We design thermal emitters based on gold micrograting structures with VO2-filled slots for enhanced far-field thermal rectification. We numerically calculate the thermal rectification ratio for two different approaches, peak extinction and peak shift. In peak extinction, the VO2 phase transition switches the radiative coupling of the surface plasmon on and off. In peak shift, the phase transition shifts the wavelength of the radiatively-coupled surface plasmon. We vary the extinction coefficient of VO2 to determine the effect on rectification for each approach. In both cases, the rectification ratio can be increased by increasing the VO2 loss in the metallic state. This suggests that highly efficient, microstructured thermal rectifiers can be achieved via suitable manipulation of the optical properties of VO2.

While electronic devices form the foundation of modern computing systems, their operation is limited in high temperature environments.1 As a result, there has been considerable interest in the development of thermal analogs of electronic devices, which would operate by controlling heat flow rather than electron transport. These include thermal memories, logic gates, and thermal rectifiers.2–9 A key figure of merit for thermal rectifiers is the rectification ratio R, which describes the asymmetry in forward and backward heat flow in the device. A variety of mechanisms have been proposed to achieve asymmetric flow, based on either conductive10–15 or radiative16 approaches. Radiative approaches consider the heat flow between two bodies separated by a gap and generally use a phase-change material such as VO2, which exhibits a significant change in optical and electrical properties around the metal-insulator transition temperature. In recent years, several VO2-based tunable absorbers have been proposed17–22 and incorporated in thermal rectifier designs.23–25 

Designs for near-field devices, where the gap is small compared to the thermal wavelength, have yielded high rectification ratios26,27 due to the participation of evanescently-decaying surface waves in radiative transport.28,29 However, experimental implementation is likely to require tight tolerances on alignment and fabrication. Far-field devices can relax these constraints, if strategies can be found to achieve high rectification ratios. A recent design has achieved an R > 11 for far-field devices based on Fabry-Perot cavities.30 In this case, a phase transition in VO2 toggles the system between one that supports a well-defined Fabry-Perot resonance and one that does not.

In this work, we explore an alternative approach to far-field rectifiers based on surface plasmon modes. Using grating structures composed of gold, VO2, and silicon, we can selectively couple evanescently-decaying surface plasmon modes to far-field radiation. This geometry allows us to study two different approaches to thermal rectification. In the peak extinction approach, we exploit the metal-insulator transition in VO2 to switch the radiative coupling from the surface plasmon mode on and off. In the peak shift approach, we shift the resonant wavelength of the surface plasmon mode. In each case, we show that the highest rectification ratios are achieved by tuning the loss of the VO2 material in the metallic state to best match the properties of gold. Several studies have demonstrated the effect of doping and changes in annealing parameters on the electrical and optical properties of VO2 thin films.31–35 This work suggests a new direction for the improvement of thermal rectifier performance through material property optimization. Moreover, it demonstrates that with appropriate design strategies for near- to far-field coupling, evanescently-decaying surface waves can be leveraged for far-field rectifier designs.

Consider emitters 1 and 2 maintained at two different temperatures T1 = Tc and T2 = Th (Th > Tc) as shown in Fig. 1(a). In accordance with the second law of thermodynamics, heat will flow from emitter 2 to emitter 1 in the absence of any external work on the system. We refer to this as the forward direction. On the other hand, the direction of heat flow will be reversed if emitter 1 is maintained at Th and emitter 2 at Tc. However, it is possible to construct a device which allows heat flow in the forward direction while suppressing it in the reverse direction. Such a device that enables unidirectional heat flow between two bodies maintained at different temperatures is referred to as a thermal rectifier.36 

FIG. 1.

(a) Schematic of a typical thermal rectifier. (b) Emission spectra of the metallic (hot) and insulating (cold) states of emitter 1 in the peak extinction approach. (c) Emission spectra of emitter 2 and the two states of emitter 1 in the peak shift approach. The black body irradiance (arbitrary units) is superimposed for reference.

FIG. 1.

(a) Schematic of a typical thermal rectifier. (b) Emission spectra of the metallic (hot) and insulating (cold) states of emitter 1 in the peak extinction approach. (c) Emission spectra of emitter 2 and the two states of emitter 1 in the peak shift approach. The black body irradiance (arbitrary units) is superimposed for reference.

