAW2, with a 42.9% increase compared to the reference. With an increase of 38%, it is followed by PAW2, PAW1, and HPAW1. HRW increased by 24.8 [Fig. 8(b)]. The GI is considered the most comprehensive measurement parameter, combining germination percentage, speed, spread, duration, and high/low events.41 

TABLE VI.

Multiple comparisons for GI.

Dependent variableCategory (I)Category (J)Mean difference (I–J)Std. errorSig.95% Confidence
Lower boundUpper bound
GI LSD Control HRW −19.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −21.6910 −16.3090 
PAW1 −28.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −30.6910 −25.3090 
PAW2 −30.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −32.6910 −27.3090 
HPAW1 −30.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −32.6910 −27.3090 
HPAW2 −33.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −35.6910 −30.3090 
HRW Control 19.00000a 1.30384 0.000 16.3090 21.6910 
PAW1 −9.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −11.6910 −6.3090 
PAW2 −11.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −13.6910 −8.3090 
HPAW1 −11.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −13.6910 −8.3090 
HPAW2 −14.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −16.6910 −11.3090 
PAW1 Control 28.00000a 1.30384 0.000 25.3090 30.6910 
HRW 9.00000a 1.30384 0.000 6.3090 11.6910 
PAW2 −2.00000 1.30384 0.138 −4.6910 0.6910 
HPAW1 −2.00000 1.30384 0.138 −4.6910 0.6910 
HPAW2 −5.00000a 1.30384 0.001 −7.6910 −2.3090 
PAW2 Control 30.00000a 1.30384 0.000 27.3090 32.6910 
HRW 11.00000a 1.30384 0.000 8.3090 13.6910 
PAW1 2.00000 1.30384 0.138 −0.6910 4.6910 
HPAW1 0.00000 1.30384 1.000 −2.6910 2.6910 
HPAW2 −3.00000a 1.30384 0.030 −5.6910 −0.3090 
HPAW1 Control 30.00000a 1.30384 0.000 27.3090 32.6910 
HRW 11.00000a 1.30384 0.000 8.3090 13.6910 
PAW1 2.00000 1.30384 0.138 −0.6910 4.6910 
PAW2 0.00000 1.30384 1.000 −2.6910 2.6910 
HPAW2 −3.00000a 1.30384 0.030 −5.6910 −0.3090 
HPAW2 Control 33.00000a 1.30384 0.000 30.3090 35.6910 
HRW 14.00000a 1.30384 0.000 11.3090 16.6910 
PAW1 5.00000a 1.30384 0.001 2.3090 7.6910 
PAW2 3.00000a 1.30384 0.030 0.3090 5.6910 
HPAW1 3.00000a 1.30384 0.030 0.3090 5.6910 
Dependent variableCategory (I)Category (J)Mean difference (I–J)Std. errorSig.95% Confidence
Lower boundUpper bound
GI LSD Control HRW −19.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −21.6910 −16.3090 
PAW1 −28.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −30.6910 −25.3090 
PAW2 −30.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −32.6910 −27.3090 
HPAW1 −30.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −32.6910 −27.3090 
HPAW2 −33.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −35.6910 −30.3090 
HRW Control 19.00000a 1.30384 0.000 16.3090 21.6910 
PAW1 −9.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −11.6910 −6.3090 
PAW2 −11.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −13.6910 −8.3090 
HPAW1 −11.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −13.6910 −8.3090 
HPAW2 −14.00000a 1.30384 0.000 −16.6910 −11.3090 
PAW1 Control 28.00000a 1.30384 0.000 25.3090 30.6910 
HRW 9.00000a 1.30384 0.000 6.3090 11.6910 
PAW2 −2.00000 1.30384 0.138 −4.6910 0.6910 
HPAW1 −2.00000 1.30384 0.138 −4.6910 0.6910 
HPAW2 −5.00000a 1.30384 0.001 −7.6910 −2.3090 
PAW2 Control 30.00000a 1.30384 0.000 27.3090 32.6910 
HRW 11.00000a 1.30384 0.000 8.3090 13.6910 
PAW1 2.00000 1.30384 0.138 −0.6910 4.6910 
HPAW1 0.00000 1.30384 1.000 −2.6910 2.6910 
HPAW2 −3.00000a 1.30384 0.030 −5.6910 −0.3090 
HPAW1 Control 30.00000a 1.30384 0.000 27.3090 32.6910 
HRW 11.00000a 1.30384 0.000 8.3090 13.6910 
PAW1 2.00000 1.30384 0.138 −0.6910 4.6910 
PAW2 0.00000 1.30384 1.000 −2.6910 2.6910 
HPAW2 −3.00000a 1.30384 0.030 −5.6910 −0.3090 
HPAW2 Control 33.00000a 1.30384 0.000 30.3090 35.6910 
HRW 14.00000a 1.30384 0.000 11.3090 16.6910 
PAW1 5.00000a 1.30384 0.001 2.3090 7.6910 
PAW2 3.00000a 1.30384 0.030 0.3090 5.6910 
HPAW1 3.00000a 1.30384 0.030 0.3090 5.6910 
a

