Recent studies including our own report (I) have revealed that heavily phosphorus (P) doped Czochralski-silicon (HP-Cz-Si) exhibits peculiar defect behaviors during crystal growth. HP-Cz-Si crystals with a low resistivity of around 0.6 mΩ cm (P concentration of 1.3 × 1020 P cm−3) have interstitial-type stacking faults (SFs) and dislocations, which degrade device characteristics. The purpose of this paper is to clarify what causes the defect behavior in HP-Cz-Si through theoretical calculations. The thermal equilibrium concentrations of substitutional P (Ps), interstitial P (Pi), and (Ps)n-vacancy (V) clusters (n = 1−4) were determined by using density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The concentrations of Pi ([Pi]) and (Ps)nV ([(Ps)nV]) balanced with the given Ps concentration ([Ps]) were obtained as a function of the total P concentration ([P]) and the temperature. On the basis of the calculated results those can quantitatively explain our experimental results in the report (I), we propose a defect model that accurately represents HP-Cz-Si crystal growth. The main feature of the model is that the incorporated Pi atoms at the solid/liquid interface around [Pi] = 1017 Pi cm−3 cause the formation of SFs and dislocations during the HP-Cz-Si crystal growth with around [P] = 1020 P cm−3. Furthermore, DFT calculations were performed for Pi segregation on the SF and for the photoelectron spectra of P 1s measured by hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to explain the other experimental results in the report (I).
I. INTRODUCTION
From the late 1970s to the early 2010s, many experimental studies have been conducted on the impact of dopants and impurities on intrinsic point defect behavior and grown-in defect formation during Si crystal growth.1–8 The types of dopants that have been reported are p-type (B and Ga), neutral (C, Ge, and Sn), and n-type (P, As, Sb, and Bi). The impacts of impurities (H, C, O, and N) have also been investigated for the purpose of improving the quality of Si crystals.4,9–15 Among the p-type and n-type dopants, B, P, and As can be doped at the highest concentration. The highest concentration of B, P, and As for which experimental results have been reported up until the early 2010s was about 1 × 1019 B cm−3, 3.5 × 1019 P cm−3 and 3 × 1019 As cm−3, respectively.4 Based on a model that quantitatively explains the intrinsic point defect behavior using density functional theory (DFT) calculations,16 the concentration distribution of intrinsic point defects valid for all pulling conditions in large-diameter Czochralski-Si (Cz-Si) crystal growth has been determined by computer simulation.17,18 Theoretical studies showed that the self-interstitial (I) and vacancy (V) formation energies around dopant atoms change depending on the type and size of the dopants, i.e., the electrical state and the local strain around the dopants. That is, the Si crystal becomes I-rich by B doping up to 1 × 1019 B cm−3 while it becomes V-rich by P doping up to 3.5 × 1019 P cm−3and As doping up to 3 × 1019 As cm−3.
In the last decade, heavily P doped (HP-Cz-Si) crystals have been widely used in power devices. To reduce the power consumption, the crystal resistivity must be reduced as much as possible. Currently, the most advanced crystals can be manufactured with a resistivity as low as 0.6 mΩ cm (1.3 × 1020 P cm−3). The defect behavior in CZ-Si has been reported to change significantly when the P concentration in the Si crystal exceeds 3 × 1019 P cm−3.4,19–26 That is, the void formation is significantly suppressed with P doping over (3–4) × 1019 P cm−3.4,19 Senda et al.20 observed plate-like SiP21 precipitates of 100–200 nm in as-grown HP-CZ-Si crystals at around 8 × 1019 P cm−3. Zeng et al.22,23 also reported the formation of oxygen precipitates from heterogeneous nuclei of small SiP precipitates during the heat treatment of HP-Cz-Si crystals. Subsequently, Wu et al.24 also reported that post-annealing of HP-CZ-Si crystals with a maximum [P] of 7.35 × 1019 P cm−3 at 450–1050 °C resulted in the formation of SiP precipitates of various crystallographic morphologies with dependent of temperature. Voronkov et al.25 and Nakamura et al.26 claimed that the increase of interstitial P (Pi) concentration causes the change of defect behavior from V-type to I-type in HP-Cz-Si.
