Solid-state refrigeration using barocaloric materials is environmentally friendly and highly efficient, making it a subject of global interest over the past decade. Here, we report giant barocaloric effects in sodium hexafluorophosphate (NaPF6) and sodium hexafluoroarsenate (NaAsF6) that both undergo a cubic-to-rhombohedral phase transition near room temperature. We have determined that the low-temperature phase structure of NaPF6 is a rhombohedral structure with space group R 3 ¯ by neutron powder diffraction. There are three Raman active vibration modes in NaPF6 and NaAsF6, i.e., F2g, Eg, and A1g. The phase transition temperature varies with pressure at a rate of dTt/dP = 250 and 310 K GPa−1 for NaPF6 and NaAsF6. The pressure-induced entropy changes of NaPF6 and NaAsF6 are determined to be around 45.2 and 35.6 J kg−1 K−1, respectively. The saturation driving pressure is about 40 MPa. The pressure-dependent neutron powder diffraction suggests that the barocaloric effects are related to the pressure-induced cubic-to-rhombohedral phase transitions.

Around 25% of global electricity consumption is already devoted to refrigeration technologies, both at the domestic and industrial levels.1,2 Unfortunately, use of refrigeration is also responsible for around 7.8% of global greenhouse gas emissions and destruction of the ozone layer, which affects the environment.3 The search for environmentally friendly refrigeration technologies to replace traditional vapor-compression refrigeration is an inevitable trend in today's sustainable development requirements. Solid-state refrigeration technology based on caloric effects, which has no carbon emissions and high energy efficiency, has attracted extensive attention in recent years.4,5 Solid-state phase transition caloric effects mainly include MagnetoCaloric Effects (MCEs),6,7 ElectroCaloric Effects (ECEs),8,9 elastoCaloric Effects (eCEs),10,11 and BaroCaloric Effects (BCEs).12–16 The first three originate from the modulation of the magnetic moment, the ferroelectric polarization, or the ordering of the crystal structure domains in ferroics by the corresponding external fields, while the latter often involves the pressure-induced phase transitions in the crystal structure.

BCEs have been found in a wide variety of systems including plastic crystals,12,13 hybrid organic–inorganic compounds,17–19 inorganic plastic crystals,14,15,20 thermoelectrics,21 ferroelectrics,22 ferroelastics,23 frustrated antiferromagnet,24 charge-transfer oxide,25 spin-crossover complexes,26,27 materials with metal-to-insulator transitions,28 liquid–solid-transition n-alkanes,29 and so forth. The discovery of colossal BCEs in plastic crystals paves a new route to barocaloric refrigeration.12–15 They usually possess small driving pressures as well as large entropy changes due to giant compressibility, extensive molecular orientational disorder, and highly anharmonic lattice dynamics of these materials.12 However, limitations for the applicability of these plastic crystals are low density, relatively large hysteresis, and low thermal conductivities caused by the strong disorder in plastic crystals.30 The phase transition temperature varying with pressure (dTt/dP) is about 100 K GPa−1 for plastic crystals.30 Currently, as barocaloric refrigeration is still under development, it is important to find more barocaloric materials with excellent properties.31 

In the present study, we report two inorganic plastic crystals NaPF6 and NaAsF6 with giant BCEs. We have determined the low-temperature phase structure of NaPF6 is a rhombohedral structure with space group R 3 ¯ by neutron powder diffraction (NPD). The phase transition temperature varies with pressure at a rate of dTt/dP 250 and 310 K GPa−1 for NaPF6 and NaAsF6. For the cubic-to-rhombohedral phase transition, NaAsF6 is more sensitive to pressure than NaPF6. The pressure-induced entropy changes of NaPF6 and NaAsF6 are approximately 45.2 and 35.6 J kg−1 K−1, respectively. The saturation drive pressure is 40 MPa. We further study the relationship between the structural and thermal properties, which will contribute to the discovery of higher-performing barocaloric materials in the future.

Polycrystalline NaPF6 (purity of 98%) samples were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Polycrystalline NaAsF6 (purity of 98%) samples were purchased from Macklin.