The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Plasma reacts to water, triggering a range of kinetic chemical reactions and giving rise to the existence of aqueous reactive species. Different processes, e.g., the transfer of gases to liquids and a chemical reaction between gas types and liquid molecules, are performed when PAW is generated at an interface layer.55 The interaction of water with the plasma results in the non-equilibrium dissociation of water molecules, leading to the formation of short-living species such as hydroxyl ions (OH) and hydrated (solvated) electrons. More stable species, including superoxides, ozone, and H2O2, are formed by subsequent rapid reactions between hydroxyl ions and hydrated (solvated) electrons.56 Apart from ROS, PAW also contains nitric acid (HNO3) and nitrous acid (HNO2) and low-level transient RNS, e.g., peroxynitrous acid/peroxynitrite and nitrogen dioxide radicals. Nitrogen oxide, which then reacts with water to form acids, is formed in the presence of air when nitrogen and oxygen are separated from the gaseous phase.48,57

As shown in Fig. 3(b), the intensity of the species' spectra nearly doubled in the optical emission spectra of the second device, and a spectrum of nitrogen oxide species was also observed. This increase in intensity was likely due to the presence of water molecules, which led to the production of more species. The active plasma species dissolved in water, resulting in the formation of stable active nitrogen species (RNS) such as NO2¯ and NO3¯ ions.58 

The reaction of water with the species produced in the plasma causes PAW to become acidic. PAW shall become more acidic as the quantity of ROS and RNS delivered to the water increases.59 Changes in ionic species within PAWs were first identified by measuring their electrical conductivity. The increases in conductivity are due to the formation of ROS and RNS when active water is prepared.

Hydrogen is the lightest gas, and it reacts with most elements under normal conditions, whereas H2 is not very reactive in its molecular state.60 At the plasma interface with water, hydrogen molecules are also decomposed in sample HPAW2. More reactions occur, and hydrogen radicals produce more of the secondary compounds. There is a growing possibility that more compounds will be dissolved in water.

The study of the physicochemical properties of activated waters shows that both HPAW1 and HPAW2 exhibit a greater decrease in pH compared to PAW1 and PAW2. Many bacteria and fungi cannot survive or thrive in highly acidic conditions because the low pH can disrupt their cellular processes and structures.61 As a result, when the pH of the solution decreases significantly, it can effectively kill or inhibit the growth of these microorganisms on the seeds.

The configuration of two hydrogen bonds and two covalent bonds between oxygen and hydrogens around the oxygen atom is consistent with the tetrahedral-like structure of five water molecules.62 As the impurities increase in water, the four-hole configuration is prevented from forming, and the Raman peak of water height is reduced (Fig. 4). Alternatively, hydrogen molecules can contribute to this structure's formation and intensify its peak. Water peak intensity has decreased in PAW2 compared to PAW1. Also, water peak intensity has decreased in HPAW2 compared to in HPAW1 due to the increasing number of substances soluble in water. By forming a symmetrical configuration, hydrogen molecules in HPAW1/HPAW2 have intensified the Raman Q-branch peak of water compared to PAW1/PAW2.