Close modal

Thermal rectification is quantified by the rectification ratio R defined as37 

R=PfPrPr,
(1)

where Pf and Pr represent radiative power exchanged in the forward and reverse directions, respectively. For two planar bodies maintained at temperatures Th and Tc, the forward and reverse radiative powers exchanged38 in the wavelength range [λ1,λ2] are defined as

Pf,r(λ,Th,Tc)=12λ1λ2dλ(IBB(λ,Th)IBB(λ,Tc))Γf,r(λ,Th,Tc).
(2)

Here, Γf,r(λ,Th,Tc) represent the forward and reverse channeled emissivities, respectively. For two bodies at temperatures Th and Tc with emissivities ɛ1 and ɛ2, respectively, the channeled emissivity is given by

Γf,r(λ,Th,Tc)=12μ=TE,TM11/ε1μ(λ,Tc,h)+1/ε2μ(λ,Th,c)1.
(3)

We will discuss two approaches of achieving thermal rectification: peak extinction and peak shift. In the more common peak extinction approach, emitter 1 is temperature-dependent, while emitter 2 is a temperature-independent black body. Therefore, ε2μ(λ)=1, and the expression for channeled emissivity simplifies to

Γf(λ,Tc)=12(ε1TE(λ,Tc)+ε1TM(λ,Tc)),Γr(λ,Th)=12(ε1TE(λ,Th)+ε1TM(λ,Th)).
(4)

As a result, Pf and Pr are directly proportional to the emissivities of emitter 1 in the low and high temperature states, respectively. Rectification can, thus, be enhanced by increasing the difference in emissivities between the two states. Figure 1(b) shows an example emission spectrum suitable for the peak extinction approach. In its insulating state, emitter 1 has a well-defined peak at 10 μm. The peak is considerably suppressed in the metallic state. This leads to the increased heat transfer in the forward direction relative to the backward direction, causing thermal rectification. This approach has previously been used for the construction of VO2-based far-field thermal rectifiers.39 

Here, we introduce an alternative approach based on peak shift. In this approach, the emissivity of emitter 1 is temperature-dependent, while that of emitter 2 is temperature-independent. Hence, the channeled emissivity can be simply defined as

Γf(λ,Tc)=12μ=TE,TM11/ε1μ(λ,Tc)+1/ε2μ(λ)1,Γr(λ,Th)=12μ=TE,TM11/ε1μ(λ,Th)+1/ε2μ(λ)1.
(5)

It is important to note that Γ is no longer dependent on the temperature of emitter 2. Consider the example spectra shown in Fig. 1(c). At a particular wavelength λ0=15μm, for example, we have ε2μ(λ0) and ε1μ(λ0,Tc) equal to 1. Therefore, from Eq. (5), Γf(λ0,Tc)=1. On the other hand, ε1μ(λ0,Th)=0, and hence the channeled emissivity for the reverse direction Γr(λ0,Th)=0. The difference in integrated channeled emissivities for the forward and reverse directions results in thermal rectification.

Intuitively, for this approach to yield high rectification, it is essential for the emissivity of emitter 2 to be strongly peaked, rather than constant. It is the temperature-dependent change in the spectral overlap between emitter 1 and 2 that results in rectification. From Eq. (5), the channeled emissivity is only nonzero over wavelength ranges for which both ɛ1 and ɛ2 are nonzero. For the forward case, the channeled emissivity is nonzero where the two peaks overlap; in the backward case, it is small everywhere.

In this study, we exploit the ability of metal gratings to exhibit surface plasmon polariton (SPP) modes to achieve rectification using both the peak extinction and peak shift approaches. For a planar metal-dielectric interface, SPPs propagate parallel to the interface and decay exponentially in the perpendicular direction.40 A photon incident on the interface can excite an SPP if it has the same wavevector component parallel to the interface (k||) as the SPP. Figure 2(a) shows the dispersion relation of an SPP at a metal-air interface as a function of k||. Since the curve does not intersect the k|| = 0 axis at any point, a normally incident plane wave cannot excite an SPP. However, if we introduce a grating on the metal surface, the wavevector space becomes periodic.40 As a result, the SPP dispersion relation gets folded at the first Brillouin zone boundaries and intersects the k|| = 0 axis. This makes it possible for normally incident photons at certain frequencies to excite an SPP on the metal-air interface.