Furthermore, in the 1020 P cm−3 order, we have identified even more peculiar defect behavior in the report (I).27 It was experimentally found that, at 1.3 × 1020 P cm−3, small dislocation loops were observed in the bottom, while interstitial-type stacking faults (SFs) with P segregation were observed in the middle of crystal. The growing and tangling dislocations and P segregation were also observed in the crystal portion for a longer thermal history around 600 °C. The P segregation suggests the existence of supersaturated interstitial Pi atoms. However, no quantitative explanation of Pi concentration during HP-Cz-Si crystal growth has been given. Furthermore, various points still need to be clarified, such as the formation of SFs, the expansion of dislocations, and the actual state of defects in low-temperature regions during crystal growth of HP-Cz-Si.
In the present paper, the thermal equilibrium concentrations of substitutional P (Ps), interstitial P (Pi), and (Ps)nV (n = 1−4) clusters in Si are obtained on the basis of DFT calculations. We propose an appropriate model of intrinsic point defect behavior in growing HP-Cz-Si. Furthermore, we perform DFT calculations for Pi segregation on the SF and for the photoelectron spectra of P 1s measured by hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HAXPES) to explain the other experimental results in the report (I).27
II. CALCULATION DETAILS
A. Formation energy and formation entropy of Ps, Pi, and (Ps)nV clusters
DFT calculations were carried out within the generalized gradient approximation (GGA)28 for electron exchange and correlation using the CAmbridge Serial Total Energy Package (CASTEP) code.29 Three-dimensional periodic boundary conditions were set with cubic supercells of 512 Si atoms to calculate the total energy of Si crystals containing Ps, Pi, and (Ps)nV clusters. The cut-off energy of the plane waves was 340 eV. We carried out k-point sampling at the Γ point. Note that if the model contains one P atom, its concentration [P] = 1 × 1020 P cm−3 is close to the actual concentration of the heavily P doped Si crystal. The formation energy of these P defects was obtained after geometry optimization.
Here, corresponds to the total energy of the cell including one cluster.
Due to the high calculation cost of the linear response method,30 formation (vibration) entropies of Ps atom [Sf (Ps)] and Pi atom [Sf (Pi)] were calculated using a cubic supercell of 64 Si atoms. The change of formation entropy through (Ps)nV cluster formation was not taken into consideration due to its low calculation accuracy of relatively large (Ps)nV cluster sizes for a 64-Si atom model.
The thermal equilibrium concentrations of the Ps, Pi, and clusters were obtained on the basis of the calculated Ef and Sf. The detail procedure will be described in Sec. III A.
B. Energy reduction in Pi cluster growth on SF
An interstitial-type Frank-loop stacking fault (SF) was modeled as shown in Fig. 3 and compared with the perfect Si model. The SF model and perfect model consist of 32 and 30 (111) layers, respectively, including 16 atoms in each layer. To obtain the energy reduction of Pi at the SF with reference to the Si bulk, formation energy [Ef (Pi)] of the Pi atom in Eq. (1a) was calculated by moving the position of the Pi atom from the bulk to the SF.
By adding the other Pi atoms to the Pi atom on the SF, the most stable (Pi)2–(Pi)7 clusters on the SF were obtained among the cluster structures considered. The energy reduction in Pi cluster growth on the SF was then calculated.
C. Binding energy of P 1s electron for Ps, Pi, and (Ps)nV clusters
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A. Concentrations of Ps, Pi, and (Ps)nV clusters and mechanism of peculiar defect behaviors during HP-Cz-Si crystal growth
Here, CSi = 5 × 1022 cm−3 is the site number of Si [= site number of Ps in Eq. (3a), site number of Pi in Eq. (3b), and site number of V in Eq. (3c)], k is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the temperature. The first row of Eq. (3b) indicates the Cpi of Pi atoms up to the 5th nearest substituted Ps atom, and the second row of Eq. (3b) indicates the Cpi of Pi atoms beyond the 5th nearest substituted Ps atom. Here, we assumed that Ef of the Pi farther than the 5th nearest is not affected by the Ps atom. 4Cn in Eq. (3c) is the degeneracy number of n Ps atoms at the nearest V.
Here, we assumed that the concentration of I maintained the thermal equilibrium concentration as the supersaturated I atoms were absorbed by the SFs and/or dislocation loops as will be mentioned later in this section.
Here, we also assumed that the concentration of I maintained the thermal equilibrium concentration.