There is a progressive differentiation of organs and tissue in developing legume seeds. Maturation is governed by a signaling network composed of sugars, amino acids, and SnRK1 kinases. Changing levels of oxygen energy and the nutrient state activate maturation processes. Embryo cells become green and photosynthetically operative during the transition. Sucrose functions as a transport and nutrient sugar and as a signal molecule that activates storage-associated processes.63 HRW plays a vital role in the conversion of starch to sugars,64 which are simple carbohydrates made of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen.65 The accumulation of soluble proteins not only aids water retention but also protects essential substances. This leads to maximizing plant growth and promoting good health.66 

The presence of ROS acts as a signal that the seed is awake and shortens its germination period. The essential nutrients for seed growth are provided by RNS compounds.67 More reactions occur in the second plasma system with the direct contact of the arc with water, resulting in more RONS being produced and dissolved in water. Compared with the first plasma system, this improved the germination parameters in water produced by a second plasma system. The presence of hydrogen in HPAW2 activates storage-associated processes that not only accelerate seed maturation but also provide a boost to sprout health.

This study examined the impact of two different plasma systems and a hydrogen injecting system and their combinations including PAW1, PAW2, HRW, HPAW1, and HPAW2 on water and the effects on lentil seed germination. The results demonstrated significant differences in the properties of different activated waters compared to control water. Also, seeds that were irrigated with HRW exhibited superior characteristics compared to the control seeds, as indicated by the results. The plasma systems effectively reduced the pH of PAW1 and PAW2, with a greater decrease observed in HPAW1 and HPAW1. Analysis of nitrite and nitrate levels revealed that HPAW2 had the highest concentrations, indicating more reactive processes in the presence of hydrogen. These results suggest that more reactions occur in the plasma system with direct arc contact with water, resulting in the increased production and dissolution of RONS in water. Raman spectrum analysis indicates a decrease in water peak intensity in HPAW2 compared to HPAW1, attributed to the increased solubility of substances in water. HPAW2 exhibited the highest germination index (GI), which combines germination percentage and speed. The increase in active species in water led to improved germination parameters, such as sprout length.

Overall, this study demonstrated that a combination of plasma systems and HRW systems could alter the physicochemical properties of water and positively impact seed germination parameters. In particular, HPAW2 showed better effects on seed growth and germination due to the increased production of reactive species.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

S. Mansory: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Funding acquisition (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Software (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). M. Bahreini: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Funding acquisition (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Project administration (equal); Resources (equal); Software (equal); Supervision (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article.