The sample was pelletized and put into high-pressure Hastelloy cells. The heat flow data were collected using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) (μDSC 7 evo, Setaram) under 0.1, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 MPa. The rate of temperature change is 1 K min−1. Details have been published elsewhere.12 

NPD experiments were performed on the polycrystalline NaPF6 powder using the general purpose powder diffractometer (GPPD) of China Spallation Neutron Source (CSNS) in Dongguan, China.32 The best resolution Δd/d will be better than 0.2% at a high angle detector bank. The sample was loaded into a vanadium can, and the NPD pattern was collected with a wavelength range from 0.1 to 4.9 Å under vacuum conditions at temperatures of 240 and 300 K. Pressure-dependent NPD experiments were performed on the polycrystalline NaPF6 powder using the powder diffractometer, which specializes in high-pressure experiments, BL11 PLANET of J-PARC in Japan.33 The resolution Δd/d is approximately 0.5%. In the experiments, we used a piston cylinder cell made of CuBe. Two plates of Pb are placed at the bottom of the cell as a pressure marker.34 We chose a combination of pressure conditions (∼0.1 and 400 MPa) and temperature conditions (250 and 297 K). Rietveld refinement was used to analyze crystal structures by GSAS.35,36

Temperature-variable x-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of NaPF6 were collected by using an x-ray diffractometer (D8 Advance, Bruker) with Cu-1 radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). The accuracy in peak positions (2 Theta) is about 0.01°. The measurements were performed at 230, 240, 250, 260, 270, 280, 290, 300, 310, and 320 K after keeping for 10 min. All patterns were analyzed with Le Bail refinement using the program Fullprof_Suite.37 Temperature-variable XRD patterns of NaAsF6 were collected by using an x-ray diffractometer (Smartlab, Rigaku) with Cu-1 radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). The accuracy in peak positions (2 Theta) is approximately 0.01°. The measurements were performed at 300, 310, 320, 330, 340, 360, and 380 K after keeping for 10 min. All patterns were analyzed with Rietveld refinement method using the program Fullprof_Suite.37 

The Raman spectra at various temperatures were acquired on the Raman spectrometer (LabRAM HR Evolution, HORIBA Jobin Yvon) with a wavelength of 532 nm. The spectral resolution is about 0.6 cm−1. We pressed the sample into the block. Raman spectra were collected at a constant temperature on heating from 240 to 330 K with 10 K as the step, and NaAsF6 samples were collected at a constant temperature on heating from 290 to 360 K with 10 K as the step. Every constant-temperature scan was carried out for 10 min under ambient pressure.

Inelastic neutron scattering (INS) experiments were carried out on the time-of-flight spectrometer PELICAN at the Australian Center for Neutron Scattering (ACNS) of the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization (ANSTO) in Sydney, Australia.38,39 The instrument was configured for an incident neutron energy of 3.7 meV, with an energy resolution of 0.135 meV at the elastic line. The instrument resolution function was acquired on a standard vanadium can at 300 K. The vanadium standard spectrum was also used for detector normalization. Data reduction and manipulation were done using the large array manipulation program (LAMP).40 The scattering function S(Q,E) is a function of scattering wave vectors (Q) and energy transfer (E). It was measured in the energy gain mode over a wide temperature range. The scattering function S(Q,E) was transformed to the generalized phonon density of states (PDOS) by formula (1):41 
(1)

The experimental pressure-induced temperature changes were measured on the VX3 Paris–Edinburgh press with a K-typed thermocouple at room temperature.13,15,42 A few drops of silicon oil were added to the sample to make the pressure received by the sample more uniform. Practical temperature as a function of time (T–t) is recorded in the cycle of pre-pressurization (from 0.1 to 15 MPa), pressurization (from 15 to 300 MPa), and de-pressurization (from 300 to 0.1 MPa).

It is known that NaPF6 crystallizes in a cubic structure, space group F m 3 ¯ m with an eightfold disorder of the anions at room temperature.43,44 Shown in Fig. 1(a) is the NPD patterns for the cubic phase. Refined parameters of the cubic cell are a = 7.603 553(35) Å at 300 K. As we can see from Fig. 1(b), each F-atom has eight possible placeholders in the cubic phase by the VESTA program.45 The crystal structure of NaPF6 at low temperatures has not been determined, but it was assumed that the unit cell is a trigonally distorted body-centered cube.46 However, we first obtained its crystal structure and space group at low temperatures by refining the NPD pattern. NaPF6 at low temperatures crystallizes in a rhombohedral structure with space group R 3 ¯. Refined parameters of the rhombohedral cell are a = 5.165 74(4) Å, c = 13.531 62(18) Å, and γ = 120°. Figure 1(c) is the NPD patterns for the rhombohedral phase at 240 K. Figure 1(d) is the NaPF6 crystal structure at 240 K and there is not a disorder. Figure 1(e) is the contour plot of the temperature-dependent x-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) patterns from 230 to 320 K with 10 K as the step. The temperature-dependent XRPD measurements are consistent with the previous thermal test that there is a first-order phase transition at about 280 K.44 The XRPD patterns at each temperature were refined by Le Bail refinement using the FullProf_Suite program to obtain the cell parameters.37  Figure 1(f) is the variation of the unit cell volume per formula (V) as the temperature increases. There is a zone of coexistence of the cubic and rhombohedral phases at 280 K, and Δ V / V is 2.8%.

