Ferroic materials exhibit long-range order with respect to their elastic, electric, or magnetic properties, giving rise to fascinating physics and functional properties that are used in, e.g., state-of-the-art sensor technology, energy harvesting, and medical diagnosis. Despite more than 100 years of research on ferroics, this class of materials remains an exciting playground for both fundamental and applied research studies, and it is safe to predict that this trend will continue. Recent examples for the special behaviors of ferroic materials that have inspired the community are the discovery of topologically protected electric1 and magnetic2,3 skyrmions, negative capacitance,4,5 and resistive switching.6,7 Progress in the field of ferroics is propelled by the remarkable evolution that has taken place in both experimental investigations and theory, making it possible to explore the physical properties of ferroic materials with unprecedented completeness down to the length scale of individual atoms. In addition, improved synthesis methods and in situ characterization tools applied during growth allow for stabilizing novel exotic phases and artificial heterostructures to engineer ferroic properties.8,9 These capabilities have opened the door for new science and conceptually different technologies, promoting innovative fields such as low-energy spintronics10 and multi-level data storage for neuromorphic computing and next-generation nanotechnology.

Many of the current challenges, however, still fall into the basic research sector, and it is clear that we have only scratched the tip of the iceberg regarding the rich emergent nanoscale phenomena in ferroics. This is the motivation for the Special Topic on Domains and Domain Walls in Ferroic Materials. The functional response of any ferroic material inevitably relates to the formation and/or manipulation of domains and domain walls. Thus, their control via the crystallographic structure, size effects, strain, and electrostatic conditions is one of the key aspects within the field. In this Guest Editorial, we will provide a short introduction to the basic concepts and the fundamental questions that drive the modern research on ferroic domains and domain walls. In addition, a short overview of different topics covered by the articles in the Special Topic will be provided.

Ferroics are defined by their elastic, electric, or magnetic order, which spontaneously arise across a non-disruptive phase transition.11 In ferroelectrics, for example, electric dipoles align giving rise to spontaneous polarization, whereas collinear arrangements of spins lead to macroscopic magnetization in ferromagnets. Depending on the microscopic interactions that drive the order, however, much more complex structures can arise. Going beyond the primary types of ferroic order—namely, ferromagnetism, ferroelectricity, ferroelasticity, and ferrotoroidicity12—a plethora of anti-ferroic phases exists. In fact, the majority of magnetically ordered systems are antiferromagnetic. Another interesting class of ferroic materials are multiferroics.13 In multiferroics, at least two types of ferroic order are present in the same phase, which can lead to unusual correlation phenomena, including pronounced magnetoelectric and magnetocapacitance effects.14 Independent of the nature of the long-range order, the order parameter(s) that describe the ferroic phase can point in at least two symmetrically equivalent directions between which it can be switched by the application of a conjugate field. When cooling into the ordered state, the symmetry equivalent directions have the same energy so that two or more order parameter orientations will occur. Regions with the same orientation of the order parameter are called domains, and the interfaces that separate them are the domain walls.15,16

Originally, ferroics-based device concepts mainly utilized the magnetic domains. Here, the basic idea is to use ferroic domains with opposite order parameters to store information, representing information bits “1” and “0.” This approach enabled magnetic recording with magnetic wires and tapes and, later, in magnetic hard disk drives.17 Eventually, this concept developed as the foundation for ferroelectric random-access memory and field-effect transistors,18,19 where the polarization of ferroelectrics is utilized for data storage. Promising new candidate materials that have the potential to revolutionize these technologies are two-dimensional (2D) electric20 and magnetic21 ferroics, offering novel opportunities for domain control and the design of power-efficient electronics devices.

Ferroic domain walls began to move into focus with the advent of racetrack-type memory technology. In the original concept, information is still stored in ferromagnetic domains;22 however, it is the domain walls and their specific interactions with spin currents that enable the motion of bits along the track, which distinguished this technology from previous approaches. Today, it is established that ferroic domain walls represent outstanding functional nano-entities with unique physical properties, which are exploited in the rapidly expanding field of domain-wall nanoelectronics.16,23 Due to their low local symmetry and the distinct structural, electric, or magnetic environment, ferroic domain walls can behave substantially differently than the surrounding domains. For example, ferromagnetic domain walls can form in otherwise antiferromagnetic systems,24,25 and insulating materials can develop highly conducting domain walls (Fig. 1).26–28 These discoveries are driving the research activities on ferroics toward the local scale and facilitate conceptually new nanotechnology concepts;16,23,29 ferroic domain walls are either leveraged as active elements within devices30–32 or the domain walls themselves become the device, emulating the behavior of electronic components at the atomic scale.33,34 In a more recent development, this trend has been expanded toward other types of nanoscale objects in ferroics, exploring local functional properties that arise due to specific types of point defects and topologically non-trivial structures, such as disclinations, dislocations, vortices, and skyrmions,1,23,35–40 offering completely new and exciting perspectives for both fundamental and applied research on ferroic materials.

