Eddy current (EC) technology is commonly used for detecting flaws, measuring geometric parameters, or determining properties of conducting materials. However, the measurement of a particular parameter can become more challenging if multiple influential parameters vary simultaneously. In particular, eddy current-based measurement of separation (gap) between a pressure tube (PT) and a calandria tube (CT) in the fuel channels of CANDU® reactors is made more difficult by variations in PT wall thickness, resistivity, and probe lift-off. An analytical model of the EC response to changes in PT–CT gap has been developed by approximating the geometry of the PT within the larger diameter CT as a pair of concentric tubes, where gap is varied by changing the CT radius. In this article, this model is used in combination with an error minimization algorithm to construct an inverse algorithm for the extraction of PT–CT gap, PT resistivity (ρ), and PT wall thickness (WT) from measured multi-frequency eddy current signals. Application of a linear regression tool in MATLAB, with fourth-order polynomial fitting of modeled data with varying ρ and WT as a function of PT–CT gap, is used to obtain coefficients that depend on ρ and WT. Output of multidimensional fitting of these coefficients is scaled and rotated to calibration data. Finally, implementation of an error minimization algorithm in MATLAB is used to produce estimates of multiple target parameters from experimental data. Simultaneous extraction of either one, two, or three parameters is examined, using experimental data obtained at frequencies used for in-reactor inspection of 4.2, 8, and 16 kHz, or just two frequencies of 4.2 and 8 kHz. Under full gap variation conditions, the inverse algorithm predicts gap to within 0.1 mm at gaps between 0 and 9 mm and to within 0.4 mm at gaps between 9 and 18 mm. PT resistivity is predicted to within 1 μΩ cm (2% relative error) and PT wall thickness within 0.03 mm (1% relative error) when each is the only extracted parameter. An excellent agreement between actual and predicted values of gap demonstrates the potential of the inverse algorithm for application to in-reactor gap measurement and simultaneous extraction of either PT wall thickness or resistivity when the other parameter is known. The extraction of PT resistivity may be particularly useful, as this parameter cannot otherwise currently be measured in-reactor.

1.
D.
Rodgers
,
M.
Griffiths
,
G.
Bickel
,
A.
Buyers
,
C.
Coleman
,
H.
Nordin
, and
S.
St Lawrence
, “
Performance of pressure tubes in CANDU reactors
,”
CNL Nucl. Rev.
5
,
1
15
(
2016
).
2.
S. R.
Prabhu
,
M. D.
Pandey
,
N.
Christodoulou
, and
B. W.
Leitch
, “
A surrogate model for the 3D prediction of in-service deformation in CANDU® fuel channels
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
369
,
110871
(
2020
).
3.
S.
Shokralla
and
T. W.
Krause
, “
Methods for evaluation of accuracy with multiple essential parameters for eddy current measurement of pressure tube to calandria tube gap in CANDU reactors
,”
CINDE J.
35
(
1
),
5
8
(
2014
).
4.
E. G.
Price
,
Highlights of the Metallurgical Behaviour of CANDU Pressure Tubes
(Atomic Energy of Canada Limited,
Chalk River, Ontario
,
1984
), AECL.
5.
S.
Shokralla
,
S.
Sullivan
,
J.
Morelli
, and
T. W.
Krause
, “
Modelling and validation of eddy current response to changes in factors affecting pressure tube to calandria tube gap measurement
,”
NDT&E Int.
73
,
15
21
(
2015
).
6.
S.
Shokralla
,
T. W.
Krause
, and
J.
Morelli
, “
Surface profiling with high density eddy current non-destructive examination data
,”
NDT&E Int.
62
,
153
159
(
2014
).
7.
G.
Klein
, “
Comprehensive modelling for eddy current based pressure tube to calandria tube gap measurements
,”
M.A.Sc thesis
(
Queen’s University
,
Kingston, Ontario
,
2017
).
8.
G.
Klein
,
M. S.
Luloff
,
J.
Morelli
, and
T. W.
Krause
, “
Evaluation of concentric tube model for pressure tube to calandria tube Gap measurement
,”
IEEE Sens. J.
19
(
15
),
6233
6239
(
2019
).
9.
V. S.
Kiiko
,
Y. I.
Komolikov
,
Y. N.
Makurin
,
I. R.
Shein
, and
A. L.
Ivanovskii
, “
Ultrasound velocity and absorption in BeO, Al2O3, ZrO2, and SiO2 ceramics
,”
Inorg. Mater.
43
(
12
),
1361
1364
(
2007
).
10.
V.
Ionescu
,
M.
Mihlalache
, and
S.
Florea
, “
Elastic anisotropy of Zr-2.5%Nb alloy CANDU pressure tube by utrasonic methods
,”
Rom. Rep. Phys.
63
(
1
),
128
136
(
2011
).
11.
V. F.
Urbanic
,
B. D.
Warr
,
A.
Manolescu
,
C. K.
Chow
, and
M. W.
Shanahan
,
Oxidation and Deuterium Uptake of Zr-2.5Nb Pressure Tubes in CANDU-PHW Reactors
(
ASTM Special Technical Publications
,
Philadelphia
,
1989
), pp.
20
34
.
12.
I. F.
Ibrahim
,
Examination of Garter Springs from CANDU Reactors
(
Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd
,
Chalk River, ON
,
1985
).
13.
P. F. D.
Bennett
,
M.
Topping
,
P. R.
Underhill
,
J. E.
Morelli
,
M. R.
Daymond
, and
T. W.
Krause
, “
Effects of heat treatment on CANDU pressure tube electrical resistivity
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
545
,
152597
(
2021
).
14.
