The axial distribution of the electron density and temperature in the discharge plasma of a water-vapor Hall thruster is measured by a cylindrical Langmuir probe using a fast-moving system. They are evaluated in two ways; by integrating full trace of the measured electron energy distribution function (EEDF) and by fitting a Maxwellian EEDF to the low-energy part of the measured EEDF. The ion current density for each species produced by electron-impact ionization is estimated using the obtained electron density and temperature. It is revealed that OH + and H + can be contained other than H 2O + with non-negligible fractions, causing an additional 20%–25% loss of the anode efficiency estimated by the plume diagnostics. It is also suggested that elastic momentum transfer, electronic excitation, and dissociation to the neutral fragments are more dominant processes than ionization, whereas the electron attachment, rotational excitation and vibrational excitation are minor events among the electron-impact reactions. The subsequent ionization processes from the neutral fragments are also expected to play an important role in determining the effective design and operating parameters for further improvement of the mass utilization efficiency.

Electric propulsion (EP) is an essential technology for today space development. Among a variety of EP thrusters, Hall thrusters (HTs) play an important role in state-of-the-art space missions. Over the last decade, geostationary satellites equipped with HTs have dramatically increased.1 In recent years, HTs have made a remarkable progress as primary propulsion systems for large satellite constellations.2,3 Furthermore, HTs started to be utilized in deep-space exploration. In 2023, NASA launched a space probe toward the metallic asteroid Psyche, which is the first deep-space cruise propelled by HTs.4 

Conventional HTs have used xenon as a propellant. Xenon has a large atomic mass, high ionization cross section, and chemical inertness. Those characteristics provide favorable thrust performance (up to 70% of thrust efficiency5) with operational stability. However, since the supply of xenon is getting unstable due to increasing demand and geopolitical uncertainties, the community is moving toward using more sustainable propellants, e.g., krypton and argon.6–10 Moreover, the investigation of alternative propellants is expanding beyond the noble gases as more advanced applications are proposed. For example, the concept of air-breathing HT is promoting researches on nitrogen, oxygen, and their mixture-gas propellants.11–14 Besides, since the application of HTs to small satellites is increasing, condensable propellants such as iodine and adamantane are attracting attention from the perspective of volume saving without high-pressure system.15–17 In the context of future in situ resource utilization (ISRU), propellants that is procurable in space like carbon dioxide have been studied.18 As various alternative propellants are proposed,5 water is also one of the promising candidates. The major benefits of water are high availability, non-toxicity, and liquid-phase storability at atmospheric pressure. These characteristics contribute to tremendous cost reduction and have great affinity with the use on small satellites. In addition, because water is expected to widely exist in the solar system,19,20 it is also attractive for ISRU. The application of water as a propellant has been proceeding in many types of propulsion system: electrolysis rocket motor,21,22 hybrid rocket motor,23 resistojet thruster,24,25 and gridded ion thruster.26–28 This suggests further growth of water-based thrusters as an element of unified multi-mode propulsion systems.29 

Development of HTs using water propellant is in progress. There are mainly two types of approaches being tested. One is a water-electrolysis Hall thruster, which uses oxygen produced by water electrolysis for the main discharge.30 The unique feature of this system is using simultaneously produced hydrogen as a cathode working gas to avoid oxidation of the electron emitter. The other approach is directly using water vapor for the plasma discharge, referred to as a water-vapor Hall thruster. The entire system can be quite simpler in this way, being more suitable for small satellites. Shirasu et al. demonstrated the operation at 200 W-class discharge power and estimated the thrust performance from the plume characteristics.31–33 Tejeda and Knoll operated a water-vapor Hall thruster and measured its thrust in the power range of 600–1600 W.34 At the same time, a cathode compatible to water vapor is also under development.35 

Although the feasibility has already been demonstrated, there are still many unresolved aspects in the discharge plasma of water vapor. Regarding the ionization process, it contains not only direct ionization producing H 2O + but also dissociative ionization which generates positively charged fragments such as H +. These dissociated ions can exist within the plume and have some influence on the thrust force; however, it has not been precisely investigated yet. The dissociated fragments possibly become negative ions through the electron attachment reactions, which induce unique phenomena reported in some devices.36 The dissociative reactions also produce the neutral fragments in both ground and excited states that can be sources of ions in secondary processes. Some of the fragments have high reactivity and there are concerns about the effect on materials. Therefore, it is essential to understand the discharge processes including those reactions for the precise performance estimation and design improvement.

In this paper, we present the axial distribution of electron density and temperature in the discharge plasma of a water-vapor Hall thruster measured by a cylindrical Langmuir probe. Using the obtained results, the ion species fractions within the plasma plume were estimated and the influence on the thrust performance was evaluated. In addition, the collision frequencies of other electron-impact reactions are compared to figure out the dominant processes in the discharge plasma. Since the measured electron energy distribution functions (EEDFs) indicate the existence of high-energy electrons being anisotropic, the sensitivity to them is also investigated in every reaction analysis.

Figure 1 shows the system schematic of the water-vapor Hall thruster. The discharge channel had a mean diameter of 20 mm and a width of 6 mm. The total channel length was 11 mm, with 4 mm from the exit plane insulated by boron nitride. A electromagnet was located at the center pole and applied radial magnetic field near the channel exit. The radial magnetic flux density B r and field lines near the channel are shown in Fig. 2. Water vapor was fed into the discharge channel through the anode. The mass flow rate of water vapor was controlled to 0.81 mg/s with an uncertainty of 7% by a originally designed controller. The structural detail and calibration of the supply system were described in Ref. 33. A LFN2000 electron source (Kaufman & Robinson) was used as the cathode, which was operated with xenon gas at the flow rate of 0.10 mg/s and the keeper voltage V k of 20–25 V in this study. The negative terminals of the discharge voltage, cathode circuit, and electromagnet circuit were connected and electrically isolated from the chamber ground by a 1 M Ω resistor. The cathode-to-ground voltage V cg, the potential difference between the floating common and the chamber ground, was recorded. The thruster body and all other components were grounded. During the thruster firing, excessive temperature rise of the thruster was suppressed by a liquid-cooled board attached on the thruster base. The temperature at the anode bottom was monitored by a thermocouple, and all measurements were started after the temperature almost saturated, typically 600–650 K. The thruster was operated in a 1.0 m-diameter and 2.6 m-length vacuum chamber. The chamber was evacuated by a turbomolecular pump and a cryopump with 820 and 2400 L/s pumping speeds of N 2, respectively. The typical background pressure during the operation was 3 × 10 2 Pa with the vacuum gauge for nitrogen. A photograph of the plasma plume during the experiments is provided in Fig. 3.

FIG. 1.

Schematic of the water-vapor Hall thruster.

FIG. 1.

Schematic of the water-vapor Hall thruster.

Close modal
FIG. 2.

Magnetic field distribution calculated by the finite element solver “FEMM.” The Langmuir probe was inserted and positioned at each measurement point along the red dashed line.

FIG. 2.

Magnetic field distribution calculated by the finite element solver “FEMM.” The Langmuir probe was inserted and positioned at each measurement point along the red dashed line.

Close modal
FIG. 3.

Side view of the plasma plume during operation.

FIG. 3.

Side view of the plasma plume during operation.

Close modal

The Langmuir probe measurements were conducted at the discharge voltage V d of 200 and 250 V, where V cg 27 V in both cases. The corresponding thrust performances were evaluated by far-field plume diagnostics using a Faraday probe and retarding potential analyzer (RPA), which were carried out in the same experimental campaign to the Langmuir probe measurements. The experimental setup and analysis method of plume diagnostics were almost same to the previous study.33 The performance summary is presented in Sec. V D, considering the performance loss due to multi-species ions estimated from the results of the Langmuir probe measurements.

A cylindrical Langmuir probe consisting of a tungsten wire electrode with a radius r p of 0.05 mm and a length l p of 0.6 mm was used. The tungsten wire was covered by an alumina tube with an inner radius of 0.15 mm and an outer radius of 0.3 mm except for the tip portion. The total length of the probe was 170 mm, with a gradual increase in the radius of the supporting tube from 0.3 to 1.25 mm. The Langmuir probe was mounted on the fast-moving stage described in Sec. III B and inserted into the discharge plasma from the downstream side.

