Photoluminescence imaging under sunlight excitation has in the recent years been proposed as a promising inspection technique of field-installed photovoltaic modules. Virtually, all studies have been conducted in full sunlight and clear sky conditions. A study in which photoluminescence images had been acquired at an irradiance level below 100 W m−2 using the lock-in technique has shown the potential of these images with respect to defect analysis. Additionally, as on-site measurement techniques are subject to weather conditions, it would be favorable to extend the applicability of photoluminescence imaging to a wider range of irradiance levels. A method for photoluminescence imaging which does not use the lock-in technique for the purpose of filtering of sunlight was proposed recently. The present study extends the application of this approach to diffuse irradiance conditions. We demonstrate that the method gives valuable information about the modules also in the case of image acquisition under diffuse global in-plane irradiance as low as 40 W m−2. Photoluminescence images acquired under low irradiance are comparable to electroluminescence images acquired at 10% of short-circuit current. Photoluminescence imaging has also been conducted successfully from the rear of bifacial modules in these illumination conditions.

1.
C.
Buerhop
et al., “
Infrared imaging of photovoltaic modules: A review of the state of the art and future challenges facing gigawatt photovoltaic power stations
,”
Prog. Energy
4
,
042010
(
2022
).
2.
“IEC TS 62446-3:2017 photovoltaic (PV) systems—Requirements for testing, documentation and maintenance, Part 3: Photovoltaic modules and plants—Outdoor infrared thermography,” Standard (2017).
3.
C.
Buerhop
et al., “Influence of the irradiance on the detection and performance of PID-affected PV-modules,” in 35th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition (EU PVSEC, 2018), pp. 2001–2004.
4.
M.
Guada
et al., “
Daylight luminescence system for silicon solar panels based on a bias switching method
,”
Energy Sci. Eng.
8
,
3839
3853
(
2020
).
5.
G. A. D. R.
Benatto
et al., “Daylight electroluminescence of PV modules in field installations: When electrical signal modulation is required?,” in 8th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (EU PVSEC, 2022), pp. 735–739.
6.
M.
Köntges
et al., “
Review: Ultraviolet fluorescence as assessment tool for photovoltaic modules
,”
IEEE J. Photovolt.
10
,
616
633
(
2020
).
7.
B.
Doll
et al., “
Photoluminescence for defect detection on full-sized photovoltaic modules
,”
IEEE J. Photovolt.
11
,
1419
1429
(
2021
).
8.
S.
Stoicescu
et al., “DaySy: Luminescence imaging of PV modules in daylight,” in 29th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition (EU PVSEC, 2014), pp. 2553–2554.
9.
T. J.
Silverman
et al., “Illuminated outdoor luminescence imaging of photovoltaic modules,” in
IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference
(IEEE, 2017), pp. 3452–3455.
10.
R.
Bhoopathy
et al., “
Outdoor photoluminescence imaging of photovoltaic modules with sunlight excitation
,”
Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl.
26
,
69
73
(
2018
).
11.
R.
Bhoopathy
et al., “
Outdoor photoluminescence imaging of solar panels by contactless switching: Technical considerations and applications
,”
Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl.
28
,
217
228
(
2020
).
12.
O.
Kunz
et al., “Outdoor PL imaging of crystalline silicon modules at constant operating point,” in
47th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference
(IEEE, 2020).
13.
O.
Kunz
et al., “High throughput outdoor photoluminescence imaging via PV string modulation,” in
48th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference
(IEEE, 2021).
14.
L.
Koester
et al., “Development of daylight photoluminescence technique for photovoltaic modules and investigation of temperature dependency,” in 37th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition (EU PVSEC, 2020) pp. 908–913.
15.
L.
Koester
et al., “Quality assurance of the photovoltaic power plants installation stage—A complementary strategy based of photoluminescence and steady-state thermography,” in 38th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition (EU PVSEC, 2021), pp. 1042–1050.
16.
G.
Rey
et al., “
Luminescence imaging of solar modules in full sunlight using ultranarrow bandpass filters
,”
Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl.
30
,
1115
1121
(
2022
).
17.
M.
Vuković
et al., “
Photoluminescence imaging of silicon modules in a string
,”
Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl.
30
,
436
446
(
2022
).
18.
M.
Vuković
et al., “
Noninvasive photoluminescence imaging of silicon PV modules in daylight
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
120
,
244102
(
2022
).
19.
W.
Mühleisen
et al., “
Scientific and economic comparison of outdoor characterisation methods for photovoltaic power plants
,”
Renew. Energy
134
,
321
329
(
2019
).
20.
“IEC TS 60904-13:2018 photovoltaic devices—Part 13: Electroluminescence of photovoltaic modules,” Standard (2018).
21.
M.
Köntges
et al., “Quantifying the risk of power loss in PV modules due to micro cracks,” in 25th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Valencia, Spain (EU PVSEC, 2010), pp. 3745–3752.
22.
L.
Stoicescu
and
M.
Reuter
, “DaySy contactless measurements of PID shunt resistance in installed PV modules,” in 25th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition (EU PVSEC, 2018), pp. 1337–1339.
23.
M.
Vuković
et al., “
Extraction of photoluminescence with Pearson correlation coefficient from images of field-installed photovoltaic modules
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
133
,
214901
(
2023
).
You do not currently have access to this content.