Negative Poisson’s ratio in auxetic structures plays a crucial role in energy absorption and impact mitigation. Origami-based lattices within the realm of auxetic structures offer the advantage of facile fabrication and design. Nevertheless, the utilization of periodic lattices in origami-based auxetic structures constrains the available design space for achieving diverse mechanical properties. Addressing this limitation, our study introduces origami-based auxetic structures with functionally graded thickness, utilizing origami-based lattices known as Tachi–Miura polyhedra. We investigated the impact of functionally graded thickness on buckling behavior and force responses through dynamic loading experiments employing 3D-printed test pieces. The experimental results indicate that functionally graded thickness induces partial auxetic deformation in lattices, and the resulting nonsymmetric deformation prevents global buckling, thereby averting bounded forces observed in structures with uniform thickness. These findings extend the applicability of auxetic structures, spanning from energy absorption to the design of cushioning structures.

Mechanical metamaterials have garnered significant attention owing to their distinctive mechanical properties.1,2 Engineered lattice metamaterials exhibit lightweight characteristics as well as various mechanical, thermal, and acoustic properties.3 Among the unique mechanical attributes of lattice metamaterials, auxeticity, which is characterized by negative Poisson’s ratios, is a promising candidate for engineering applications.4 In contrast to conventional materials, which expand under compression, auxetic structures display lateral contraction. This inherent auxetic property enhances their resistance to indentation at points of concentrated loads,5,6 enhances resistance against shear deformation,7,8 improves fracture toughness,9 and boosts the efficiency of energy absorption (EA).10 Additionally, the out-of-bending behavior of auxetic structures results in curved surfaces with positive Gaussian curvatures.11 The mechanical properties and deformation modes of auxetic structures have been extensively investigated,12 with examples including re-entrant honeycombs,10,13 chiral structures,14,15 and arrowheads.16,17

Furthermore, origami-based lattice structures contribute to the realization of efficient designs by harnessing auxeticity through origami folding. Notably, the auxetic properties of origami-based structures have been observed in the Miura-ori18–21 and water bomb tubes.22–24 Re-entrant shapes within Tachi–Miura polyhedra (TMP)25–27 also induce auxeticity.27,28 Additionally, investigations into multidirectional auxeticity based on Miura-ori have been conducted.29 The enhancement of EA through the auxeticity of TMP has been investigated30 and applied to applications such as head protection.31 

To enhance the design of auxetic lattices, functionally graded approaches have been investigated.17,32,33 Furthermore, functionally graded origami-based structures have been investigated.34,35 This approach has also been applied to auxetic origami-based lattices.36 Previous studies have primarily focused on grading the mechanical properties of origami lattices based on the geometry of origami patterns. However, to the best of our knowledge, the effects of graded thickness in origami-based lattices on their mechanical properties have not been thoroughly investigated. Graded thickness in periodic lattices can be easily achieved without considering the connectivity of lattices between unit cells. In addition, facile fabrication of functionally graded auxetic lattices can be enabled by stacking the folded materials with varying thicknesses through plate folding37 or employing self-folding 4D printing techniques.38,39

This study elucidates the control of buckling behavior in origami-based auxetic metamaterials through functionally graded thickness. The implementation of functionally graded thickness in origami-based lattices induces local buckling in low-thickness layers, preempting global buckling of lattice structures by disrupting symmetry. Experimental impact testing on 3D-printed structures has substantiated this concept. The ability to control buckling behavior broadens the spectrum of force responses, thereby expanding the potential applications of auxetic structures.

The TMP unit cell is constituted by connecting the upper and lower origami sheets, as illustrated in Fig. 1(a). The geometry is characterized by dimensions l, m, and d, along with the internal angle of the parallelogram, denoted as α. Changes in TMP geometry are delineated in relation to the folding angles β, γ, and the internal angle of the parallelogram α,25 
(1)
Here, the folding ratio related to β is introduced as follows:
(2)
FIG. 1.