FIG. 2.

Effect of a grating on the SPP dispersion relation.

FIG. 2.

Effect of a grating on the SPP dispersion relation.

Close modal

VO2 has a phase transition from insulating to the metallic state near 340 K. By designing a metal/vanadium dioxide grating that supports SPP in the insulating state, several new opportunities for far-field thermal rectifier designs become possible. In the section below, we first present a peak extinction design. In this case, the phase transition effectively toggles the structure between a planar metal slab and a metal/dielectric grating, switching the radiative coupling of the SPP on and off. We then present a peak shift design, where the phase transition changes the effective slot depth of the grating. This shifts the wavelength of the SPP, reducing the spectral overlap with a second, temperature-independent emitter.

To illustrate the peak extinction approach, we take emitter 1 to be a gold micrograting structure with VO2-filled slots. One unit cell of the grating is shown in Fig. 3(a). Emitter 2 is taken to be a black body. Normal-incidence emissivity spectra are computed using Lumerical FDTD solutions, assuming that emissivity is equal to absorptivity from Kirchoff's law. The optical constants for gold and silicon are obtained from the built-in material library, while those for VO2 are taken from Ref. 41. For all our calculations, we define Th= 340 K + ΔT and Tc= 340 K − ΔT, where ΔT = 30 K. We optimized the slot dimensions to yield the highest rectification ratio R, as shown in Fig. 3(b). A slot depth of 950 nm and a slot width of 400 nm give an optimal value of 4.86.

FIG. 3.

(a) Unit cell of grating used as emitter 1 in the peak extinction approach. (b) Slot parameter optimization. (c) Emission spectra for the metallic and insulating states of emitter 1.

FIG. 3.

(a) Unit cell of grating used as emitter 1 in the peak extinction approach. (b) Slot parameter optimization. (c) Emission spectra for the metallic and insulating states of emitter 1.

Close modal

The emissivity spectra for the optimized grating are shown in Fig. 3(c). For the insulating state of VO2, we observe a strong emissivity peak close to 15 μm. This is consistent with coupling to a normal-incidence SPP mode of the metal-dielectric grating. For the metallic state of VO2, the emissivity is strongly suppressed. This behavior is similar to that expected for a solid block of metal, for which the SPP cannot couple to normal-incidence light. This result suggests that strong rectification is achieved due to the resemblance of the metallic state of VO2 to gold. However, the optical constants of metallic VO2 and gold are not identical. We, thus, explore the effect of increasing the loss in the metallic state with the goal of increasing the rectification value. We note that the qualitative behavior exhibited in Fig. 3(c) is similar to that observed in Ref. 30; the smaller value of R we obtain largely results from a narrower emission peak.

Figure 4(a) shows emission spectra for the metallic state of emitter 1 with the imaginary part of the refractive index (extinction coefficient) scaled by a factor CM. As CM increases, the metallic state becomes increasingly lossy. This causes the emissivity to reduce, ultimately mimicking the spectrum obtained for a hypothetical case of VO2 replaced with gold (that is, a solid, gold slab). Figure 4(b) shows a scatter plot of R vs CM. As CM increases and the metallic state emissivity reduces, R increases to a value of around 16.6.

FIG. 4.

(a) Emission spectra for the metallic state of emitter 1 for various values of CM. (b) Variation of R with CM. (c) Emission spectra for the insulating state of emitter 1 for various values of CI. (d) Variation of R with CI with CM = 4.

FIG. 4.

(a) Emission spectra for the metallic state of emitter 1 for various values of CM. (b) Variation of R with CM. (c) Emission spectra for the insulating state of emitter 1 for various values of CI. (d) Variation of R with CI with CM = 4.