There are some general considerations regarding the probe orientation when measuring the Hall thruster discharge plasma. One is the existence of supersonic ion flow. Since the ions are accelerated by the strong electric field, they can flow into the probe over the limit of Bohm criteria, which increase the net ion current collected by the probe. A practical solution is to align the probe axis along the stream vector of the ion flow.37 In this study, the Langmuir probe was inserted into the discharge plasma with the orientation shown in Fig. 2, in which the probe axis is approximately perpendicular to the field lines near the exit, i.e., along the direction of the electric field. The magnetic field imposes another requirement because strong electron gyromotion makes it complicated to interpret plasma parameters from the probe response. The magnitude of the magnetic field effect is usually evaluated by comparing the probe radius and electron Larmor radius r L , e. The typical electron temperature is 10–30 eV, corresponding to r L , e / r p 10 with the maximum B r. This satisfied the criteria proposed by Godyak and Demidov38 for the use of conventional methods.

The thermal condition in the Hall thruster discharge plasma is quite severe for the Langmuir probe to stay in due to the high density and highly energetic plasma flow. To avoid excessive heating and ablation of the probe, a fast-moving linear stage driven by a shaft motor (S160D, Nippon Pulse Motor) was developed and used for the probe insertion, which was similar to the high-speed reciprocating probe systems in Refs. 39 and 40. The time-averaged I V characteristic at each measurement point was obtained by the following procedure. The probe-tip remained around 140 mm downstream from the channel exit while the bias voltage V b was being swept with triangle wave by a bipolar power supply. The sweep frequency was fixed to 250 Hz, which was 2 orders of magnitude lower than the typical frequency of discharge current oscillation, to evaluate the time-averaged plasma characteristics. The probe was inserted toward the target point at the maximum speed of 1000 mm/s, paused for approximately 50 ms, and then returned back to the original position with the same speed of the insertion. The probe current I p measured by a 10  Ω resistor was recorded during the pausing time by a 10-bit oscilloscope. The probe insertion was repeated two or three times for each measurement point. Because the sweep frequency was relatively high, the measured current contained the capacitive current I C = C ( d V b / d t ) due to the stray capacitance C in the entire circuit. This was compensated by the effective capacitance calculated from the I V characteristic without plasma that was measured in advance. After the compensation, I p was averaged per Δ V b ( = 0.78 V) discretized by the vertical resolution of the oscilloscope. The instantaneous maximum of I p was about 70 mA even at the highest density region, which resulted in 0.7 V at the shunt resistor. Since this was lower than the typical uncertainty of the plasma potential in a Hall thruster plasma measurement,37 the potential drop at the shunt resistor was neglected. Figure 4 shows the measurement process visually and an example of the time-averaged I V characteristic. A series of the process was conducted at 29 measurement points, every 0.5 mm from 4 mm inside to 10 mm outside relative to the channel exit. No significant damage or melting of the probe-tip was confirmed through the entire campaign.

FIG. 4.

(a) A graphical explanation of the data acquisition process by a Langmuir probe using the fast-moving system and (b) an example of the time-averaged I V characteristics (at z = 0 mm and V d = 200 V).

FIG. 4.

(a) A graphical explanation of the data acquisition process by a Langmuir probe using the fast-moving system and (b) an example of the time-averaged I V characteristics (at z = 0 mm and V d = 200 V).

Close modal
The electron density and temperature are essential parameters to analyze the electron-impact reactions. In a Hall thruster discharge plasma, electrons can be affected by some non-negligible kinetic effects such as E × B drift to the azimuthal direction or beam-acceleration from the cathode.41,42 EEDF observation is effective for precise interpretation of the electron energy considering these kinetic effects.43 The EEDF g e ( ε e ) can be derived from the second derivative of the I V characteristics, which is the so-called Druyvesteyn method,38 as
(1)
where m e is the electron mass, A p is the probe area, e is the elementary charge, ε e is the electron kinetic energy defined as ε e = e ( V p V b ), and V p is the plasma potential. We should note that this formula assumes an isotropic plasma. Strictly speaking, the probe current have to be converted to the electron current by subtracting the ion current before. However, it is not a trivial task to exactly find the ion current due to a possible offset by supersonic ion flow and the end effects at the probe-tip.44 Since the current in the ion saturation regime was more than an order of magnitude lower than the total I p range, the error caused by this treatment would only affect the high-energy regime in the EEDFs. Moreover, since the ion current varied almost linearly with the bias voltage, the process of computing the second derivative reduced the influence of ion current. In the following analysis, we mainly mention the electron energy probability functions (EEPFs) given as g p ( ε e ) = ε e 1 / 2 g e ( ε e ) because EEPF clearly visualized the discrepancy from Maxwellian distribution by its linearity in the semi-logarithmic plot.

The second derivative was calculated using the Savitzky–Golay filter, which has an advantage in the energy resolution among some numerical techniques.45 The quadratic function was selected and the window of 45 points ( = ± 17 V) was used for the smoothing and differentiation, though the window size was adjusted for the both ends not to protrude the V b range. The standard deviation of the probe current Δ I p was used to estimate the uncertainty as d 2 ( I p ± Δ I p ) / d V b 2. The total uncertainty of the EEPFs was calculated including that of the probe area Δ A p / A p 0.16 and propagated for the error analysis of the density and temperature. The plasma potential was found as the zero crossing point of the second derivative.

Blue curves in Fig. 5 show the measured EEPFs obtained by Eq. (1) in the region of 3 z 4 mm. We can see a bump structure in the EEPFs around the channel exit, suggesting the existence of two electron populations. The second population has a large kinetic energy ε k, characterized by its peak, and a relatively low temperature, characterized by the inverse of its slope. Such a high-energy population has also been observed with a conventional xenon Hall thruster, and it was discussed to be caused by the cathode-derived electrons.43 In this study, the kinetic energy was determined by the peak fitting in 1 z 4 mm, where the second peak was clearly found. In Fig. 6, the kinetic energy is plotted with the plasma potential on the spatial map of the EEPFs. On the plume side, the kinetic energy is around 30 eV. Since the cathode body is negatively biased to about 60 V with respect to the plasma potential ( = V p + V cg V k), the incident electrons are accelerated with this potential difference. Besides, ionization also occurs during this process, decreasing the kinetic energy of the high-energy population. In this context, 30 eV is reasonable for the electrons originating from the cathode. In the ion-acceleration region, the kinetic energy increases toward the anode side along with the plasma potential, which suggests acceleration from the plume region. Given that perspective, these electrons could exhibit anisotropy because they are accelerated by a directional electric field. As mentioned above, the Druyvesteyn formula is derived from an isotropic assumption. Therefore, the kinetic energy and temperature of the high-energy population discussed here may need to be modified depending on the anisotropicity, which requires more detailed measurements.

FIG. 5.

Full trace of the measured EEPFs (blue curves) from 3 to 4 mm relative to the thruster exit at the discharge voltage of (a) 200 and (b) 250 V. The Maxwellian EEPFs fitted to the low-energy part are also plotted as red lines for z 2 mm.

FIG. 5.

Full trace of the measured EEPFs (blue curves) from 3 to 4 mm relative to the thruster exit at the discharge voltage of (a) 200 and (b) 250 V. The Maxwellian EEPFs fitted to the low-energy part are also plotted as red lines for z 2 mm.

Close modal
FIG. 6.

Measured EEPFs (color maps), plasma potential (white plots), and kinetic (peak) energy of the second population (red plots) as a function of axial position. The EEPFs are normalized by the maximum value in each discharge voltage.

FIG. 6.

Measured EEPFs (color maps), plasma potential (white plots), and kinetic (peak) energy of the second population (red plots) as a function of axial position. The EEPFs are normalized by the maximum value in each discharge voltage.