Geometry of Tachi–Miura polyhedron. (a) Unit cell of Tachi–Miura polyhedron composed of the upper and lower origami sheets. (b) Folding motions of Tachi–Miura polyhedron. (c) Functionally graded thickness in Tachi–Miura polyhedron. The thickness distribution increases from top to bottom.

FIG. 1.

Geometry of Tachi–Miura polyhedron. (a) Unit cell of Tachi–Miura polyhedron composed of the upper and lower origami sheets. (b) Folding motions of Tachi–Miura polyhedron. (c) Functionally graded thickness in Tachi–Miura polyhedron. The thickness distribution increases from top to bottom.

Close modal

With an increase in the folding ratio, the cross sections of TMP tubes undergo a transition from convex shapes [for example, R = 25 % in Fig. 1(b)] to concave shapes [e.g., R = 50 % in Fig. 1(b)]. The pairing of upper and lower origami sheets with l : m : d = 1 : 1 : 1 and α = 65 ° forms the basis for TMP-based lattices. The variation in the cross-sectional geometry in TMP results in re-entrant shapes, contributing to auxeticity. To control the mechanical properties and buckling deformation, the thicknesses of the origami sheets are graded, as shown in Fig. 1(c). As an example of graded thickness, the thickness increases from the bottom to the top of the origami sheets in TMP. This distribution of thickness influences buckling deformation.

To demonstrate the control of buckling behavior through functionally graded thickness, TMPs with uniform and graded thickness distributions were designed and manufactured. The TMP was constructed using five sets of upper and lower origami sheets, defined by the geometrical parameters l = m = d = 12.5 mm, α = 65 ° and R = 47.8 %, as employed in a prior study to realize auxetic structures.30 This configuration is depicted in Figs. 2(a-1)2(a-3), where the heights of both TMPs are 130 mm. For reasonable comparison, the thickness distributions in TMP are designed such that the average thickness among the TMPs is 1.5 mm. The structure in Fig. 2(a-1) has a 1.5 mm uniform thickness, and those in Figs. 2(a-2) and 2(a-3) have thickness distributions of t1.0– t2.0 and t0.5– t2.5, respectively.

FIG. 2.

Uniform and functionally graded thickness distribution in a Tachi–Miura polyhedron for fabrication via 3D printing: (a-1) exhibits a t1.5-mm uniform thickness; (a-2) and (a-3) exhibit thickness distributions of t1.0– t2.0 and t0.5– t2.5, respectively; (b-1)–(b-3) are fabricated structures of (a-1)–(a-3), respectively, achieved using 3D printing. The masses of the test pieces shown in (b-1)–(b-3) used in this study are 428.8, 417.1, and 415.5 g, respectively.

FIG. 2.

Uniform and functionally graded thickness distribution in a Tachi–Miura polyhedron for fabrication via 3D printing: (a-1) exhibits a t1.5-mm uniform thickness; (a-2) and (a-3) exhibit thickness distributions of t1.0– t2.0 and t0.5– t2.5, respectively; (b-1)–(b-3) are fabricated structures of (a-1)–(a-3), respectively, achieved using 3D printing. The masses of the test pieces shown in (b-1)–(b-3) used in this study are 428.8, 417.1, and 415.5 g, respectively.

Close modal

As illustrated in Figs. 2(b-1)2(b-3), the designed TMPs were fabricated using a commercial fused filament fabrication type 3D printer (Markforged, Onyx Pro) and commercially available Nylon filament (Markforged, Nylon White). The filament had a diameter of 1.75 mm, and the pitch for stacking materials was set at 0.2 mm. The tubular structure of the TMPs was oriented vertically against the bed of the 3D printer, allowing fabrication without the need for supporting materials. Figure 3 indicates the average mass of the three test pieces used for the dynamic testing with different velocities. As the average thickness are same in the designed TMPs, the masses of the fabricated structures were approximately identical.

FIG. 3.

Average mass of the test pieces fabricated by 3D printing. The average mass is approximately identical for a fair comparison between test pieces with uniform and graded thicknesses.