Close modal

In order to increase the rectification ratio further, we scale the extinction coefficient of insulating VO2. Figure 4(c) shows emission spectra for the insulating state of emitter 1 with extinction coefficients scaled by a factor CI. An increase in CI causes the peak emissivity to reduce and the prominent emission peak to broaden. Figure 4(d) shows a scatter plot of R vs the scaling factor CI with CM fixed at 4. The rectification ratio is directly influenced by the overlap integral between the black body spectrum and the insulating state emissivity. In an ideal case, one would expect a sufficiently broad peak with near-perfect emissivity to yield the highest rectification. However, for the grating structure under study, the peak width and height are inversely related [Fig. 4(c)]. Hence, there is a trade-off between peak broadening and peak height reduction. An initial increase in the value of R is caused by peak broadening, which dominates over peak height reduction to give a maximum rectification value of 20.67 at a scaling factor of 6. Beyond this point, the peak width remains nearly constant, while the peak height continues to decrease. As a result, the rectification ratio reduces.

To illustrate the peak shift approach, we study a gold micrograting structure with slots partly filled with VO2 and Si. The unit cell is shown in Fig. 5(a). For emitter 2, we choose a gold grating similar to emitter 1 but with 0.9 μm deep slots completely filled with Si. Figure 5(b) shows the emission spectra for the metallic and insulating states of emitter 1 along with that of emitter 2. For T1 = Th, VO2 is in the metallic state, and emitter 1 behaves as a metal-dielectric grating with a slot depth given by the height of the Si region. The SPP mode is close to 12 μm and couples with normally incident light, giving a broad emission peak. However, for T1 = Tc, VO2 is in its insulating state and emitter 1 acts as a metal-dielectric grating with a slot depth given by the sum of the Si and VO2 heights; Si was chosen for the dielectric material due to the similarity between the values of n for Si and insulating VO2. As a result of the change in slot depth, the SPP mode shifts to 15 μm and gives a sharp emission peak at that wavelength. This peak overlaps with the emission peak of emitter 2, which is designed to have an SPP mode at 15 μm.

FIG. 5.

(a) Unit cells of emitters 1 (left) and 2 (right) gratings for peak shift approach. (b) Emission spectra for the metallic and insulating states of emitter 1.

FIG. 5.

(a) Unit cells of emitters 1 (left) and 2 (right) gratings for peak shift approach. (b) Emission spectra for the metallic and insulating states of emitter 1.

Close modal

In order to increase the value of R for the peak shift approach, it is desirable to tune the emission peak of emitter 1 in the metallic state to increase peak emissivity and reduce overlap with the insulating state. This is achieved by scaling the extinction coefficient of metallic VO2 by a factor of CM greater than 1. Figure 6(a) shows the metallic state emission spectra for a few values of CM. As the value of CM increases, metallic VO2 becomes increasingly lossy, ultimately causing the emission spectrum to look similar to that for the hypothetical case of VO2 replaced with gold. Figure 6(b) shows a scatter plot of R vs the metallic state scaling factor CM. As the value of CM increases and the metallic state emission peak becomes sharper, R increases to a value of around 7.3. In order to increase the value of R further, we scale the extinction coefficient of insulating VO2. Figure 6(c) shows the insulating state emission spectra for a few values of the scaling factor CI with CM fixed at 10. It can be seen that scaling does not have a significant impact on the emission spectrum. This claim is further substantiated by Fig. 6(d), which shows a scatter plot of R vs the insulating state scaling factor CI. The rectification ratio increases from 7.3 to 8.4 with an increase in the value of CI. However, the change is not as significant as in the peak extinction approach.

FIG. 6.

(a) Emission spectra for the metallic state of emitter 1 for various values of CM. (b) Variation of R with CM. (c) Emission spectra for the insulating state of emitter 1 for various values of CI. (d) Variation of R with CI with CM = 10.

FIG. 6.

(a) Emission spectra for the metallic state of emitter 1 for various values of CM. (b) Variation of R with CM. (c) Emission spectra for the insulating state of emitter 1 for various values of CI. (d) Variation of R with CI with CM = 10.

Close modal

It is possible to have a third approach by using a temperature independent emitter 2 instead of a black body in the peak extinction approach. If we use the grating design for emitter 1 described in the peak extinction approach along with that for emitter 2 in the peak shift approach, we get a rectification ratio of 6.58. This is higher than the values of 4.86 and 1.38 obtained for peak extinction and peak shift, respectively, for unscaled VO2. By using a scaling factor of CM = 10, we obtain a value of 14.79 for the rectification ratio. Combining this with a scaling factor of CI = 2, we get R = 15.15.

