Electric field (F) effects in self-assembled quantum dots with a lens geometry have been studied. The optical selection rules and the origin of the anomalous behavior of the photoluminescence lines with the applied field reported by Raymond et al. [Phys. Rev. B 58, R13415 (1998)] are analyzed in terms of the interband oscillator strength and lens symmetry. Also, an explicit analytical representation in the framework of the simple parabolic model for the electronic states as a function of F and lens parameter are given. The excitonic effect has been considered in the strongly confined regime when the excitonic Bohr radius is smaller than the dot dimensions. The influence of the lens geometry on the quantum Stark effect shows an asymmetric energy shift in the electron-hole transition.

1.
D. Bimberg, M. Grundmann, and N. N. Ledentsov, The Quantum Dot Heterostructures (Wiley, Chichester, 1999).
2.
A. D.
Yoffe
,
Adv. Phys.
50
,
1
(
2001
).
3.
M. A.
Cusack
,
P. R.
Briddon
, and
M.
Jaros
,
Phys. Rev. B
54
,
R2300
(
1996
).
4.
M. A.
Cusack
,
P. R.
Briddon
, and
M.
Jaros
,
Phys. Rev. B
56
,
4047
(
1997
).
5.
M.
Grundmann
,
O.
Stier
, and
D.
Bimberg
,
Phys. Rev. B
52
,
11969
(
1995
).
6.
L.
Wang
and
A.
Zunger
,
Phys. Rev. B
59
,
15806
(
1999
).
7.
C.
Pryor
,
Phys. Rev. B
57
,
7190
(
1998
).
8.
O.
Stier
,
M.
Grundmann
, and
D.
Bimberg
,
Phys. Rev. B
59
,
5688
(
1999
).
9.
A.
Zunger
,
Phys. Status Solidi B
224
,
727
(
2001
).
10.
E.
Menéndez-Proupin
,
C.
Trallero-Giner
, and
S. E.
Ulloa
,
Phys. Rev. B
60
,
16747
(
1999
).
11.
J. L.
Marı́n
,
R.
Riera
, and
S. A.
Cruz
,
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
10
,
1349
(
1998
).
12.
E.
Menéndez
,
C.
Trallero-Giner
, and
M.
Cardona
,
Phys. Status Solidi B
199
,
81
(
1997
).
13.
T.
Uozumi
et al.,
Phys. Rev. B
59
,
9826
(
1999
).
14.
D. J.
Eaglesham
and
M.
Cerullo
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
64
,
1943
(
1990
).
15.
A.
Forchel
et al.,
Semicond. Sci. Technol.
11
,
1529
(
1996
).
16.
I.
Hapke-Wurst
et al.,
Semicond. Sci. Technol.
14
,
L41
(
1999
).
17.
J. H.
Zhu
,
K.
Brunner
, and
G.
Abstreiter
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
72
,
424
(
1998
).
18.
X. Z.
Liao
et al.,
Phys. Rev. B
58
,
R4235
(
1998
).
19.
J. M.
Moison
et al.,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
64
,
196
(
1994
).
20.
A. H.
Rodrı́guez
,
C.
Trallero-Giner
,
S. E.
Ulloa
, and
J.
Marı́n-Antuña
,
Phys. Rev. B
63
,
125319
(
2001
).
21.
J.
Zou
,
X. Z.
Liao
,
D. J. H.
Cockayne
, and
R.
Leon
,
Phys. Rev. B
59
,
12279
(
1999
).
22.
C.
Trallero-Giner
and
J.
López-Gondar
,
Physica B
138B
,
287
(
1986
).
23.
E. C.
Niculescu
,
Phys. Status Solidi B
226
,
385
(
2001
).
24.
C. M. A.
Kapteyn
et al.,
Phys. Rev. B
60
,
14265
(
1999
).
25.
D. A. B.
Miller
,
D. S.
Chemla
, and
S.
Schmitt-Rink
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
52
,
2154
(
1988
).
26.
E. B.
Salem
,
S.
Jaziri
, and
R.
Bennaceur
,
Phys. Status Solidi B
224
,
397
(
2001
).
27.
E.
Casado
and
C.
Trallero-Giner
,
Phys. Status Solidi B
196
,
335
(
1996
).
28.
H.
Rossmann
,
A.
Schülzgen
,
F.
Henneberger
, and
M.
Müller
,
Phys. Status Solidi B
159
,
287
(
1990
).
29.
S.
Nomura
and
T.
Kobayashi
,
Solid State Commun.
73
,
425
(
1990
).
30.
V.
Davydov
et al.,
Phys. Status Solidi B
224
,
425
(
2001
).
31.
P. W.
Fry
et al.,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
84
,
733
(
2000
).
32.
P. W.
Fry
et al.,
Phys. Status Solidi B
224
,
497
(
2001
).
33.
I.
Shtrichman
et al.,
Phys. Rev. B
65
,
081303
(
2002
).
34.
S.
Raymond
et al.,
Phys. Rev. B
58
,
R13415
(
1998
).
35.
A. H.
Rodrı́guez
and
C.
Trallero-Giner
,
Phys. Status Solidi B
230
,
463
(
2002
).
36.
A. A.
Kiselev
,
K. W.
Kim
, and
M. A.
Stroscio
,
Phys. Rev. B
60
,
7748
(
1999
).
37.
W.
Sheng
and
J. P.
Leburton
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
88
,
167401
(
2002
).
38.
Landolt-Börnstein Tables, Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edited by O. Madelung (Springer, Berlin, 1982), Vol. 17a.
39.
D. A. B.
Miller
et al.,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
53
,
2173
(
1984
).
40.
M.
Matsuura
and
T.
Kamizato
,
Phys. Rev. B
33
,
8385
(
1986
).
41.
J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, 1999, New York, 1999).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.