Simple but rigorous derivations are presented for the inequalities(Proofs of the first two inequalities have been given by Buckingham and Gunton.1) Here d is the dimensionality and α′, β, γ, γ′ and δ are the exponents characterizing a ferromagnet near its critical point,2 while η and ν describe the decay of the corresponding spin‐spin correlation functions2 , according to ,where the inverse range of correlation κ1 may be defined by . The corresponding exponent ηE for the energy‐energy correlation function (essentially , where ) is proved to satisfy ,where the specific heat CM at T=Tc diverges with the magnetization as M−αc while the energy derivative varies as Mζ. (Mean Field or classical values are αc=0, ζ=1.) The proofs are based on the ``intuitively obvious'' properties: (a) positivity, namely, , and (b) monotonic increase of Γ1, Γ2 and Γ4 under increase of magnetic field and decrease of temperature. These properties are known3 to be rigorously valid for Ising models of arbitrary spin, lattice structure and ferromagnetic coupling (Jij≥0). Their validity for real magnets together with the experimental observation δ≤4.7 leads to the significant conclusion η≥0.05.
REFERENCES
1.
M. J. Buckingham and J. D. Gunton, Phys. Rev. (in press);
2.
For definitions, etc., see
M. E.
Fisher
, J. Appl. Phys.
38
, 981
(1967
).3.
D. G.
Kelly
and S.
Sherman
, J. Math. Phys.
9
, 466
(1968
); , J. Math. Phys.
R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. (to be published).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1969 The American Institute of Physics.
1969
The American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.