The magnetostriction and magnetic induction calculated by a continuous, anisotropic, anhysteric, magnetization model are compared with magnetostriction and magnetic induction measurements on burst and nonburst magnetostrictive twinned single crystal rods. The model shows that the magnetostriction and permeability suppression occurring at low applied field is the result of the rotation, and subsequent capture, of initial field antiparallel magnetization into field transverse [111̄] or [1̄1̄1] local magnetoelastic energy minima. The model further shows that the interval of high magnetostriction applied field derivative, , characteristic of burst magnetostrictive material, is the result of the rotation of field transverse [111̄] or [1̄1̄1] oriented magnetization into the [111] near field magnetocrystalline minima. The occurance of burst magnetostriction is therefore contingent on obtaining sufficient magnetocrystalline anisotropy and sufficiently tight magnetization energy distribution in experimental twinned single crystal rods so as to minimize the applied field interval over which this magnetization rotation process occurs. A final analysis shows that the present model is able to correctly approximate the applied field dependence of the burst magnetostriction response and the applied field dependence of the simultaneous magnetostriction and permeability suppression with a single set of parameters for a range of constant [112] applied compressive stresses. The model additionally exhibits approximately correct saturation magnetostrictions for a range of experimentally applied compressive stresses. However, the model fails to match the experimental behavior above a simultaneous , permeability and field hysteresis transition, located approximately 1000 microstrain from the saturation magnetostriction. The experimental transition clearly indicates a change in magnetization mechanism not accommodated by the present model.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
15 April 1997
Research Article|
April 15 1997
Burst magnetostriction in
William D. Armstrong
William D. Armstrong
Riso/ National Laboratory, Materials Department, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Appl. Phys. 81, 3548–3554 (1997)
Article history
Received:
November 11 1996
Accepted:
January 13 1997
Citation
William D. Armstrong; Burst magnetostriction in . J. Appl. Phys. 15 April 1997; 81 (8): 3548–3554. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.364992
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Citing articles via
Impulse coupling enhancement of aluminum targets under laser irradiation in a soft polymer confined geometry
C. Le Bras, E. Lescoute, et al.
A step-by-step guide to perform x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
Grzegorz Greczynski, Lars Hultman
GaN-based power devices: Physics, reliability, and perspectives
Matteo Meneghini, Carlo De Santi, et al.
Related Content
The structure, magnetostriction, and hysteresis of (Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.9)1−x(Tb0.15Ho0.85Fe1.9)x alloys
J. Appl. Phys. (March 2015)
Magnetostriction ‘‘jumps’’ in twinned Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.9
J. Appl. Phys. (April 1988)
A 3D anisotropic rotation model for magnetization and magnetostriction in Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.9 (abstract)
J. Appl. Phys. (April 1991)
A new model of magnetostrictive ‘‘jumps’’ in twinned Terfenol‐D (abstract)
J. Appl. Phys. (May 1993)
Barkhausen effect and discontinuous magnetostriction in Terfenol‐D
J. Appl. Phys. (November 1988)