We describe and present results of a numerical method we have used to solve the hydrodynamic equations with negligible rates of change of momentum and angular momentum, but without other approximations, in a liquid‐crystal twist cell. We verify that the ’’bounce’’ in transmission of normally incident light that is observed when the electric potential across the cell is turned off is an effect of shear flow (backflow) which causes temporary reverse rotation of directors in the middle of the cell. It is not an inertial effect. Inertial effects would have transient times much shorter than the times associated with the optical bounce. When fluid flow is omitted, as in our previous papers, molecules do not tilt backward and the ’’optical bounce’’ occurs only for light that is obliquely incident in one quadrant. A qualitative explanation of the optics of the bounce is given, in addition to numerical results.

1.
F. M.
Leslie
,
Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.
28
,
265
(
1968
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
2.
J. L.
Ericksen
,
Trans. Soc. Rheol.
5
,
23
(
1961
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
3.
N.
Schadt
 and
W.
Helfrich
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
18
,
127
(
1971
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
4.
W.
Helfrich
,
Mol. Crystl. Liq. Cryst.
21
,
187
(
1973
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
5.
C. Z. Van Doorn, Vth International Liquid Crystal Conference, Stockholm, Session H, 1974 (unpublished).
6.
P.
Pieranski
,
F.
Brochard
, and
E.
Guyon
,
J. Phys.
34
,
35
(
1973
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
7.
V.
Freedericsz
 and
V.
Zolina
,
Trans. Am. Electrochem. Soc.
55
,
85
(
1929
);
Google Scholar
 
V.
Freedericsz
 and
V.
Zolina
,
Z. Kristallogr.
79
,
255
(
1931
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
8.
The contents of this paper were presented at the Fifth Freiburger Arbeitstagung Flüssigkristalle, Freiburg, W. Germany, 1975 (Paper I). We were informed there that Dr. Van Doorn has also solved the equations numerically and has submitted a paper on his solution for publication. We were shown a transmission curve with bounce for normally incident light from his manuscript that agrees well with ours.
9.
C. J.
Van Doorn
,
J. Appl. Phys.
46
,
3738
(
1975
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
10.
C. W.
Oseen
,
Ark. Mat. Astron. Fys.
19
,
1
(
1925
).
Google Scholar
 
11.
F. C.
Frank
,
Discuss. Faraday Soc.
25
,
19
(
1958
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
12.
D. W.
Berreman
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
25
,
12
(
1974
);
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
D. W.
Berreman
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
25
,
321
(
1974
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
13.
G. Bauer, F. Windscheid, and D. W. Berreman, Appl. Phys. (to be published).
14.
S.
Meiboom
 and
R. C.
Hewitt
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
30
,
261
(
1973
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
15.
C.
Gähwiller
,
Phys. Lett.
A36
,
311
(
1971
).
Google Scholar
 
16.
D. W.
Berreman
,
J. Opt. Soc. Am.
63
,
1374
(
1973
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
17.
We previously overlooked what is probably the first description of the 4×4 matrix method [
D. O.
Smith
,
Opt. Acta
12
,
13
(
1965
)].
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
18.
C.
Mauguin
,
Bull. Soc. Fr. Mineral.
34
,
71
(
1911
).
Google Scholar
 
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1975 American Institute of Physics.
1975
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.