Close modal
With this consideration, we selected two types of analysis to evaluate the electron density and temperature. The first method is based on the assumption of the fully isotropic plasma. In this case, the electron density and electron temperature can be calculated by the integration of EEPFs as38 
(2)
(3)
A subscript “EEPF” is added to distinguish them from those in the second method. The electron temperature defined in this way is often refered to as the effective electron temperature. The second method ignores the high-energy electrons that could be anisotropic and approximates the low-energy part of the EEPFs with an isotropic Maxwellian distribution. A Maxwellian EEPF can be expressed as
(4)
We fitted Eq. (4) to the relatively linear region of low-energy part in the measured EEPFs in the semi-logarithmic plot and found n e , Mxw and T e , Mxw. The second method is only applied in z 2 mm region where we could explicitly identified the first peak. Red lines in Fig. 5 show the fitted Maxwellian EEPFs. By comparing the results of these two methods, we examine the impact of high-energy electrons on the reaction analysis.

Water-molecule density is the other important factor because the electron-impact reactions are largely governed by collisions with H 2O. The propellant flow diffuses outward from the channel exit, resulting in a spatial distribution of water-molecule density along the thrust axis. The water-molecule density was calculated by axial-symmetric direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC). The calculation domain was defined from the gas injection surface to 20 mm downstream of the channel exit in the axial direction, from the center axis to a distance of twice the channel mean radius in the radial direction. The channel shape was simplified to a coaxial cylinder and the propellant was injected from both edges of the injection surface emulating the real configuration. The velocity of injected particles was given assuming a shifted Maxwellian velocity distribution function with the speed of sound at 650 K and the net-flux at the injection surface was adjusted to be same mass flow rate as the experiment. The temperature of all wall surfaces was also set to 650 K and particles colliding with them were diffusively reflected. Elastic collisions between particles were treated using the hard-sphere model. Figure 7 shows the steady-state solution of the spatial distribution of the water-molecule density. In fact, the propellant flux decreases with ionization because the total mass flux is conserved. As shown in Sec. V D, the mass utilization efficiency is less than 20%, which means at least 80% of the mass flux remains as neutrals. Taking this into account, the ionization has small influence on the H 2O distribution compared to the effect by spatial diffusion.

FIG. 7.

(a) Two-dimensional distribution of H 2O density calculated by DSMC in r z plane and (b) axial distribution of that on the measured axis of the probe experiments.

FIG. 7.

(a) Two-dimensional distribution of H 2O density calculated by DSMC in r z plane and (b) axial distribution of that on the measured axis of the probe experiments.

Close modal

Figure 8 shows the axial distribution of electron density and temperature obtained from the EEDFs by the two methods described in Sec. III C. The electron density shows quantitatively similar trend between the two methods. This is mainly caused by a trade-off of these methods. As shown by the blue lines in Fig. 8, the lowest part of the EEPFs is depleted, which typically occurs due to the finite resistance of the probe circuit or magnetic field effect.38 The distortion diminishs the actual physical structure of the EEPFs, causing the density from Eq. (2) to underestimate the low-energy populations. In contrast, the density found by the fitting method compensates the depleted regime with a Maxwellian distribution. The similarity between the two methods indicates that the uncertainty on the density due to the high-energy electrons is no greater than that caused by the distortions of the EEPFs. On the other hand, the electron temperature shows a significant difference depending on the analysis methods. Because of the feature of each method mentioned above, the temperature defined by Eq. (3) is weighted toward higher energy, while the temperature obtained by the fitting is weighted toward low energy. Therefore, the actual electron temperature is expected to be between them. According to the previous probe studies on conventional xenon Hall thrusters, the electron temperature typically becomes around 10% of the discharge voltage at the peak point.43,46,47 In the case of the water-vapor Hall thruster, it appeares to reach slightly higher ( 30 eV at 200 V and 40 eV at 250 V), but does not significantly exceed the typical values of them. The axial profiles approximated by single Gaussian functions are used in the following analysis.

FIG. 8.

Axial distribution of (a) electron density and (b) electron temperature at the discharge voltage of 200 and 250 V. The blue plots show n e , EEPF and T e , EEPF calculated by Eqs. (2) and (3) and the red plots show n e , Mxw and T e , Mxw found by fitting of Eq. (4) to the low-energy region of the measured EEPF. The solid and dashed lines are filtered distributions by single Gaussian functions for each method, respectively.

FIG. 8.

Axial distribution of (a) electron density and (b) electron temperature at the discharge voltage of 200 and 250 V. The blue plots show n e , EEPF and T e , EEPF calculated by Eqs. (2) and (3) and the red plots show n e , Mxw and T e , Mxw found by fitting of Eq. (4) to the low-energy region of the measured EEPF. The solid and dashed lines are filtered distributions by single Gaussian functions for each method, respectively.

Close modal
Water-vapor plasma exhibits a wide variety of reactions in electron-impact processes. Recent efforts on electron swarm calculations propose a comprehensive set of electron-impact reactions with water molecules.48,49 As described in these papers, rotational and electronic excitation involve a large number of transition states. Here, we use a simplified format for the cross sections: rotational excitation is expressed as a sum of all individual reactions, while electronic excitation represented two major reactions (#5 and #6) and one scaled model (#7). Itikawa and Mason provide a set of major ionization reactions in electron- H 2 O collisional processes.50 The considered reactions are listed in Table I. Influences by these reactions are discussed based on the collision frequencies defined as
(5)
where σ v e type , k is the rate constant of kth reaction in a certain type of collisions (e.g., ionization). σ v e type , k can be calculated from an EEPF as
(6)
where σ type , k is the cross section and g ^ p ( ε e ) is the normalized EEPF to be 0 ε e g ^ p ( ε e ) d ε e = 1. The rate constants with the assumption of a Maxwellian EEPF were calculated in advance as a function of electron temperature, K type , k ( T e ), shown in Fig. 9. In general, the rate constant directly obtained by Eq. (6) and that assuming a Maxwellian EEPF with the effective electron temperature are not necessarily equal. Nevertheless, in this study, the difference between them was less than 25% for total ionization, dissociation, electronic excitation, and elastic momentum transfer. For the other reactions that are dominant in low-energy region, larger discrepancies were observed between σ v e type , k and K type , k ( T e , EEPF ), which are considered to be caused by errors due to the distortion in the low-energy part of the EEPFs. Therefore, we use K type , k ( T e , EEPF ) for simple discussion based on the electron temperature. The collision frequency for each type of collisions calculated using T e , EEPF and T e , Mxw inside and near the exit of the discharge channel is shown in Fig. 10.
FIG. 9.

(a) Rate constants for each type of collision calculated as a function of T e with the assumption of a Maxwellian EEPF (see Table I). Ionization rate constants from neutral fragments listed in Table II are also included. (b) Ionization rate constants for six collisions listed in Table I normalized by the total ionization rate constant.

FIG. 9.

(a) Rate constants for each type of collision calculated as a function of T e with the assumption of a Maxwellian EEPF (see Table I). Ionization rate constants from neutral fragments listed in Table II are also included. (b) Ionization rate constants for six collisions listed in Table I normalized by the total ionization rate constant.

Close modal
FIG. 10.

Collision frequency for each type of collision listed in Table I inside and near the exit of the discharge channel at 200 and 250 V. The solid lines were calculated with n e , EEPF and T e , EEPF, and the dashed lines were calculated with n e , Mxw and T e , Mxw.

FIG. 10.

Collision frequency for each type of collision listed in Table I inside and near the exit of the discharge channel at 200 and 250 V. The solid lines were calculated with n e , EEPF and T e , EEPF, and the dashed lines were calculated with n e , Mxw and T e , Mxw.

Close modal
TABLE I.

Electron-impact reactions for H2O.