FIG. 3.

Average mass of the test pieces fabricated by 3D printing. The average mass is approximately identical for a fair comparison between test pieces with uniform and graded thicknesses.

Close modal

Importantly, the materials were utilized in a water-absorbed state to prevent fracture, as water absorption induces a transition in nylon from a glassy state to a rubbery state. Therefore, the test pieces were immersed in water at 50  °C for 20 h before the experiments. Water-absorbed test pieces were extracted and stored in aluminum bags to prevent drying until the experiments began. The stress–strain curves obtained by the three-point bending test of the fabricated rectangular plates are illustrated in Fig. 4, following JIS K7171 (plastics determination of flexural properties). The stress–strain curve indicates that the water-absorbed nylon exhibits ductile material properties with a large elongation before failure. The maximum elongations observed under a high strain rate before failure may be shorter than that achieved via quasi-static testing.40 The basic material properties of the 3D-printed filament need to be further investigated. Young’s modulus identified from the stress–strain curve was 332 MPa. The mass density measured from the rectangular plates used in the three-point bending test was 1162  kg / m 3. Poisson’s ratio of nylon generally is within the range of 0.34–0.43.41 

FIG. 4.

Stress–strain curves of water-absorbed nylon obtained using the three-point bending test. The materials used to fabricate the test pieces facilitate ductile responses.

FIG. 4.

Stress–strain curves of water-absorbed nylon obtained using the three-point bending test. The materials used to fabricate the test pieces facilitate ductile responses.

Close modal

To demonstrate the control of buckling behavior through functionally graded thickness, the buckling deformation of TMP under dynamic loading was observed using the experimental setup depicted in Fig. 5. The 3D-printed test pieces were affixed to a rigid wall using cords, with a load cell positioned behind the rigid wall. The load cell is protected by bars to prevent high-load input to the load cell when the energy absorption of the test pieces is insufficient. The impactor, propelled by compressed air, was introduced from the right side, as shown in Fig. 5. The impact mass was fixed as 103.15 kg and impact energy was controlled using projection velocities. To study the effects of impact velocity, three types of projection velocity were selected: 3.4, 6.3, and 8.5 m/s (Corresponding strain rates are 26.2, 48.5, and 65.4.). First, the impact energy at a 3.4 m/s velocity was selected as the resulting deformation was smaller than half the height of the specimen, and this system was used to compare the small deformations of three samples. The impact energy with a 6.3 m/s velocity was selected to observe further large deformations including the densification of the test pieces. Finally, the 8.5 m/s velocity was selected to deform the entire structure. In addition to the effect of velocities, the repetitive use of fabricated test pieces was investigated by repeating the 3.4 m/s injection five times for the same test pieces, where a low velocity was selected to safely repeat dynamic loading. Given that the strain rate of compression in this experiment falls within the range of 10 1, the test is categorized as a dynamic-low velocity experiment.42 Due to mechanical resonances associated with dynamic-low velocity impacts, the noise by resonances in measured data is removed by a low-pass filter with a cutoff frequency of 1000 Hz. The deformation of the test pieces was recorded using a high-speed camera (NAC Image Technology, MEMRECAM fx-K4).

FIG. 5.

Experimental setup for dynamic testing. The impactor is projected from the right side by compressed air. The impact mass is 103.15 kg. The speeds of the projection are 3.4, 6.3, and 8.5 m/s.

FIG. 5.

Experimental setup for dynamic testing. The impactor is projected from the right side by compressed air. The impact mass is 103.15 kg. The speeds of the projection are 3.4, 6.3, and 8.5 m/s.

