Quartz was implanted with titanium ions at high doses (up to 3.3×1017 cm−2). At low energy (40 keV), a highly conductive layer was formed near the surface. The measured sheet resistance was less than 100 Ω/⧠. The implantation‐induced changes in quartz were characterized using various methods such as cross‐sectional transmission electron microscopy, Rutherford backscattering spectrometry, and x‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). As a result of ion implantation, SiO2 was dissociated. Metallic titanium and new chemical compounds between Si, O, and Ti were observed by XPS. However, no conductivity was observed with other metallic ions, such as Fe and Cu, which are known not to react chemically with SiO2. This suggests a correlation between the induced surface conductivity and the chemical reactivity of the implanted species with SiO2. The ion beam synthesis of such a near‐surface conductive layer was then applied during the fabrication of miniaturized pressure sensors based on piezoelectric quartz. This technique is proposed to replace the more conventional approach, i.e., deposition of a thin metallic layer, and to resolve problems related to the hermetic seal made by field‐assisted bonding between glass and quartz plate.

1.
M. Dufour, M. T. Delaye, F. Michel, J. S. Danel, B. Diem, and G. Delapierre, IEEE Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, San Francisco, 1991, p. 668.
2.
R. D. Watkins, C. D. Tuthill, R. M. Curlee, D. R. Koehler, and C. F. Joerg, Proceedings of the 11th Quartz Dev. Conf. and Exhib., Kansas City, 1989 (Electron. Ind. Assoc., Washington, DC), Vol. 1, p. 6.
3.
G. Götz, in Ion Beam Modification of Insulators, edited by P. Mazzoldi and G. W. Arnold (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987), p. 412.
4.
J. F. Ziegler, J. P. Biersack, and U. Littmark, The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids (Pergamon, New York, 1985).
5.
P.
Hartemann
,
Ferroelectrics
42
,
197
(
1982
).
6.
T.
Choudhury
,
S. O.
Saied
,
J. L.
Sullivan
, and
A. M.
Abbot
,
J. Phys. D
22
,
1185
(
1989
).
7.
A.
Ermolieff
,
S.
Marthon
,
P.
Martin
,
F.
Pierre
, and
M.
Dufour
,
Solid State Commun.
82
,
517
(
1992
).
8.
R.
Meaudre
and
A.
Perez
,
Nucl. Instrum. Methods B
32
,
75
(
1988
).
9.
S.
Sato
,
H.
Watanabe
,
K.
Takahashi
,
Y.
Abe
, and
M.
Iwaki
,
Nucl. Instrum. Methods B
59/60
,
1391
(
1991
).
10.
T. Venkatesan, L. Calcagno, B. S. Elman, and G. Foti, in Ion Beam Modification of Insulators, edited by P. Mazzoldi and G. W. Arnold (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987), p. 301, and references therein.
11.
J. G.
Perkins
,
J. Non-Cryst. Solids
3
,
349
(
1972
).
12.
R.
Preterms
,
J. M.
Harris
, and
M. A.
Nicolet
,
Solid-State Electron.
21
,
667
(
1978
).
13.
H. Kraütle, W. K. Chu, M. A. Nicolet, J. W. Mayer, and K. N. Tu, in Applications of Ion Beams to Metals, edited by S. T. Picraux, E. P. EerNisse, and F. L. Vook (Plenum, New York, 1974), p. 193.
14.
T.
Banwell
,
B. X.
Liu
,
I.
Golecki
, and
M. A.
Nicolet
,
Nucl. Instrum. Methods
209/210
,
125
(
1983
).
15.
C. W.
White
,
G.
Farlow
,
J.
Narayan
,
G. J.
Clark
, and
J. E. E.
Baglin
,
Mater. Lett.
2
,
367
(
1984
).
16.
R. Kelly, in Ion Bombardment Modification of Surfaces, edited by O. Auciello and R. Kelly (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984), p. 79, and references therein.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.