A universal curve of energy‐dissipation range vs normalized electron energy is proposed, which includes the average atomic number Z of the material being bombarded in the energy normalization factor. Range‐energy expressions of the form , derived from the Bohr‐Bethe energy‐loss relation, are valid over limited energy ranges, but the exponent α differs for materials of greatly different atomic numbers over the same energy range. For the aluminum‐silicon dioxide‐silicon system used here, RG = 4.0 EB(keV)1.75 μg/cm2 has been found accurate for 5 <EB <25 keV. Using this value of range, and taking the steady‐state electron‐beam‐induced current through a thin insulating layer of SiO2 as a measure of the energy dissipation in that layer, an energy‐dissipation (depth‐dose) function has been determined which should be valid for 10 <Z <15. Using this normalized expression, λ(y) = 0.60 + 6.21y − 12.40y2 + 5.69y3 and the range RG, the energy dissipated at any depth may be determined, and hence the carrier‐pair generation in semiconductors, light generation in phosphors, etc., may be predicted. An expression relating the depth‐dose function to the applied voltage drop across the oxide provided an independent check on the experimental measurements and the assumptions used in reducing the data. The ratio of (mobility × lifetime) to the (mean electron excitation energy in the oxide) was found to be (μτ/EA) = (2.97 ± 0.06) × 10−13(cm/V)2 using the energy‐dissipation formulation, and (μτ/EA) = (3.00 ± 0.05) × 10−13(cm/V)2 using the check expression, where the errors quoted are root‐mean‐square deviations computed for 12 or more points.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 1971
Research Article|
December 01 1971
Determination of Kilovolt Electron Energy Dissipation vs Penetration Distance in Solid Materials
T. E. Everhart;
T. E. Everhart
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
Search for other works by this author on:
P. H. Hoff
P. H. Hoff
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Appl. Phys. 42, 5837–5846 (1971)
Article history
Received:
November 23 1970
Citation
T. E. Everhart, P. H. Hoff; Determination of Kilovolt Electron Energy Dissipation vs Penetration Distance in Solid Materials. J. Appl. Phys. 1 December 1971; 42 (13): 5837–5846. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1660019
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A step-by-step guide to perform x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
Grzegorz Greczynski, Lars Hultman
Scaling effects on the microstructure and thermomechanical response of through silicon vias (TSVs)
Shuhang Lyu, Thomas Beechem, et al.
Related Content
20‐Kilovolt Delta‐Function Generator
Rev. Sci. Instrum. (May 1954)
A Preliminary Report on the Development of a 300‐Kilovolt Magnetic Electron Microscope
J. Appl. Phys. (October 1941)
A 500‐Kilovolt Linear Accelerator Using Selenium Rectifiers
Rev. Sci. Instrum. (September 1950)
A Portable 250‐Kilovolt Accelerator
Rev. Sci. Instrum. (June 1953)
Kilovolt x-ray scattering from a plasma
Rev. Sci. Instrum. (February 1998)