Eddy current (EC) technology is commonly used for detecting flaws, measuring geometric parameters, or determining properties of conducting materials. However, the measurement of a particular parameter can become more challenging if multiple influential parameters vary simultaneously. In particular, eddy current-based measurement of separation (gap) between a pressure tube (PT) and a calandria tube (CT) in the fuel channels of CANDU® reactors is made more difficult by variations in PT wall thickness, resistivity, and probe lift-off. An analytical model of the EC response to changes in PT–CT gap has been developed by approximating the geometry of the PT within the larger diameter CT as a pair of concentric tubes, where gap is varied by changing the CT radius. In this article, this model is used in combination with an error minimization algorithm to construct an inverse algorithm for the extraction of PT–CT gap, PT resistivity (ρ), and PT wall thickness (WT) from measured multi-frequency eddy current signals. Application of a linear regression tool in MATLAB, with fourth-order polynomial fitting of modeled data with varying ρ and WT as a function of PT–CT gap, is used to obtain coefficients that depend on ρ and WT. Output of multidimensional fitting of these coefficients is scaled and rotated to calibration data. Finally, implementation of an error minimization algorithm in MATLAB is used to produce estimates of multiple target parameters from experimental data. Simultaneous extraction of either one, two, or three parameters is examined, using experimental data obtained at frequencies used for in-reactor inspection of 4.2, 8, and 16 kHz, or just two frequencies of 4.2 and 8 kHz. Under full gap variation conditions, the inverse algorithm predicts gap to within 0.1 mm at gaps between 0 and 9 mm and to within 0.4 mm at gaps between 9 and 18 mm. PT resistivity is predicted to within 1 μΩ cm (2% relative error) and PT wall thickness within 0.03 mm (1% relative error) when each is the only extracted parameter. An excellent agreement between actual and predicted values of gap demonstrates the potential of the inverse algorithm for application to in-reactor gap measurement and simultaneous extraction of either PT wall thickness or resistivity when the other parameter is known. The extraction of PT resistivity may be particularly useful, as this parameter cannot otherwise currently be measured in-reactor.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
28 May 2022
Research Article|
May 26 2022
Inverse algorithm for extraction of multiple parameters using analytical model of eddy current response
Special Collection:
Non-Invasive and Non-Destructive Methods and Applications Part II
Stephane Contant
;
Stephane Contant
1
Department of Physics, Royal Military College of Canada
, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
K7K 7B4
Search for other works by this author on:
Geoffrey Klein;
Geoffrey Klein
1
Department of Physics, Royal Military College of Canada
, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
K7K 7B42
Department of Physics, Queen's University
, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
K7L 3N6
Search for other works by this author on:
Jordan Morelli;
Jordan Morelli
2
Department of Physics, Queen's University
, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
K7L 3N6
Search for other works by this author on:
Thomas W. Krause
Thomas W. Krause
a)
1
Department of Physics, Royal Military College of Canada
, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
K7K 7B4a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: thomas.krause@rmc.ca and thomaswalter.krause@gmail.com
Search for other works by this author on:
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: thomas.krause@rmc.ca and thomaswalter.krause@gmail.com
Note: This paper is part of the Special Topic on Non-Invasive and Non-Destructive Methods and Applications Part II.
J. Appl. Phys. 131, 205103 (2022)
Article history
Received:
February 14 2022
Accepted:
May 12 2022
Citation
Stephane Contant, Geoffrey Klein, Jordan Morelli, Thomas W. Krause; Inverse algorithm for extraction of multiple parameters using analytical model of eddy current response. J. Appl. Phys. 28 May 2022; 131 (20): 205103. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0088221
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Citing articles via
Impulse coupling enhancement of aluminum targets under laser irradiation in a soft polymer confined geometry
C. Le Bras, E. Lescoute, et al.
A step-by-step guide to perform x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
Grzegorz Greczynski, Lars Hultman
GaN-based power devices: Physics, reliability, and perspectives
Matteo Meneghini, Carlo De Santi, et al.
Related Content
Eddy current proximity measurement of perpendicular tubes from within pressure tubes in CANDU® nuclear reactors
AIP Conference Proceedings (April 2018)
Model based optimization of driver-pickup separation for eddy current measurement of gap
AIP Conference Proceedings (April 2018)
Analysis of pulsed eddy current data using regression models for steam generator tube support structure inspection
AIP Conference Proceedings (February 2016)
Comparison of analytical eddy current models using principal components analysis
AIP Conference Proceedings (February 2017)
Examination of Dodd and Deeds solutions for a transmit-receive eddy current probe above a layered planar structure
AIP Conference Proceedings (February 2017)