When thermal and stress confinement conditions are satisfied, the propagation of laser-induced ultrasound (LIU) is governed by an inhomogeneous wave equation for pressure, and the laser temporal profile can be modeled by a Dirac delta distribution. If these conditions are not fulfilled, the coupled differential equations for temperature and pressure must be solved, considering a laser pulse with finite time-width. Here, an exact solution of the boundary value problem for the 1D-wave equation is obtained in both the frequency domain and the time domain. Since highly absorbent optical materials are out of the validity range of the confinement conditions, these are used as a numerical and experimental model. It is shown that the impulse-response model correctly predicts the time of flight of photoacoustic waves. However, when considering a laser pulse with finite time-width, the resultant theoretical amplitude of the LIU signal decays rapidly to zero, which is not observed in the experiment. To overcome this, we propose a thermal correction on the LIU source, defined typically as the optical penetration length, which imposes a redefinition of stress and thermal confinement in just one statement. Additionally, with the aim of comparing the corrected-theoretical results with the acquired electrical signals, the sensor and the oscilloscope were modeled as an RC circuit in parallel. It was found that the amplitude of the electrical signal was proportional to the difference of the LIU amplitudes at the faces of the sensor. It is demonstrated that even though the sensor impulse response is modeled as a Dirac delta distribution, this difference strongly affects the shape of the LIU electrical signals, hiding relevant information of the acoustic waves.

1.
B.
Cox
and
P. C.
Beard
, in Photoacoustic Imaging and Spectroscopy, edited by L. Wang (CRC Press, 2009), Chap. 3, pp. 25–34.
2.
M.
Xu
and
L. V.
Wang
, “
Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine
,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
77
,
041101
(
2006
).
3.
L. V.
Wang
,
Photoacoustic Imaging and Spectroscopy
(
CRC Press
,
2009
).
4.
V. V.
Kozhushko
and
P.
Hess
, “
Laser-induced focused ultrasound for nondestructive testing and evaluation
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
103
,
124902
(
2008
).
5.
M.
Xu
and
L. V.
Wang
, “
Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine
,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
77
,
041101
(
2006
).
6.
S.
Kothapalli
,
T.
Ma
,
S.
Vaithilingam
,
O.
Oralkan
,
B. T.
Khuri-Yakub
, and
S. S.
Gambhir
, “
Deep tissue photoacoustic imaging using a miniaturized 2D capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer array
,”
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
59
,
1199
1204
(
2012
).
7.
S.
Sethuraman
,
J. H.
Amirian
,
S. H.
Litovsky
,
R. W.
Smalling
, and
S. Y.
Emelianov
, “
Ex vivo characterization of atherosclerosis using intravascular photoacoustic imaging
,”
Opt. Express.
15
,
16657
16666
(
2007
).
8.
J. L.
Su
,
A. B.
Karpiouk
,
B.
Wang
, and
S.
Emelianov
, “
Photoacoustic imaging of clinical metal needles in tissue
,”
J. Biomed. Opt.
15
,
021309
(
2010
).
9.
P. M.
Morse
and
K. U.
Ingard
,
Theoretical Acoustics
(
Princeton University Press
,
1968
), pp.
281
283
.
10.
G. J.
Diebold
,
T.
Sun
, and
M. I.
Khan
, “
Photoacoustic monopole radiation in one, two, and three dimensions
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
67
,
3384
(
1991
).
11.
T.
Sun
and
G. J.
Diebold
, “
Generation of ultrasonic waves from a layered photoacoustic source
,”
Nature
355
,
806
(
1992
).
12.
R. J.
Dewhurst
,
T.
Li
, and
G.
Gondek
, “
Amplitude decay of photoacoustic signals in biological tissue when irradiated by nanosecond laser pulses
,”
Proc. SPIE
6437
,
643723
(
2007
).
13.
G.
Gondek
,
T.
Li
,
R.
Lynch
, and
R. J.
Dewhurst
, “
Decay of photoacoustic signals from biological tissue irradiated by near infrared laser pulses
,”
J. Biomed. Opt.
11
,
11
11–4
(
2006
).
14.
A. L.
McKenzie
, “
Physics of thermal processes in laser–tissue interaction
,”
Phys. Med. Biol.
35
,
1175
1210
(
1990
).
15.
D.
Cywiak
,
M. D.
Barreiro-Argüelles
,
M.
Cywiak
,
A.
Landa-Curiel
,
C.
Garcia-Segundo
, and
G.
Gutierrez-Juárez
, “
A one-dimensional solution of the photoacoustic wave equation and its relationship with optical absorption
,”
Int. J. Thermophys.
34
,
1473
1480
(
2013
).
16.
S.
Park
,
M.
Khan
,
H.
Cheng
, and
G.
Diebold
, “
Photoacoustic effect in strongly absorbing fluids
,”
Ultrasonics
29
,
63
67
(
1991
).
17.
J. T.-A.
Francisco Herrerías-Azcúe
,
A.
Gonzáles Vega
, and
G.
Gutiérrez-Juárez
, “
Solution for the photoacoustic wave equation with a single spatial degree of freedom, Beer’s law absorption of radiation and mechanical barriers
,”
Mod. Phys. Lett. B
27
,
1350135
(
2013
).
18.
N.
Baddour
and
A.
Mandelis
, “
The effect of acoustic impedance on subsurface absorber geometry reconstruction using 1D frequency-domain photoacoustics
,”
Photoacoustics
3
,
132
142
(
2015
).
19.
H.
Schoeffmann
,
H.
Schmidt-Kloiber
, and
E.
Reichel
, “
Time-resolved investigations of laser-induced shock waves in water by use of polyvinylidenefluoride hydrophones
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
63
,
46
51
(
1988
).
20.
C. A.
Bravo-Miranda
,
A.
González-Vega
, and
G.
Gutiérrez-Juárez
, “
Influence of the size, geometry and temporal response of the finite piezoelectric sensor on the photoacoustic signal: The case of the point-like source
,”
Appl. Phys. B
115
,
471
482
(
2014
).
You do not currently have access to this content.