FIG. 1.

Piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) amplitude (top) and conductive atomic force microscopy (cAFM) current map (bottom) of an epitaxial BiFeO3 thin film deposited on the La0.67Sr0.33MnO3-buffered SrTiO3 (001) substrate, showing conductive domain walls. Image courtesy of Q. Zhang and D. Sando, University of New South Wales (UNSW).

FIG. 1.

Piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) amplitude (top) and conductive atomic force microscopy (cAFM) current map (bottom) of an epitaxial BiFeO3 thin film deposited on the La0.67Sr0.33MnO3-buffered SrTiO3 (001) substrate, showing conductive domain walls. Image courtesy of Q. Zhang and D. Sando, University of New South Wales (UNSW).

Close modal

Ferroic domains are of direct interest as small-sized units for processing or storing information as briefly discussed in Sec. II. Technological opportunities are, however, much wider and domains offer multiple avenues for the development of tunable devices. Thus, understanding their formation and local responses to external stimuli is of essential interest for the field. Kondovych et al. study the domain formation of ferroelectric domains under local electric fields in thin films with in-plane polarization.41 Govinden et al. investigate the impact of depolarization fields on ferroelectric domains,42 while strain43 and thickness44 effects are discussed in the works by Ichinose et al. and Feng et al., respectively. Utilizing the impact of varying structural boundary conditions on ferroelectric domains, Geng et al. control polar nanodomains in BiFeO3 multilayers,45 Chen et al. manipulate ferroelectric domains in patterned arrays of Pb(Zr0.7,Ti0.3)O3 (PZT) nanoislands,46 and Picht et al. apply grain size effects in PZT ceramics.47 Domain engineering in LiNbO3 by electron beam irradiation is discussed by Kokhanchik and co-workers,48 and the relation between the temperature and the electric-field response of ferroelectric domains in LiNbO3 is studied by Liu et al.49 Monodomain states in ferroelectric heterostructures50 and new opportunities for controlling the ferroelectric order via superlattice structures51 are addressed in the work by Mahjoub et al. and Strkalj et al., respectively. Going beyond local aspects, domain engineering is well-established and widely applied to control the response of ferroic materials at the macro-scale. To better understand the relation between structure, mesoscopic-scale domains, and macroscopic properties, Zhao et al. study the domain structure under electric fields in (1−x)Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3-(x)BaTiO3 ceramics52 and Nishiyama et al. measure the large-signal piezoelectric properties of (Li,Na,K)NbO3-based ceramics under combined electrical and mechanical loadings.53 

The collection of research articles is extended toward magnetism by Tianen and Jin, who revisit the cellular magnetic domains in Fe–Ga alloys,54 and antiferromagnetic disks are analyzed by Silva et al. with a focus on magnetic skyrmions and their dynamics.55 Cross coupling phenomena between electric fields and magnetic domains are tackled by Antipin et al. by studying the electric-field-induced formation of magnetic domains in iron garnet thin films.56 Ghidini and co-workers transfer voltage-driven strain to polycrystalline Ni films using a single-crystal PMN–PT substrate, demonstrating a new potential pathway toward low-power magnetoelectric memory technology.57 The coexistence of multiple (anti-)ferroic order parameters and related magnetic domains in hexaferrites are investigated by Ueda et al., shedding new light on magnetoelectric coupling in multiferroics.58 Using pulsed laser deposition, Liu et al. synthesize multiferroic Bi2FeCrO6 thin films and study the ferroelectric domain structures and their response to electrical fields.59 

In addition to the fundamental physical properties of ferroic domains, their characterization by different microscopy tools is covered in the Special Topic. A comprehensive tutorial about piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) imaging and local hysteresis loop measurement is given by Hong.60 Hiranaga et al. propose scanning nonlinear dielectric microscopy for visualizing ferroelectric switching,61 and Solís Canto and co-workers explore the impact of the cantilever spring constant and frequency in PFM-based domain studies using BiFeO3 as an instructive model system.62 Furthermore, the perspective of Park et al. takes an application-oriented view of devices with a focus on fluorite-structured ferroelectrics, discussing the state of the art of the field, open challenges, and future opportunities.63 

