Understanding photogenerated carrier transport dynamics is important for optimizing the performance of various semiconductor optoelectronic devices, such as photocatalysts, solar cells, and radiation detectors. In this paper, the spatiotemporal evolution of photogenerated carriers after excitation is investigated both analytically and numerically, in order to reveal the origin of two contradictory photocarrier motion directions, i.e., separation and ambipolar transport in the semiconductors. An analytical solution of the separation distance between mean positions of photogenerated electrons and holes is derived, which shows that photocarriers will transport ambipolarly in the lifetime regime, where the carrier lifetime τ0 is larger than the dielectric relaxation time τd, and separate spontaneously in the relaxation regime, where τ0<τd. Numerical simulation verifies the analytical results and reveals rich dynamics of carrier transport near the boundary of two regimes. In the lifetime regime, the separation distance rises asymptotically to a polarization distance, while there is a transitional sub-region near the regime boundary where majority carriers go through a separating-ambipolar transformation dynamics. This phenomenon originates from two different components of the drift current. In the relaxation regime, majority carriers deplete because of a larger recombination rate in the minority carrier pulse region. Combining the analytical and numerical results, detailed photocarrier transport dynamics are obtained in the lifetime and relaxation regimes of semiconductors.

1.
A.
Kafizas
,
R.
Godin
, and
J. R.
Durrant
, in Semiconductors and Semimetals, 1st ed. (Elsevier Inc., 2017), Vol. 97, pp. 3–46.
2.
S.
Fonash
, Solar Cell Device Physics, 2nd ed. (Elsevier Science, 2010), pp. 69–95.
3.
Z.
He
,
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A
463
,
250
(
2001
).
4.
B.
Liao
,
E.
Najafi
,
H.
Li
,
A. J.
Minnich
, and
A. H.
Zewail
,
Nat. Nanotechnol.
12
,
871
(
2017
); e-print arXiv:1610.03030
5.
M.
Martini
,
J. W.
Mayer
, and
K. R.
Zanio
, in Applied Solid State Science: Advances in Materials and Device Research Volume 3, edited by R. Wolfe (Academic Press, 1972), p. 181.
6.
M. M.
Gabriel
,
E. M.
Grumstrup
,
J. R.
Kirschbrown
,
C. W.
Pinion
,
J. D.
Christesen
,
D. F.
Zigler
,
E. E. M.
Cating
,
J. F.
Cahoon
, and
J. M.
Papanikolas
,
Nano Lett.
14
,
3079
(
2014
).
7.
E.
Najafi
,
T. D.
Scarborough
,
J.
Tang
, and
A.
Zewail
,
Science
347
,
164
(
2015
).
8.
J.
Sun
,
A.
Adhikari
,
B. S.
Shaheen
,
H.
Yang
, and
O. F.
Mohammed
,
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
7
,
985
(
2016
).
9.
W.
van Roosbroeck
,
Phys. Rev.
91
,
282
(
1953
).
10.
B. A.
Ruzicka
,
L. K.
Werake
,
H.
Samassekou
, and
H.
Zhao
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
97
,
1
(
2010
); e-print arXiv:1102.1366
11.
M. M.
Gabriel
,
J. R.
Kirschbrown
,
J. D.
Christesen
,
C. W.
Pinion
,
D. F.
Zigler
,
E. M.
Grumstrup
,
B. P.
Mehl
,
E. E. M.
Cating
,
J. F.
Cahoon
, and
J. M.
Papanikolas
,
Nano Lett.
13
,
1336
(
2013
).
12.
R.
Bose
,
J.
Sun
,
J. I.
Khan
,
B. S.
Shaheen
,
A.
Adhikari
,
T. K.
Ng
,
V. M.
Burlakov
,
M. R.
Parida
,
D.
Priante
,
A.
Goriely
,
B. S.
Ooi
,
O. M.
Bakr
, and
O. F.
Mohammed
,
Adv. Mater.
28
,
5106
(
2016
).
13.
K.
Shen
and
G.
Vignale
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
110
,
096601
(
2013
); e-print arXiv:1201.2574
14.
R. A.
Höpfel
,
J.
Shah
,
P. A.
Wolff
, and
A. C.
Gossard
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
56
,
2736
(
1986
).
15.
J. R.
Haynes
and
W.
Shockley
,
Phys. Rev.
81
,
835
(
1951
).
16.
W.
van Roosbroeck
,
Phys. Rev.
123
,
474
(
1961
).
17.
W.
van Roosbroeck
,
Phys. Rev.
119
,
636
(
1960
).
18.
J.
Keilson
,
J. Appl. Phys.
24
,
1198
(
1953
).
19.
W.
van Roosbroeck
and
H. C.
Casey
, in Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on the Physics of Semiconductors, edited by S. P. Keller, J. C. Hensel, and F. Stern (U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Division of Technical Information, Cambridge, MA, 1970), pp. 832–838.
20.
N. M.
Haegel
,
Appl. Phys. A Solids Surf.
53
,
1
(
1991
).
21.
J. L.
Scales
and
A. L.
Ward
,
J. Appl. Phys.
39
,
1692
(
1968
).
22.
J.
Parrott
,
Solid-State Electron.
28
,
1065
(
1985
).
23.
S. M.
Sze
and
K. K.
Ng
, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 3rd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, 2006), p. 63.
24.
J. C.
Manifacier
and
H. K.
Henisch
,
Phys. Rev. B
17
,
2648
(
1978
).
25.
J. C.
Manifacier
and
H. K.
Henisch
,
Phys. Rev. B
17
,
2640
(
1978
).
26.
C.
Popescu
and
H. K.
Henisch
,
Phys. Rev. B
11
,
1563
(
1975
).
27.
C.
Popescu
and
H. K.
Henisch
,
Phys. Rev. B
14
,
517
(
1976
).
28.
I.
Mora-Seró
,
T.
Dittrich
,
G.
Garcia-Belmonte
, and
J.
Bisquert
,
J. Appl. Phys.
100
,
103705
(
2006
).
29.
D. A.
Neamen
, Semiconductor Physics and Devices (McGraw-Hill Education, 2011), p. 200.
30.
J. C.
Manifacier
,
Y.
Moreau
,
H. K.
Henisch
, and
G.
Rieder
,
J. Appl. Phys.
56
,
387
(
1984
).
31.
H. K.
Henisch
,
J. C.
Manifacier
, and
Y.
Moreau
,
Philos. Mag. B Phys. Condens. Matter Stat. Mech. Electronic, Opt. Magn. Prop.
52
,
382
(
1985
).
32.
B. T.
Cavicchi
and
N. M.
Haegel
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
63
,
195
(
1989
).
33.
G. L.
Fong
,
N. M.
Haegel
, and
J. T.
Walton
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
69
,
2404
(
1992
); e-print arXiv:0000135489
34.
N.
Derhacobian
,
J. H.
Madok
, and
N. M.
Haegel
,
J. Appl. Phys.
72
,
2294
(
1992
).
35.
N.
Derhacobian
and
N. M.
Haegel
,
Phys. Rev. B
44
,
12754
(
1991
).
You do not currently have access to this content.