We report here a systematic study of the magnon-drag induced thermoelectric properties of Fe-rich, Fe-Co body-centered-cubic alloys. The sign of the low temperature behavior of thermopower is explained well by the hydrodynamic theory for magnon-drag, informed by density functional theory calculations of the ground state of Fe-Co alloys. The high-temperature thermopower of some of the alloys, and indeed that of elemental iron, changes the sign, as previously observed. We propose a mechanism to elucidate this hitherto unexplained observation. Further, the power factor of Fe72Co28 peaks around 35 μV/cm K2 at 500 K, comparable to the standard thermoelectric material Bi2Te3. Because of their high thermoelectric power factor, Fe-Co alloys are potential candidate thermoelectric metals for active cooling of electronic devices.

Thermoelectric materials are capable of relating temperature gradients and electrical transport through solid-state processes. This property has garnered increasing interest in improving the efficiency of thermal engines via waste heat recovery from their exhaust gas. Conversely, the same effect has applications in solid-state refrigeration.1 Low efficiency of commercially viable thermoelectric materials limits applications of thermoelectric refrigerators and power generators. The efficiency is characterized by the dimensionless figure of merit,

(1)

where α, σ, T, and κ are thermopower or Seebeck coefficient, electrical conductivity, absolute temperature, and thermal conductivity, respectively. Thermoelectric devices are also used for active cooling of electronics; it was recently pointed out2,3 that active cooling processes are very different from those used in refrigeration. In active cooling, the goal is to cool a load to ambient temperature by moving heat from the hot device to ambient. In refrigeration, the goal is to cool a load to below ambient temperature by moving heat from the cold device to ambient temperature. Thus, it is reasonable that a high thermal conductivity is favorable in active cooling applications, where the heat flux from the load to the ambient must be maximized, but not in refrigeration, where the backflow of heat from the ambient to the load must be prevented. Therefore, whereas zT is the right criterion for refrigeration, it not for cooling. It has been shown2 that the materials' criterion for cooling is the power factor P,

(2)

Furthermore, thermoelectric metals with a high electrical and thermal conductivity are ideally suited for cooling, provided they also have a high thermopower.

Unfortunately, in the classical nonmagnetic electron transport theory, σ and α are inversely related due to the direct connection between σ and the density of charge carriers ne, and the Pisarenko relation4 

(3)

Thus, until now, thermoelectric materials development has concentrated on semiconductors.

The thermopower characterized by the Pisarenko relation is known as diffusion thermopower; however, in magnetically ordered materials, magnon-drag thermopower, which is absent in spin-degenerate materials, has an additive effect on the total thermopower, and in the case of the 3d transition metals (Fe, Co, and Ni) dominates thermoelectric transport.5 For magnetically ordered metals, this provides a valuable parameter to tune and optimize. Moreover, metals, which are typically mechanically strong and ductile, relatively easy to manufacture, to shape, and to join, provide greater functionality and easier integration into industrial processing procedures. As discussed above, in the case of cooling of electronics, the high thermal conductivity of metals is beneficial. Even in power generation and refrigeration applications, only the phonon thermal conductivity acts as a loss mechanism that lowers the thermal efficiency of thermoelectric processes.5 Designing metal alloys with enhanced thermopower, therefore, provides a great opportunity for the widespread adoption of the thermoelectric technology and allows for the seamless integration of thermoelectric devices into existing industrial and commercial products.

In magnetically ordered metals, the collective excitation of the localized magnetic moments forms magnons6 that have associated specific heat, thermal conductivity, and chemical potential. The magnon chemical potential, a recently introduced theoretical quantity that describes magnon accumulation under thermodynamic driving forces,5 interacts with temperature gradients resulting in nonequilibrium magnon generation, and, therefore, a magnonic thermopower. The thermally driven magnon diffusion produces a drag effect on the surrounding electron fluid resulting in a contribution to the total thermoelectric power, called the magnon-drag thermopower αmd. A hydrodynamic theory was developed7 to quantify it: αmd is proportional to the magnon specific heat Cm over the total number of free electrons ne,