The emergence of superconductivity at ferroelastic domain walls,26 enhanced electronic conductivity at ferroelectric domain walls,27 and pronounced spin torque effects at ferromagnetic domain walls64 are fascinating examples for the functional phenomena that arise at ferroic domain walls. For readers interested in a broader introduction to the fundamentals, the physical properties of ferroic domain walls and related device applications, we refer to recent review articles that address these particular aspects.16,23,29,31,32,65,66 In this Special Topic, a snapshot of current research directions is presented that reflects the broad activities, ranging from advanced characterization techniques and property analysis to novel application opportunities. In their tutorial, Cherifi-Hertel et al. discuss second harmonic generation (SHG) as a powerful tool for studying ferroelectric domain walls, which provides access to the three-dimensional domain wall structure and their local symmetry.67 Yokota and Uesu apply SHG to ferroelastic walls, comparing the local nonlinear optical response at domain walls in CaTiO3, LaAlO3, Pb3(PO4)2, and BiVO4.68 Novel insight into the contrast formation in SHG microscopy experiments at domain walls is presented by Spychala et al.69 By combining PFM, three-dimensional x-ray diffraction, and phase-field simulations, Schmidbauer et al. study the 3D patterns of ferroelectric domain walls in K0.9Na0.1NbO3.70 A tutorial about scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for domain wall investigations and opportunities that arise when correlating SEM with other techniques, such as focused ion beam (FIB) and atom probe tomography, is presented by Hunnestad et al.71 To resolve differences at the atomic scale between charged and uncharged domain walls in BiFeO3 ceramics, Condurache et al. apply high-angle annular-dark-field scanning-transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM).72 

Emergent physical phenomena at ferroic domain walls, the progress in measuring their properties, and the potential of ferroelastic domain walls for the development of new device concepts are discussed by Salje.73 One interesting example is the polar properties that arise at anti-phase boundaries in SrTiO3 and PbZrO3, which are scrutinized by Schranz et al.74 An innovative approach for stabilizing charged ferroelastic domain walls via self-assembled nano-islands in BiFeO3 is presented by Chen et al.75 Puntigam et al. demonstrate that insulating improper ferroelectric domain walls in hexagonal manganites (Fig. 2) give rise to an internal barrier layer capacitance, which may be used for engineering materials with colossal dielectric permittivities.76 In Fe-doped BaTiO3, Noguchi et al. report domain walls contributing to the overall photo-voltaic response77 and Lundh et al. investigate local heating effects that arise due to electric-field driven domain wall movements in PZT thin films.78 The possibility of pinning ferroelectric domain walls via defects in BiFeO3 thin films to achieve improved polarization retention is explored by Zhang and co-workers.79 

FIG. 2.

Network of conducting (bright) and insulating (dark) ferroelectric domain walls in the hexagonal manganite ErMnO3 mapped by conductive atomic force microscopy. Image courtesy of J. Schultheiß and D. Meier, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).

FIG. 2.

Network of conducting (bright) and insulating (dark) ferroelectric domain walls in the hexagonal manganite ErMnO3 mapped by conductive atomic force microscopy. Image courtesy of J. Schultheiß and D. Meier, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).

Close modal

Liu et al. expand the discussion toward magnetic domain walls and vortices by applying a six-state clock model, analogous to previous studies on ferroelectric domain walls and related topological phenomena in hexagonal manganites.80 A more general discussion about topological structures and related phenomena in ferroelectric oxides is given in the perspective by Ma and co-authors.81 