Close modal

The results of dynamic testing with impact velocities of 3.4, 6.3, and 8.5 m/s are analyzed to investigate the influence of functionally graded thickness on buckling behavior and force responses. Figure 6 shows the experimental results of dynamic testing under 3.4 m/s impacts. In TMPs with uniform thickness, force responses promptly increase after impact due to auxetic deformation, continuing up to approximately a 10 mm displacement. Subsequently, the force response plateaus, indicative of global buckling occurring around a 30 mm displacement. Here, the global buckling deformation has a high-order mode characterized by an S-like shape. In the traditional theory of Euler buckling, high-order modes are produced by applying external constraints at inflection points on columns with a slender aspect ratio.43 In this experiment, the test pieces have a slender aspect ratio due to dynamic changes in the cross-sectional area caused by shrinking following auxetic deformation after impact. Furthermore, the shrinking by auxetic deformation also densifies the center of the origami lattice, constraining the deflection at the inflection point of the S-like shapes of the structures. In addition, the local buckling of microstructures can bring the eigenvalues of higher-order modes close to the first mode, which is demonstrated as the programmable higher-order mode in Euler buckling using hierarchical structures.44 In contrast, TMPs with functionally graded thickness exhibit partial auxetic deformation originating from the small-thickness layer closest to the impact point, resulting in gradual increases in force responses. The non-symmetric deformation in TMPs with functionally graded thickness prevents global buckling, leading to unbounded force responses. Notably, both TMPs, with uniform and graded thickness, demonstrate the ability to absorb the entire impact energy and recover after reaching the maximum displacement, as illustrated in Fig. 6.

FIG. 6.

Force response and buckling deformation induced by 3.4 m/s impact. Uniform thickness generates global auxetic deformation after impact. In contrast, the functionally graded thickness partially generates auxetic deformation from contact layers, leading to gradual increases in force responses.

FIG. 6.

Force response and buckling deformation induced by 3.4 m/s impact. Uniform thickness generates global auxetic deformation after impact. In contrast, the functionally graded thickness partially generates auxetic deformation from contact layers, leading to gradual increases in force responses.

Close modal

Subsequently, force responses and buckling deformation resulting from a 6.3 m/s impact are presented in Fig. 7. As the 6.3 m/s impact inputs higher energy to the test pieces than the 3.4 m/s impact, larger displacements are required to absorb the entire impact energy. Consequently, such displacements induce densification of the test pieces after approximately a 40 mm displacement, resulting in high-force responses. Specifically, the functionally graded thickness causes the high-force responses to compensate for the lack of energy absorption caused by small forces at small displacements. Particularly in test pieces with functionally graded thicknesses from 0.5 to 2.5 mm, the high-force responses lead to the formation of cracks at approximately a 70 mm displacement.

FIG. 7.

Force response and buckling deformation induced by a 6.3 m/s impact. Under a uniform thickness, high-energy impact requires large displacements to absorb all of the energy, causing densification of the structure after a 40 mm displacement. In addition, the functionally graded thickness increases force responses to compensate for the lack of energy absorption at small displacements when the graded thickness ranges from 0.5 to 2.5 mm, causing cracking at a displacement of approximately 70 mm of the test pieces.

FIG. 7.

Force response and buckling deformation induced by a 6.3 m/s impact. Under a uniform thickness, high-energy impact requires large displacements to absorb all of the energy, causing densification of the structure after a 40 mm displacement. In addition, the functionally graded thickness increases force responses to compensate for the lack of energy absorption at small displacements when the graded thickness ranges from 0.5 to 2.5 mm, causing cracking at a displacement of approximately 70 mm of the test pieces.

Close modal

Force responses and buckling deformation resulting from the 8.5 m/s impact are shown in Fig. 8. The force responses and buckling deformations before the densification process (corresponding to approximately an 80 mm displacement) are approximately identical to the experimental results with a 6.3 m/s impact velocity. For instance, cracking occurs at approximately a 70 mm displacement of the test pieces with a thickness graded from 0.5 to 2.5 mm. In contrast, the fabricated test pieces cannot absorb the entire energy of impact at a 8.5 m/s velocity, resulting in a significant increase in the force responses via densification of the origami lattices at displacements from 80 to 100 mm. During the densification stage, the force responses were similar among the three test pieces because the designed mechanical properties were altered by densification. The remaining impact energy was dissipated by collision with the bars for the protection of the load cells. Therefore, the recovered process was not evaluated in the 8.5 m/s experiments.