FIG. 1.

Crystal structure of NaPF6. (a) NPD pattern and Rietveld refinement at 300 K. (b) The cubic structure with space group F m 3 ¯ m of NaPF6. (c) NPD pattern and Rietveld refinement at 240 K. (d) The rhombohedral structure with space group R 3 ¯ of NaPF6. (e) Temperature-dependent XRPD patterns from 230 to 320 K with a step of 10 K. (f) The variation of the unit cell volume per formula (V) with temperature.

FIG. 1.

Crystal structure of NaPF6. (a) NPD pattern and Rietveld refinement at 300 K. (b) The cubic structure with space group F m 3 ¯ m of NaPF6. (c) NPD pattern and Rietveld refinement at 240 K. (d) The rhombohedral structure with space group R 3 ¯ of NaPF6. (e) Temperature-dependent XRPD patterns from 230 to 320 K with a step of 10 K. (f) The variation of the unit cell volume per formula (V) with temperature.

Close modal

After determining the temperature-induced structural phase transition, we study lattice dynamics as a function of temperature. Figure 2(a) is the temperature-dependent Raman scattering spectra which exhibit a significant phase transition with increasing temperature. The cubic and rhombohedral phases of NaPF6 are the same as those of NaSbF6 and CaZrF6, so the Raman spectra that it produces are similar.47,48 There are also three Raman active vibration modes in NaPF6, which are named F2g, Eg, and A1g modes corresponding to three peaks located near 470, 580, and 760 cm−1, respectively.44,47,48 The biggest difference is that the rhombohedral phase has two peaks located near 470 cm−1, while the cubic phase has one. The Raman spectrum of polycrystalline NaPF6 at room temperature displays the A1g mode (symmetric stretching) as the most intense vibration located at 760 cm−1, the Eg mode (asymmetric stretching) as the weakest vibration located at 580 cm−1, and the F2g mode (bending) as the medium intensity vibration located at 470 cm−1. The F2g mode is the bending vibrations of fluorine atoms perpendicular to the linear Na−F−P bonds resulting in the twisting of the PF6 octahedra. As shown in Fig. 2(b), the very small splitting of F2g implies that there are two kinds of different bending vibrations of fluorine atoms at the rhombohedral phase in NaPF6. Figure 2(c) is the temperature-dependent vibrational frequency of the A1g mode. The vibrations within the cubic phase are redshifted as the temperature increases. In the rhombohedral phase with increasing temperature, however, there is a blueshift. Note that there is a marked blueshift for the A1g mode at the rhombohedral-to-cubic phase transition. Figure 2(d) is the PDOS up to 150 meV at 240 and 300 K under ambient pressure. There are many smaller peaks on the larger main peak (∼20 meV) at 240 K. Still, they gradually disappear at 300 K. The peak around 30 meV is also much wider at 300 K. As the temperature increases, the phonons are very noticeably redshifted. There is a broadening of the peaks. This indicates the presence of strong lattice anharmonicity in NaPF6.

FIG. 2.

Lattice dynamics of NaPF6. (a) Temperature-dependent Raman scattering spectra, where F2g, Eg, and A1g modes are labeled. (b) Temperature-dependent Raman scattering spectra from 460 to 490 cm−1. (c) Temperature-dependent vibrational frequency of the A1g mode. (d) The experimental PDOS at 240 and 300 K.

FIG. 2.

Lattice dynamics of NaPF6. (a) Temperature-dependent Raman scattering spectra, where F2g, Eg, and A1g modes are labeled. (b) Temperature-dependent Raman scattering spectra from 460 to 490 cm−1. (c) Temperature-dependent vibrational frequency of the A1g mode. (d) The experimental PDOS at 240 and 300 K.

Close modal
Shown in Fig. 3(a) is the heat flow Q(P,T) under different pressures on heating and cooling. The temperatures of the endothermic and exothermic peaks during the phase transition increase with increasing pressure. Figure 3(b) is the phase diagram which is constructed based on the pressure dependence of the phase transition temperature (Tt). The phase boundaries on heating and cooling are defined as the slope, dTt/dP. The dTt/dP slope is 247.9 K GPa−1 on heating (pink) and 249.84 K GPa−1 on cooling (blue) for NaPF6, respectively. According to the Clausius–Clapeyron relation,
(2)
where Δ V t is 1.07 × 10−5 m3 kg−1 and the calculated entropy change Δ S t is about 43 J kg−1 K−1 for the rhombohedral-to-cubic phase transition for NaPF6. Thermal hysteresis between the phase boundaries is approximately 11 K. The entropy changes of the phase transition (ΔSt) are obtained by integrating the heat flow which was subtracted baseline.12,49 Figures 3(c) and 3(d) are the ΔSt of cubic-to-rhombohedral transition on heating and cooling, respectively. We got that the entropy changes of NaPF6 are about 45.2 and 57.0 J kg−1 K−1 at 0.1 MPa on heating and cooling, respectively. The entropy change at other pressures is approximately the same as at ambient pressure. The pressure-induced entropy changes ( Δ S P 0 P ) from the ambient pressure P0 to the chosen pressure P were calculated according to the following formula:
(3)
FIG. 3.