The dynamic characteristics of ferroic domains and domain walls introduce the element of spatial mobility, allowing for real-time adjustment of their position, morphology, and density. This mobility in combination with the pronounced responses to external stimuli (e.g., strain and electric/magnetic fields) represents an important degree of flexibility that enables control of both the local and macroscopic properties of ferroic materials. Performing systematic studies on chemically doped BiFeO3 ceramics, Makarovic et al. reveal how the density of conducting ferroelectric domain walls impacts the macroscopic nonlinear piezoelectric response.82 Liu et al. synthesize ferroelectric (K,Na)NbO3 ceramics with different concentrations of point defects to control the domain wall motion and investigate the influence of the microstructure and electric properties,83 while Adhikary and Ranjan demonstrate composition-driven changes in the electric field response of (x)Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-(1 − x)K0.5Bi0.5TiO3.84 The growth dynamics of isolated ferroelectric domains with charged domain walls and the formation of self-assembled domain arrays in LiNbO3 are presented by Shur et al.85 By addressing the domain physics in relaxor ferroelectrics, Liu et al. explore the domain structures and electromechanical properties in the a.c. electric field-poled Pb(In0.5Nb0.5)O3–Pb(Mg0.33Nb0.66)O3–PbTiO3.86 In general, ferroic materials exhibit pronounced nonlinear responses, which Riemer and co-authors discuss for the case of different types of ferroelectric materials, including hard and soft systems, as well as relaxors; the physical origins of such nonlinearities, a mathematical formalism for their analysis, and experimental approaches are presented.87 More fundamental theoretical investigations regarding the role of interface boundaries for the formation of two-phase states is presented by Levanyuk et al.88 In addition, dynamical phenomena closely related to domain switching are investigated, such as charge injection and dynamics in PZT and the electroresistance effect in BaTiO3, presented by Wang et al.89 and Zhang et al.,90 respectively.

Another important direction is the research on ferroic systems that do not belong to the perovskite family, searching for novel materials with superior functional properties. Here, hafnium oxide (HfO2)–based compounds play an increasingly important role, promoting fast switching, high scalability, and reduced power consumption. A perspective discussing the switching behavior and the application potential of HfO2-based ferroelectrics is given by Wang et al.91 Park and co-workers look into the specifics of defects in Si-doped HfO2 thin films, concluding a substantial correlation between the switching dynamics and oxygen vacancies.92 Another promising class of materials in this context are ferroelectric wurtzite-type semiconductors, which exhibit a reversible ferroelectric polarization as Wolff et al. show at the unit cell length scale for Al0.75Sc0.25N thin films.93 

In summary, the research on ferroic materials has substantially grown, but it is still far from being fully explored. Novel phases, physical effects, and functional properties are continuously discovered, and the exploration of new systems often goes hand in hand with technological breakthroughs. Considering the trends in the field, the development of 2D ferroic materials sticks out as an appealing pathway toward a new generation of ferroic-based electronics as discussed in the perspective on 2D layered materials by Li et al.94 In addition to improved electronic performance, sustainability aspects will play in the future a more and more important role for the research on ferroics and materials science in general. This new focus on sustainability will impose conceptually different challenges and requires new ways of thinking that inevitably will drive the field into unexplored directions; most importantly, it will give us the chance to revise our scientific strategies and establish novel functional ferroic materials for a more sustainable future.

The guest editors thank all authors for contributing to the “Domains and Domain Walls in Ferroic Materials” Special Topic of the Journal of Applied Physics, as well as the reviewers, journal editors, and the staff for handling the submissions.