(4)

where e is the effective charge of the dominant charge carrier, and τem and τm are the scattering time for magnon-electron collisions and magnon collisions, respectively. In metals at sufficiently low temperatures, magnons are scattered dominantly by electrons so that the scattering time portion of αmd approaches unity (this statement does not hold for magnetic semiconductors). The sign of the effective charge e and the magnon-drag thermopower in Eq. (4) is governed only by the polarity of the charge carrier: positive for holes and negative for electron bands. The hydrodynamic theory models magnons and electrons as two types of fluids and neglects Umklapp and magnon nonconserving processes. Further, assuming that the electrons undergo mostly normal electron-phonon and magnetic scattering, the diffusion thermopower in metals is given by8 

(5)

where EF is the Fermi level of that material. A recent study by Watzman et al.7 investigated the magnon-electron drag effect in the elemental Fe, Co, and Ni, for which the magnon structure and carrier concentrations are well known. The sum of αd and αmd calculated by the hydrodynamic theory explains the data on Fe and Co very well up to about 25% of the Curie temperature without adjustable parameters. The result further shows that the magnon-drag thermopower can be one order of magnitude larger than the diffusion thermopower at low temperatures. However, the origin of the changes in the sign observed9 in the thermopower of elemental iron remains a mystery to date.

The quantities e, EF, and ne in Eqs. (4) and (5) originate from the band structure and density of states (DOS) of the material, allowing for the qualitative calculation of the thermopower of metals from ground state ab initio density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The number of electrons is proportional to the DOS at the Fermi level, which can be orbital-resolved to estimate the number of s-, p-, and d-orbital electrons. As d-orbital electrons generally are localized, the number of free electrons can be considered proportional to the partial DOS of the s- and p-electrons. Thus, as tuning the carrier concentration in metals is not practical via alloying, a method of optimizing the redistribution of electrons into localized d-orbitals can be used to optimize the thermopower of magnetic metal alloys.

The sign of the effective charge e is that of the energy derivative of the DOS at the Fermi level, ΔDOS. A positive ΔDOS results in electrons being the dominant charge carrier and corresponds to a negative value of e; a negative value of ΔDOS results in hole-dominated behavior and a positive e. In the hydrodynamic theory, the sign of αmd depends solely on this quantity.7 However, a more precise microscopic theory was developed subsequently,10 which is equivalent to the hydrodynamic theory at low temperatures but suggests the possibility of a change in the sign of αmd when itinerant magnetism becomes an important part of the total magnetization of a ferromagnetic sample. Therefore, we discuss a possible role of itinerant magnetism in our high-temperature data further in the paper. Nevertheless, in the light of the success of the hydrodynamic theory on Fe below 200 K, we will not consider this point in the analysis of our data on Fe-rich Fe-Co alloys below 200 K.

In this work, thermopower of body-centered-cubic (BCC) Fe-Co Fe-rich solid solutions has been investigated and compared with DFT calculation of DOS. Although good agreement is achieved, the goal of enhancing thermopower is obstructed by the compensating effect of the carriers in this alloy system.

Seven Fe-Co alloy samples were prepared in total, with nominal Co content of 1%, 5%, 8%, 10%, 12%, 15%, and 28%. According to the binary phase diagram,11 this covers the concentration region where solid solutions of Co in Fe crystallize in a single body-centered-cubic solid solution phase (the models do not cover multiphase alloys). The starting materials are 99.9% pure Co pieces and 99.98% pure Fe granules, both from Alfa Aesar. The starting materials were arc-melted in flowing argon gas. The melting was repeated 5 times to increase the homogeneity of the resulting ingots. These alloy ingots then were sealed in ampoules and annealed at 1150 °C for 7 days for homogeneity. The structure of the samples was confirmed by X-ray diffraction.

The low temperature (80 K to 400 K) thermopower, electrical conductivity, Hall effect, and Nernst effect were measured in a ST-300 T Janis flow-cryostat system up to 1.4 T controlled by a LabVIEW program, using a static heater-and-sink method with copper-constantan thermocouple thermometry. The high-temperature (400 K to 1000 K) thermopower and electrical conductivity were measured in the commercial thermoelectric property measurement system Linseis LSR-3 in a helium atmosphere. The experimental uncertainties are the same as in previous similar studies on other materials and are discussed elsewhere.12 

