Although it is well-established that voids profoundly influence the initiation and reaction behaviors of heterogeneous energetic materials such as polymer-bonded explosives (PBX) and propellants, there has been little study of how void location in different constituents in the microstructures of such materials affect the macroscale behavior. Here, we use three-dimensional (3D) mesoscale simulations to study how void placement within the reactive grains vs the polymer binder influences the shock-to-detonation transition in a polymer-bonded explosive. The material studied here has a microstructure comprised of 75% PETN (pentaerythritol tetranitrate) grains and 25% hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene polymer binder by volume. Porosities up to 10% in the form of spherical voids distributed in both the grains and polymer are considered. An Arrhenius reactive burn relation is used to model the chemical kinetics of the PETN grains under shock loading, thereby resolving the heterogeneous detonation behavior of the PBX. The influence of void location on the shock initiation sensitivity of the material is quantitatively ranked by comparing the predicted run distance to detonation (RDD) for each sample. The analysis includes inherent quantification of uncertainties arising from the stochastic variations in the microstructure morphologies and void distributions by using statistically equivalent microstructure sample sets, leading to probabilistic formulations for the RDD as a function of shock pressure. The calculations reveal that the location of voids in the composite microstructure significantly affects the RDD. Specifically, voids exclusively within the grains cause the PBX to be more sensitive (having shorter RDD) than voids in the polymer binder. Unique probabilistic relationships are derived to map the probability of observing RDD for each void location material case, allowing for prediction of initiation behavior anywhere in the shock pressure–RDD space. These findings agree with trends reported in the literature.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
CHORUS
Article navigation
14 February 2022
Research Article|
February 08 2022
Effect of void positioning on the detonation sensitivity of a heterogeneous energetic material Available to Purchase
Christopher Coffelt;
Christopher Coffelt
1
The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering and The School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0405, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Daniel Olsen;
Daniel Olsen
1
The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering and The School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0405, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Christopher Miller
;
Christopher Miller
2
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, California 94550, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Min Zhou
Min Zhou
a)
1
The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering and The School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0405, USA
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Christopher Coffelt
1
Daniel Olsen
1
Christopher Miller
2
Min Zhou
1,a)
1
The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering and The School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0405, USA
2
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, California 94550, USA
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
J. Appl. Phys. 131, 065101 (2022)
Article history
Received:
December 07 2021
Accepted:
January 20 2022
Citation
Christopher Coffelt, Daniel Olsen, Christopher Miller, Min Zhou; Effect of void positioning on the detonation sensitivity of a heterogeneous energetic material. J. Appl. Phys. 14 February 2022; 131 (6): 065101. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0081188
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A step-by-step guide to perform x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
Grzegorz Greczynski, Lars Hultman
Piezoelectric thin films and their applications in MEMS: A review
Jinpeng Liu, Hua Tan, et al.
Tutorial: Simulating modern magnetic material systems in mumax3
Jonas J. Joos, Pedram Bassirian, et al.
Related Content
Three-dimensional microstructure-explicit and void-explicit mesoscale simulations of detonation of HMX at millimeter sample size scale
J. Appl. Phys. (March 2020)
Shock-to-detonation transition behavior of functionally graded energetic materials
J. Appl. Phys. (September 2023)
Modeling deflagration-to-detonation transition in granular explosive pentaerythritol tetranitrate
J. Appl. Phys. (August 2008)
DETONATION SHOCK DYNAMICS FOR POROUS EXPLOSIVES AND ENERGETIC MATERIALS
AIP Conf. Proc. (December 2009)
Multi-scale shock-to-detonation simulation of pressed energetic material: A meso-informed ignition and growth model
J. Appl. Phys. (August 2018)