#Type of collision (abbr.)Reaction # kReactionRate constant (m3s−1)References
Momentum transfer (mt) … H2O + e → H2O + e Kmt(Te49  
Rotational excitation (rot) … H2O(J = J) + e → H2O(J = J′) + e Krot(Te49  
Vibrational excitation (vib) H2O(v = 000) + e → H2O(v = 010) + e Kvib,1(Te51  
 H2O(v = 000) + e → H2O(v = 100 + 001) + e Kvib,2(Te51  
Electronic excitation (ex)  H 2 O + e H 2 O ( a ~ 3 B 1 ) + e Kex,1(Te51  
  H 2 O + e H 2 O ( A ~ 1 B 1 ) + e Kex,2(Te51  
 H2O + e → H2O* + e Kex,3(Te49  
Dissociation (dis) H2O + e → OH(X) + H + e Kdis,1(Te51  
 H2O + e → O(1S0) + H2 + e Kdis,2(Te51  
10  H2O + e → OH(A) + H + e Kdis,3(Te51  
11 Attachment (att) H2O + e → H + OH Katt,1(Te51  
12  H2O + e → O + H2 Katt,2(Te51  
13  H2O + e → OH + H Katt,3(Te51  
14 Ionization (iz) H2O + e → H2O+ + 2e Kiz,1(Te50  
15  H2O + e → OH+ + H + 2e Kiz,2(Te50  
16  H2O + e → H+ + OH + 2e Kiz,3(Te50  
17  H2O + e → O+ + H2 + 2e Kiz,4(Te50  
18   H 2 O + e H 2 + + O + 2 e Kiz,5(Te50  
19  H2O + e → O2+ + H2 + 3e Kiz,6(Te50  
#Type of collision (abbr.)Reaction # kReactionRate constant (m3s−1)References
Momentum transfer (mt) … H2O + e → H2O + e Kmt(Te49  
Rotational excitation (rot) … H2O(J = J) + e → H2O(J = J′) + e Krot(Te49  
Vibrational excitation (vib) H2O(v = 000) + e → H2O(v = 010) + e Kvib,1(Te51  
 H2O(v = 000) + e → H2O(v = 100 + 001) + e Kvib,2(Te51  
Electronic excitation (ex)  H 2 O + e H 2 O ( a ~ 3 B 1 ) + e Kex,1(Te51  
  H 2 O + e H 2 O ( A ~ 1 B 1 ) + e Kex,2(Te51  
 H2O + e → H2O* + e Kex,3(Te49  
Dissociation (dis) H2O + e → OH(X) + H + e Kdis,1(Te51  
 H2O + e → O(1S0) + H2 + e Kdis,2(Te51  
10  H2O + e → OH(A) + H + e Kdis,3(Te51  
11 Attachment (att) H2O + e → H + OH Katt,1(Te51  
12  H2O + e → O + H2 Katt,2(Te51  
13  H2O + e → OH + H Katt,3(Te51  
14 Ionization (iz) H2O + e → H2O+ + 2e Kiz,1(Te50  
15  H2O + e → OH+ + H + 2e Kiz,2(Te50  
16  H2O + e → H+ + OH + 2e Kiz,3(Te50  
17  H2O + e → O+ + H2 + 2e Kiz,4(Te50  
18   H 2 O + e H 2 + + O + 2 e Kiz,5(Te50  
19  H2O + e → O2+ + H2 + 3e Kiz,6(Te50  
TABLE II.

Secondary ionization processes from H and OH.

#ReactionRate constant (m3 s−1)Refs.
H + e → H+ + 2e KH,iz(Te52  
OH + e → OH+ + 2e KOH,iz(Te53  
#ReactionRate constant (m3 s−1)Refs.
H + e → H+ + 2e KH,iz(Te52  
OH + e → OH+ + 2e KOH,iz(Te53  
Electron-impact processes in water vapor produce not only H 2 O + but also several kinds of ions through dissociative reactions as a nature of molecular gas. The ion production rate for kth ion species by direct and dissociative ionization from H 2O is given as
(7)
where the subscript “iz” denotes ionization. Figure 11 shows the ion production rates for six species appearing in Table I at 200 and 250 V, respectively. As expected, H 2O + is dominant among ion products in both cases; however, OH + and H + are also produced with a relatively large amount. For further quantitative evaluation, we estimate the ion current for each ion species from their production rates. The steady-state continuity equation for kth ions can be written as
(8)
where Γ i , k is the ion flux of kth ion. The ion current density j i , k is obtained as
(9)
where z 0 is the axial position of the anode surface. Because the ion production rates are predominant in the range from 4 to 2 mm in Fig. 11, the other regions are neglected in the integration of Eq. (9). Figure 12(a) shows the estimated ion current density for each ion species in the two discharge voltage cases. The absolute amount varies depending on the discharge voltage and determination methods of the density and temperature. This is simply because the ionization rate constant is positively correlated with the electron temperature as shown in Fig. 9(a). The increasing trend with the discharge voltage is consistent with the increase in the mass utilization efficiency indicated in Table III. On the other hand, when focusing on the current fraction of each ion species, it is almost independent of the voltage or determination methods. From Fig. 9(b), it is evident that the ionization rate constant of H 2O +, OH +, and H + as a proportion of the total ionization rate constant does not significantly change above 20 eV, which is the reason of the insensitivity of the current fraction.
FIG. 11.

Ion production rates by electron-impact ionization with water molecule as a function of the axial position at 200 and 250 V. The solid lines were calculated with n e , EEPF and T e , EEPF, and the dashed lines were calculated with n e , Mxw and T e , Mxw.

FIG. 11.

Ion production rates by electron-impact ionization with water molecule as a function of the axial position at 200 and 250 V. The solid lines were calculated with n e , EEPF and T e , EEPF, and the dashed lines were calculated with n e , Mxw and T e , Mxw.

Close modal
FIG. 12.

Estimated ion current density and its fraction for each ion species. (a) Only electron-impact processes with water molecules are considered and (b) subsequent secondary ionization from H and OH are considered. “EEPF” is based on n e , EEPF and T e , EEPF and “Mxw” is based on n e , Mxw and T e , Mxw.

FIG. 12.

Estimated ion current density and its fraction for each ion species. (a) Only electron-impact processes with water molecules are considered and (b) subsequent secondary ionization from H and OH are considered. “EEPF” is based on n e , EEPF and T e , EEPF and “Mxw” is based on n e , Mxw and T e , Mxw.

Close modal
TABLE III.

Discharge conditions for the Langmuir probe measurements and corresponding thrust performances. The values in parentheses are with consideration of the secondary ionization effect.

Mass flow rate ( m ˙/mg s−10.81 0.81 
Discharge voltage (Vd /V) 200 250 
Discharge current (Id /A) 0.92 1.15 
Discharge power (Pd /W) 184 288 
Voltage utilization efficiency (ηv0.76 0.81 
Current utilization efficiency (ηc0.61 0.65 
Mass utilization efficiency (ηm0.11 (0.11) 0.15 (0.14) 
Beam efficiency (ηb0.63 0.66 
Dissociation efficiency (ηd0.93 (0.91) 0.93 (0.91) 
Anode efficiency (ηa0.03 (0.03) 0.05 (0.05) 
Square of thrust coefficient (α20.81 (0.76) 0.80 (0.75) 
Mass flow rate ( m ˙/mg s−10.81 0.81 
Discharge voltage (Vd /V) 200 250 
Discharge current (Id /A) 0.92 1.15 
Discharge power (Pd /W) 184 288 
Voltage utilization efficiency (ηv0.76 0.81 
Current utilization efficiency (ηc0.61 0.65 
Mass utilization efficiency (ηm0.11 (0.11) 0.15 (0.14) 
Beam efficiency (ηb0.63 0.66 
Dissociation efficiency (ηd0.93 (0.91) 0.93 (0.91) 
Anode efficiency (ηa0.03 (0.03) 0.05 (0.05) 
Square of thrust coefficient (α20.81 (0.76) 0.80 (0.75) 
As shown in Fig. 10, dissociation to neutral fragments is also one of the primary collisional processes, and the subsequent secondary ionization can alter the ion-species fractions. The dissociation is primarily driven by reaction #8 in Table I, producing H and OH as fragments. The local density of them can be roughly estimated by the continuity as
(10)
(11)
where v H and v OH are the velocity of H and OH, respectively, and the subscript “dis” denotes dissociation. In addition to the dissociation to neutral fragments, the contribution of the dissociative ionization is considered. We assume that each velocity is equal to the average flow velocity of water molecules v H 2 O obtained by DSMC. Using the estimated density of each fragment and the rate constant of the possible ionization reactions from them (listed in Table II), we evaluate the influence of the secondary processes on the current density, same as Eq. (9). Figure 12(b) includes the additional OH + and H + current density produced by the secondary ionization processes. Comparing Figs. 12(a) and 12(b), the secondary ionization increases the current fraction of OH + and H + by 1.7 and 1.2 times, respectively. Specifically, the influence on OH + is larger due to a relatively large ionization rate constant of OH. In fact, the velocity of the neutral fragments can differ from that of water molecules due to the mass difference; even so, the subsequent processes from the fragments are considered an important ionization mechanism in water-vapor Hall thrusters.
Ion fragments produced by the dissociative reactions need to be considered to accurately estimate the thrust performance from the plume diagnostics because the relationship between mass flux and current flux changes. Since the production of H 2 + and O 2 + is negligible from Fig. 11, we only consider the other four species, i.e., only the singly charged ions in the following analysis. The thrust coefficient α due to molecular mass variation can be expressed as
(12)
where Ω i , k is the current fraction and M i , k is the mass ratio of kth ion, defined as Ω i , k = j i , k / ( k j i , k ) and M i , k = m i , k / m H 2 O, respectively. This coefficient represents the ratio of the actual thrust force F to the thrust force assuming that all of the current is composed of H 2O +,33 
(13)
where I a is the axial component of the beam current and V ac is the beam acceleration voltage. The anode efficiency is defined as
(14)
where m ˙ is the propellant mass flow rate and P d is the discharge power ( = I d V d). η v, η c, η m, η b, and η d are mentioned as the voltage utilization efficiency, current utilization efficiency, mass utilization efficiency, beam efficiency, and dissociation efficiency, respectively, and defined as54,55
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
where I b is the total beam current. Neutral gain, the thrust gain by the momentum of neutral flow, is neglected. In those definitions, the influence of dissociative ions is included in both the mass utilization efficiency and dissociation efficiency. If we directly evaluate the overall effect, the value of α 2 is useful.