1.
W. M.
Stewart
and
T. L.
Roberts
, “
Food security and the role of fertilizer in supporting it
,”
Procedia Eng.
46
,
76
82
(
2012
).
2.
M.-H.
Kang
,
M.
Veerana
,
S.
Eom
,
H.-S.
Uhm
,
S.
Ryu
, and
G.
Park
, “
Plasma mediated disinfection of rice seeds in water and air
,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
53
,
214001
(
2020
).
3.
T. L.
Roberts
and
A. S.
Tasistro
, “
The role of plant nutrition in supporting food security
,”
Fertil. Crops Improve Hum. Health Sci. Rev.
1
,
11
28
(
2012
).
4.
M.
Ahemad
and
M. S.
Khan
, “
Effects of pesticides on plant growth promoting traits of mesorhizobium strain MRC4
,”
J. Saudi. Soc. Agric. Sci.
11
,
63
71
(
2012
).
5.
A. O.
Adesemoye
,
H. A.
Torbert
, and
J. W.
Kloepper
, “
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers
,”
Microb. Ecol.
58
,
921
929
(
2009
).
6.
M.
Abdollahi
,
A.
Ranjbar
,
S.
Shadnia
,
S.
Nikfar
, and
A.
Rezaie
, “
Pesticides and oxidative stress: A review
,”
Med. Sci. Monit.
10
(
6
),
141
147
(
2004
).
7.
S. I.
Hosseini
,
S.
Mohsenimehr
,
J.
Hadian
,
M.
Ghorbanpour
, and
B.
Shokri
, “
Physico-chemical induced modification of seed germination and early development in artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.) using low energy plasma technology
,”
Phys. Plasmas
25
,
1
10
(
2018
).
8.
V.
Rathore
and
S. K.
Nema
, “
Optimization of process parameters to generate plasma activated water and study of physicochemical properties of plasma activated solutions at optimum condition
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
, 084901 (
2021
).
9.
C.
Man
,
C.
Zhang
,
H.
Fang
,
R.
Zhou
,
B.
Huang
,
Y.
Xu
,
X.
Zhang
, and
T.
Shao
, “
Nanosecond-pulsed microbubble plasma reactor for plasma-activated water generation and bacterial inactivation
,”
Plasma Process. Polym.
19
,
2200004
(
2022
).
10.
J.-L.
Brisset
and
J.
Pawlat
, “
Chemical effects of air plasma species on aqueous solutes in direct and delayed exposure modes: Discharge, post-discharge and plasma activated water
,”
Plasma Chem. Plasma Process.
36
,
355
381
(
2016
).
11.
L.
Sivachandiran
and
A.
Khacef
, “
Enhanced seed germination and plant growth by atmospheric pressure cold air plasma: Combined effect of seed and water treatment
,”
RSC Adv.
7
,
1822
1832
(
2017
).
12.
V.
Rathore
and
S. K.
Nema
, “
A comparative study of dielectric barrier discharge plasma device and plasma jet to generate plasma activated water and post-discharge trapping of reactive species
,”
Phys. Plasmas
29
, 033510 (
2022
).
13.
S. S.
Siddique
,
G. E. S. J.
Hardy
, and
K. L.
Bayliss
, “
Plasma-activated water inhibits in vitro conidial germination of colletotrichum alienum, a postharvest pathogen of avocado
,”
Plant Pathol.
70
,
367
376
(
2021
).
14.
H.
Guo
,
Y.
Wang
,
L.
Liao
,
Z.
Li
,
S.
Pan
,
C.
Puyang
,
Y.
Su
,
Y.
Zhang
,
T.
Wang
, and
J.
Ren
, “
Review on remediation of organic-contaminated soil by discharge plasma: Plasma types, impact factors, plasma-assisted catalysis, and indexes for remediation
,”
Chem. Eng. J.
436
,
135239
(
2022
).
15.
M.
Bafoil
,
A.
Jemmat
,
Y.
Martinez
,
N.
Merbahi
,
O.
Eichwald
,
C.
Dunand
, and
M.
Yousfi
, “
Effects of low temperature plasmas and plasma activated waters on arabidopsis thaliana germination and growth
,”
PLoS ONE
13
,
e0195512
(
2018
).
16.
M.
Wartel
,
F.
Faubert
,
I. D.
Dirlau
,
S.
Rudz
,
N.
Pellerin
,
D.
Astanei
,
R.
Burlica
,
B.
Hnatiuc
, and
S.
Pellerin
, “
Analysis of plasma activated water by gliding arc at atmospheric pressure: Effect of the chemical composition of water on the activation
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
233301
(
2021
).
17.
See https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0217788 for “Plasma activated water as resistance inducer against bacterial leaf spot of tomato,” PLoS ONE, Accessed 26 February 2024.