Barocaloric performances of NaPF6. (a) Heat flow Q(P,T) under different pressures. (b) Temperature-pressure phase diagram. (c) and (d) Entropy changes of the phase transition (ΔSt) on heating and cooling, respectively. (e) The pressure-induced entropy changes at different pressures. (f) The real-time sample temperature was recorded in the cycle of pre-pressurization (from 0.1 to 15 MPa), pressurization (from 15 to 300 MPa), and de-pressurization (from 300 to 0.1 MPa).

FIG. 3.

Barocaloric performances of NaPF6. (a) Heat flow Q(P,T) under different pressures. (b) Temperature-pressure phase diagram. (c) and (d) Entropy changes of the phase transition (ΔSt) on heating and cooling, respectively. (e) The pressure-induced entropy changes at different pressures. (f) The real-time sample temperature was recorded in the cycle of pre-pressurization (from 0.1 to 15 MPa), pressurization (from 15 to 300 MPa), and de-pressurization (from 300 to 0.1 MPa).

Close modal
The pressure-induced entropy changes at different pressures are plotted in Fig. 3(e). As we can see from this figure, the maximum value Δ S P 0 P max is 45.2 J kg−1 K−1. Therefore, the saturation pressure is relatively small. The calculated 43.0 J kg−1 K−1 is highly consistent with the value of 45.2 J kg−1 K−1 ( Δ S P 0 P max ). The relative cooling power (RCP) was obtained as follows:50 
(4)
For NaPF6, δ T FWHM is 24.6 K and Δ S P 0 P max is 45.2 J kg−1 K−1 at 100 MPa, so the RCP is about 1112 J kg−1. Finally, we tested the NaPF6 adiabatic temperature change (ΔTad) which is the most important performance for practical refrigeration applications. Figure 3(f) is T–t up to 300 MPa at room temperature for ten cycles. When the pressure is applied, the temperature of the sample rises. On the contrary, the temperature of the sample decreases when the pressure is reduced. The repeatability of the sample is excellent, and the average ΔTad is 9 K. The adiabatic temperature change can be estimated as follows:
(5)

Here, the isothermal entropy change | Δ S rev | is about 45.2 J kg−1 K−1 under 100 MPa and the specific heat capacity Cp is about 930 J kg−1 K−1,51 so the adiabatic temperature change ΔTad is approximately 14 K. Due to the poor thermal insulation performance of the experimental equipment, the value of the practical ΔTad (9 K) is smaller than the calculated one (14 K). For adiabatic temperature change testing, this is a situation that seems to be very normal and common.13,15,52

To verify the pressure-induced phase transition, we conducted the pressure-dependent NPD measurements (Fig. 4). When the applied pressure is about 400 MPa, the crystal structure is the rhombohedral phase, which is the same as at low temperatures. We are, therefore, confident that pressure can induce the onset of phase transition.

FIG. 4.

Pressure-dependent NPD patterns and Rietveld refinements. (a) T = 297 K and P = 0.1 MPa. (b) T = 297 K and P = 398 MPa. (c) T = 250 K and P = 0.1 MPa. (d) T = 250 K and P = 358 MPa.

FIG. 4.

Pressure-dependent NPD patterns and Rietveld refinements. (a) T = 297 K and P = 0.1 MPa. (b) T = 297 K and P = 398 MPa. (c) T = 250 K and P = 0.1 MPa. (d) T = 250 K and P = 358 MPa.