Table III shows the results of efficiency analysis. Every efficiency is calculated using the angular distribution of the beam current and ion energy distribution function downstream on the center axis obtained by the far-field plume diagnostics and the current fraction estimated in the previous section. The effect of ion fragments is evaluated both without and with consideration of the secondary ionization, corresponding to Figs. 12(a) and 12(b). The performance loss by dissociative ions has a minor effect compared to the other loss factors. The change of current fraction by the secondary processes is also not sensitive to the performance estimation because of the small mass difference between H 2O + and OH +. Nevertheless, the influence of multi-species ions is more significant than that by multiple-charged ions in xenon Hall thrusters, whose efficiency is typically more than 95%.54,55 This is almost due to the production of H +, which has a large mass difference to H 2 O +.

It should be noted that some additional factors can cause the actual α 2 to differ from the estimated value. One is the multi-dimensional spatial distribution of the plasma. The actual plasma has non-uniformity especially in the radial direction due to the physical reasons such as wall sheath or secondary electron emission (SEE). Though an increase in electron temperature is not expected to alter the current fraction significantly, a substantial change is anticipated if the temperature decreases less than 10 eV, which may happen near the wall where the cooling by SEE predominates. In such case, α 2 improves because the fraction of H 2O + increases according to Fig. 9(b). Subsequent processes can also alter the ion-species fractions. While we discuss the effect up to the secondary ionization processes in this paper, further dissociation and ionization reactions may play a role in the discharge mechanism. Ion-neutral charge exchange (CEX) collisions are another processes that can change the ion components in the plume. We can discuss the influence by comparing the mean-free path of CEX collisions with the thruster scale. The CEX mean-free path λ CEX with water molecules can be written as
(20)
where σ CEX is the CEX cross section. The dominant CEX collisions are expected to occur between H 2 O and fast H 2 O +. This collisional event can also produce H 3 O + through a proton transfer reaction, but the CEX reaction preferentially occur with σ CEX 1.0 × 10 19 m 2 if the colliding ion is accelerated to over 1 eV.56 Considering n H 2 O 1.0 × 10 20 m 3 inside the channel, the CEX mean-free path becomes the same order to the channel length. Regarding the influence on α 2, the CEX reaction of H 2 O + H + ( fast ) H 2 O + + H ( fast ) has a great impact due to the large mass change of the ions. Although σ CEX of this reaction has not been well-studied below a few hundred eV yet, it can be expected on the same order to that for H 2 O- H 2 O + according to the previous research;57 thus, λ CEX is also comparable to the thruster scale. For a more precise evaluation of ion species in the plume, direct observation using other techniques such as E × B probe is necessary. However, difficulty in the spectral decomposition is anticipated due to the variety of species and their close mass-to-charge ratios.58 The findings from this study are useful to distinguish the effects of the electron-impact ionization from the other aforementioned factors.
Production of negative ions is one of the unique features of a water-vapor plasma, though the electron-attachment collision frequencies are less than the others by two orders in Fig. 10. The produced negative ions are eliminated from the plasma by electron detachment reactions listed in Table IV in the collisional processes. If we only consider the attachment and detachment collisions, the electronegativity n / n e can be approximated from the particle balance equations as
(21)
where n is the total density of negative ions, subscript “att” denotes the electron attachment collision, subscript “det(H 2O)” denotes the H 2O-impact detachment collision, and subscript “det(e)” denotes the electron-impact detachment collision. Assuming n H 2 O 1.5 × 10 20 m 3, n e 5.0 × 10 17 m 3 and T e 20 eV as representative values from the results of this study, the electronegativity is estimated to be less than 1%. Therefore, the negative ions are not expected to play an important role in the discharge mechanism of the plasma as well as interpreting the experimental results by a Langmuir probe.
TABLE IV.

Electron-detachment reactions for the negative-ion fragments. We cited Ref. 36 for all rate constants.

#ReactionRate constant (m3 s−1)
H - + H 2 O H + H 2 O + e 1.5 × 10−15 
O - + H 2 O O + H 2 O + e 1.4 × 10−15 
O H - + H 2 O OH + H 2 O + e 1.8 × 10−15 
H - + e H + 2 e 9.2 × 10−12a 
O - + e O + 2 e 7.4 × 10−18a 
O H - + e OH + 2 e 1.8 × 10−14a 
#ReactionRate constant (m3 s−1)
H - + H 2 O H + H 2 O + e 1.5 × 10−15 
O - + H 2 O O + H 2 O + e 1.4 × 10−15 
O H - + H 2 O OH + H 2 O + e 1.8 × 10−15 
H - + e H + 2 e 9.2 × 10−12a 
O - + e O + 2 e 7.4 × 10−18a 
O H - + e OH + 2 e 1.8 × 10−14a 
a

Values at Te = 20 eV.

Figure 10 indicates that inelastic collisions occur more frequently than elastic collisions near the channel exit, and the primary reaction is not ionization but electronic excitation. Some of the excited molecules can contribute to the ion production by cumulative ionization, which is not considered in the above analysis. Besides, dissociation to neutral fragments outweighs ionization reactions, leading to secondary ionization processes discussed above. Predominance of electronic excitation and dissociation is also unfavorable in terms of electron-energy consumption because it means that higher energy is effectively consumed per one ionization event. While inelastic collisions have small influence on the energy balance in xenon Hall thrusters,59 their contribution may increase in the case of water-vapor Hall thrusters. On the other hand, the energy loss to the wall is also expected to be large in this thruster case because of the narrow width of the discharge channel. The difference in the energy-loss process is also affect the EEDF formation. Further study is needed to reveal the importance of inelastic collisions in the total energy balance and determine the electron energy distribution. In the near-anode region, elastic momentum transfer dominates as the electron temperature decreases. Rotational and vibrational excitation also occur more actively. Nevertheless, because their collision frequencies are lower than that of elastic momentum transfer and their energy thresholds are less than 1 eV,49–51 the energy consumption by these processes may not be significant.