1.
S.
Das
 et al, “
Observation of room-temperature polar skyrmions
,”
Nature
568
,
368
372
(
2019
).
2.
S.
Mühlbauer
 et al, “
Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet
,”
Science
323
,
915
919
(
2009
).
3.
A.
Fert
,
N.
Reyren
, and
V.
Cros
, “
Magnetic skyrmions: Advances in physics and potential applications
,”
Nat. Rev. Mater.
2
,
17031
(
2017
).
4.
A. I.
Khan
 et al, “
Negative capacitance in a ferroelectric capacitor
,”
Nat. Mater.
14
,
182
186
(
2015
).
5.
J.
Íñiguez
,
P.
Zubko
,
I.
Luk’yanchuk
, and
A.
Cano
, “
Ferroelectric negative capacitance
,”
Nat. Rev. Mater.
4
,
243
256
(
2019
).
6.
J.
Rodríguez Contreras
 et al, “
Resistive switching in metal–ferroelectric–metal junctions
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
83
,
4595
4597
(
2003
).
7.
A.
Chanthbouala
 et al, “
A ferroelectric memristor
,”
Nat. Mater.
11
,
860
864
(
2012
).
8.
L. W.
Martin
,
Y.-H.
Chu
, and
R.
Ramesh
, “
Advances in the growth and characterization of magnetic, ferroelectric, and multiferroic oxide thin films
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng. R. Rep.
68
,
89
133
(
2010
).
9.
L. W.
Martin
and
A. M.
Rappe
, “
Thin-film ferroelectric materials and their applications
,”
Nat. Rev. Mater.
2
,
16087
(
2017
).
10.
C.
Back
 et al, “
The 2020 skyrmionics roadmap
,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
53
,
363001
(
2020
).
11.
V.
Wadhawan
,
Introduction to Ferroic Materials
(
CRC Press
,
2000
).
12.
B. B.
Van Aken
,
J.-P.
Rivera
,
H.
Schmid
, and
M.
Fiebig
, “
Observation of ferrotoroidic domains
,”
Nature
449
,
702
705
(
2007
).
13.
M.
Fiebig
,
T.
Lottermoser
,
D.
Meier
, and
M.
Trassin
, “
The evolution of multiferroics
,”
Nat. Rev. Mater.
1
,
16046
(
2016
).
14.
T.
Kimura
 et al, “
Magnetic control of ferroelectric polarization
,”
Nature
426
,
55
58
(
2003
).
15.
A.
Tagantsev
,
L. E.
Cross
, and
J.
Fousek
,
Domains in Ferroic Crystals and Thin Films
(
Springer-Verlag
,
2010
).
16.
D.
Meier
,
J.
Seidel
,
M.
Gregg
, and
R.
Ramesh
,
Domain Walls: From Fundamental Properties to Nanotechnology Concepts
(
Oxford University Press
,
2020
).
17.
L. D.
Stevens
, “
The evolution of magnetic storage
,”
IBM J. Res. Dev.
25
,
663
676
(
1981
).
18.
J.
Hoffman
 et al, “
Ferroelectric field effect transistors for memory applications
,”
Adv. Mater.
22
,
2957
2961
(
2010
).
19.
T.
Mikolajick
,
S.
Slesazeck
,
M. H.
Park
, and
U.
Schroeder
, “
Ferroelectric hafnium oxide for ferroelectric random-access memories and ferroelectric field-effect transistors
,”
MRS Bull.
43
,
340
346
(
2018
).
20.
C.
Cui
,
F.
Xue
,
W.-J.
Hu
, and
L.-J.
Li
, “
Two-dimensional materials with piezoelectric and ferroelectric functionalities
,”
NPJ 2D Mater. Appl.
2
,
18
(
2018
).
21.
M.
Gibertini
,
M.
Koperski
,
A. F.
Morpurgo
, and
K. S.
Novoselov
, “
Magnetic 2D materials and heterostructures
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
14
,
408
419
(
2019
).
22.
S. S. P.
Parkin
,
M.
Hayashi
, and
L.
Thomas
, “
Magnetic domain-wall racetrack memory
,”
Science
320
,
190
194
(
2008
).
23.
G. F.
Nataf
 et al, “
Domain-wall engineering and topological defects in ferroelectric and ferroelastic materials
,”
Nat. Rev. Phys.
2
,
634
648
(
2020
).
24.
O.
Hellwig
,
A.
Berger
, and
E. E.
Fullerton
, “
Domain walls in antiferromagnetically coupled multilayer films
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
91
,
197203
(
2003
).
25.
Y.
Geng
,
N.
Lee
,
Y. J.
Choi
,
S.-W.
Cheong
, and
W.
Wu
, “
Collective magnetism at multiferroic vortex domain walls
,”
Nano Lett.
12
,
6055
6059
(
2012
).
26.
A.
Aird
and
E. K. H.
Salje
, “
Sheet superconductivity in twin walls: Experimental evidence of WO3
,”
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
10
,
L377
L380
(
1998
).
27.
J.
Seidel
 et al, “
Conduction at domain walls in oxide multiferroics
,”
Nat. Mater.
8
,
229
234
(
2009
).
28.
D.
Meier
 et al, “
Anisotropic conductance at improper ferroelectric domain walls
,”
Nat. Mater.
11
,
284
288
(
2012
).
29.
G.
Catalan
,
J.
Seidel
,
R.
Ramesh
, and
J. F.
Scott
, “
Domain wall nanoelectronics
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
84
,
119
156
(
2012
).
30.
P.
Sharma
 et al, “
Nonvolatile ferroelectric domain wall memory
,”
Sci. Adv.
3
,
e1700512
(
2017
).
31.
P. S.
Bednyakov
,
B. I.
Sturman
,
T.
Sluka
,
A. K.
Tagantsev
, and
P. V.
Yudin
, “