Close modal

It is known that there are plenty of compounds undergoing a variety of phase transitions around room temperature in the AIMVF6 family.53,54 As one more example, we also found the giant barocaloric effect in its sister system NaAsF6. Figure 5(a) is the contour plot of the temperature-dependent XRPD patterns of NaAsF6 from 300 to 380 K. There is a first-order phase transition at about 327 K, which is consistent with the previous calorimetry data.55 The XRPD patterns at each temperature were refined by Rietveld refinement to obtain the cell parameters.37  Figure 5(b) is the variation of the unit cell volume per formula (V) as the temperature increases for NaAsF6. There is also a zone of coexistence of the cubic and rhombohedral phases at 330 K, and Δ V / V is 3.5%. Figure 5(c) is the temperature-dependent Raman scattering spectra for NaAsF6. There are also three Raman active vibration modes (F2g, Eg, and A1g) in NaAsF6, which correspond to three peaks located near 370, 585, and 700 cm−1, respectively. Although the splitting of its F2g mode is not obvious in the rhombohedral phase, we can see that the peak is not very symmetrical. This means that there are at least two peaks here, which is just like NaPF6. Figure 5(d) is the temperature-dependent vibrational frequency of the A1g mode for NaAsF6. We also found that there is a marked blueshift for the A1g mode when the rhombohedral phase transforms into the cubic phase in NaAsF6. Figure 5(e) is the phase diagram for NaAsF6, which is constructed based on the pressure dependence of Tt. The dTt/dP slope is 313 K GPa−1 on heating (pink) and 324.07 K GPa−1 on cooling (blue) for NaPF6, respectively. For the cubic-to-rhombohedral phase transition, NaAsF6 is more sensitive to pressure than NaPF6. The diameter of the As5+ cation is larger than that of the P5+ cation, which leads to a large cell parameter in NaAsF6 and, thus, twisting of the anionic octahedron during the phase transition is easier.51 Due to the volume change Δ V t (1.16 × 10−5 m3 kg−1) at the phase transition, the calculated entropy change Δ S t is about 37 J kg−1 K−1 for the rhombohedral-to-cubic phase transition for NaAsF6. Figure 5(f) shows the pressure-induced entropy changes at different pressures. As we can see from this figure, Δ S P 0 P max is 35.6 J kg−1 K−1. When the pressure reaches 40 MPa, the pressure-induced entropy changes have reached its maximum value. The calculated 37 J kg−1 K−1St) is highly consistent with the value of 35.6 J kg−1 K−1 ( Δ S P 0 P max ). For NaAsF6, δ T FWHM is 31.0 K and Δ S P 0 P max is 35.6 J kg−1 K−1 at 100 MPa, so the RCP is about 1104 J kg−1. As the MV atomic number increases, the compounds may have an increasing rate of change in volume and become more sensitive to pressure.

FIG. 5.

Crystal structures, lattice dynamics, and barocaloric performances in NaAsF6. (a) Temperature-dependent XRPD patterns from 300 to 380 K. (b) The variation of the unit cell volume per formula (V) with temperature. (c) Temperature-dependent Raman scattering spectra. (d) Temperature-dependent vibrational frequency of A1g modes. (e) Phase diagram of NaAsF6. (f) The pressure-induced entropy changes at different pressures.

FIG. 5.

Crystal structures, lattice dynamics, and barocaloric performances in NaAsF6. (a) Temperature-dependent XRPD patterns from 300 to 380 K. (b) The variation of the unit cell volume per formula (V) with temperature. (c) Temperature-dependent Raman scattering spectra. (d) Temperature-dependent vibrational frequency of A1g modes. (e) Phase diagram of NaAsF6. (f) The pressure-induced entropy changes at different pressures.

Close modal

To summarize, we have determined the low-temperature phase structure of NaPF6 is a rhombohedral structure with space group R 3 ¯ by NPD. There are three Raman active vibration modes in NaPF6 and NaAsF6, which are named F2g, Eg, and A1g modes. There is a marked blueshift for the A1g mode at the rhombohedral-to-cubic phase transition. The phase transition temperature varies with pressure at a rate of dTt/dP 250 and 310 K GPa−1 for NaPF6 and NaAsF6. For the cubic-to-rhombohedral phase transition, NaAsF6 is more sensitive to pressure than NaPF6. The diameter of the As5+ cation is larger than that of the P5+ cation, which leads to a large cell parameter in NaAsF6 and, thus, the twisting of the anionic octahedron during the phase transition is easier. The pressure-induced entropy changes of NaPF6 and NaAsF6 are around 45.2 and 35.6 J kg−1 K−1, respectively. The saturation drive pressure is 40 MPa. The experimental adiabatic temperature change is 9 K for NaPF6. The pressure-dependent NPD establishes a pressure that can induce the phase transition to take place. We further study the relationship between the structural and thermal properties, which will contribute to the discovery of higher-performing barocaloric materials in the future.

The supplementary material contains figures of NaPF6 and NaAsF6 XRPD refinement data; figures of NaAsF6 heat flow Q(P,T) under different pressures; table of NaPF6 lattice parameters at different temperatures and pressures; and table of structural information of phase transition on AIMVF6.

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant Nos. 2022YFE0109900 and 2021YFB3501201), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. ZDBS-LY-JSC002), the International Partner Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. 174321KYSB20200008), the IMR Innovation Fund, the CSNS Consortium on High-performance Materials of Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Young Innovation Talent Program of Shenyang (Grant No. RC210435), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) (Grant Nos. 11934007 and 11804346). We also acknowledge the beam time provided by ANSTO (Proposal Nos. 7867 and IC8021), GPPD (Proposal No. P1820033000002), and J-PARC (No. 2018I0011).