Low mass utilization efficiency is the most challenging issue for water-vapor Hall thrusters,33,34 as shown in Table III. A practical approach to address it is to extend the ionization length L iz. Although H 2O loss by reactions is not considered in the propellant flow analysis using DSMC in this study, it becomes more critical with a longer ionization length. In addition to ionization, dissociation also consumes water molecules, while the neutral fragments can change into ions by the secondary processes. Here, we examine the influence of those mechanisms on the mass utilization efficiency. As the dominant processes for species transition, reactions #8, #14, #15, and #16 in Table I and #1 and #2 in Table II are selected. Each neutral flux follows the continuity as
(22)
(23)
(24)
where λ iz , k and λ dis , k are the kth ionization and dissociation mean free paths from H 2O in Table I, defined as λ iz , k = v H 2 O / n e K iz , k ( T e ) and λ dis , k = v H 2 O / n e K dis , k ( T e ), respectively. λ OH , iz and λ H , iz are the ionization mean free paths from the neutral fragments in Table II defined in the same way. For simple formulations, we provide production (denoted as subscript “p”) and consumption (denoted as subscript “c”) mean free paths for each species. Taking the spatial average for n e and T e and integrating the set of equations over the ionization length, these fluxes can be analytically solved as
(25)
(26)
(27)
where Γ 0 is the propellant inflow flux. From the total mass conservation, the mass utilization efficiency is expressed using these fluxes as
(28)
If we take λ c , H and λ c , OH , the expression without the secondary ionization can be obtained. In addition, if we ignore the propellant loss by dissociative reactions [ λ c , H 2 O ( k 1 / λ iz , k ) 1, Γ H 0, and Γ OH 0], the formula considering only ionization, commonly used for atomic propellants,60 can be obtained.

We predict the mass utilization efficiency using Eq. (28) and compare it with the two ultimate cases to investigate the contribution of each processes. Two pairs of n e and T e are used based on the measurement results, which are obtained by averaging n e , EEPF and T e , EEPF over the region of z 2 mm for 200 and 250 V, respectively. The average neutral velocity from DSMC is used for the calculation of the mean free paths. Figure 13 shows the predicted mass utilization efficiency as a function of the ionization length. Assuming a short ionization length, the influence of dissociation and secondary ionization is small, which is relevant to this thruster case. When the length is extended, dissociation to neutral fragments reduces the total amount of H 2O available for ionization. Nevertheless, owing to relatively high ionization rate of OH, the mass utilization efficiency is recovered by the secondary ionization processes and does not deviate much from the prediction without dissociation. Therefore, dissociation to neutral fragments is not a significant concern from the perspective of mass consumption. In Fig. 13, the monotonic increase in the mass utilization efficiency is deduced assuming constant electron temperature; however, a greater contribution of the secondary ionization leads to lower electron temperature, causing a decrease in the mass utilization efficiency. According to the previous studies,51,53 the energy yield of OH production from H 2O and yield of OH + production from OH are 6.5 and 13.1 eV, respectively; thus, the effective ionization energy of this secondary process is around 20 eV, 1.5 times larger than the energy yield of H 2O + (12.6 eV).50 The most beneficial ionization length will be determined by the balance between the gain in ion fluxes from the secondary ionization and the corresponding loss in electron energy. Increasing the discharge voltage is another possible way to improve the mass utilization efficiency, as demonstrated in this study. Even with this approach, the secondary processes remain significant as more propellant is consumed. When the increase in the effective ionization energy outweighs the electron-energy gain by Joule heating, the electron temperature will no longer rise, limiting further improvements in the mass utilization efficiency.

FIG. 13.

Predicted mass utilization efficiency as a function of ionization length. “w/o secondary ionization” corresponds to the ultimate case of λ p , H and λ p , OH , and “w/o dissociation” corresponds to the ultimate case of λ c , H 2 O ( k 1 / λ iz , k ) 1, Γ H 0, and Γ OH 0 in Eq. (30).

FIG. 13.

Predicted mass utilization efficiency as a function of ionization length. “w/o secondary ionization” corresponds to the ultimate case of λ p , H and λ p , OH , and “w/o dissociation” corresponds to the ultimate case of λ c , H 2 O ( k 1 / λ iz , k ) 1, Γ H 0, and Γ OH 0 in Eq. (30).

Close modal

This work investigated the electron-impact reactions in the discharge plasma of a water-vapor Hall thruster based on the experimentally obtained EEDFs by Langmuir probe measurements. A cylindrical Langmuir probe was inserted along the thrust axis using a fast-moving system to prevent the thermal damage and the time-averaged I V characteristics were acquired at 29 measurement points from 4 mm inside to 10 mm outside on the channel center. The EEDFs were obtained by the second derivative of the time-averaged I V characteristics. Since the measured EEDFs indicated two electron populations and the high-energy part was suspected to be anisotropic, we evaluated the electron density and temperature in two ways: One is by the integration of the measured EEDF and the other is by fitting of a Maxwellian EEDF to the low-energy part of the measured EEDF. The density distribution showed a similar trend in both ways, whereas the temperature distribution by the integration method T e , EEPF and the fitting method T e , Mxw showed a discrepancy; the actual temperature was considered to be found between them. While the electron temperature seemed to be slightly higher, the axial profile of the discharge plasma was similar to that of conventional xenon Hall thrusters.

The ion current density for each species produced by electron-impact ionization was estimated as an axial integration of the one-dimensional steady-state continuity equation. The ion production rates were calculated using the electron density and temperature obtained by the Langmuir probe measurements and the water-molecule density computed by DSMC simulation. As a result, H 2O +, OH +, and H + were expected to be contained as the main products. The current fractions were estimated about 67%, 18%, and 12% if only the primary ionization was considered, and about 49%, 32%, and 15% if the subsequent secondary ionization from the neutral fragments was considered. This ratio was not sensitive to whether we used T e , EEPF or T e , Mxw, nor to the discharge voltage. We calculated the efficiency loss due to the mass difference based on the estimated current fraction, which resulted in an additional 20%–25% loss of the anode efficiency estimated by the plume diagnostics.

The effects of reactions other than ionization were also examined. Although water-vapor plasma produced negative ions through electron-attachment reactions, the collision frequencies of them were estimated to be so small that the existence of negative ions could be negligible. It was anticipated that inelastic collisions increased near the channel exit; however, electronic excitation and dissociation to neutral fragments were more likely to occur than ionization reactions, leading to higher effective energy cost per ionization. Energy losses in rotational and vibrational excitation were expected to be minor because these reactions were not dominant and did not consume significant electron energy per collision.

We finally discussed possible approaches to improve the mass utilization efficiency, such as extending the ionization length or increasing the discharge voltage, based on the investigated ionization mechanisms. From the analytical expressions, it was predicted that the contribution of secondary ionization from the neutral fragments increased as the mass utilization efficiency improved. Therefore, the effectiveness of these approaches was expected to be determined by the balance between the gain in ion production from the subsequent ionization processes and the corresponding increase in effective ionization energy.

This work was supported by the Takahashi Industrial and Economic Research Foundation, MEXT Coordination Funds for Promoting AeroSpace Utilization (Grant No. JPJ000959), and JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No. 22KJ1149). The authors acknowledge fruitful discussions about the interpretation of the measurement results and the reactions of water-vapor plasma with K. Hara, Y. Yamashita, and L. Vialetto.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

K. Shirasu: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Funding acquisition (equal); Investigation (lead); Methodology (equal); Project administration (equal); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (equal). H. Koizumi: Conceptualization (equal); Funding acquisition (lead); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Project administration (equal); Supervision (lead); Writing – review & editing (equal). H. Sekine: Funding acquisition (equal); Methodology (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). K. Komurasaki: Supervision (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

As described in Sec. II, far-field plume diagnostics were conducted in the same experimental campaign for the performance evaluation. Detailed explanations of the Faraday probe and RPA that we used can be seen in Refs. 32 and 33. The Faraday probe was rotated around the thruster with a sweep radius R s of 20 cm, while the RPA was fixed at 50 cm downstream from the channel exit. Figure 14(a) shows the ion current density j FP collected by the Faraday probe as a function of angular position θ, which was modified by subtracting the average value at θ = ± 90 °. Figure 14(b) shows the ion energy distribution functions (IEDFs) g i ( ε i ) obtained by the RPA, derived as the first derivative of the collector current with respect to the discriminator grid voltage V dg. The total and axial beam current and acceleration voltage were calculated as32 
(A1)
(A2)
(A3)
Because the measured IEDFs appeared to have an offset in the low-energy regime, we used only the data within ± 50 V around the high-energy peak for the integration. Strictly speaking, V ac have to be evaluated by subtracting far-field plasma potential, which was not measured in this experiment. Assuming the first peak indicates the plasma potential, it is around 10 V, which is comparable to or less than the typical uncertainty;32 thus, we neglected it in the performance analysis.
FIG. 14.

