An extensive study has been made on the growth and characterization of single‐crystal magnesium aluminate spinel. This material has received attention as a superior substrate for epitaxial silicon‐integrated electronic devices. Large spinel single crystals within the compositional range MgO:Al2O3–MgO:3Al2O3, have been successfully grown by flame fusion using a modern three‐tube post‐mix‐type Verneuil burner. Substrate wafers of (111), (100), and (110) orientations were prepared for silicon epitaxy. Surface preparation of the substrates was studied, including mechanical polishing, hydrogen annealing, and chemical etching. The composition, lattice parameter, crystalline perfection, mechanical hardness, thermal stability, and dielectric properties of the spinel single crystals have been characterized by various techniques in an effort to obtain a basic understanding for substrate use of this material system. Some trends in the dependence of these properties on composition were observed. In particular, the thermal stability increases with decreasing Al content in the spinel system. It was found that the spinel crystals with alumina content up to MgO:2.5Al2O3 are thermally stable and exhibit no cracking and/or exsolution behavior to at least 1200°C, which is the temperature commonly used for fabricating many silicon devices. However, the ease of growth and the mechanical stability decrease with decreasing Al content in spinel. A post‐growth annealing treatment enhances the mechanical stability and prevents formation of cracks during cutting. Substrates within the compositional range of MgO:1.5Al2O3–MgO:2.5Al2O3 are suitable for silicon epitaxy, and the choice of the optimum substrate composition depends on the specific conditions for processing of the silicon devices.

1.
R. Ward, Progress in Inorganic Chemistry (Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1959), Vol. I, pp. 465–536.
2.
J. D.
Filby
and
S.
Nielson
,
Brit. J. Appl. Phys.
18
,
1357
(
1967
).
3.
T. J. LaChapelle, A. Miller, and F. L. Morritz, Progress in Solid State Chemistry, H. Reiss, Ed. (Pergamon Press, Inc., New York, 1967), Vol. 3, p. 1.
4.
C. W.
Mueller
and
P. H.
Robinson
,
Proc. IEEE
52
,
1487
(
1964
).
5.
F. P.
Heiman
,
IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices
13
,
855
(
1966
).
6.
A.
Miller
,
Electronics
40
,
171
(
1967
).
7.
P. B.
Hart
,
P. J.
Etter
,
B. W.
Jervis
, and
J. M.
Flanders
,
Brit. J. Appl. Phys.
18
,
1389
(
1967
).
8.
H. M.
Manasevit
and
D. H.
Forbes
,
J. Appl. Phys.
37
,
734
(
1966
).
9.
H.
Seiter
and
C.
Zaminer
,
Z. Angew. Phys.
20
,
158
(
1965
).
10.
P. H.
Robinson
and
D. J.
Dumin
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
115
,
75
(
1968
).
11.
W.
Heywang
,
Mat. Res. Bull.
3
,
315
(
1968
).
12.
A distinct property of the spinel system is that it has a wide composition range (MgO:xAl2O3,x≈0.64−6.7) as described in A. D. Wadsley, Non‐Stoichiometric Compounds, L. Mandelcorn, Ed. (Academic Press Inc., New York, 1964).
13.
M. H. Barnes, L. Merker, and W. F. Eppler, FIAT Reps., U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C. (1947).
14.
G.
Bemski
,
Phys. Rev.
111
,
1515
(
1958
).
15.
S. J.
Silverman
and
J. B.
Singleton
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
106
,
591
(
1958
).
16.
C. C.
Wang
and
S. H.
McFarlane
III
,
J. Cryst. Growth
3‐4
,
485
(
1968
).
17.
C. C.
Wang
,
G. E.
Gottlieb
,
G. W.
Cullen
,
S. H.
McFarlane
III
, and
K. H.
Zaininger
,
Trans. Met. Soc. AIME
245
,
441
(
1969
).
18.
E. F. Farrell, A. Linz, and M. Redman, Contract Rep., AF19 (628)‐3884 (1965).
19.
H. Palmour III, R. D. McBrayer, D. E. Witter, and W. W. Kriegel, Contract Rep., AF33 (616)‐7820 (1964).
20.
H.
Saalfeld
and
H.
Jagodzinski
,
Z. Krist.
109
,
87
(
1957
).
21.
J. G.
Grabmaier
and
B. C.
Watson
,
J. Amer. Ceram. Soc.
51
,
355
(
1968
).
22.
J. A.
Adamski
,
J. Appl. Phys.
36
,
1784
(
1965
).
23.
C. G.
Dunn
and
W. W.
Martin
,
Trans. AIME
185
,
417
(
1945
).
24.
B. D. Cullity, Element of X‐Ray Diffraction lpar;Addison‐Wesley Publ. Co., Inc., Reading, Mass., 1959).
25.
J. B.
Newkirk
,
Trans. Met. Soc. AIME
215
,
483
(
1959
).
26.
F. B.
Nelson
and
D. P.
Riley
,
Proc. Phys. Soc. (London)
57
,
60
(
1945
).
27.
F. D.
Rosi
,
B.
Abeles
, and
R. V.
Jensen
,
J. Phys. Chem. Solids
10
,
191
(
1959
).
28.
A. H.
Scott
and
H. L.
Curtis
,
J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand.
22
,
747
(
1939
).
29.
F.
Knoop
,
C. G.
Peters
, and
W. B.
Emerson
,
J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand.
23
,
39
(
1939
).
30.
R. C. Linares, Contract Reps., AF19 (628)‐4057 and AF19 (628)‐2965 (1964).
31.
K. A.
Wickersheim
and
R. A.
Lefever
,
J. Opt. Soc. Amer.
50
,
831
(
1960
).
32.
R. H.
Arlett
and
M.
Robbins
,
J. Amer. Ceram. Soc.
50
,
273
(
1967
).
33.
Details will be reported in separate papers.
34.
D. E.
Bradley
,
Brit. J. Appl. Phys.
11
,
506
(
1960
).
35.
G. W. Cullen, G. E. Gottlieb, C. C. Wang, and K. H. Zaininger, J. Electrochem. Soc. (to be published).
36.
K. H. Zaininger and C. C. Wang, Solid‐State Electron. (to be published).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.