We would like to correct the anisotropy values that were misquoted on page 2 at the bottom of column 1 and top of column 2, as well as on page 3 at the top of column 2.1 The anisotropy values are misprinted as “K1 = 570 J m−3, K15 nm = 6700 J m−3, K30 nm = 7200 J m−3, and K50 nm = 8100 J m−3.” The correct values that were used in the simulated results presented are “K1 = 5700 J m−3, K15 nm = 67 000 J m−3, K30 nm = 72 000 J m−3, and K50 nm = 81 000 J m−3.” This change has no impact on the results presented in the paper as these are the accurate anisotropy values that were obtained by hysteresis curve measurements and used in the simulated results presented. Therefore, this erratum is simply to correct a typographical error and to make clear the properties used in the simulations so that the work can be accurately reproduced by the reader.

1.
T.
Wren
,
B.
Gribkov
,
V.
Petrashov
, and
O.
Kazakova
,
J. Appl. Phys.
118
,
023906
(
2015
).