Figure 5 shows the thermal equilibrium concentrations, Cps of Ps [Eq. (4a)], Cpi of Pi [Eq. (6)], and [Eqs. (7a)–(7d)] as a function of temperature. For Cpi, the values of [Ps] at 1 × 1019, 5 × 1019, 1 × 1020, and 2 × 1020 Ps cm−3 are shown. Here, we assumed that the melting temperature T of HP-Cz-Si is 1412 °C. By using the thermal equilibrium concentration at the melting temperature, we obtained the incorporated P defect concentrations, [Ps] of Ps, [Pi] of Pi, and of as functions of total P concentrations [P]tot as shown in Fig. 6(a). Here, we calculated [Pi] by Eq. (4c), by Eq. (4e), and [P]tot by Eq. (5) at the given [Ps]. We clarified that the main P defects incorporated at the solid/liquid interface are Ps and Pi in the [P]tot range of 1 × 1019–2 × 1020 P cm−3. Figure 6(b) shows the P defect concentrations, [Ps] of Ps, [Pi] of Pi, and of as functions of total P concentrations [P]tot at T = 600 °C. Figure 6(c) shows Ps, Pi, and (Ps)4V concentrations at [P]tot = 1 × 1020 P cm−3 as a function of temperature. The obtained expressions, Cps [Eq. (4a)], Cpi [Eq. (6)], and [Eqs. (7a)–(7d)], will be very impactful to expand the application of numerical simulation18 to HP-Cz-Si crystal growth. Here, we use these data in the following discussion on the mechanism of defect behaviors in HP-Cz-Si crystal growth.
Table II summarizes the incorporated Ps and Pi concentration at the melting temperature with their supersaturated temperatures. The data in Table II can be used quantitatively to explain our experimental results in the report (I)27 of the peculiar defect behavior around 1020 P cm−3 mentioned in Sec. I.
At the melting temperature, Pi around 1017 cm−3 is incorporated at the solid/liquid interface by heavily P doping around 1020 P cm−3. V becomes supersaturated at a concentration of about 1014–1015 V cm−3 after the pair recombination with I.4,35 Pi atoms become supersaturated at a concentration of about 1017 Pi cm−3 around void formation temperatures (around 1100 °C).36 Since the calculated diffusion barrier of Pi atom is very small (0.14 eV), the reaction Pi + V → Ps proceeds, and the observable voids no longer form during crystal growth. Note that Pi still remains at [Pi] ∼ 1017 Pi cm−3 after the reaction Pi + V → Ps.
During cooling of the crystal down to about 600 °C, the supersaturated Pi kicks out a lattice Si atom (Pi → Ps + I). The [Pi] is decreasing as can be seen from Fig. 6(c). The I becomes supersaturated and forms I-type dislocation loops and SFs.27 The concentration of I maintained the thermal equilibrium concentration as the supersaturated I atoms were absorbed by the SFs and/or dislocation loops.
At temperatures of 600 °C and lower, Ps becomes supersaturated. As can be seen from Figs. 6(b) and 6(c), the (Ps)4V concentration balanced to that of Ps is about 1019 P4V cm−3 when [P]tot = 1020 Pcm−3. That is, a (Ps)4V cluster forms from the reaction 4Ps → (Ps)4V + I at 600 °C and lower. We will further discuss of the formation of (Ps)4V in Sec. III C. The generated I is absorbed by the I-type dislocation loops, causing defect growth and tangle. In addition, the Pi formed by Ps + I → Pi segregates on SFs.27 The clustering of Pi atoms on SF will be discussed in Sec. III B. The formation of (Ps)4V drastically proceeds during long-time wafer annealing at 600 °C and lower.27
Finally, we briefly discuss the case when [P]tot is less than 5 × 1019 P cm−3. As shown in Table II, Pi becomes supersaturated when below the void formation temperatures (around 1100 °C). Therefore, supersaturated V forms voids and later the reaction Pi → Ps + I occurs during crystal growth. This is probably the reason that voids were experimentally observed at [P]tot less than 5 × 1019 P cm−3.4
B. Pi segregation on SF
Figure 7 shows the most stable configuration of the Pi atom at the SF and the formation energy of the Pi atom with reference that on the SF. We found that the Pi atom becomes about 0.3 eV more stable when the Pi atom is trapped on the SF. The energy is not greatly reduced but it will be a sufficient driving force for trapping as the supersaturation of Pi increases as the temperature decreases during crystal growth.