Physics and applications of charged domain walls
,”
NPJ Comput. Mater.
4
,
65
(
2018
).
32.
A. Q.
Jiang
and
Y.
Zhang
, “
Next-generation ferroelectric domain-wall memories: Principle and architecture
,”
NPG Asia Mater.
11
,
2
(
2019
).
33.
J. A.
Mundy
 et al, “
Functional electronic inversion layers at ferroelectric domain walls
,”
Nat. Mater.
16
,
622
627
(
2017
).
34.
J.
Schaab
 et al, “
Electrical half-wave rectification at ferroelectric domain walls
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
13
,
1028
1034
(
2018
).
35.
D. M.
Evans
 et al, “
Conductivity control via minimally invasive anti-Frenkel defects in a functional oxide
,”
Nat. Mater.
19
,
1195
1200
(
2020
).
36.
D. M.
Evans
 et al, “
Observation of electric-field-induced structural dislocations in a ferroelectric oxide
,”
Nano Lett.
21
,
3386
3392
(
2021
).
37.
J.
Ma
 et al, “
Controllable conductive readout in self-assembled, topologically confined ferroelectric domain walls
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
13
,
947
952
(
2018
).
38.
N.
Balke
 et al, “
Enhanced electric conductivity at ferroelectric vortex cores in BiFeO3
,”
Nat. Phys.
8
,
81
88
(
2012
).
39.
K. C.
Erb
and
J.
Hlinka
, “
Vector, bidirector, and Bloch skyrmion phases induced by structural crystallographic symmetry breaking
,”
Phys. Rev. B
102
,
024110
(
2020
).
40.
J.
Seidel
,
R. K.
Vasudevan
, and
N.
Valanoor
, “
Topological structures in multiferroics—Domain walls, skyrmions and vortices
,”
Adv. Electron. Mater.
2
,
1500292
(
2016
).
41.
S.
Kondovych
,
A.
Gruverman
, and
I.
Luk’yanchuk
, “
Tip-induced domain protrusion in ferroelectric films with in-plane polarization
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
054103
(
2021
).
42.
V.
Govinden
,
Q.
Zhang
,
D.
Sando
, and
N.
Valanoor
, “
Depolarization field tuning of nanoscale ferroelectric domains in (001)PbZr0.4Ti0.6O3/SrTiO3/PbZr0.4Ti0.6O3 epitaxial heterostructures
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
024104
(
2021
).
43.
D.
Ichinose
 et al, “
Domain structure transition in compressively strained (100)/(001) epitaxial tetragonal PZT film
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
024101
(
2021
).
44.
Y. P.
Feng
 et al, “
Thickness-dependent evolution of piezoresponses and a/c domains in [101]-oriented PbTiO3 ferroelectric films
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
224102
(
2020
).
45.
W. R.
Geng
,
Y. L.
Tang
,
Y. L.
Zhu
,
Y. J.
Wang
, and
X. L.
Ma
, “
Boundary conditions control of topological polar nanodomains in epitaxial BiFeO3 (110) multilayered films
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
184103
(
2020
).
46.
H.
Chen
 et al, “
Complex center-type topological domain in ferroelectric nanoislands of rhombohedral Pb(Zr0.7,Ti0.3)O3
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
224103
(
2020
).
47.
G.
Picht
 et al, “
Grain size effects in donor doped lead zirconate titanate ceramics
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
214105
(
2020
).
48.
L. S.
Kokhanchik
,
E. V.
Emelin
,
V. V.
Sirotkin
, and
A. A.
Svintsov
, “
Domain engineering in LiNbO3 crystals by e-beam and features of spatial distribution of electric field: Experiment and computer simulation
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
144101
(
2020
).
49.
Q.
Liu
 et al, “
Temperature dependent domain-wall moving dynamics of lithium niobate during high electric field periodic poling
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
224101
(
2020
).
50.
R.
Mahjoub
,
V.
Nagarajan
, and
J.
Junquera
, “
Structural and electronic properties of monodomain ultrathin PbTiO3/SrTiO3/PbTiO3/SrRuO3 heterostructures: A first-principles approach
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
244102
(
2020
).
51.
N.
Strkalj
 et al, “
Stabilization and manipulation of in-plane polarization in a ferroelectric|dielectric superlattice
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
174104
(
2021
).
52.
J.
Zhao
 et al, “
Evolution of mesoscopic domain structure and macroscopic properties in lead-free Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3-BaTiO3 ferroelectric ceramics
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
084103
(
2021
).
53.
H.
Nishiyama
 et al, “
Electric-field-induced strain of (Li,Na,K)NbO3-based multilayered piezoceramics under electromechanical loading