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Zhao Zhang: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Takanori Hattori: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal). Ruiqi Song: Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal). Dehong Yu: Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal). Richard Mole: Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal). Jie Chen: Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal). Lunhua He: Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal). Zhidong Zhang: Supervision (equal). Bing Li: Conceptualization (lead); Supervision (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
United Nations Environmental Programme
,
The Importance of Energy Efficiency in the Refrigeration, Air-Conditioning and Heat Pump Sectors
(
United Nations Environmental Programme
,
2018
).
2.
T. A.
Peters
, “Cool world: Defining the energy conundrum of cooling for all,” Technical report (Birmingham energy institute, the institute for global, 2018).
3.
I.I.R. IIF
,
V.
Morlet
,
D.
Coulomb
,
J.
Dupont
, “The impact of the refrigeration sector on climate change,” in 35th Informatory Note on Refrigeration Technologies (
2023
).
4.
C.
Aprea
,
A.
Greco
,
A.
Maiorino
, and
C.
Masselli
,
Climate
7
,
115
(
2019
).
5.
L. M.
Maier
,
P.
Corhan
,
A.
Barcza
,
H. A.
Vieyra
,
C.
Vogel
,
J. D.
Koenig
,
O.
Schäfer-Welsen
,
J.
Wöllenstein
, and
K.
Bartholomé
,
Commun. Phys.
3
,
186
(
2020
).
6.
G. V.
Brown
,
J. Appl. Phys.
47
,
3673
3680
(
1976
).
7.
B.
Shen
,
J.
Sun
,
F.
Hu
,
H.
Zhang
, and
Z.
Cheng
,
Adv. Mater.
21
,
4545
4564
(
2009
).
8.
B.
Neese
,
B.
Chu
,
S.
Lu
,
Y.
Wang
,
E.
Furman
, and
Q.
Zhang
,
Science
321
,
821
823
(
2008
).
9.
X.
Qian
,
D.
Han
,
L.
Zheng
,
J.
Chen
,
M.
Tyagi
,
Q.
Li
,
F.
Du
,
S.
Zheng
,
X.
Huang
,
S.
Zhang
,
J.
Shi
,
H.
Huang
,
X.
Shi
,
J.
Chen
,
H.
Qin
,
J.
Bernholc
,
X.
Chen
,
L.-Q.
Chen
,
L.
Hong
, and
Q.
Zhang
,
Nature
600
,
664
669
(
2021
).
10.
S. A.
Nikitin
,
G.
Myalikgulyev
,
M. P.
Annaorazov
,
A. L.
Tyurin
,
R. W.
Myndyev
, and
S. A.
Akopyan
,
Phys. Lett. A
171
,
234
236
(
1992
).
11.
D.
Cong
,
W.
Xiong
,
A.
Planes
,
Y.
Ren
,
L.
Mañosa
,
P.
Cao
,
Z.
Nie
,
X.
Sun
,
Z.
Yang
,
X.
Hong
, and
Y.
Wang
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
122
,
255703
(
2019
).
12.
B.
Li
,
Y.
Kawakita
,
S.
Ohira-Kawamura
,
T.
Sugahara
,
H.
Wang
,
J.
Wang
,
Y.
Chen
,
S. I.
Kawaguchi
,
S.
Kawaguchi
,
K.
Ohara
,
K.
Li
,
D.
Yu
,
R.
Mole
,
T.
Hattori
,
T.
Kikuchi
,
S.-I.
Yano
,
Z.
Zhang
,
Z.
Zhang
,
W.
Ren
,
S.
Lin
,
O.
Sakata
,
K.
Nakajima
, and
Z.
Zhang
,
Nature
567
,
506
510
(
2019
).
13.
K.
Zhang
,
R.
Song
,
J.
Qi
,
Z.
Zhang
,
Z.
Zhang
,
C.
Yu
,
K.
Li
,
Z.
Zhang
, and
B.
Li
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
32
,
2112622
(
2022
).
14.
Q.
Ren
,
J.
Qi
,
D.
Yu
,
Z.
Zhang
,
R.
Song
,
W.
Song
,
B.