The computational portion of this study was performed with the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP), using projector augmented wave (PAW) pseudopotentials, and the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) exchange-correlation functional.13–17 Spin-polarized calculations were performed on 64 atom supercells using special quasirandom structures (SQS) to approximate solid-solution alloys.18,19 The Brillouin zone was sampled using a 5 × 5 × 5 Monkhorst-Pack k-point mesh, using Methfessel-Paxton smearing for structural relaxation and the tetrahedron method with Blöchl corrections for DOS calculations.20,21 An energy cutoff of 400 eV was used throughout all calculations. To facilitate numerical differentiation of the DOS around the Fermi level, a Savitzky-Golay filter was applied using a 3rd order polynomial with a window length of 7.22,23

The measured thermopower for all candidate alloys between 80 K and 1000 K is shown in Fig. 1(a). With Co atom percentage increasing from 1% to 28%, the thermopower becomes generally more negative. The data on pure Fe from Ref. 7 are added as a reference. Figure 1(b) shows thermopower vs Co concentration at 200 K, and the behavior of the same curves at lower temperatures is similar, and the zero crossing point remains within the experimental inaccuracy on sample composition, at 11 ± 1 at. % Co from 77 to 200 K

FIG. 1.

Thermopower α of Fe-Co Fe-rich alloys. (a) Temperature dependence of α with Co concentration of 1, 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 28%. The thermopower of Fe from Ref. 7 is added as a dashed line. (b) Dependence of α on the Co atomic percent at 200 K. The thermopower decreases nearly monotonically with increasing Co concentration and changes the sign from positive to negative around 11 ± 1%.

FIG. 1.

Thermopower α of Fe-Co Fe-rich alloys. (a) Temperature dependence of α with Co concentration of 1, 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 28%. The thermopower of Fe from Ref. 7 is added as a dashed line. (b) Dependence of α on the Co atomic percent at 200 K. The thermopower decreases nearly monotonically with increasing Co concentration and changes the sign from positive to negative around 11 ± 1%.

Close modal

The DFT calculations, shown in Fig. 2, indicate that both s- and p-orbits have a minimum at around 12% Co content. Since the exchange interaction of Fe-Co alloys is larger than that of the pure elements,24 and the Curie temperature of iron is above 1000 K, below 200 K all the alloys can be assumed to be in the regime where Eq. (4) holds, as it does for iron. If all the carriers on s- and p-orbits had the same sign of the ΔDOS, then the hydrodynamic theory would predict that the magnon-drag thermopower had a maximum when the total number of s- and p-carriers was at its minimum. In fact, the ΔDOS, and thus the polarity of carriers on both s- and p-orbits, changes from holes to electrons when Co content increases. At 12% Co content, the effective mass of the s-electrons changes from negative to positive, but p-electrons maintain a negative effective mass, and, therefore, have p-type behavior. The different polarities of s- and p-carriers make the 12% Co-Fe alloy nearly a compensated metal. As a result, both the diffusion thermopower and magnon drag thermopower approach zero for this composition. This conclusion is supported by the experimental results. As shown in Fig. 1(b), in the low temperature range, the thermopower decreases with increasing Co atomic percent and changes the sign from positive to negative. At around 10%, the thermopower is zero. Therefore, the low temperature behavior of thermopower is well explained and understood.

FIG. 2.

(a) Orbital contributions of the DOS and (b) its energy dependence ΔDOS at the Fermi energy as a function of Co content. Note how the change in the sign of the ΔDOS of the s- and, more importantly, the p-orbital electrons, which dominate transport, corresponds well to the change in the sign of the thermopower [Fig. 1(b)].

FIG. 2.

(a) Orbital contributions of the DOS and (b) its energy dependence ΔDOS at the Fermi energy as a function of Co content. Note how the change in the sign of the ΔDOS of the s- and, more importantly, the p-orbital electrons, which dominate transport, corresponds well to the change in the sign of the thermopower [Fig. 1(b)].