FIG. 8.

Force response and buckling deformation induced by 8.5 m/s impact. The fabricated test pieces can not absorb the entire energy of impact with 8.5 m/s velocity. The remaining impact energy is dissipated by collision with the bars for the protection of load cells. Therefore, the recovered process was not evaluated in the 8.5 m/s experiments.

FIG. 8.

Force response and buckling deformation induced by 8.5 m/s impact. The fabricated test pieces can not absorb the entire energy of impact with 8.5 m/s velocity. The remaining impact energy is dissipated by collision with the bars for the protection of load cells. Therefore, the recovered process was not evaluated in the 8.5 m/s experiments.

Close modal

Although the strain rate in these dynamic loadings was on the order of 10 1, higher strain rates could achieve different results. For instance, the impact resulting from a strain rate of 10 3 10 5 causes plastic wave propagation, while strain rates exceeding 10 5 cause shock wave propagation.42Video files in the supplementary material provide detailed motions of the TMPs.

TMPs with uniform thickness exhibit highly efficient energy absorption, maximizing the area under the force-displacement curves by bounding maximum forces to prevent structural fracture. This force response is well-suited for applications in energy absorption structures. Conversely, the functionally graded thickness does not bind the force by avoiding global buckling as a result of partial auxetic deformation. The non-uniform mechanical responses achieved by controlling buckling are the main advantage of auxetic structures with a functional thickness because non-uniform responses are often required in engineering applications. For instance, structures, such as protective gear, packaging materials, and automotive systems for crash safety, that ensure protection require a gradual transition between hardness and softness. In addition, non-uniform responses are also essential in improving the comfortability of products such as seats, helmets, and wearable devices by balancing softness with comfort and hardness for support. Therefore, the functionally graded thickness in TMPs broadens the range of force responses in auxetic structures by controlling buckling behavior, thereby expanding the potential applications of auxetic structures.

To assess the potential for repetitive use, a dynamic test with a 3.4 m/s impact was conducted five times for each TMP with uniform and functionally graded thicknesses, as illustrated in Fig. 6. The corresponding force responses are presented in Fig. 9. In all instances, the impact energy was entirely absorbed during the first to fifth impacts. However, a larger displacement was necessary to absorb the entire impact energy after the second impact, attributed to softened force responses. Specifically, the force responses of the TMP with uniform thickness softened after the second impact due to sustained plastic deformation resulting from global buckling. In contrast, the force responses of TMP with functionally graded thickness stabilized after the third impact. Importantly, none of the test pieces experienced fracture during repetitive use under the 3.4 m/s impact. Therefore, repetitive auxetic deformations with functionally graded thickness can be achieved using 3D-printed test pieces, indicating the potential for repetitive applications in energy absorption and cushioning structures through 3D printing technology under low-velocity impacts. To realize the repetitive use of these structures under high-velocity impacts, materials with high strength must be used to avoid cracking.

FIG. 9.

Effect of repeated impact on force response induced by 3.4 m/s impact. (a) has t1.5 mm uniform thickness; (b) and (c) have thickness distribution from t1.0 to t2.0 and from t0.5 to t2.5, respectively.

FIG. 9.

Effect of repeated impact on force response induced by 3.4 m/s impact. (a) has t1.5 mm uniform thickness; (b) and (c) have thickness distribution from t1.0 to t2.0 and from t0.5 to t2.5, respectively.

Close modal

This study delves into the manipulation of buckling behavior through functionally graded thickness in origami-inspired auxetic structures. In auxetic structures with uniform thickness, forces increase due to auxetic deformation following an impact, with the force bounded after bifurcation buckling, resulting in a global-S-like shape.

In contrast, functionally graded thickness leads to the gradual generation of localized buckling, characterized by partial auxeticity, preserving auxetic behavior throughout the deformation process. Therefore, the introduction of varying thicknesses in auxetic structures allows for a spectrum of buckling behaviors and force responses. The plateaued forces resulting from global buckling are advantageous for energy absorption, as the area under force responses is maximized within the constraints of maximum force, while gradual force increases were ideal for cushioning applications.