C. Photoelectron spectra of P 1s measured by HAXPES
Table III summarizes the calculated binding energies of the P 1s electron (Eb) for Ps, Pi, and (Ps)nV clusters and energy shift ΔEb from the value of Ps. The charge state determined by the energy band calculations is also shown. By comparing the calculated results with the experimental HAXPES results [P1, P2 (inactive) and P2 (active) peaks] in the report (I),27 we concluded that the origin of the P1 peak should be Ps. The origin of the P2 peak (inactive), which becomes noticeable after a longer thermal history at 600 °C and lower and/or long-time wafer annealing at 600 °C and lower, should be (Ps)4V. (Ps)2V is not the origin of the P2 peak (inactive) as its concentration is very low as shown in Fig. 6(b).
The P2 peak (active) was also observed in the as-grown crystal.27 Figure 10 shows two types of P3 clusters, (Ps + Pi) + Ps(a) and (Ps + Pi) + Ps(b), which are responsible for the P2 peak (active). These two clusters are stable as the energy of (Ps + Pi) + Ps(a) is reduced by −0.94 eV and that of (Ps + Pi) + Ps(b) is reduced by −1.10 eV from the isolated one Ps and two Pi. Furthermore, they have a +1 charge and ΔEb close to that of the experimental results. That is, the two clusters are possible origins of P2 (active) formed during crystal growth.
IV. CONCLUSION
HP-Cz-Si crystals with a resistivity down to 0.6 mΩ cm ([P] = 1.3 × 1020 P cm−3) are currently being manufactured for application for low-voltage power MOSFETs. Recent studies including our own report (I)27 have revealed that HP-Cz-Si exhibits peculiar defect behaviors such as the formation of SFs and dislocations. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the causes of the defect behavior in HP-Cz-Si through theoretical calculations.
The thermal equilibrium concentrations of Ps, Pi, and (Ps)nV (n = 1−4) clusters were determined by DFT calculations. Furthermore, equilibrium concentrations of Pi and (Ps)nV balanced to the given Ps concentration were obtained as functions of the total P concentration and the temperature. On the basis of the calculated results those can quantitatively explain our experimental results in the report (I),27 we proposed the following defect model to represent HP-Cz-Si crystal growth. At the melting temperature, Pi around 1017 cm−3 is incorporated at the solid/liquid interface by heavily P doping around 1020 P cm−3. From 1100 to 600 °C, supersaturated Pi atom interacts with the Si atom to become Ps with the emission of I. The emitted Is agglomerate and form SFs and dislocations. At temperatures of 600 °C and lower, supersaturated Ps becomes (Ps)4V with the emission of I. The SFs and dislocations absorb Is and become more complex defects. The supersaturated Pi also segregates on the defects. The formation of (Ps)4V further proceeds during long-time wafer annealing at 600 °C and lower.
The other DFT calculations explained the Pi segregation on the SF. The calculated energy is reduced by about 0.8–2.0 eV for each Pi associated with the growth of a Pi cluster up to (Pi)7. That is, if one Pi is trapped on the SF, the growth of the Pi cluster will proceed drastically.
Finally, the binding energies of the P 1s electron for Ps, Pi, and (Ps)nV clusters were calculated and compared to the experimental HAXPES results [P1, P2 (inactive) and P2 (active) peaks] in the report (I).27 We concluded that the origin of the P1 peak should be Ps, and the origin of the P2 peak (inactive), which becomes noticeable after longer thermal history at 600 °C and lower and/or long-time wafer annealing at 600 °C and lower, should be (Ps)4V. Lastly, we proposed two structures of the P3 cluster responsible for the P2 peak (active) observed in the as-grown crystal.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was partially supported by JST, CREST, Japan (Grant No. JPMJCR21C2).
AUTHOR DECLARATIONS
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts to disclose.
Author Contributions
Koji Sueoka: Conceptualization (lead); Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Funding acquisition (lead); Investigation (lead); Methodology (lead); Supervision (lead); Validation (lead); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (lead). Yasuhito Narushima: Investigation (supporting); Methodology (supporting); Validation (supporting). Kazuhisa Torigoe: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Validation (equal). Naoya Nonaka: Investigation (supporting); Methodology (supporting); Validation (supporting). Koutaro Koga: Investigation (supporting); Methodology (supporting); Validation (supporting). Toshiaki Ono: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Validation (equal). Hiroshi Horie: Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (supporting); Methodology (supporting); Validation (supporting). Masataka Hourai: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Validation (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).
DATA AVAILABILITY
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article.