18.
V.
Rathore
,
B. S.
Tiwari
, and
S. K.
Nema
, “
Treatment of pea seeds with plasma activated water to enhance germination, plant growth, and plant composition
,”
Plasma Chem. Plasma Process.
42
,
109
129
(
2022
).
19.
P.
Terebun
,
M.
Kwiatkowski
,
K.
Hensel
,
M.
Kopacki
, and
J.
Pawłat
, “
Influence of plasma activated water generated in a gliding arc discharge reactor on germination of beetroot and carrot seeds
,”
Appl. Sci.
11
,
6164
(
2021
).
20.
M. C.
Pérez-Pizá
,
L.
Prevosto
,
P. E.
Grijalba
,
C. G.
Zilli
,
E.
Cejas
,
B.
Mancinelli
, and
K. B.
Balestrasse
, “
Improvement of growth and yield of soybean plants through the application of non-thermal plasmas to seeds with different health status
,”
Heliyon
5
,
e01495
(
2019
).
21.
P.
Starič
,
A.
Kolmanič
,
I.
Junkar
, and
K.
Vogel-Mikuš
, “
Chemical alterations of grain surface by cold plasma technology: Comparison of buckwheat and wheat grain responses to oxygen low-pressure plasma
,”
Heliyon
9
,
e20215
(
2023
).
22.
R. P.
Guragain
,
H. B.
Baniya
,
D. P.
Guragain
,
S. P.
Pradhan
, and
D. P.
Subedi
, “
From seed to sprout: Unveiling the potential of non-thermal plasma for optimizing cucumber growth
,”
Heliyon
9
,
e21460
(
2023
).
23.
Q.
Wu
,
N.
Su
,
J.
Cai
,
Z.
Shen
, and
J.
Cui
, “
Hydrogen-rich water enhances cadmium tolerance in Chinese cabbage by reducing cadmium uptake and increasing antioxidant capacities
,”
J. Plant Physiol.
175
,
174
182
(
2015
).
24.
Y.
Lin
,
W.
Zhang
,
F.
Qi
,
W.
Cui
,
Y.
Xie
, and
W.
Shen
, “
Hydrogen-rich water regulates cucumber adventitious root development in a heme oxygenase-1/carbon monoxide-dependent manner
,”
J. Plant Physiol.
171
,
1
8
(
2014
).
25.
P.
Huang
,
C.
Li
,
H.
Liu
,
Z.
Zhao
, and
W.
Liao
, “
Hydrogen gas improves seed germination in cucumber by regulating sugar and starch metabolisms
,”
Horticulturae
7
,
456
(
2021
).
26.
K.
Mizuno
,
A. T.
Sasaki
,
K.
Ebisu
,
K.
Tajima
,
O.
Kajimoto
,
J.
Nojima
,
H.
Kuratsune
,
H.
Hori
, and
Y.
Watanabe
, “
Hydrogen-rich water for improvements of mood, anxiety, and autonomic nerve function in daily life
,”
Med. Gas Res.
7
,
247
(
2017
).
27.
W.
Cui
,
C.
Gao
,
P.
Fang
,
G.
Lin
, and
W.
Shen
, “
Alleviation of cadmium toxicity in medicago sativa by hydrogen-rich water
,”
J. Hazard. Mater.
260
,
715
724
(
2013
).
28.
Q.
Jin
,
K.
Zhu
,
W.
Cui
,
Y.
Xie
,
B. I. N.
Han
, and
W.
Shen
, “
Hydrogen gas acts as a novel bioactive molecule in enhancing plant tolerance to paraquat-induced oxidative stress via the modulation of heme oxygenase-1 signalling system
,”
Plant Cell Environ.
36
,
956
969
(
2013
).
29.
J.
Zhang
,
H.
Hao
,
M.
Chen
,
H.
Wang
,
Z.
Feng
, and
H.
Chen
, “
Hydrogen-rich water alleviates the toxicities of different stresses to mycelial growth in hypsizygus marmoreus
,”
AMB Express
7
,
1
11
(
2017
).
30.
Y.
Xie
,
Y.
Mao
,
D.
Lai
,
W.
Zhang
, and
W.
Shen
, “
H2 enhances arabidopsis salt tolerance by manipulating ZAT10/12-mediated antioxidant defence and controlling sodium exclusion
,”
PLoS ONE
7
,
e49800
(
2012
).
31.
C.
Li
,
T.
Gong
,
B.
Bian
, and
W.
Liao
, “
Roles of hydrogen gas in plants: A review
,”
Funct. Plant Biol.
45
,
783
792
(
2018
).
32.
X.
Zhang
,
X.
Zhao
,
Z.
Wang
,
W.
Shen
, and
X.
Xu
, “
Protective effects of hydrogen-rich water on the photosynthetic apparatus of maize seedlings (Zea mays L.) as a result of an increase in antioxidant enzyme activities under high light stress
,”
Plant Growth Regul.
77
,
43
56
(
2015
).
33.
S.
Xu
,
Y.
Jiang
,
W.
Cui
,
Q.
Jin
,
Y.
Zhang
,
D.
Bu
,
J.
Fu
,
R.
Wang
,
F.
Zhou
, and
W.
Shen
, “
Hydrogen enhances adaptation of rice seedlings to cold stress via the reestablishment of redox homeostasis mediated by miRNA expression
,”
Plant Soil
414
,
53
67
(
2017
).
34.
D.
Jezierny
,
R.