Furthermore, 3D-printed functionally graded origami lattices using nylon materials could sustain force responses after repeated dynamic loading, suggesting potential repetitive uses in energy absorption or cushioning structures. Therefore, the incorporation of functionally graded thickness in auxetic structures presents opportunities for diverse practical applications, offering versatile load-response characteristics.

See the supplementary material for the videos related to Figs. 6–8.

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Dr. Hidekazu Nishigaki, Dr. Masato Tanaka, and Dr. Shoko Arita at Toyota Central R & D Labs, Inc. for their valuable advice.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

S. Tomita: Conceptualization (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (lead); Visualization (lead); Writing – original draft (lead). K. Shimanuki: Investigation (equal). K. Umemoto: Conceptualization (equal); Supervision (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
K.
Bertoldi
,
V.
Vitelli
,
J.
Christensen
, and
M.
Van Hecke
, “
Flexible mechanical metamaterials
,”
Nat. Rev. Mater.
2
,
17066
(
2017
).
2.
L.
Yanping
and
H.
Hong
, “
A review on auxetic structures and polymeric materials
,”
Sci. Res. Essays
5
,
1052
1063
(
2010
).
3.
Z.
Jia
,
F.
Liu
,
X.
Jiang
, and
L.
Wang
, “
Engineering lattice metamaterials for extreme property, programmability, and multifunctionality
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
127
,
150901
(
2020
).
4.
R.
Lakes
, “
Foam structures with a negative Poisson’s ratio
,”
Science
235
,
1038
1040
(
1987
).
5.
R.
Lakes
and
K.
Elms
, “
Indentability of conventional and negative Poisson’s ratio foams
,”
J. Compos. Mater.
27
,
1193
1202
(
1993
).
6.
G. N.
Greaves
,
A. L.
Greer
,
R. S.
Lakes
, and
T.
Rouxel
, “
Poisson’s ratio and modern materials
,”
Nat. Mater.
10
,
823
837
(
2011
).
7.
F.
Scarpa
and
P. J.
Tomlin
, “
On the transverse shear modulus of negative Poisson’s ratio honeycomb structures
,”
Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct.
23
,
717
720
(
2000
).
8.
J.
Ju
and
J. D.
Summers
, “
Compliant hexagonal periodic lattice structures having both high shear strength and high shear strain
,”
Mater. Des.
32
,
512
524
(
2011
).
9.
J. P.
Donoghue
,
K. L.
Alderson
, and
K. E.
Evans
, “
The fracture toughness of composite laminates with a negative Poisson’s ratio
,”
Phys. Status Solidi B
246
,
2011
2017
(
2009
).
10.
Z.
Zhou
,
J.
Zhou
, and
H.
Fan
, “
Plastic analyses of thin-walled steel honeycombs with re-entrant deformation style
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng., A
688
,
123
133
(
2017
).
11.
R.
La Magna
and
J.
Knippers
, “Tailoring the bending behaviour of material patterns for the induction of double curvature,” in Humanizing Digital Reality: Design Modelling Symposium Paris 2017 (Springer, Singapore, 2018), pp. 441–452.
12.
J.
Zhang
,
G.
Lu
, and
Z.
You
, “
Large deformation and energy absorption of additively manufactured auxetic materials and structures: A review
,”
Composites, Part B
201
,
108340
(
2020
).
13.
X. C.
Teng
,
X.
Ren
,
Y.
Zhang
,
W.
Jiang
,
Y.
Pan
,
X. G.
Zhang