In conclusion, we have used gold micrograting structures with VO2-filled slots to achieve enhanced, far-field thermal rectification. We exploited the ability of the gratings to exhibit tunable SPP modes and investigated two approaches to far-field rectification. In the peak extinction approach, the coupling of the SPP mode to the far field is switched on and off with temperature. In the peak shift mode, the resonant wavelength of the SPP mode is shifted to change the spectral overlap with a second, resonant emitter. For both approaches, we studied the dependence of the rectification ratio R on the extinction coefficients of the metallic and insulating states of VO2. We observed that rectification increases as the extinction coefficient of metallic VO2 approaches that of gold. By scaling the insulating state extinction coefficient of VO2 in addition to the metallic state, we were able to achieve a rectification ratio of 20.67 for the peak extinction approach. These observations suggest that materials research focused on manipulation of the optical properties of VO2 could yield more efficient thermal rectifier devices, as the general strategy of tuning the optical loss could potentially yield higher rectification ratios for a variety of device geometries. Moreover, we have shown that by appropriately considering mechanisms for coupling evanescently-decaying surface modes to the far field, such modes can play a critical role in far-field rectifier design.

This work was funded in part by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency under Agreement No. HR00111820046. The views, opinions, and/or findings expressed are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official views or policies of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. R.A. was funded in part by the USC Viterbi Graduate School Merit Fellowship.