Close modal

The temperature dependence of the thermopower, i.e., the direct effect of the temperature gradient on the electrons, at the higher temperature range is abnormal for all the alloys, as is that of the elemental iron.9 The diffusion thermopower is linear with temperature for metals,8 and since the band structure has little temperature dependence, cannot give rise to a sign change. It is, therefore, likely that the peculiar features of α(T), such as sign change in the samples with 1%, 5%, and 8% Co and the valleys in α(T) shared by all the curves at high temperatures, are caused by changes in the magnon drag thermopower. The alternative magnon drag theory by Flebus et al.10 mentioned in Sec. I suggests a possible explanation. In this theory, αmd has a prefactor (βαG), where αG is the Gilbert damping parameter and β is the spin transfer torque parameter.9 If less than 1/3, the ratio (αG) can change the sign of αmd. This ratio is equal to the ratio of itinerant spin-angular momentum to the total spin-angular momentum.25 Rosengaard and Johansson26 used DFT to calculate the ground state properties of Fe and used the Monte Carlo method to calculate the magnetic properties of Fe at finite temperature. Because of the quenching of the orbital angular momentum of 3d elements, the local moment of Fe ion is proportional to the number of localized d electrons. The local moment of Fe is shown to increase slowly with temperature, which means that more electrons become localized as temperature increases. In other words, the ratio of itinerant electrons to the total number of electrons decreases with temperature. Therefore, this calculation roughly supports our explanation; work is in progress to develop a more rigorous and quantitative explanation for the thermopower of the elemental iron up to 1000 K.

For completeness, the resistivity measured through the whole temperature range is shown in Fig. 3(a). Power factor (PF) then is calculated following Eq. (2). The results are shown in Fig. 3(b). The 28% Co sample shows a PF comparable with commercially available Bi2Te3, whose peak is around 40 at 200 K;27 we point out that the PF of the elemental cobalt in its FCC phase is much higher yet, reaching 160 μW K−1 cm−1at 300–400 K.5 

FIG. 3.

(a) Resistivity and (b) power factor of Fe-Co alloys [compositions indicated in (a)].

FIG. 3.

(a) Resistivity and (b) power factor of Fe-Co alloys [compositions indicated in (a)].

Close modal

Using the hydrodynamic theory of magnon-drag thermopower, we use a DFT directed search for thermoelectric alloys in the Fe-Co system. Thermopower, resistivity, and power factor of Fe-Co alloys from 80 K to 1000 K are explored experimentally. The sign of the low temperature thermopower is described well by DFT calculations. The high-temperature features of thermopower deviated from predictions derived from ab initio calculations, and are, in fact, unexplained to date, even on the elemental iron. Using recent theoretical work published by Flebus et al.,10 as well as calculations performed by Rosengaard and Johansson,25 we suggest that this deviation is due to the increasing population of localized d electrons.

Although we obtain good agreement between experiment and DFT calculation, the thermoelectric properties of Fe-Co alloys are optimized fully by tuning the population of electron orbitals at the Fermi level. As predicted by DFT calculations, the s- and p-orbitals have different polarities at the same Co concentration, where the number total free carriers is at minimum. The number of the two types of carriers is comparable, making the Fe-Co alloy a compensated metal. Since magnon drag is a mechanism that increases the thermopower of magnetic metals by an order of magnitude,7 the results reported here offer a way to discover and prepare high-power-factor metal thermoelectrics suitable, in particular, in active cooling applications.2 

This work was supported by the Center for Emergent Materials, a National Science Foundation (NSF) MRSEC under Grant No. DMR-1420451. Y.Z. and J.P.H. are also supported by the Army Research Office (ARO) MURI under Grant No. W911NF-14-1-0016. Computational work was performed using resources allocated by the Ohio Supercomputing Center under Grant No. PAS0072.