Yuan
,
T.
Wang
,
W.
Ren
,
Z.
Zhang
,
X.
Tong
, and
B.
Li
,
Nat. Commun.
13
,
2293
(
2022
).
15.
Z.
Zhang
,
K.
Li
,
S.
Lin
,
D.
Yu
,
R.
Song
,
Y.
Wang
,
J.
Wang
,
S.
Kawaguchi
,
Z.
Zhang
,
C.
Yu
,
X.
Li
,
J.
Chen
,
L.
He
,
R.
Mole
,
B.
Yuan
,
Q.
Ren
,
K.
Qian
,
Z.
Cai
,
J.
Yu
,
M.
Wang
,
C.
Zhao
,
X.
Tong
,
Z.
Zhang
, and
B.
Li
,
Sci. Adv.
9
,
eadd0374
(
2023
).
16.
B.
Li
and
Z.
Zhang
,
Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astron.
51
,
067505
(
2021
).
17.
C.
Yu
,
J.
Huang
,
J.
Qi
,
P.
Liu
,
D.
Li
,
T.
Yang
,
Z.
Zhang
, and
B.
Li
,
APL Mater.
10
,
011109
(
2022
).
18.
J. M.
Bermúdez-García
,
M.
Sánchez-Andújar
,
S.
Castro-García
,
J.
López-Beceiro
,
R.
Artiaga
, and
M. A.
Señarís-Rodríguez
,
Nat. Commun.
8
,
15715
(
2017
).
19.
J.
Seo
,
R. D.
McGillicuddy
,
A. H.
Slavney
,
S.
Zhang
,
R.
Ukani
,
A. A.
Yakovenko
,
S.-L.
Zheng
, and
J. A.
Mason
,
Nat. Commun.
13
,
2536
(
2022
).
20.
Z.
Zhang
,
X.
Jiang
,
T.
Hattori
,
X.
Xu
,
M.
Li
,
C.
Yu
,
Z.
Zhang
,
D. H.
Yu
,
R.
Mole
,
S.
Yano
,
J.
Chen
,
L. H.
He
,
C.-W.
Wang
,
H.
Wang
,
B.
Li
, and
Z.
Zhang
,
Mater. Horiz.
10
,
977
982
(
2023
).
21.
J.
Min
,
A. K.
Sagotra
, and
C.
Cazorla
,
Phys. Rev. Mater.
4
,
015403
(
2020
).
22.
E. A.
Mikhaleva
,
I. N.
Flerov
,
V. S.
Bondarev
,
M. V.
Gorev
,
A. D.
Vasiliev
, and
T. N.
Davydova
,
Ferroelectrics
430
,
78
83
(
2012
).
23.
W.
Xu
,
Y.
Zeng
,
W.
Yuan
,
W.
Zhang
, and
X.
Chen
,
Commun. Chem.
56
,
10054
10057
(
2020
).
24.
D.
Matsunami
,
A.
Fujita
,
K.
Takenaka
, and
M.
Kano
,
Nat. Mater.
14
,
73
78
(
2015
).
25.
Y.
Kosugi
,
M.
Goto
,
Z.
Tan
,
A.
Fujita
,
T.
Saito
,
T.
Kamiyama
,
W.-T.
Chen
,
Y.-C.
Chuang
,
H.-S.
Sheu
,
D.
Kan
, and
Y.
Shimakawa
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
31
,
2009476
(
2021
).
26.
S. P.
Vallone
,
A. N.
Tantillo
,
A. M.
dos Santos
,
J. J.
Molaison
,
R.
Kulmaczewski
,
A.
Chapoy
,
P.
Ahmadi
,
M. A.
Halcrow
, and
K. G.
Sandeman
,
Adv. Mater.
31
,
1807334
(
2019
).
27.
J.
Seo
,
J. D.
Braun
,
V. M.
Dev
, and
J. A.
Mason
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
144
,
6493
6503
(
2022
).
28.
J.
Lin
,
P.
Tong
,
X.
Zhang
,
Z.
Wang
,
Z.
Zhang
,
B.
Li
,
G.
Zhong
,
J.
Chen
,
Y.
Wu
,
H.
Lu
,
L.
He
,
B.
Bai
,
L.
Ling
,
W.
Song
,
Z.
Zhang
, and
Y.
Sun
,
Mater. Horiz.
7
,
2690
2695
(
2020
).
29.
J.
Lin
,
P.
Tong
,
K.
Zhang
,
K.
Tao
,
W.
Lu
,
X.
Wang
,
X.
Zhang
,
W.
Song
, and
Y.
Sun
,
Nat. Commun.
13
,
596
(
2022
).
30.
P.
Lloveras
and
J. L.
Tamarit
,
MRS Energy Sustain.
8
,
3
15
(
2021
).
31.
L.
Cirillo
,
A.
Greco
, and
C.
Masselli
,
Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog.
33
,
101380
(
2022
).
32.
J.
Chen
,
L.
Kang
,
H.
Lu
,
P.
Luo
,
F.
Wang
, and
L.
He
,
Physica B
551
,
370
372
(
2018
).
33.
T.
Hattori
,
A.
Sano-Furukawa
,
H.
Arima
,
K.
Komatsu
,
A.
Yamada
,
Y.
Inamura
,
T.
Nakatani
,
Y.
Seto
,
T.
Nagai
,
W.
Utsumi
,
T.
Iitaka