(a) Ion current density as a function of angular position of the Faraday probe and (b) normalized IEDF obtained by the RPA.

FIG. 14.

(a) Ion current density as a function of angular position of the Faraday probe and (b) normalized IEDF obtained by the RPA.

Close modal
1.
D.
Lev
,
R. M.
Myers
,
K. M.
Lemmer
,
J.
Kolbeck
,
H.
Koizumi
, and
K.
Polzin
, “
The technological and commercial expansion of electric propulsion
,”
Acta Astronaut.
159
,
213
227
(
2019
).
2.
J. C.
McDowell
, “
The low earth orbit satellite population and impacts of the SpaceX starlink constellation
,”
ApJL
892
,
L36
(
2020
).
3.
Y.
Henri
, “The OneWeb satellite system,” in Handbook of Small Satellites: Technology, Design, Manufacture, Applications, Economics and Regulation, edited by J. N. Pelton (Springer International Publishing, 2020), pp. 1–10.
4.
J. S.
Snyder
,
A.
Lopez Ortega
,
I. G.
Mikellides
,
J.
Li
,
A.
Murphy
, and
I.
Johnson
, “Electric propulsion for the psyche mission: A new trajectory and final preparations for launch,” in AIAA SciTech 2024 Forum, AIAA 2024-1958 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Orlando, FL, 2024).
5.
V.-G.
Tirila
,
A.
Demairé
, and
C. N.
Ryan
, “
Review of alternative propellants in Hall thrusters
,”
Acta Astronaut.
212
,
284
306
(
2023
).
6.
G.
Xia
,
H.
Li
,
Y.
Ding
,
L.
Wei
,
S.
Chen
, and
D.
Yu
, “
Performance optimization of a krypton Hall thruster with a rotating propellant supply
,”
Acta Astronaut.
171
,
290
299
(
2020
).
7.
L. L.
Su
and
B. A.
Jorns
, “
Performance comparison of a 9-kW magnetically shielded Hall thruster operating on xenon and krypton
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
130
,
163306
(
2021
).
8.
J.
Yamasaki
,
S.
Yokota
, and
K.
Shimamura
, “
Performance enhancement of an argon-based propellant in a Hall thruster
,”
Vacuum
167
,
520
523
(
2019
).
9.
T. F.
Munro-O’Brien
and
C. N.
Ryan
, “
Performance of a low power Hall effect thruster with several gaseous propellants
,”
Acta Astronaut.
206
,
257
273
(
2023
).
10.
D.
Satpathy
,
H.
Sekine
,
N.
Barth
,
R.
Kawashima
,
K.
Komurasaki
, and
H.
Koizumi
, “Experimental investigation on ionization length required for efficient operation of argon Hall thrusters,” Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci. (to be published).
11.
L.
Pekker
and
M.
Keidar
, “
Analysis of airbreathing Hall-effect thrusters
,”
J. Propul. Power
28
,
1399
1405
(
2012
).
12.
A.
Gurciullo
,
A. L.
Fabris
, and
M. A.
Cappelli
, “
Ion plume investigation of a Hall effect thruster operating with Xe/N 2 and Xe/air mixtures
,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
52
,
464003
(
2019
).
13.
F.
Marchioni
and
M. A.
Cappelli
, “
Extended channel Hall thruster for air-breathing electric propulsion
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
130
,
053306
(
2021
).
14.
E.
Ferrato
,
V.
Giannetti
,
F.
Califano
, and
T.
Andreussi
, “
Atmospheric propellant fed Hall thruster discharges: 0D-hybrid model and experimental results
,”
Plasma Sources Sci. Technol.
31
,
075003
(
2022
).
15.
J.
Szabo
,
B.
Pote
,
S.
Paintal
,
M.
Robin
,
A.
Hillier
,
R. D.
Branam
, and
R. E.
Huffmann
, “
Performance evaluation of an iodine-vapor Hall thruster
,”
J. Propul. Power
28
,
848
857
(
2012
).
16.
F.
Paganucci
,
L.
Bernazzani
,
A.
Ceccarini
, and
M.
Saravia
, “Development of an iodine feeding system for low power ion and Hall effect thrusters,” in AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2019 Forum, AIAA 2019-3996 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Indianapolis, IN, 2019).
17.
M. A.
Bretti
, “Progress and developments of ultra-compact 10 Watt class adamantane fueled Hall thrusters for picosatellites,” in the 37th International Electric Propulsion Conference, IEPC-2022-349 (Electric Rocket Propulsion Society, Cambridge, MA, 2022).
18.
T.
Maki
,
K.
Kinefuchi
,
S.
Cho
, and
H.
Watanabe
, “
Dry ice propellant for electric propulsion with triple-point storage
,”
Acta Astronaut.
202
,
283
291
(
2023
).
19.
C. I.
Honniball
,
P. G.
Lucey
,
S.
Li
,
S.
Shenoy
,
T. M.
Orlando
,
C. A.
Hibbitts
,
D. M.
Hurley
, and
W. M.
Farrell
, “
Molecular water detected on the sunlit Moon by SOFIA
,”
Nat. Astron.
5
,
121
127
(
2020
).
20.
E. L.
Scheller
,
B. L.
Ehlmann
,
R.
Hu
,
D. J.
Adams
, and
Y. L.
Yung
, “
Long-term drying of Mars by sequestration of ocean-scale volumes of water in the crust
,”
Science
372
,
56
62
(
2021
).
21.
A.
Porter
,
M.
Freedman
,
R.
Grist
,
C.
Wesson
, and
M.
Hanson
, “Flight qualification of a water electrolysis propulsion system,” in Small Satellite Conference, SSC21-XI-06 (Utah State University, Logan, UT, 2021).
22.
M.
Hwang
,
T.-S.
Rho
, and
H. J.
Lee
, “
Conceptual design and performance analysis of water electrolysis propulsion system with catalytic igniter for CubeSats
,”
Acta Astronaut.
200
,
316
328
(
2022
).
23.
M.
Akiyama
,
K.
Nishii
,
Y.
Mannami
,
M.
Murohara
,
H.
Koizumi
, and
K.
Komurasaki
, “
Feasibility study of a hybrid thruster using wire-shaped magnesium and water for application to small spacecraft
,”
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci.
64
,
223
233
(
2021
).
24.
K.
Nishii
,
A.
Hattori
,
H.
Koizumi
, and
K.
Komurasaki
, “
Low-pressure-vaporization of water droplets on wall under normal and microgravity conditions
,”
Acta Astronaut.
186
,
508
516
(
2021
).
25.
K.
Yaginuma
,
J.
Asakawa
,
Y.
Nakagawa
,
Y.
Tsuruda
,
H.
Koizumi
,
K.
Kakihara
,
K.
Yanagida
,
Y.
Murata
,
M.
Ikura
,
S.
Matsushita
,
Y.
Aoyanagi
, and
T.
Matsumoto
, “
AQT-D: CubeSat demonstration of a water propulsion system deployed from ISS
,”
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci.
18
,
141
148
(
2020
).
26.
Y.
Nakagawa
,
H.
Koizumi
,
H.
Kawahara
, and
K.
Komurasaki
, “
Performance characterization of a miniature microwave discharge ion thruster operated with water
,”
Acta Astronaut.
157
,
294
299
(
2019
).
27.
Y.
Ataka
,
Y.
Nakagawa
,
H.
Koizumi
, and
K.
Komurasaki
, “
Improving the performance of a water ion thruster using biased electrodes
,”
Acta Astronaut.
187
,
133
140
(
2021
).
28.
T.
Motoki
,
D.
Takasaki
,
H.
Koizumi
,
Y.
Ataka
,
K.
Komurasaki
, and
Y.
Takao
, “
Experimental study on the performance characteristics of a miniature microwave discharge cathode
,”
Acta Astronaut.
196
,
231
237
(
2022
).
29.
H.
Koizumi
,
J.
Asakawa
,
Y.
Nakagawa
,
K.
Nishii
,
Y.
Takao
,
M.
Nakano
, and
R.
Funase
, “
Assessment of micropropulsion system unifying water ion thrusters and water resistojet thrusters
,”
J. Spacecr. Rockets
56
,
1400
1408
(
2019
).
30.
A.
Schwertheim
