One‐dimensional shock loading, attenuation, and recompression data from gas‐gun experiments on mechanical mixtures of alumina powder and epoxy were used to develop model parameters for stress‐wave propagation. Specimens with 0.42, 0.34, and 0.20 volume fractions of alumina were investigated. Calculations simulating the experiments were performed using an extension of a Maxwell rate‐dependent model which requires definitions of the instantaneous, equilibrium, and relaxation functions as input. Experimental observations indicated the shock‐loading behavior is identifiable with the equilibrium response, and the release wave behavior is closely related to the instantaneous response. To model these effects, for negative strain rates, indicative of expansion, a relaxation time of 0.25 μs was used; this value gave agreement between the calculated and measured release wave behavior. For positive strain rates, indicative of compression, the relaxation time was permitted to decrease to 0.03 μs, which caused the shock‐loading response to be dominated by the equilibrium function. Hugoniot data determined from the stress‐wave profiles were compared to effective modulus calculations. This comparison suggests a strength effect which can be interpreted as an interaction between the components. Analysis using a self‐consistent scheme for spherical particles shows good correlation between calculated and measured ultrasonic and Hugoniot intercept wave velocities.

1.
L. M.
Barker
,
J. Compos. Mater.
5
,
140
(
1971
).
2.
R. P.
Reed
and
D. E.
Munson
,
J. Compos. Mater.
6
,
232
(
1972
).
3.
A registered product of Shell Chemical Company.
4.
A registered product of Aluminum Company of America.
5.
L. M.
Barker
and
R. E.
Hollenbach
,
J. Appl. Phys.
35
,
742
(
1964
).
6.
In two of the recompression experiments, Al2O3‐epoxy specimens were not used in the target, and impact was directly onto the fused‐silica disk.
7.
L. M. Barker, Behavior of Dense Media under High Dynamic Pressures (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1968), p. 483.
8.
L. M.
Barker
and
R. E.
Hollenbach
,
J. Appl. Phys.
43
,
4669
(
1972
).
9.
L. M.
Barker
and
K. W.
Schuler
,
J. Appl. Phys.
45
,
3692
(
1974
).
10.
L. M. Barker, Sandia Laboratories Report SLA 73‐1038, 1974 (unpublished).
11.
R. A.
Graham
,
F. W.
Neilson
, and
W. B.
Benedick
,
J. Appl. Phys.
36
,
1775
(
1965
).
12.
G. A.
Jones
and
W. J.
Halpin
,
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
39
,
258
(
1958
).
13.
L. M.
Barker
,
C. D.
Lundergan
, and
W.
Herrmann
,
J. Appl. Phys.
35
,
1203
(
1964
).
14.
The directly measured values of the release wave velocity are Lagrangian and are given in Table III in this form. However, the calculated model response is couched in Eulerian values; consequently, the results plotted in Fig. 7 are Eulerian. The Eulerian values are obtained from Ur (Eulerian) = (ρ0/ρ)Ur (Lagrangian), where ρ is the final density.
15.
L. Kent, K. J. Bowen, and B. M. Butcher, Sandia Laboratories Report SC‐DR‐70‐291, 1970 (unpublished).
16.
D. E.
Munson
and
K. W.
Schuler
,
J. Compos. Mater
5
,
286
(
1971
).
17.
D. E. Munson and K. W. Schuler, Shock Waves and Mechanical Properties of Solids, edited by W. Weiss (Syracuse U.P., Syracuse, 1971), p. 185.
18.
W.
Herrmann
,
J. Appl. Phys.
40
,
2490
(
1969
).
19.
R. J. Lawrence, Sandia Laboratories Report SC‐RR‐720114, 1971 (unpublished).
20.
It was assumed that the components were at the same stress level, so this corresponds to the Reuss model.
21.
T. R. Guess, Sandia Laboratories Report SC‐DR‐68‐343, 1968 (unpublished).
22.
D. E.
Munson
and
R. P.
May
,
J. Appl. Phys.
43
,
962
(
1972
).
23.
J. W. Nunziato, E. K. Walsh, K. W. Schuler, and L. M. Barker, Handbuch der Physik, edited by C. Truesdell (Springer‐Verlag, Berlin, 1974), Vol. VIa/4.
24.
J. W.
Nunziato
and
H. J.
Sutherland
,
J. Appl. Phys.
21
,
184
(
1973
).
25.
B.
Budiansky
,
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
13
,
223
(
1965
).
26.
T. J.
Ahrens
,
W. H.
Gust
, and
E. B.
Royce
,
J. Appl. Phys.
39
,
4610
(
1968
).
27.
D. E. Munson, Sandia Laboratories Report SC‐RR‐69‐803, 1970 (unpublished).
28.
L. M.
Barker
and
R. E.
Hollenbach
,
J. Appl. Phys.
41
,
4208
(
1970
).
29.
J. P.
Watt
,
G. F.
Davies
, and
R. J.
O’Connell
,
Rev. Geophys. Space Phys.
14
,
541
(
1976
).
30.
H. J. Sutherland, (private communication).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.