J.
Beale
,
B.
Yoon
,
R.
Daum
, and
S.
Hanlon
, “
Estimation of hydrogen in zircaloy using multi frequency eddy current
,” in
Top Fuel Reactor Fuel Performance
(
Czech Republic
,
Prague
,
2018
).
15.
K.
Tashiro
,
H.
Sedo
, and
M.
Ng
,
Method and Apparatus for Measurement of Terminal Solid Solubility Temperature in Alloys Capable of Forming Hydrides
(
Kinetrics
,
Toronto
,
2007
).
16.
A.
Lois
,
H.
Mendoca
, and
M.
Ruch
, “
Eddy current assessment of hydrogen content in zirconium
,” in
15th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing
(World Conference on Nondestructive Testing,
Rome
,
2000
).
17.
S.
MacEwen
,
R.
Zee
,
R.
Birtcher
, and
C.
Abkomeit
, “
Point defect production and annihilation in neutron-irradiated zirconium
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
123
(
1–3
),
1036
1040
(
1984
).
18.
D. J.
Alexander
,
L. L.
Snead
,
S.
Zinkle
,
A. N.
Gubbi
,
A. F.
Rowcliffe
,
W. S.
Eatherly
, and
E. E.
Bloom
, “
Effects of low temperature irradiation on the mechanical properties of V-4Cr-4Ti
,” in
18th International Symposium on Effects of Radiation on Materials
(U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical Information,
Hyannis, MA
,
1999
).
19.
J. R.
Bowler
, “
Thin-skin eddy-current inversion for the determination of crack shapes
,”
Inverse Probl.
18
(
6
),
1891
1905
(
2002
).
20.
S. J.
Norton
and
J.
Bowler
, “
Theory of eddy current inversion
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
73
(
2
),
501
512
(
1993
).
21.
L.
Sabbagh
and
H.
Sabbagh
, “
An eddy-current model and inversion algorithms for three-dimensional flaw reconstruction
,” in
Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation
(
Springer
,
Boston, MA
,
1985
).
22.
I. D.
Adewale
and
G. Y.
Tian
, “
Decoupling the influence of permeability and conductivity in pulsed eddy-current measurements
,”
IEEE Trans. Magn.
49
(
3
),
1119
1127
(
2013
).
23.
D.
Desjardins
,
T. W.
Krause
, and
L.
Clapham
, “
Transient eddy current method for the characterization of magnetic permeability and conductivity
,”
NDT & E Int.
80
,
65
70
(
2016
).
24.
J. A.
Buck
,
P. R.
Underhill
,
J.
Morelli
, and
T. W.
Krause
, “
Simultaneous multi-parameter measurement in pulsed eddy current steam generator data using artificial neural networks
,”
IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas.
65
(
3
),
672
679
(
2016
).
25.
L.
Yin
,
B.
Ye
,
Z.
Zhang
,
Y.
Tao
,
H.
Xu
, and
J. R.
Salas Avila
, “
A novel feature extraction method of eddy current testing for defect detection based on machine learning
,”
NDT&E Int.
107
,
102108
(
2019
).
26.
I. T.
Rekanos
,
T. P.
Theodoulidis
,
S. M.
Panas
, and
T. D.
Tsiboukis
, “
Impedance inversion in eddy current testing of layered planar structures via neural networks
,”
” NDT&E Int.
30
(
2
),
69
74
(
1997
).
27.
E.
Reingold
, see http://www.psych.utoronto.ca/users/reingold/courses/ai/cache/neural2.html for “Artificial Neural Networks Technology,” University of Toronto.
28.
L. S.
Rosado
,
F. M.
Janeiro
,
P. M.
Ramos
, and
M.
Piedade
, “
Defect characterization with eddy current testing using nonlinear-regression feature extraction and artificial neural networks
,”
IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas.
62
(
5
),
1207
1214
(
2013
).
29.
X.
Chen
and
Y.
Lei
, “
Inversion problem of pulsed eddy current field of ferromagnetic plates
,”
Chin. Phys. B
24
(
3
),
030301
(
2015
).
30.
F. F.
Ren
and
Y.
Lei
, “
Thickness and conductivity measurement of three layered plan conductors based on harmonic eddy current testing
,”
Nondestruct. Test.
35
(
8
),
50
53
(
2013
).
31.
X.
Mao
and
Y.
Lei
, “
Thickness measurement of metal pipe using swept frequency eddy current testing
,”
NDT&E Int.
78
,
10
19
(
2016
).
32.
M. S.
Luloff
,
S.
Contant
,
J.
Morelli
, and
T. W.
Krause
, “
Simultaneous extraction of multiple parameters from a transmit-receive eddy current probe above a layered planar conductive structure
,”
ASME J. Nondestruct. Eval.
3
(
4
),
041104
(
2020
).
33.
G.
Klein
,
J.
Morelli
, and
T. W.
Krause
, “
Analytical model of the eddy current response of a drive-receive coil system inside two concentric tubes
,”
NDT&E Int.
96
,
18
25
(
2018
).
34.
MathWorks, see https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/stepwiselm.html for Stepwiselm (
2017
).
35.
MathWorks, see https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/fminsearch.html for Fminsearch (
2017
).
36.
M.
Trelinski
, “
Inspection of CANDU reactor pressure tubes using ultrasonics
,” in
17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing
(World Conference on Nondestructive Testing,
2008
).
37.
M.
Griffiths
,
J.
Winegar
, and
A.
Buyers
, “
The transformation behaviour of the β-phase in Zr-2.5Nb pressure tubes
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
383
,
28
33
(
2008
).
You do not currently have access to this content.