The possibility is discussed of using flux quantization in superconductors as the basis of an ammeter and more generally as a fundamental standard of electromagnetic measurement. A particular design is proposed and in this context some of the fundamental design problems of this sort of instrument are considered. It is concluded that an instrument of this type could measure a current in terms of the flux quantum, length, and time to an accuracy approaching 1 part in 106. The limitations and advantages of the proposed instrument are discussed and comparisons are made with present current‐measuring instruments and some conjectures are made of the future potential of flux quantization instruments of this kind.

1.
F. London, Superfluids (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1950), Vol. 1, p. 152.
2.
R.
Doll
and
M.
Näbauer
,
Phys. Rev. Letters
7
,
51
(
1961
).
3.
B. S.
Deaver
, Jr.
and
W. M.
Fairbank
,
Phys. Rev. Letters
7
,
43
(
1961
).
4.
W. H.
Parker
,
B. N.
Taylor
, and
D. N.
Langenberg
,
Phys. Rev. Letters
18
,
287
(
1967
). According to this experiment the measured value of h/2e = 2.06786±0.00001 Wb.
5.
An excellent review of the current status of electrical standards has recently been published: I. L. Cooter, B. L. Dunfee, F. K. Harris, W. P. Harris, F. L. Hermack, and C. Peterson, Electrotechnology, Science and Engineering Series. No. 97 (Conover‐Mast Publications, New York, 1967).
6.
The present time standard is accurate to about 1 part in 1011; it is probable that this accuracy will soon be raised to 1 part in 1013. See
Norman F.
Ramsey
,
Metrologia
1
,
7
(
1965
);
R. F.
Lacey
,
Metrologia
3
,
70
(
1967
). The present length standard is probably accurate to 1 part in 109.,
Metrologia
7.
A. L. Kwiram and B. S. Deaver, Jr., The Ninth International Conference on Low Temperature Physics, 1964 (Plenum Press, New York, 1965), p. 451.
8.
W. A.
Little
and
R. D.
Parks
,
Phys. Rev. Letters
9
,
9
(
1962
).
9.
J. E.
Zimmerman
and
A. H.
Silver
,
Phys. Letters
10
,
47
(
1964
).
10.
J.
Lambe
,
A. H.
Silver
,
J. E.
Mercereau
, and
R. C.
Jaklevic
,
Phys. Letters
11
,
16
(
1964
).
11.
R. Meservey, The Ninth International Conference on Low Temperature Physics, 1964 (Plenum Press, New York, 1965), p. 455.
12.
D. H.
Douglass
, Jr.
,
Phys. Rev.
132
,
513
(
1963
).
13.
For instance from The Greenfield Tap and Die Co., Greenfield, Mass., or the Speedring Corp, Warren, Michigan.
14.
These tubes were made by the Wilmad Glass Co., Buena, N.J.
15.
Fringe count micrometer model 214 made by the Link Division of General Precision Corp.
16.
A. H.
Silver
and
J. E.
Zimmerman
,
Phys. Rev.
157
,
317
(
1967
).
17.
R. L.
Forgacs
and
A.
Warnick
,
IEEE Trans. Instr. Meas.
IM‐15
,
113
(
1966
).
18.
B. N.
Taylor
,
W. H.
Parker
,
D. N.
Langenberg
, and
A.
Denenstein
,
Metrologia
3
,
89
(
1967
).
19.
R. L.
Driscoll
and
R. D.
Cutkosky
,
J. Res. Natl. Bur. Std.
60
,
297
(
1958
).
20.
P.
Vigoureux
,
Metrologia
1
,
2
(
1965
).
21.
M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, National Bureau of Standards Mathematical Series No. 55 (1964).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.