Mosenthin
, and
E.
Bauer
, “
The use of grain legumes as a protein source in pig nutrition: A review
,”
Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.
157
,
111
128
(
2010
).
35.
C. J.
Bryant
, “
Plant-based animal product alternatives are healthier and more environmentally sustainable than animal products
,”
Future Foods
6
,
100174
(
2022
).
36.
H.
Khazaei
,
M.
Subedi
,
M.
Nickerson
,
C.
Martínez-Villaluenga
,
J.
Frias
, and
A.
Vandenberg
, “
Seed protein of lentils: Current status, progress, and food applications
,”
Foods
8
,
391
(
2019
).
37.
H.
Khazaei
,
R.
Podder
,
C. T.
Caron
,
S. S.
Kundu
,
M.
Diapari
,
A.
Vandenberg
, and
K. E.
Bett
, “
Marker–trait association analysis of iron and zinc concentration in lentil (lens culinaris medik.) seeds
,”
Plant Genome
10
(
2
), pp.plantgenome2017-02. (
2017
).
38.
E. R.
Grela
,
B.
Kiczorowska
,
W.
Samolińska
,
J.
Matras
,
P.
Kiczorowski
,
W.
Rybiński
, and
E.
Hanczakowska
, “
Chemical composition of leguminous seeds: Part I—Content of basic nutrients, amino acids, phytochemical compounds, and antioxidant activity
,”
Eur. Food Res. Technol.
243
,
1385
1395
(
2017
).
39.
N. M.
Nahrani
,
M.
Bahreini
, and
S. H.
Tadi
, “
Simulation of plasma–water interaction with discharge in the existing bubble in water
,”
Acta Phys. Pol.
143
(
1
),
100
111
(
2023
), ISSN: 1898-794X 143:100–100.
40.
M.
Ceritoglu
,
M.
Erman
,
F.
Çığ
,
F.
Ceritoglu
,
Ö.
Uçar
,
S.
Soysal
, and
A.
El Sabagh
, “
Enhancement of root system architecture, seedling growth, and germination in lentil under salinity stress by seed priming with silicon and salicylic acid
,”
Pol. J. Environ. Stud.
32
(
5
),
4481
4491
(
2023
).
41.
M. A.
Kader
, “
A comparison of seed germination calculation formulae and the associated interpretation of resulting data
,”
J. Proc. R. Soc. New South Wales
138
,
65
75
(
2005
).
42.
S. M.
Lynch
, “
Comparing means across multiple groups: Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
,” in
Using Statistics in Social Research
(
Springer
,
New York
,
2013
), pp.
117
126
.
43.
X.
Tu
,
L.
Yu
,
J. H.
Yan
,
K. F.
Cen
, and
B. G.
Cheron
, “
Dynamic and spectroscopic characteristics of atmospheric gliding arc in gas-liquid two-phase flow
,”
Phys. Plasmas
16
,
113506
(
2009
).
44.
R.
Zhou
,
R.
Zhou
,
P.
Wang
,
Y.
Xian
,
A.
Mai-Prochnow
,
X.
Lu
,
P. J.
Cullen
,
K. K.
Ostrikov
, and
K.
Bazaka
, “
Plasma-activated water: Generation, origin of reactive species and biological applications
,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
53
,
303001
(
2020
).
45.
B.
Ghimire
,
J.
Sornsakdanuphap
,
Y. J.
Hong
,
H. S.
Uhm
,
K.-D.
Weltmann
, and
E. H.
Choi
, “
The effect of the gap distance between an atmospheric-pressure plasma jet nozzle and liquid surface on OH and N2 species concentrations
,”
Phys. Plasmas
24
,
073502
(
2017
).
46.
See https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349251092_Electrical_and_Optical_Characterization_of_Gliding_Arc_Discharge_GAD_Operated_at_Line_Frequency_50_Hz_Power_Supply for “Electrical and optical characterization of gliding arc discharge (GAD) operated at line frequency (50 Hz) power supply,” ResearchGate, Accessed 19 August 2023.
47.
F.
Khalili
,
B.
Shokri
,
M.-R.
Khani
,
M.
Hasani
,
F.
Zandi
, and
A.
Aliahmadi
, “
A study of the effect of gliding arc non-thermal plasma on almonds decontamination
,”
AIP Adv.
8
,
105024
(
2018
).
48.
R.
Thirumdas
,
A.
Kothakota
,
U.
Annapure
,
K.
Siliveru
,
R.
Blundell
,
R.
Gatt
, and
V. P.
Valdramidis
, “
Plasma activated water (PAW): Chemistry, physico-chemical properties, applications in food and agriculture
,”
Trends Food Sci. Technol.
77
,
21
31
(
2018
).
49.
E. S.
Hopkins
, “
The effect of slightly alkaline Tap water upon spawn and eggs of trout and perch
,”
J. Am. Water Works Assoc.