1.
M. R.
Werner
and
W. R.
Fahrner
,
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
48
,
249
(
2001
).
2.
B.
Li
,
L.
Wang
, and
G.
Casati
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
93
,
184301
(
2004
).
3.
L.
Wang
and
B.
Li
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
99
,
177208
(
2007
).
4.
M.
Terraneo
,
M.
Peyrard
, and
G.
Casati
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
88
,
094302
(
2001
).
5.
M.
Peyrard
,
Europhys. Lett.
76
,
1
(
2006
).
6.
C. R.
Otey
,
W. T.
Lau
, and
S.
Fan
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
104
,
154301
(
2010
).
7.
N.
Yang
,
G.
Zhang
, and
B.
Li
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
93
,
243111
(
2008
).
8.
R.
Scheibner
,
M.
Konig
,
D.
Reuter
,
A. D.
Wieck
,
C.
Gould
,
H.
Buhmann
, and
L. W.
Molenkamp
,
New J. Phys.
10
,
083016
(
2008
).
9.
N.
Yang
,
G.
Zhang
, and
B.
Li
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
95
,
033107
(
2009
).
10.
C. W.
Chang
,
D.
Okawa
,
A.
Majumdar
, and
A.
Zettl
,
Science
314
,
1121
(
2006
).
11.
W.
Kobayashi
,
Y.
Teraoka
, and
I.
Terasaki
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
95
,
171905
(
2009
).
12.
X.
Yang
,
D.
Yu
, and
B.
Cao
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
9
,
24078
(
2017
).
13.
T.
Zhang
and
T.
Luo
,
Small
11
,
4657
(
2015
).
14.
H.
Tian
,
D.
Xie
,
Y.
Yang
,
T.-L.
Ren
,
G.
Zhang
,
Y.-F.
Wang
,
C.-J.
Zhou
,
P.-G.
Peng
,
L.-G.
Wang
, and
L.-T.
Liu
,
Sci. Rep.
2
,
523
(
2012
).
15.
I.
Kim
,
M.
Kang
, and
S. W.
Kim
,
Int. J. Thermophys.
38
,
172
(
2017
).
16.
W.
Kobayashi
,
D.
Sawaki
,
T.
Omura
,
T.
Katsufuji
,
Y.
Moritomo
, and
I.
Terasaki
,
Appl. Phys. Express
5
,
027302
(
2012
).
17.
P.
Ben-Abdallah
,
H.
Benisty
, and
M.
Besbes
,
J. Appl. Phys.
116
,
034306
(
2014
).
18.
H.
Kocer
,
S.
Butun
,
B.
Banar
,
K.
Wang
,
S.
Tongay
,
J.
Wu
, and
K.
Aydin
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
106
,
161104
(
2015
).
19.
H.
Kocer
,
S.
Butun
,
E.
Palacios
,
Z.
Liu
,
S.
Tongay
,
D.
Fu
,
K.
Wang
,
J.
Wu
, and
K.
Aydin
,
Sci. Rep.
5
,
13384
(
2015
).
20.
J.-H.
Shin
,
K.
Moon
,
E. S.
Lee
,
I.-M.
Lee
, and
K. H.
Park
,
Nanotechnology
26
,
315203
(
2015
).
21.
Y.
Sharma
,
V. A.
Tiruveedhula
,
J. F.
Muth
, and
A.
Dhawan
,
Optics Express
23
,
5822
(
2015
).
22.
L.
Liu
,
L.
Kang
,
T. S.
Mayer
, and
D. H.
Werner
,
Nat. Commun.
7
,
13236
(
2016
).
23.
P.
Ben-Abdallah
and
S.-A.
Biehs
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
103
,
191907
(
2013
).
24.
K.
Ito
,
K.
Nishikawa
,
H.
Iizuka
, and
H.
Toshiyoshi
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
105
,
253503
(
2014
).
25.
Z.
Zheng
,
X.
Liu
,
A.
Wang
, and
Y.
Xuan
,
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
109
,
63
(
2017
).
26.
A.
Ghanekar
,
J.
Ji
, and
Y.
Zheng
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
109
,
123106
(
2016
).
27.
S.
Basu
and
M.
Francoeur
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
98
,
113106
(
2011
).
28.
Y.
Yang
,
S.
Basu
, and
L.
Wang
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
103
,
163101
(
2013
).
29.
J.
Huang
,
Q.
Li
,
Z.
Zheng
, and
Y.
Xuan
,
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
67
,
575
(
2013
).
30.
A.
Ghanekar
and
G.
Xiao
,
Sci. Rep.
7
,
6339
(
2017
).
31.
H. M.
Pinto
,
J.
Correia
,
R.
Binions
,
C.
Piccirillo
,
I. P.
Parkin
, and
V.
Teixeira
,
Mater. Sci. Forum
587
,
640
(
2008
).
32.
L.
Kang
,
Y.
Gao
,
Z.
Zhang
,
J.
Du
,
C.
Cao
,
Z.
Chen
, and
H.
Luo
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
114
, 1901 (
2010
).
33.
S.
Hu
,
S. Y.
Li
,
R.
Ahuja
,
C. G.
Granqvist
,
K.
Hermansson
,
G. A.
Niklasson
, and
R. H.
Scheicher
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
101
,
201902
(
2012
).
34.
L.
Dai
,
S.
Chen
,
J.
Liu
,
Y.
Gao
,
J.
Zhou
,
Z.
Chen
,
C.
Cao
,
H.
Luo
, and
M.
Kanehira
,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
15
,
11723
(
2013
).
35.
S.-Y.
Li
,
G. A.
Niklasson
, and
C. G.
Granqvist
,
J. Appl. Phys.
115
,
053513
(
2014
).
36.
D.
Segal
and
A.
Nitzan
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
94
,
034301
(
2005
).
37.
C.
Dames
,
J. Heat Transfer
131
,
061301
(
2009
).
38.
F. P.
Incropera
,
D. P.
DeWitt
,
T. L.
Bergman
, and
A. S.
Lavine
, Introduction to Heat Transfer (Wiley, 1990).
39.
S.
Zeng
,
D.
Baillargeat
,
H.-P.
Ho
, and
K.-T.
Yong
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
43
,
3426
(
2014
).
40.
M.
Gwon
,
E.
Lee
,
D.-W.
Kim
,
K.-J.
Yee
,
M. J.
Lee
, and
Y. S.
Kim
,
Opt. Express
19
,
5895
(
2011
).
41.
J. B.
Kana Kana
,
J. M.
Ndjaka
,
G.
Vignaud
,
A.
Gibaud
, and
M.
Maaza
,
Opt. Commun.
284
,
807
(
2011
).