and
A.
Knoll
, “
Experimental investigation of a water electrolysis Hall effect thruster
,”
Acta Astronaut.
193
,
607
618
(
2022
).
31.
K.
Shirasu
,
D.
Takasaki
,
H.
Sekine
,
H.
Koizumi
,
Y.
Nakagawa
,
H.
Watanabe
, and
K.
Komurasaki
, “Demonstration of the low-power Hall thruster with water propellant,” in 72nd International Astronautical Congress, IAC-21,C4,8-B4.5A,3,x64527 (IAF, Dubai, 2021).
32.
K.
Shirasu
,
H.
Kuwabara
,
M.
Matsuura
,
H.
Koizumi
,
R.
Kawashima
,
Y.
Nakagawa
,
H.
Watanabe
,
H.
Sekine
, and
K.
Komurasaki
, “Far-field plume diagnostics of low-power water Hall thruster,” in International Electric Propulsion Conference 2022, IEPC-2022-387 (Electric Rocket Propulsion Society, Cambridge, MA, 2022).
33.
K.
Shirasu
,
H.
Kuwabara
,
M.
Matsuura
,
H.
Koizumi
,
Y.
Nakagawa
,
H.
Watanabe
,
H.
Sekine
, and
K.
Komurasaki
, “
Demonstration and experimental characteristics of a water-vapor Hall thruster
,”
J. Electr. Propul.
2
,
11
(
2023
).
34.
J. M.
Tejeda
and
A.
Knoll
, “
A water vapour fuelled Hall effect thruster: Characterization and comparison with oxygen
,”
Acta Astronaut.
211
,
702
715
(
2023
).
35.
D.
Takasaki
,
A.
Fujimori
,
H.
Sekine
,
H.
Koizumi
,
H.
Watanabe
,
Y.
Nakagawa
, and
K.
Komurasaki
, “Performance measurements of a propellant-free lab6 thermionic cathode,” in The 37th International Electric Propulsion Conference, IEPC-2022-126 (Electric Rocket Propulsion Society, Cambridge, MA, 2022).
36.
K.
Nakamura
,
H.
Koizumi
,
M.
Nakano
, and
Y.
Takao
, “
Effects of negative ions on discharge characteristics of water plasma source for a miniature microwave discharge ion thruster
,”
Phys. Plasmas
26
,
043508
(
2019
).
37.
R. B.
Lobbia
and
B. E.
Beal
, “
Recommended practice for use of Langmuir probes in electric propulsion testing
,”
J. Propul. Power
33
,
566
581
(
2017
).
38.
V. A.
Godyak
and
V. I.
Demidov
, “
Probe measurements of electron-energy distributions in plasmas: What can we measure and how can we achieve reliable results?
,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
44
,
233001
(
2011
).
39.
J. M.
Haas
,
A. D.
Gallimore
,
K.
McFall
, and
G.
Spanjers
, “
Development of a high-speed, reciprocating electrostatic probe system for Hall thruster interrogation
,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
71
,
4131
4138
(
2000
).
40.
K.
Dannenmayer
and
S.
Mazouffre
, “
Compact high-speed reciprocating probe system for measurements in a Hall thruster discharge and plume
,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
83
,
123503
(
2012
).
41.
Y.
Yamashita
,
R.
Lau
, and
K.
Hara
, “
Inertial and anisotropic pressure effects on cross-field electron transport in low-temperature magnetized plasmas
,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
56
,
384003
(
2023
).
42.
V. Y.
Fedotov
,
A. A.
Ivanov
,
G.
Guerrini
,
A. N.
Vesselovzorov
, and
M.
Bacal
, “
On the electron energy distribution function in a Hall-type thruster
,”
Phys. Plasmas
6
,
4360
4365
(
1999
).
43.
M.
Tichý
,
A.
Pétin
,
P.
Kudrna
,
M.
Horký
, and
S.
Mazouffre
, “
Electron energy distribution function in a low-power Hall thruster discharge and near-field plume
,”
Phys. Plasmas
25
,
061205
(
2018
).
44.
S.
Marholm
and
R.
Marchand
, “
Finite-length effects on cylindrical Langmuir probes
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
2
,
023016
(
2020
).
45.
A.
Caldarelli
,
F.
Filleul
,
R. W.
Boswell
,
C.
Charles
,
N. J.
Rattenbury
, and
J. E.
Cater
, “
Data processing techniques for ion and electron-energy distribution functions
,”
Phys. Plasmas
30
,
040501
(
2023
).
46.
Y.
Raitses
,
D.
Staack
,
M.
Keidar
, and
N. J.
Fisch
, “
Electron-wall interaction in Hall thrusters
,”
Phys. Plasmas
12
,
057104
(
2005
).
47.
M. M.
Saravia
,
A.
Giacobbe
, and
T.
Andreussi
, “
Bayesian analysis of triple Langmuir probe measurements for the characterization of Hall thruster plasmas
,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
90
,
023502
(
2019
).
48.
S.
Kawaguchi
,
K.
Takahashi
,
K.
Satoh
, and
H.
Itoh
, “
Electron transport analysis in water vapor
,”
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.
55
,
07LD03
(
2016
).
49.
M.
Budde
,
T. C.
Dias
,
L.
Vialetto
,
N.
Pinhão
,
V.
Guerra
, and
T.
Silva
, “
Electron-neutral collision cross sections for H 2O: I. Complete and consistent set
,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
55
,
445205
(
2022
).
50.
Y.
Itikawa
and
N.
Mason
, “
Cross sections for electron collisions with water molecules
,”
J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data
34
,
1
22
(
2005
).
51.
M.-Y.
Song
,
H.
Cho
,
G. P.
Karwasz
,
V.
Kokoouline
,
Y.
Nakamura
,
J.
Tennyson
,
A.
Faure
,
N. J.
Mason
, and
Y.
Itikawa
, “
Cross sections for electron collisions with H 2O
,”
J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data
50
,
023103
(
2021
).
52.
See www.lxcat.net/Morgan for Morgan database (accessed 24 September 2024).
53.
V.
Tarnovsky
,
H.
Deutsch
, and
K.
Becker
, “
Electron impact ionization of the hydroxyl radical
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
109
,
932
936
(
1998
).
54.
D. L.
Brown
,
C. W.
Larson
,
B. E.
Beal
, and
A. D.
Gallimore
, “
Methodology and historical perspective of a Hall thruster efficiency analysis
,”
J. Propul. Power
25
,
1163
1177
(
2009
).
55.
H.
Watanabe
,
S.
Cho
, and
K.
Kubota
, “
Performance and plume characteristics of an 85 W class Hall thruster
,”
Acta Astronaut.
166
,
227
237
(
2020
).
56.
C. R.
Lishawa
,
R. A.
Dressler
,
J. A.
Gardner
,
R. H.
Salter
, and
E.
Murad
, “
Cross sections and product kinetic energy analysis of H 2O +–H 2O collisions at suprathermal energies
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
93
,
3196
3206
(
1990
).
57.
C.
Simon Wedlund
,
D.
Bodewits
,
M.
Alho
,
R.
Hoekstra
,
E.
Behar
,
G.
Gronoff
,
H.
Gunell
,
H.
Nilsson
,
E.
Kallio
, and
A.
Beth
, “
Solar wind charge exchange in cometary atmospheres I. Charge-changing and ionization cross sections for He and H particles in H 2O
,”
Astron. Astrophys.
630
,
1
22
(
2019
).
58.
A. J.
Sheppard
, Theoretical and experimental performance of an electron cyclotron resonance thruster operating on water vapor propellant, Ph.D. thesis (University of Washington, 2021).
59.
K.
Hara
,
M. J.
Sekerak
,
I. D.
Boyd
, and
A. D.
Gallimore
, “
Mode transition of a Hall thruster discharge plasma
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
115
,
203304
(
2014
).
60.
J.-P.
Boeuf
, “
Tutorial: Physics and modeling of Hall thrusters
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
121
,
011101
(
2017
).