,
H.
Kagi
,
Y.
Katayama
,
T.
Inoue
,
T.
Otomo
,
K.
Suzuya
,
T.
Kamiyama
,
M.
Arai
, and
T.
Yagi
,
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A
780
,
55
67
(
2015
).
34.
T.
Strässle
,
S.
Klotz
,
K.
Kunc
,
V.
Pomjakushin
, and
J. S.
White
,
Phys. Rev. B
90
,
014101
(
2014
).
35.
A. C.
Larson
, and
R. B.
Von Dreele
, “
General structure analysis system (GSAS)
,” Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LAUR (LANL Research Library,
2004
), pp. 86–748.
36.
B. H.
Toby
,
J. Appl. Cryst.
34
,
210
213
(
2001
).
37.
J.
Rodríguez-Carvajal
,
Physica B
192
,
55
69
(
1993
).
38.
D.
Yu
,
R.
Mole
,
T.
Noakes
,
S.
Kennedy
, and
R.
Robinson
,
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
82
,
SA027
(
2013
).
39.
D.
Yu
,
R. A.
Mole
, and
G. J.
Kearley
,
EPJ Web Conf.
83
,
03019
(
2015
).
40.
D.
Richard
,
M.
Ferrand
, and
G. J.
Kearley
,
J. Neutron Res.
4
,
33
39
(
1996
).
41.
A.
Furrer
,
J. F.
Mesot
, and
T.
Strässle
,
Neutron Scattering in Condensed Matter Physics
(
World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd
,
2009
).
42.
P.
Zhang
,
X.
Tang
,
Y.
Wang
,
X.
Wang
,
D.
Gao
,
Y.
Li
,
H.
Zheng
,
Y.
Wang
,
X.
Wang
,
R.
Fu
,
M.
Tang
,
K.
Ikeda
,
P.
Miao
,
T.
Hattori
,
A.
Sano-Furukawa
,
C. A.
Tulk
,
J. J.
Molaison
,
X.
Dong
,
K.
Li
,
J.
Ju
, and
H.-K.
Mao
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
142
,
17662
17669
(
2020
).
43.
H.
Bode
, and
G.
Teufer
,
Z. fur Anorg. Allg. Chem.
268
,
20
24
(
1952
).
44.
A. M.
Heyns
,
C. W. F. T.
Pistorius
,
P. W.
Richter
, and
J. B.
Clark
,
Spectrochim. Acta Part A
34
,
279
286
(
1978
).
45.
K.
Momma
and
F.
Izumi
,
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
44
,
1272
1276
(
2011
).
46.
H. S.
Gutowsky
and
S.
Albert
,
J. Chem. Phys.
58
,
5446
5452
(
1973
).
47.
C.
Yang
,
B.
Qu
,
S.
Pan
,
L.
Zhang
,
R.
Zhang
,
P.
Tong
,
R.
Xiao
,
J.
Lin
,
X.
Guo
,
K.
Zhang
,
H.
Tong
,
W.
Lu
,
Y.
Wu
,
S.
Lin
,
W.
Song
, and
Y.
Sun
,
Inorg. Chem.
56
,
4990
4995
(
2017
).
48.
A.
Sanson
,
M.
Giarola
,
G.
Mariotto
,
L.
Hu
,
J.
Chen
, and
X.
Xing
,
Mater. Chem. Phys.
180
,
213
218
(
2016
).
49.
R. J.
Moffat
,
J. Fluids Eng.
107
,
173
178
(
1985
).
50.
K. A.
Gschneidner
Jr
,
V. K.
Pecharsky
, and
A. O.
Tsokol
,
Rep. Prog. Phys.
68
,
1479
1539
(
2005
).
51.
K.
Burkmann
,
B.
Hansel
,
F.
Habermann
,
B.
Störr
,
M.
Bertau
, and
F.
Mertens
,
Z. Naturforsch. B
78
,
575
578
(
2023
).
52.
C.
Zhang
,
D.
Wang
,
S.
Qian
,
Z.
Zhang
,
X.
Liang
,
L.
Wu
,
L.
Long
,
H.
Shi
, and
Z.
Han
,
Mater. Horiz.
9
,
1293
1298
(
2022
).
53.
N. G.
Parsonage
and
L. A. K.
Staveley
,
Disorder in Crystals
(
Clarendon Press
,
Oxford
,
1978
).
54.
Z.
Mazej
and
R.
Hagiwara
,
J. Fluor. Chem.
128
,
423
437
(
2007
).
55.
M.
Biswal
,
M.
Body
,
C.
Legein
,
G.
Corbel
,
A.
Sadoc
, and
F.
Boucher
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
116
,
11682
11693
(
2012
).