1.
H. J.
Goldsmid
,
Introduction to Thermoelectricity
(
Springer Verlag
,
Berlin
,
2010
).
2.
M. J.
Adams
,
M.
Verosky
,
M.
Zebarjadi
, and
J. P.
Heremans
, “
Active Peltier coolers based on correlated and magnon-drag metals
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
11
,
054008
(
2019
).
3.
M.
Parker
, “
Going with the flow
,”
Nat. Electron.
2
,
1
(
2019
).
4.
A. F.
Ioffe
,
Physics of Semiconductors
(
Academic Press
,
New York
,
1960
).
5.
K.
Vandaele
 et al, “
Thermal spin transport and energy conversion
,”
Mater. Today Phys.
1
,
39
49
(
2017
).
6.
C.
Kittel
, “
Magnons and their interactions with phonons and photons
,”
J. Phys. Radium
20
,
145
147
(
1959
).
7.
S. J.
Watzman
 et al, “
Magnon-drag thermopower and Nernst coefficient in Fe, Co, and Ni
,”
Phys. Rev. B
94
,
144407
(
2016
).
8.
J. M.
Ziman
,
Electrons and Phonons: The Theory of Transport Phenomena in Solids
(
Clarendon Press
,
Oxford
,
1960
).
9.
F. J.
Blatt
,
D. J.
Flood
,
V.
Rowe
,
P. A.
Schroeder
, and
J. E.
Cox
, “
Magnon-drag thermopower ion iron
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
18
,
395
396
(
1967
).
10.
B.
Flebus
,
R. A.
Duine
, and
Y.
Tserkovnyak
, “
Landau-Lifshitz theory of the magnon-drag thermopower
,”
Europhys. Lett.
115
(
5
),
57004
(
2016
).
11.
See https://matdata.asminternational.org/apd/index.aspx for “ASM Alloy Phase Diagram Database.”
12.
B.
He
,
Y.
Wang
,
M. Q.
Arguilla
,
N. D.
Cultrara
,
M. R.
Scudder
,
J. E.
Goldberger
,
W.
Windl
, and
J. P.
Heremans
, “
The Fermi surface geometrical origin of axis-dependent conduction polarity in layered materials
,”
Nat. Mater.
18
,
568
572
(
2019
).
13.
G.
Kresse
and
J.
Hafner
, “
Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals
,”
Phys. Rev. B
47
,
558
561
(
1993
).
14.
G.
Kresse
and
J.
Hafner
, “
Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium
,”
Phys. Rev. B
49
,
14251
14269
(
1994
).
15.
P. E.
Blöchl
, “
Projector augmented-wave method
,”
Phys. Rev. B
50
,
17953
17979
(
1994
).
16.
J. P.
Perdew
,
K.
Burke
, and
M.
Ernzerhof
, “
Generalized gradient approximation made simple
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
77
,
3865
3868
(
1996
).
17.
J. P.
Perdew
,
K.
Burke
, and
M.
Ernzerhof
, “
Generalized gradient approximation made simple
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
78
,
1396
1396
(
1997
).
18.
A.
Zunger
,
S.-H.
Wei
,
L. G.
Ferreira
, and
J. E.
Bernard
, “
Special quasirandom structures
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
65
,
353
356
(
1990
).
19.
A.
van de Walle
 et al, “
Efficient stochastic generation of special quasirandom structures
,”
Calphad
42
,
13
18
(
2013
).
20.
H. J.
Monkhorst
and
J. D.
Pack
, “
Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations
,”
Phys. Rev. B
13
(
12
),
5188
5192
(
1976
).
21.
P. E.
Blöchl
,
O.
Jepsen
, and
O. K.
Andersen
, “
Improved tetrahedron method for Brillouin-zone integrations
,”
Phys. Rev. B
49
,
16223
16233
(
1994
).
22.
A.
Savitzky
and
M. J. E.
Golay
, “
Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures
,”
Anal. Chem.
36
,
1627
1639
(
1964
).
23.
E.
Jones
,
T.
Oliphant
,
P.
Peterson
 et al, see http://www.scipy.org for SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python, 2001.
24.
J. M.
MacLaren
,
T. C.
Schulthess
,
W. H.
Butler
,
R.
Sutton
, and
M.
McHenry
, “
Electronic structure, exchange interactions, and Curie temperature of FeCo
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
85
,
4833
4835
(
1999
).
25.
Y.
Tserkovnyak
,
A.
Brataas
, and
G. E. W.
Bauer
, “
Theory of current-driven magnetization dynamics in inhomogeneous ferromagnets
,”
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
320
,
1282
(
2008
).
26.
N. M.
Rosengaard
and
B.
Johansson
, “
Finite-temperature study of itinerant ferromagnetism in Fe, Co, and Ni
,”
Phys. Rev. B
55
,
14975
14986
(
1997
).
27.
J. P.
Heremans
and
B.
Wiendlocha
, “
The tetradymites Bi2Te3 related materials
,” in
Materials Aspect of Thermoelectricity
, edited by
C.
Uher
(
CRC Press, Taylor and Francis
,
Boca Raton
,
FL
,
2016
).