Unit‐cell parameters of synthetic zeolite 4A were determined at several pressures to 4.0 GPa in four different hydrostatic pressure media: ethanol, methanol, glycerol, and an organofluorine compound, C8F16O (FC‐75). These data, when combined with previously published results on zeolite in water and a water‐bearing 4 : 1 methanol : ethanol mixture, reveal that compression of zeolite depends on the relative sizes of the hydrostatic fluid molecules compared with the structural channels in the zeolite framework. Zeolite 4A is most compressible (ΔV/VΔP =β=0.046 GPa−1) in glycerol and FC‐75, which have molecular dimensions that are larger than the zeolite channels. Zeolite is least compressible ( β=0.007 GPa−1) in water, which has a maximum molecular dimension that is significantly smaller than the channel diameter. In methanol and ethanol alcohols, which have intermediate molecular diameters, zeolite 4A also has intermediate compressibility. This zeolite in alcohols, furthermore, progressively undergoes a series of transitions to more compressible states as pressure is raised.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
15 September 1984
Research Article|
September 15 1984
Compressibility of zeolite 4A is dependent on the molecular size of the hydrostatic pressure medium Available to Purchase
R. M. Hazen;
R. M. Hazen
Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C. 20008
Search for other works by this author on:
L. W. Finger
L. W. Finger
Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C. 20008
Search for other works by this author on:
R. M. Hazen
Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C. 20008
L. W. Finger
Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C. 20008
J. Appl. Phys. 56, 1838–1840 (1984)
Article history
Received:
February 03 1984
Accepted:
May 08 1984
Citation
R. M. Hazen, L. W. Finger; Compressibility of zeolite 4A is dependent on the molecular size of the hydrostatic pressure medium. J. Appl. Phys. 15 September 1984; 56 (6): 1838–1840. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.334194
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Re-examination of important defect complexes in silicon: From microelectronics to quantum computing
P. P. Filippatos, A. Chroneos, et al.
Tutorial: Simulating modern magnetic material systems in mumax3
Jonas J. Joos, Pedram Bassirian, et al.
Piezoelectric thin films and their applications in MEMS: A review
Jinpeng Liu, Hua Tan, et al.
Related Content
Synthesis and application of high silicon zeolites from natural sources
AIP Conf. Proc. (June 2022)
Rotary echo nutation NMR
J. Chem. Phys. (January 1988)
Photoinduced effects in a mordenite‐AgI inclusion compound
J. Appl. Phys. (September 1987)
Positron annihilation in zeolite 13X
J. Appl. Phys. (September 1987)
Confined geometry effects on reorientational dynamics of molecular liquids in porous silica glasses
J. Chem. Phys. (November 1991)