,
X. Y.
Zhang
, and
Y. M.
Xie
, “
A simple 3D re-entrant auxetic metamaterial with enhanced energy absorption
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
229
,
107524
(
2022
).
14.
W.
Wu
,
W.
Hu
,
G.
Qian
,
H.
Liao
,
X.
Xu
, and
F.
Berto
, “
Mechanical design and multifunctional applications of chiral mechanical metamaterials: A review
,”
Mater. Des.
180
,
107950
(
2019
).
15.
F.
Auricchio
,
A.
Bacigalupo
,
L.
Gambarotta
,
M.
Lepidi
,
S.
Morganti
, and
F.
Vadalà
, “
A novel layered topology of auxetic materials based on the tetrachiral honeycomb microstructure
,”
Mater. Des.
179
,
107883
(
2019
).
16.
C.
Yang
,
H. D.
Vora
, and
Y.
Chang
, “
Behavior of auxetic structures under compression and impact forces
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
27
,
025012
(
2018
).
17.
J. X.
Qiao
and
C. Q.
Chen
, “
Impact resistance of uniform and functionally graded auxetic double arrowhead honeycombs
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
83
,
47
58
(
2015
).
18.
C.
Lv
,
D.
Krishnaraju
,
G.
Konjevod
,
H.
Yu
, and
H.
Jiang
, “
Origami based mechanical metamaterials
,”
Sci. Rep.
4
,
5979
(
2014
).
19.
S.
Kamrava
,
D.
Mousanezhad
,
H.
Ebrahimi
,
R.
Ghosh
, and
A.
Vaziri
, “
Origami-based cellular metamaterial with auxetic, bistable, and self-locking properties
,”
Sci. Rep.
7
,
46046
(
2017
).
20.
M.
Schenk
,
S. D.
Guest
, and
G. J.
McShane
, “
Novel stacked folded cores for blast-resistant sandwich beams
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
51
,
4196
4214
(
2014
).
21.
X.
Zhou
,
S.
Zang
, and
Z.
You
, “
Origami mechanical metamaterials based on the Miura-derivative fold patterns
,”
Proc. R. Soc. A
472
,
20160361
(
2016
).
22.
T.
Mukhopadhyay
,
J.
Ma
,
H.
Feng
,
D.
Hou
,
J. M.
Gattas
,
Y.
Chen
, and
Z.
You
, “
Programmable stiffness and shape modulation in origami materials: Emergence of a distant actuation feature
,”
Appl. Mater. Today
19
,
100537
(
2020
).
23.
K.
Kuribayashi
,
K.
Tsuchiya
,
Z.
You
,
D.
Tomus
,
M.
Umemoto
,
T.
Ito
, and
M.
Sasaki
, “
Self-deployable origami stent grafts as a biomedical application of Mi-rich tini shape memory alloy foil
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
419
,
131
137
(
2006
).
24.
C. D.
Onal
,
R. J.
Wood
, and
D.
Rus
, “
An origami-inspired approach to worm robots
,”
IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron.
18
,
430
438
(
2013
).
25.
K.
Miura
and
T.
Tachi
, “
Synthesis of rigid-foldable cylindrical polyhedra
,” in
Eighth Congress and Exhibition of the International Society for the Interdisciplinary Study of Symmetry
(International Society for the Interdisciplinary Study of Symmetry,
2010
), pp. 204–213.
26.
T.
Tachi
and
K.
Miura
, “
Rigid-foldable cylinders and cells
,”
J. Int. Assoc. Shell Spatial Struct.
53
,
217
226
(
2012
).
27.
H.
Yasuda
,
T.
Yein
,
T.
Tachi
,
K.
Miura
, and
M.
Taya
, “
Folding behaviour of Tachi–Miura polyhedron bellows
,”
Proc. R. Soc. A
469
,
20130351
(
2013
).
28.
H.
Yasuda
,
B.
Gopalarethinam
,
T.
Kunimine
,
T.
Tachi
, and
J.
Yang
, “
Origami-based cellular structures with in situ transition between collapsible and load-bearing configurations
,”