19
,
313
322
(
1928
).
50.
A. A.
Kananenka
and
J. L.
Skinner
, “
Fermi resonance in OH-stretch vibrational spectroscopy of liquid water and the water hexamer
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
148
(
3
),
313
322
(
2018
).
51.
J.
Borysow
and
M.
Moraldi
, “
On the interpretation of the Q -branch of hydrogen in water
,”
J. Phys. B
49
,
115202
(
2016
).
52.
T. J.
Orchard
, “
Estimating the parameters of plant seedling emergence
,”
Seed Sci. Technol.
5
(
1
),
61
69
(
1977
).
53.
K. W.
Jones
and
D. C.
Sanders
, “
The influence of soaking pepper seed in water or potassium salt solutions on germination at three temperatures
,”
J. Seed Technol.
11
(
1
),
97
102
(
1987
).
54.
R. L.
Benech Arnold
,
M.
Fenner
, and
P. J.
Edwards
, “
Changes in germinability, ABA content and ABA embryonic sensitivity in developing seeds of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.: Induced by water stress during grain filling
,”
New Phytol.
118
,
339
347
(
1991
).
55.
D.
Weber
,
M. J.
Davies
, and
T.
Grune
, “
Determination of protein carbonyls in plasma, cell extracts, tissue homogenates, isolated proteins: Focus on sample preparation and derivatization conditions
,”
Redox Biol.
5
,
367
380
(
2015
).
56.
A.
Khlyustova
,
C.
Labay
,
Z.
Machala
,
M.-P.
Ginebra
, and
C.
Canal
, “
Important parameters in plasma jets for the production of RONS in liquids for plasma medicine: A brief review
,”
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.
13
,
238
252
(
2019
).
57.
A. M.
Lietz
and
M. J.
Kushner
, “
Air plasma treatment of liquid covered tissue: Long timescale chemistry
,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
49
,
425204
(
2016
).
58.
X.
Lu
,
S.
Wang
,
R.
Zhou
,
Z.
Fang
, and
P. J.
Cullen
, “
Discharge modes and liquid interactions for plasma-bubble discharges
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
132
, 073303 (
2022
).
59.
Z.
Machala
,
B.
Tarabova
,
K.
Hensel
,
E.
Spetlikova
,
L.
Sikurova
, and
P.
Lukes
, “
Formation of ROS and RNS in water electro-sprayed through transient spark discharge in air and their bactericidal effects: Formation of ROS/RNS in water sprayed through spark in Air
,”
Plasma Process. Polym.
10
,
649
659
(
2013
).
60.
J.
Slezák
,
B.
Kura
,
K.
Frimmel
,
M.
Zálešák
,
T.
Ravingerová
,
C.
Viczenczová
,
L.
Okruhlicová
, and
N.
Tribulová
, “
Preventive and therapeutic application of molecular hydrogen in situations with excessive production of free radicals
,”
Physiol. Res.
65
,
S11
S28
(
2016
).
61.
A.-P.
Magiorakos
,
A.
Srinivasan
,
R. B.
Carey
,
Y.
Carmeli
,
M. E.
Falagas
,
C. G.
Giske
,
S.
Harbarth
,
J. F.
Hindler
,
G.
Kahlmeter
, and
B.
Olsson-Liljequist
, “
Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance
,”
Clin. Microbiol. Infect.
18
,
268
281
(
2012
).
62.
Y.
Tominaga
,
A.
Fujiwara
, and
Y.
Amo
, “
Dynamical structure of water by Raman spectroscopy
,”
Fluid Phase Equilib.
144
,
323
330
(
1998
).
63.
H.
Weber
,
L.
Borisjuk
, and
U.
Wobus
, “
Molecular physiology of legume seed development
,”
Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.
56
,
253
279
(
2005
).
64.
S.
Xu
,
S.
Zhu
,
Y.
Jiang
,
N.
Wang
,
R.
Wang
,
W.
Shen
, and
J.
Yang
, “
Hydrogen-rich water alleviates salt stress in rice during seed germination
,”
Plant Soil
370
,
47
57
(
2013
).
65.
See https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-4939-7819-9_7 for “Quantification of soluble sugars and sugar alcohols by LC-MS/MS,” SpringerLink, Accessed 18 August 2023.
66.
S.
Kaur
,
A. K.
Gupta
, and
N.
Kaur
, “
Gibberellic acid and kinetin partially reverse the effect of water stress on germination and seedling growth in chickpea
,”
Plant Growth Regul.
25
,
29
33
(
1998
).
67.
T. T.
Kozlowski
,
Seed Germination, Ontogeny, and Shoot Growth
(
Elsevier
,
2012
).