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
244101
(
2020
).
54.
M. N.
Tianen
and
Y. M.
Jin
, “
Variations in the cellular magnetic domain structure in Fe–Ga alloys
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
163904
(
2020
).
55.
R. L.
Silva
,
R. C.
Silva
,
A. R.
Pereira
, and
W. A.
Moura-Melo
, “
Robust dynamics of antiferromagnetic skyrmion driven by spin-polarized current in small thin disks
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
163902
(
2020
).
56.
K. S.
Antipin
,
T. T.
Gareev
,
N. V.
Myasnikov
,
E. P.
Nikolaeva
, and
A. P.
Pyatakov
, “
Bipolar electric field-induced nucleation of magnetic domains with 90° domain walls
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
024103
(
2021
).
57.
M.
Ghidini
 et al, “
Non-volatile voltage control of in-plane and out-of-plane magnetization in polycrystalline Ni films on ferroelectric PMN–PT (001)pc substrates
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
154101
(
2021
).
58.
H.
Ueda
 et al, “
Multiple magnetic order parameters coexisting in multiferroic hexaferrites resolved by soft x rays
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
174101
(
2020
).
59.
Y.
Liu
 et al, “
Ferroelectric domain structure of Bi2FeCrO6 multiferroic thin films
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
234103
(
2020
).
60.
S.
Hong
, “
Single frequency vertical piezoresponse force microscopy
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
051101
(
2021
).
61.
Y.
Hiranaga
,
T.
Mimura
,
T.
Shimizu
,
H.
Funakubo
, and
Y.
Cho
, “
Local C–V mapping for ferroelectrics using scanning nonlinear dielectric microscopy
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
244105
(
2020
).
62.
O.
Solís Canto
 et al, “
Piezoresponse force microscopy imaging and its correlation with cantilever spring constant and frequency
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
084101
(
2020
).
63.
J. Y.
Park
 et al, “
A perspective on semiconductor devices based on fluorite-structured ferroelectrics from the materials–Device integration perspective
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
240904
(
2020
).
64.
L
.
Berger
,
Exchange interaction between ferromagnetic domain wall and electric current in very thin metallic films
.
J. Appl. Phys.
55
1954
1956
(
1984
).
65.
D.
Meier
, “
Functional domain walls in multiferroics
,”
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
27
,
463003
(
2015
).
66.
D. M.
Evans
,
V.
Garcia
,
D.
Meier
, and
M.
Bibes
, “
Domains and domain walls in multiferroics
,”
Phys. Sci. Rev.
5
,
1
23
(
2020
).
67.
S.
Cherifi-Hertel
 et al, “
Shedding light on non-Ising polar domain walls: Insight from second harmonic generation microscopy and polarimetry analysis
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
081101
(
2021
).
68.
H.
Yokota
and
Y.
Uesu
, “
Optical second-harmonic generation microscopy as a tool for ferroelastic domain wall exploration
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
014101
(
2021
).
69.
K. J.
Spychala
 et al, “
Nonlinear focal mapping of ferroelectric domain walls in LiNbO3: Analysis of the SHG microscopy contrast mechanism
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
234102
(
2020
).
70.
M.
Schmidbauer
 et al, “
Temperature dependence of three-dimensional domain wall arrangement in ferroelectric K0.9Na0.1NbO3 epitaxial thin films
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
184101
(
2020
).
71.
K. A.
Hunnestad
,
E. D.
Roede
,
A. T. J.
van Helvoort
, and
D.
Meier
, “
Characterization of ferroelectric domain walls by scanning electron microscopy
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
191102
(
2020
).
72.
O.
Condurache
,
G.
Dražić
,
N.
Sakamoto
,
T.
Rojac
, and
A.
Benčan
, “
Atomically resolved structure of step-like uncharged and charged domain walls in polycrystalline BiFeO3
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
054102
(
2021
).
73.
E. K. H.
Salje
, “
Ferroelastic domain walls as templates for multiferroic devices
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
164104
(
2020
).
74.
W.
Schranz
,
A.
Tröster
, and
I.
Rychetsky
, “
Contributions to polarization and polarization switching in antiphase boundaries of SrTiO3 and PbZrO3
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
194101
(
2020
).
75.
M.
Chen
 et al, “
Stabilization of ferroelastic charged domain walls in self-assembled BiFeO3 nanoislands