Adv. Eng. Mater.
21
,
1900562
(
2019
).
29.
H.
Wang
,
D.
Zhao
,
Y.
Jin
,
M.
Wang
,
T.
Mukhopadhyay
, and
Z.
You
, “
Modulation of multi-directional auxeticity in hybrid origami metamaterials
,”
Appl. Mater. Today
20
,
100715
(
2020
).
30.
S.
Tomita
,
K.
Shimanuki
,
H.
Nishigaki
,
S.
Oyama
,
T.
Sasagawa
,
D.
Murai
, and
K.
Umemoto
, “
Origami-inspired metamaterials with switchable energy absorption based on bifurcated motions of a Tachi–Miura polyhedron
,”
Mater. Des.
225
,
111497
(
2023
).
31.
S.
Tomita
,
K.
Shimanuki
,
S.
Oyama
,
H.
Nishigaki
,
T.
Nakagawa
,
M.
Tsutsui
,
Y.
Emura
,
M.
Chino
,
H.
Tanaka
,
Y.
Itou
, and
K.
Umemoto
, “
Transition of deformation modes from bending to auxetic compression in origami-based metamaterials for head protection from impact
,”
Sci. Rep.
13
,
12221
(
2023
).
32.
W.
Hou
,
X.
Yang
,
W.
Zhang
, and
Y.
Xia
, “
Design of energy-dissipating structure with functionally graded auxetic cellular material
,”
Int. J. Crashworthiness
23
,
366
376
(
2018
).
33.
H. L.
Tan
,
Z. C.
He
,
E.
Li
,
X. W.
Tan
,
A. G.
Cheng
, and
Q. Q.
Li
, “
Energy absorption characteristics of three-layered sandwich panels with graded re-entrant hierarchical honeycombs cores
,”
Aerosp. Sci. Technol.
106
,
106073
(
2020
).
34.
J.
Ma
,
J.
Song
, and
Y.
Chen
, “
An origami-inspired structure with graded stiffness
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
136
,
134
142
(
2018
).
35.
L.
Yuan
,
H.
Dai
,
J.
Song
,
J.
Ma
, and
Y.
Chen
, “
The behavior of a functionally graded origami structure subjected to quasi-static compression
,”
Mater. Des.
189
,
108494
(
2020
).
36.
Q.
Li
,
X.
Zhi
, and
F.
Fan
, “
Dynamic crushing of uniform and functionally graded origami-inspired cellular structure fabricated by SLM
,”
Eng. Struct.
262
,
114327
(
2022
).
37.
L.
Wang
,
K.
Saito
,
Y.
Gotou
, and
Y.
Okabe
, “
Design and fabrication of aluminum honeycomb structures based on origami technology
,”
J. Sandwich Struct. Mater.
21
,
1224
1242
(
2019
).
38.
Q.
Ge
,
C. K.
Dunn
,
H. J.
Qi
, and
M. L.
Dunn
, “
Active origami by 4D printing
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
23
,
094007
(
2014
).
39.
D.
Naritomi
,
N.
Hosoya
,
G.
Ando
,
S.
Maeda
, and
H.
Shigemune
, “
Creation of origami-inspired honeycomb structure using self-folding paper
,”
Mater. Des.
223
,
111146
(
2022
).
40.
T.
Letcher
and
M.
Waytashek
, “Material property testing of 3D-printed specimen in PLA on an entry-level 3D printer,” in ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Vol. 2A: Advanced Manufacturing V02AT02A014 (ASME, 2014).
41.
D.
Rosato
and
D.
Rosato
, “Design parameter,” in Plastics Engineered Product Design, edited by D. Rosato and D. Rosato (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2003), Chap. 3, pp. 161–197.
42.
T.
Yu
and
X.
Qiu
,
Introduction to Impact Dynamics
(
John Wiley & Sons
,
2018
).
43.
S. P.
Timoshenko
and
J. M.
Gere
,
Theory of Elastic Stability
(
McGraw-Hill Book Company, Incorporated
,
1936
).
44.
M. G.
Tarantino
and
K.
Danas
, “
Programmable higher-order Euler buckling modes in hierarchical beams
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
167
,
170
183
(
2019
).