The linear compressibilities of sodium nitrite and sodium nitrate have been determined from x‐ray diffraction of synthetic single crystals mounted in a miniature diamond‐anvil high‐pressure cell at pressures to 27 kbars. Compressibilities of both compounds are anisotropic; compression perpendicular to rigid N‐O bonds is approximately 3.5 times greater than compression within the plane of N‐O bonding. In NaNO2 axial compression ratios are a : b : c=1.0 : 0.46 : 0.28. For a second‐order Birch‐Murnaghan equation of state, K0=219±2 kbars and K′=4.3±0.8. The a : c axial compression ratio of NaNO3 is 0.35 : 1.0. Linear compressibilities are in agreement with data of Bridgman, who determined bulk modulus, K0=258±6 kbars, and K′=6.6±1.5. The product of bulk modulus and molar volume (K0V0) is a constant for alkali halides with the NaCl structure, and the same value is observed for NaNO2, which is only slightly distorted from an NaCl arrangement of Na+ and NO2. Sodium nitrate, which does not posssess the NaCl topology of Na+ and NO3, deviates from this constant. Broadening of x‐ray diffraction maxima of NaNO2 above 10 kbars may be due to twinning in a high‐pressure phase of NaNO2. Such twinning could indicate reduced symmetry; however, the high‐pressure diffraction data indicate a deviation from orthogonality of less than 1°.

1.
R. M.
Hazen
and
L. W.
Finger
,
Am. Mineral.
63
,
289
(
1978
).
2.
ASTM cards 6‐0392 and 7‐271.
3.
L.
Merrill
and
W. A.
Bassett
,
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
45
,
290
(
1974
).
4.
R. M.
Hazen
and
L. W.
Finger
,
Carnegie Inst. Washington Yearb.
76
,
655
(
1977
).
5.
G.
Piermarini
,
S.
Block
,
J. D.
Barnett
, and
R. A.
Forman
,
J. Appl. Phys.
46
,
2774
(
1975
).
6.
W. C. Hamilton, International Tables for X‐Ray Crystallography, Vol. IV (Kynoch, Birmingham, England, 1974), p. 273.
7.
H. King and L. W. Finger, J. Appl. Crystallogr. (to be published).
8.
. Note that the error in bulk modulus derived from this equation (±1%) is significantly smaller than the errors in Δa/a and Δc/c using second‐order polynomials.
9.
D. M.
Adams
and
S. K.
Sharma
,
Chem. Phys. Lett.
36
,
407
(
1975
).
10.
P. W.
Bridgman
,
Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci.
64
,
51
(
1929
).
11.
P. W.
Bridgman
,
Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci.
76
,
1
(
1945
).
12.
J. D.
Barnett
,
J.
Pack
, and
H. T.
Hall
,
Trans. Am. Crstallogr. Assoc.
5
,
113
(
1969
). Unit‐cell parameters versus pressure were not tabulated by Barnett et al.; data in their Fig. 8 are similar to Δa/a and Δc/c values of the present study.
13.
The second‐order term was indeterminate using the four points of this study and was constrained to be equal to that of Bridgman (Ref. 10).
14.
R. W. G. Wyckoff, Crystal Structures, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1954), Vol. I.
15.
O. L.
Anderson
and
J. E.
Nafe
,
J. Geophys. Res.
70
,
3951
(
1965
).
16.
C.
Pistorius
,
Prog. Solid State Chem.
11
,
1
(
1976
).
17.
K.
Gesi
,
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
26
,
953
(
1969
).
18.
R. M.
Hazen
and
L. W.
Finger
,
Phase Trans.
1
,
1
(
1979
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.