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
124103
(
2020
).
76.
L.
Puntigam
 et al, “
Insulating improper ferroelectric domain walls as robust barrier layer capacitors
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
074101
(
2021
).
77.
Y.
Noguchi
,
R.
Inoue
, and
H.
Matsuo
, “
Domain-wall photovoltaic effect in Fe-doped BaTiO3 single crystals
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
084101
(
2021
).
78.
J. S.
Lundh
 et al, “
Local measurements of domain wall-induced self-heating in released PbZr0.52Ti0.48O3 films
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
214102
(
2020
).
79.
D.
Zhang
,
D.
Sando
,
Y.
Pan
,
P.
Sharma
, and
J.
Seidel
, “
Robust ferroelectric polarization retention in harsh environments through engineered domain wall pinning
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
014102
(
2021
).
80.
J.
Liu
,
Y.
Xie
,
X.
Li
,
M.
Liu
, and
J.-M.
Liu
, “
Monte Carlo study on domain wall dynamics of J1–J2 triangular spin system
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
224106
(
2020
).
81.
Y. L.
Tang
,
Y. L.
Zhu
, and
X. L.
Ma
, “
Topological polar structures in ferroelectric oxide films
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
200904
(
2021
).
82.
M.
Makarovic
,
M. Ç.
Bayir
,
H.
Ursic
,
A.
Bradesko
, and
T.
Rojac
, “
Domain wall conductivity as the origin of enhanced domain wall dynamics in polycrystalline BiFeO3
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
064104
(
2020
).
83.
Y.-X.
Liu
,
H.-C.
Thong
,
Y.-Y.-S.
Cheng
,
J.-W.
Li
, and
K.
Wang
, “
Defect-mediated domain-wall motion and enhanced electric-field-induced strain in hot-pressed K0.5Na0.5NbO3 lead-free piezoelectric ceramics
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
024102
(
2021
).
84.
G. D.
Adhikary
and
R.
Ranjan
, “
Abrupt change in domain switching behavior within tetragonal phase regime of (x)Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3-(1-x)K1/2Bi1/2TiO3
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
204102
(
2020
).
85.
V. Y.
Shur
,
E. V.
Pelegova
,
A. P.
Turygin
,
M. S.
Kosobokov
, and
Y. M.
Alikin
, “
Forward growth of ferroelectric domains with charged domain walls: Local switching on non-polar cuts
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
044103
(
2021
).
86.
J.
Liu
 et al, “
Impact of alternating current electric field poling on piezoelectric and dielectric properties of Pb(In1/2Nb1/2)O3–Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–PbTiO3 ferroelectric crystals
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
094104
(
2020
).
87.
L. M.
Riemer
 et al, “
Dielectric and electro-mechanic nonlinearities in perovskite oxide ferroelectrics, relaxors, and relaxor ferroelectrics
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
054101
(
2021
).
88.
A. P.
Levanyuk
,
S. A.
Minyukov
,
I.
Burc Misirlioglu
, and
M.
Baris Okatan
, “
Effects of interphase boundaries in Ginzburg–Landau one-dimensional model of two-phase states in clamped systems
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
044102
(
2021
).
89.
J.-J.
Wang
 et al, “
Injection charge dynamics on the Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 surface by scanning probe microscopy
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
184104
(
2020
).
90.
X.
Zhang
,
W.
Chen
,
B.
Zhang
,
W.
Xiong
, and
Y.
Zheng
, “
Revisiting the switching characteristics and electroresistance effect in ferroelectric thin film towards an optimized hybrid switching strategy
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
128
,
224104
(
2020
).
91.
C.
Wang
,
H.
Qiao
, and
Y.
Kim
, “
Perspective on the switching behavior of HfO2-based ferroelectrics
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
010902
(
2021
).
92.
S.
Park
 et al, “
Effect of annealing temperature on switching properties in Si-doped HfO2 films
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
164101
(
2021
).
93.
N.
Wolff
 et al, “
Atomic scale confirmation of ferroelectric polarization inversion in wurtzite-type AlScN
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
034103
(
2021
).
94.
H.
Li
,
L.
Tao
, and
J.-B.
Xu
, “
Intrinsic memristive mechanisms in 2D layered materials for high-performance memory
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
129
,
050902
(
2021
).